1 40 57 https://www.ssmp.mdocs.skidmore.edu/files/original/f480b432a2e7755e5eb52c6ecade35e3.JPG 0f48c99a7e93aab08da612a3c7318c02 Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Jill Sweet https://www.ssmp.mdocs.skidmore.edu/files/original/daae08e853c7c82f60d1ebe6826bc377.mp3 e77f5799a74c911641a05e58925733ba https://www.ssmp.mdocs.skidmore.edu/files/original/8816786fbed07a6c196de2e0c5526a7a.pdf f1e4adfcc6572c8aee49fd71b48303b9 https://www.ssmp.mdocs.skidmore.edu/files/original/56a45e72ead5e9935b3ed423fd9bc819.pdf 897bf929f52f1de1cf16a4787c6b7cc7 Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Skidmore College Retirees Oral History A resource containing historical information obtained in interviews with persons having firsthand knowledge. Interviewer The person(s) performing the interview Eileen McAdam Interviewee The person(s) being interviewed Jill Sweet Original Format The type of object, such as painting, sculpture, paper, photo, and additional data Audio recording Record Contributor Individual who prepared the item and/or edited it. Susan Bender Record Creation Date Day/Month/Year of record creation/edit December 13, 2018 Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Interview with Jill Sweet Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource May 13, 2013 Is Part Of A related resource in which the described resource is physically or logically included. Skidmore Saratoga Memory Project Description An account of the resource Jill Sweet intended to be a dancer, but her work with native Americans to learn about their dance turned into an interest in cultural anthropology which she studied at the University of New New Mexico before coming to Skidmore in 1981.  In this interview she discusses the inspiration she found with a department that mixed the theoretical courses in sociology and anthropology with archeology and social work where theory was put into practice.  She also discusses interviewing skills learned from her time with the Pueblo Indians which she passed on to students using role play, a skill she learned through her actress mother.  She recounts her development of Native American Week on campus and the Tang exhibit of Edward Curtis photos from the Scribner Library collection that inspired creations by living native Americans.  During President Porter’s tenure, she experienced a growing demand for academic excellence, efforts at student diversity, and attempts to recruit native American students.  She also discusses her friendship with Helen Porter and faculty-staff relations which she learned of through her marriage to Steven Rosenbach, a member of the Skidmore security staff.  As a person with MS she comments on campus accessibility.  Since her retirement in 2010, she has written a book about her bohemian mother, “Life as a Tarantella,” and articles written originally for a local paper published now as a book, “Whiskers and Tails,”  as well as articles and newsletters for Friends of the Saratoga County Animal Shelter.  Language A language of the resource English (en) Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Dym, Jordana, Stern, Rebecca, '16 Subject The topic of the resource Retiree Oral History Project Contributor An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource Eileen McAdam Date Available Date (often a range) that the resource became or will become available. January 20, 2015 Type The nature or genre of the resource Oral History Anthropology Department Biology Department Creative Thought Matters David Porter Edward Curtis faculty relations Helen Porter Joseph Palamountain Skidmore faculty Susan Bender Tang Museum https://www.ssmp.mdocs.skidmore.edu/files/original/3ddaa63f75e084276464b65808a3d676.JPG d56ace44808e28947c4bbc4d28830c74 https://www.ssmp.mdocs.skidmore.edu/files/original/73df41e1e3a6270c3fc29b7ad96d06a0.mp3 12c1f3109548e26d882bf833705833a3 https://www.ssmp.mdocs.skidmore.edu/files/original/745354ffac9b848ffe27d38816d25afc.pdf f91f0d78fb4203dab87627c6aca7b64a https://www.ssmp.mdocs.skidmore.edu/files/original/3a6d0a21112d45bf4d0134dd1543adb5.pdf 93a62c42349c324167f38a536a75767d Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Skidmore College Retirees Oral History A resource containing historical information obtained in interviews with persons having firsthand knowledge. Interviewer The person(s) performing the interview Eileen McAdam, Sound and Story Project of the Hudson Valley Interviewee The person(s) being interviewed Eleanor Samworth Original Format The type of object, such as painting, sculpture, paper, photo, and additional data Audio recording Record Contributor Individual who prepared the item and/or edited it. Susan Bender Record Creation Date Day/Month/Year of record creation/edit December 13, 2018 Location The location of the interview Skidmore College, Saratoga Springs, NY, 12866 Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Interview with Eleanor Samworth Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource April 22, 2015 Is Part Of A related resource in which the described resource is physically or logically included. Skidmore Saratoga Memory Project Description An account of the resource Eleanor Samworth came to Skidmore in 1964.  During her tenure she experienced the move to the new campus, growth in student enrollments, inception of coeducation in 1970, expansion of Liberal Studies, and computer use as central to many disciplines.  As chair of the Chemistry/Physics Department she oversaw the inception of Physics as a separate major and an agreement with Dartmouth for an engineering program.  In this interview she also discusses her involvement with the Skidmore Chapter of AAUP, especially a study of salary disparities between men and women faculty.  She remarks on how President Palamountain’s tenure was marked by construction and, during the Vietnam war era, tensions between faculty and administration.  Under the Porter presidency she saw an increase in money raised for student scholarships as well as a growth in student minority recruitment and funds for faculty support and endowed chairs.  Since her retirement in 1994 she has volunteered for a number of local organizations. Language A language of the resource English (en) Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Dym, Jordana; Stern, Rebecca, '16 Subject The topic of the resource Retiree Oral History Project Contributor An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource Eileen McAdam Date Created Date of creation of the resource. January 5, 2016 Date Copyrighted Date of copyright. January 5, 2015 Date Submitted Date of submission of the resource. Examples of resources to which a Date Submitted may be relevant are a thesis (submitted to a university department) or an article (submitted to a journal). January 17, 2016 Date Issued Date of formal issuance (e.g., publication) of the resource. January 17, 2016 Date Modified Date on which the resource was changed. January 17, 2016 Date Valid Date (often a range) of validity of a resource. January 17, 2016 Type The nature or genre of the resource Oral History AAUP chemistry coeducation Engineering Program Eric Porter Faculty Gender Equity Information Technology Liberal Studies Palamountain Physics https://www.ssmp.mdocs.skidmore.edu/files/original/64c498b82adf8e7095fc4b2a19a39b95.jpg cd4b03fe43422d2c893154fed17bf657 https://www.ssmp.mdocs.skidmore.edu/files/original/0879d7e71568b86ee47ad881507b9b7f.mp3 f954379110cad1825084927a4e00a6b7 https://www.ssmp.mdocs.skidmore.edu/files/original/31435760f338e2a087f96a137facdaf5.pdf eeb10e1296e72abf7744939b57dbecf3 https://www.ssmp.mdocs.skidmore.edu/files/original/f8f1ce7b1129f74ccb36e76083c3d3c3.pdf 757900c107a0631e8e4a94c83ff5a7cc Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Skidmore College Retirees Oral History A resource containing historical information obtained in interviews with persons having firsthand knowledge. Interviewer The person(s) performing the interview Eileen McAdam, Sound and Story Project of the Hudson Valley Interviewee The person(s) being interviewed Bob Desieno Original Format The type of object, such as painting, sculpture, paper, photo, and additional data Audio recording Record Contributor Individual who prepared the item and/or edited it. Susan Bender Record Creation Date Day/Month/Year of record creation/edit December 13, 2018 Location The location of the interview Skidmore College, Saratoga Springs, NY, 12866 Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Interview with Bob Desieno Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource April 8, 2015 Is Part Of A related resource in which the described resource is physically or logically included. Skidmore Saratoga Memory Project Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Dym, Jordana, Stern, Rebecca, '16 Description An account of the resource Bob DiSieno, was a faculty member and Chair of the Mathematics and Computer Science department from 1983-2006. In this interview, he discusses expanding the use of computing across campus, forming the Science Planning Group to strengthen the role of the sciences on campus, and working as an Advisor to the Dean of Faculty. Language A language of the resource English (en) Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Eileen McAdam Format The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource Audio, Transcript Date Created Date of creation of the resource. November 18, 2015 Date Submitted Date of submission of the resource. Examples of resources to which a Date Submitted may be relevant are a thesis (submitted to a university department) or an article (submitted to a journal). November 18, 2015 Date Issued Date of formal issuance (e.g., publication) of the resource. November 18, 20125 Date Modified Date on which the resource was changed. November 18, 2015 Subject The topic of the resource Retiree Oral History Project Type The nature or genre of the resource Oral History Zotero Artist Eileen McAdam Academic Rigor Academy of Lifelong Learning Administrative Computing Art Department Collaborative Research David Porter DeSieno Prize Faculty and Administrative Relations Harder Hall Information Resources Council Interdisciplinary Collaboration Liberal Studies Mathematics and Computer Science Department Palamountain sciences student body Tenure Town-Gown Relations https://www.ssmp.mdocs.skidmore.edu/files/original/cdf9dfeb0f729c8b9e9dde50388fe498.jpeg 1142c67b529cc1e284cff6f5d3ffbd81 https://www.ssmp.mdocs.skidmore.edu/files/original/055d13ba36dbe7d4c90813dc4a6fb1ae.mp3 491bae90f41d96840b5a326c549dd208 https://www.ssmp.mdocs.skidmore.edu/files/original/9f4be88a5fee31f2c8d017ee1b34dd05.pdf eaf5469b75cc4b30ad1fd2bcd6167453 https://www.ssmp.mdocs.skidmore.edu/files/original/f0203c88a444d9455a8195fe1238bcc9.pdf 644f2d47ccf5b0671e4cb1eaf401353c Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Skidmore College Retirees Oral History A resource containing historical information obtained in interviews with persons having firsthand knowledge. Interviewer The person(s) performing the interview Frederick Nelson Interviewee The person(s) being interviewed Steve Otrembiak Location The location of the interview Media Services, Skidmore College Original Format The type of object, such as painting, sculpture, paper, photo, and additional data audio recording Record Contributor Individual who prepared the item and/or edited it. Frederick Nelson Record Creation Date Day/Month/Year of record creation/edit 4/26/2017 Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Interview with Steve Otrembiak Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 4/6/2017 Is Part Of A related resource in which the described resource is physically or logically included. The Skidmore Retiree Memory Project Description An account of the resource Former Skidmore College media technician, Saratoga Native, and second generation Skidmore employee, Steve Otrembiak, recalls his extensive, over 30-year career working in a growing and changing community. As someone who has witnessed the college’s evolution from a number of different perspectives over a long period of time, Steve provides an insightful narrative of Skidmore’s challenges and triumphs and its ability to keep up with a changing world.  Language A language of the resource English Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Frederick Nelson Campus Move Employee Tuition Benefit Program Media Services Staff as Students Tang Museum Technological Changes Transitions in Staff Positions Unionization https://www.ssmp.mdocs.skidmore.edu/files/original/67d1225cb07c877b07fe1b03f8f15cd2.png 6a7340fd79a3a64a33c2e9fd58fcaee4 https://www.ssmp.mdocs.skidmore.edu/files/original/60555438ac9eeac6baabbaf3f784541b.mp4 3ca9406bb6487045522393e6f6a79901 Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Skidmore College Retirees Moving Image A series of visual representations imparting an impression of motion when shown in succession. Examples include animations, movies, television programs, videos, zoetropes, or visual output from a simulation. Original Format The type of object, such as painting, sculpture, paper, photo, and additional data video Duration Length of time involved (seconds, minutes, hours, days, class periods, etc.) 2 minutes, 13 seconds Producer Name (or names) of the person who produced the video Vickie Riley Director Name (or names) of the person who produced the video Vickie Riley Record Contributor Individual who prepared the item and/or edited it. J. Dym Record Creation Date Day/Month/Year of record creation/edit 04/11/2016 Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource In Memoriam of David H. Porter Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource April 4, 2016 Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived Skidmore College Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Skidmore College Description An account of the resource A video remembrance of President emeritus David H. Porter (1935-2016) that is part of the College's <a title="David H. Porter In Memoriam" href="https://vimeo.com/161512190">video collection</a>. Language A language of the resource eng Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Vickie Riley; Wendy Anthony Subject The topic of the resource Skidmore College -- Retirees -- Faculty Skidmore College -- Retirees -- Administrators Skidmore College -- History Format The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource video https://www.ssmp.mdocs.skidmore.edu/files/original/96149523e7d47ed2f26bebc6b3d00c4f.JPG 32c7cca128253b0263fdb5e57d80e03a Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Ann Henderson Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 10/18/2014 Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Eileen McAdam https://www.ssmp.mdocs.skidmore.edu/files/original/a923b00f26b6f564bc83709ed9c9544b.mp3 10c95f65ffe6b95e3f41c671e997edd5 https://www.ssmp.mdocs.skidmore.edu/files/original/e2af96bf5c5073b90755905544a10109.pdf 8c5febcb1ce7050a6375360fbdcc7176 https://www.ssmp.mdocs.skidmore.edu/files/original/1bab73aa661e3dd3055aa25aec9aa9c3.pdf 826ebbc7d52f75685bf7b6b6a466b5df Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Skidmore College Retirees Oral History A resource containing historical information obtained in interviews with persons having firsthand knowledge. Interviewer The person(s) performing the interview Eileen McAdam, Sound and Story Project of the Hudson Valley Interviewee The person(s) being interviewed Ann Henderson Location The location of the interview Skidmore College, Saratoga Springs, NY, 12866 Original Format The type of object, such as painting, sculpture, paper, photo, and additional data Audio recording Duration Length of time involved (seconds, minutes, hours, days, class periods, etc.) 45:00 Record Contributor Individual who prepared the item and/or edited it. Susan Bender Record Creation Date Day/Month/Year of record creation/edit November 30, 2018 Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Interview with Ann Henderson Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource October 18, 2014 Is Part Of A related resource in which the described resource is physically or logically included. Skidmore Saratoga Memory Project Language A language of the resource English (en) Subject The topic of the resource Retiree Oral History Project Type The nature or genre of the resource Oral History Description An account of the resource Ann Henderson, Registrar at Skidmore College and Director of Institutional Research, was an integral part of Skidmore from 1990-2010. In this interview, she talks about the technological changes that occurred across campus including her initiative to move Skidmore to an online course registration system and being part of a selected group of small institutions helping Oracle design a software that would meet all of the necessary registration and advising requirements.  9/11/2001 Campus Culture Dean of Studies English Department Jon Ramsey Phyllis Roth https://www.ssmp.mdocs.skidmore.edu/files/original/33a9c1282b5735ef4c8d41b1f4ace17b.JPG e0c26cba99a47eb0fe48eeba38394c39 Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Don McCormack Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 10/18/2014 Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Eileen McAdam https://www.ssmp.mdocs.skidmore.edu/files/original/f76b79377ef4c3712df693ad448373a7.mp3 93976de11c07153791ae3c90fcbac015 https://www.ssmp.mdocs.skidmore.edu/files/original/d4b815a6eea3e67face4fb62ac1a4f2f.pdf c24dfb564ca69a677c8b870d58413e85 https://www.ssmp.mdocs.skidmore.edu/files/original/566fbb6e717d9acdb9725d5c1ed45894.pdf 202e3da57fd8ab1f2b24a4b992b9d54c Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Skidmore College Retirees Oral History A resource containing historical information obtained in interviews with persons having firsthand knowledge. Interviewer The person(s) performing the interview Eileen McAdam, Sound and Story Project of the Hudson Valley Interviewee The person(s) being interviewed Don McCormack, Director, Special Programs (Years) Location The location of the interview Skidmore College, Saratoga Springs, NY, 12866 Duration Length of time involved (seconds, minutes, hours, days, class periods, etc.) 45:00 Record Contributor Individual who prepared the item and/or edited it. Susan Bender Record Creation Date Day/Month/Year of record creation/edit November 30, 2018 Original Format The type of object, such as painting, sculpture, paper, photo, and additional data Audio recording Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Interview with Don McCormack Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource October 18, 2014 Is Part Of A related resource in which the described resource is physically or logically included. Skidmore Saratoga Memory Project Language A language of the resource English (en) Subject The topic of the resource Retiree Oral History Project Type The nature or genre of the resource Oral History Description An account of the resource Don McCormack, held a variety of roles at Skidmore from 1970-2005 (Faculty in the Government Department, Director of the University Without Walls program, Dean of Special Programs). In this interview he talks about the spirit of campus in the 1970’s with large gatherings of students, faculty, community members and visitors at his house and the Tin & Lint bar; University Without Walls, including teaching in the Great Meadow Correctional Facility; and starting Skidmore’s Jazz Institute. Boys Choir of Harlem Jazz Institute Tint & Lint Bar UWW https://www.ssmp.mdocs.skidmore.edu/files/original/9b5fc62598f978d8e17650e1a3081c7f.jpg adca20006157629dd5a6b3d32a93cc85 Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Anne Palamountain at the Cube Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 10/18/2014 Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Eileen McAdam Subject The topic of the resource Palamountain, Anne Contributor An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource Jordana Dym Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource Please cite the photographer if you use this photograph. https://www.ssmp.mdocs.skidmore.edu/files/original/b60aed25c1e4cb0100600aefb1d59eb7.mp3 f2bc5e394b5acd6558f3c6d38293eb04 https://www.ssmp.mdocs.skidmore.edu/files/original/356976c19250c15ad9003f38d71d9dc2.pdf 0eb03c23bcd0aec067380702d8fdb668 https://www.ssmp.mdocs.skidmore.edu/files/original/114d6433b5b634dab978bd9600c9630f.pdf 315c76445ed53535af929525dd00aeb9 Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Skidmore College Retirees Oral History A resource containing historical information obtained in interviews with persons having firsthand knowledge. Interviewer The person(s) performing the interview <a title="Eileen McAdam, Sound &amp; Story Project of the Hudson Valley" href="http://www.soundandstory.org/audioproducers.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Eileen McAdam, Sound and Story Project of the Hudson Valley</a> Interviewee The person(s) being interviewed Anne Palamountain Location The location of the interview Skidmore College, Saratoga Springs, NY, 12866 Duration Length of time involved (seconds, minutes, hours, days, class periods, etc.) 45:00 Record Contributor Individual who prepared the item and/or edited it. Susan Bender Record Creation Date Day/Month/Year of record creation/edit November 30, 2018 Original Format The type of object, such as painting, sculpture, paper, photo, and additional data Audio recording Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Interview with Anne Palamountain Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource October 18, 2014 Language A language of the resource English (en) Has Version A related resource that is a version, edition, or adaptation of the described resource. This interview was used in a memorial video created by the Skidmore College Video team in January 2015, <a title="Anne Palamountain, A Remembrance" href="http://www.skidmore.edu/news/2015/0227-anne-palamountain-video.php">Anne Palamountain: A Remembrance</a>.&nbsp; The video alone can be found on <a title="Anne Palamountain: A Remembrance (video)" href="https://vimeo.com/117927061">Youtube</a> Description An account of the resource Anne Palamountain, wife of Skidmore’s fourth President, Joseph Palamountain, was a vital presence at the College during his 22-year presidency (1965-1986) and beyond. In this interview, she reflects on some her first impressions of Saratoga Springs, the turbulent 60’s, her priorities as Skidmore’s “First Lady”, and the challenges and rewards of her career. Is Part Of A related resource in which the described resource is physically or logically included. Skidmore Saratoga Memory Project Subject The topic of the resource Retiree Oral History Project Type The nature or genre of the resource Oral History Board of Trustees Campus Culture Campus Move coeducation Collections Employee Tuition Benefit Program Faculty Gender Equity Financial Instability J Erik Jonsson Joseph Palamountain Skidmore History Social Work Department Town-Gown Relations https://www.ssmp.mdocs.skidmore.edu/files/original/33c7d009b97b5a3241993e0f2f33d99e.JPG 7a3db360e4cd4c7ad1eb4f22671ee017 https://www.ssmp.mdocs.skidmore.edu/files/original/59a91ac6a92dbafb8ea923ebb4a3ce18.mp3 8d350de488d75127de4f61dc95f7ad91 Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource David Porter Interview (Sound) https://www.ssmp.mdocs.skidmore.edu/files/original/500355f8fca789da6ec92f54c7f3c9ae.pdf 3b8ab1741480a09d28d0dcb599d0a2ae Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource David Porter - Log https://www.ssmp.mdocs.skidmore.edu/files/original/3a3e2a10b43ef636f0c5e179ff56769f.pdf 5452b585741aef9bf1e220a12e607e57 Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Skidmore College Retirees Oral History A resource containing historical information obtained in interviews with persons having firsthand knowledge. Interviewer The person(s) performing the interview Eileen McAdam, Sound and Story Project of the Hudson Valley Interviewee The person(s) being interviewed David Porter Location The location of the interview Skidmore College, Saratoga Springs, NY, 12866 Original Format The type of object, such as painting, sculpture, paper, photo, and additional data Audio recording Duration Length of time involved (seconds, minutes, hours, days, class periods, etc.) 0:45:00 Record Contributor Individual who prepared the item and/or edited it. Susan Bender Record Creation Date Day/Month/Year of record creation/edit December 13, 2018 Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Interview with David Porter Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource October 18, 2015 Description An account of the resource <a title="David Porter, President, Skidmore College" href="http://www.skidmore.edu/skidmorehistory/centennial/leaders/david-porter.php" target="_blank" rel="noopener">David Porter</a>, President of the college from 1987-1999, saw the college through many landmark moments. In this interview he talks about his background in Classics and Music; learning on the job; the recruitment of a more diverse student body; renovating the Library; and the development of the Tang Teaching Museum. &nbsp;A <a title="David H. Porter" href="https://vimeo.com/161512190">video celebration </a>of his life and presidency draws on this interview. Language A language of the resource English (en) Is Part Of A related resource in which the described resource is physically or logically included. Skidmore Saratoga Memory Project Subject The topic of the resource Retiree Oral History Project Type The nature or genre of the resource Oral History Commission on the 90's Diversity Divestment from South Africa Library Renovation Tang Museum https://www.ssmp.mdocs.skidmore.edu/files/original/4fb472ebbc91dd9e3041b4407f4ff0a5.JPG 37a66aed976cfd7969cd3fb04fab9305 https://www.ssmp.mdocs.skidmore.edu/files/original/7c4f650836d7ac3f3d9d60c19f2f8873.mp3 26b55e1756f941a108140908cba4a5ad https://www.ssmp.mdocs.skidmore.edu/files/original/ae21e7973c8e78a39fb8d693a6e2387c.pdf 71ad5d68a9cf5a66c39392de19c6ce59 https://www.ssmp.mdocs.skidmore.edu/files/original/4d08cf8e1697b684701e518e2b17175d.pdf f28101cebe7447a8d833dbbd965115b1 Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Skidmore College Retirees Oral History A resource containing historical information obtained in interviews with persons having firsthand knowledge. Time Summary A summary of an interview given for different time stamps throughout the interview 1:02:36 Record Contributor Individual who prepared the item and/or edited it. Susan Bender Record Creation Date Day/Month/Year of record creation/edit December 13, 2018 Interviewer The person(s) performing the interview Eileen McAdam, Sound and Story Project of the Hudson Valley Interviewee The person(s) being interviewed Susan J. Bender Original Format The type of object, such as painting, sculpture, paper, photo, and additional data Audio recording Location The location of the interview Skidmore College, Saratoga Springs, NY, 12866 Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Date Submitted Date of submission of the resource. Examples of resources to which a Date Submitted may be relevant are a thesis (submitted to a university department) or an article (submitted to a journal). August 24, 2015 Title A name given to the resource Interview with Susan J. Bender Is Part Of A related resource in which the described resource is physically or logically included. Skidmore Saratoga Memory Project Language A language of the resource English (en) Subject The topic of the resource Retiree Oral History Project Type The nature or genre of the resource Oral History Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource May 13, 2015 Description An account of the resource Susan Bender, was a faculty member in the Department of Sociology, Anthropology, and Social Work from 1982-2010 and also served as Associate Dean of the Faculty from 1998-2002. In this interview she covers her academic background in archeology; being a mother and woman at Skidmore; the development of the Anthropology department and local archeological field program and lab; the establishment of the Liberal Studies curriculum; increase in academic rigor on campus; and the building of the Tang Teaching Museum. 4-1-4 Academic Calendar Academic Rigor Anthropology Department Archaeology Field Lab David Porter Feminism First Year Experience Interdisciplinary on "Mapping" J-Semester Liberal Studies Tang Museum Tenure Town-Gown Relations https://www.ssmp.mdocs.skidmore.edu/files/original/30023c8d5f576bb756ff50af6ecc1e1e.JPG e77bd25b769f7786bcfa9b785f0bab9d https://www.ssmp.mdocs.skidmore.edu/files/original/e450cd2aa06188cc48f0d0e6eb9e0533.mp3 697aa0083f629405834ab0dc0d2dfea7 https://www.ssmp.mdocs.skidmore.edu/files/original/49ecc97f2669a34284c661e45ab3c5bc.pdf 5a863ce456df35ad6bca5f39f124937f https://www.ssmp.mdocs.skidmore.edu/files/original/14be3376b4e6b2db8945fd051fd753d8.pdf 758770f681ae6e2216f8359064a04b16 Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Skidmore College Retirees Oral History A resource containing historical information obtained in interviews with persons having firsthand knowledge. Interviewer The person(s) performing the interview Eileen McAdam, Sound and Story Project of the Hudson Valley Interviewee The person(s) being interviewed Mimi Ciancio Location The location of the interview Skidmore College, Saratoga Springs, NY, 12866 Original Format The type of object, such as painting, sculpture, paper, photo, and additional data Audio recording Duration Length of time involved (seconds, minutes, hours, days, class periods, etc.) 58:07 minutes Record Contributor Individual who prepared the item and/or edited it. Susan Bender Record Creation Date Day/Month/Year of record creation/edit December 13, 2018 Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Interview with Mimi Ciancio Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource June 16, 2015 Is Part Of A related resource in which the described resource is physically or logically included. Skidmore Saratoga Memory Project Language A language of the resource English (en) Subject The topic of the resource Retiree Oral History Project Type The nature or genre of the resource Oral History Abstract A summary of the resource. Interview with Mimi Ciancio by Eileen McAdam, Skidmore College Retiree Oral History Project, Saratoga Springs, New York, June 16, 2015. Date Accepted Date of acceptance of the resource. Examples of resources to which a Date Accepted may be relevant are a thesis (accepted by a university department) or an article (accepted by a journal). December 9, 2015 Date Copyrighted Date of copyright. December 9, 2015 Date Submitted Date of submission of the resource. Examples of resources to which a Date Submitted may be relevant are a thesis (submitted to a university department) or an article (submitted to a journal). December 9, 2015 Date Issued Date of formal issuance (e.g., publication) of the resource. December 9, 2015 Date Modified Date on which the resource was changed. December 9, 2015 Date Valid Date (often a range) of validity of a resource. December 9, 2015 Description An account of the resource Mimi Ciancio, held a variety of positions at Skidmore College. She started out as an active faculty wife in 1965, worked briefly in the Admissions Office, then was hired to teach in the English department. She later became one of the creators of Skidmore’s Summer Opportunity Program and served as a valued advisor and mentor to many students who attended Skidmore through that program. admissions Civil Rights coeducation David Porter Diversity Faculty Wives Feminism Increasing Applicant Pool Opportunity Program Palamountain Summer OP Program The Surrey Town-Gown Relations https://www.ssmp.mdocs.skidmore.edu/files/original/8ee987402bcaa5bbbe79339d6dfcee3b.JPG c8cab190a6abb37c024af5d368ea4045 https://www.ssmp.mdocs.skidmore.edu/files/original/1891491c6d584cd7bb2892fc2976516b.mp3 212d9066d5afadf998afdef59ef7374c https://www.ssmp.mdocs.skidmore.edu/files/original/73284472273c2e5cfeaf854db2052935.pdf 17251ead22547b4f6e860ea3133c722a https://www.ssmp.mdocs.skidmore.edu/files/original/74416900e412ccd6f956ec30547f527a.pdf aa6c26fe5799911cae5e9e65c2bf4e45 Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Skidmore College Retirees Oral History A resource containing historical information obtained in interviews with persons having firsthand knowledge. Interviewer The person(s) performing the interview Eileen McAdam Interviewee The person(s) being interviewed Eric Weller Location The location of the interview Skidmore College Original Format The type of object, such as painting, sculpture, paper, photo, and additional data Audio recording Record Contributor Individual who prepared the item and/or edited it. Susan Bender Duration Length of time involved (seconds, minutes, hours, days, class periods, etc.) 1:11:49 Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Interview with Eric Weller Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource June 16, 2015 Is Part Of A related resource in which the described resource is physically or logically included. Skidmore Saratoga Memory Project Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Dym, Jordana; McAdam, Eileen; Stern, Rebecca, '16 Description An account of the resource Eric Weller joined the Philosophy Faculty at Skidmore in 1963.  He became Dean of the Faculty in 1975, a post that he retained until 1990.  Despite Weller’s substantial administrative responsibilities, teaching philosophy remained a central commitment throughout his years at Skidmore. In this interview he describes the transition to Joseph Palamountain’s Presidency from the Wilson years, the College’s move to coeducation, curricular changes of the 70’s and 80’s, and the challenges of being Dean of Faculty.  Language A language of the resource English (en) Subject The topic of the resource Retiree Oral History Project Type The nature or genre of the resource Oral History 4-1-4 Academic Calendar Business Department Faculty Gender Equity Interdisciplinary Collaboration Liberal Studies Palamountain Sociology Department Summer Program Development Tenure Val Wilson https://www.ssmp.mdocs.skidmore.edu/files/original/df8a91d906626bbb1cdeb4815d337f6d.JPG 03b6821b58b269c174976c82d37cac09 https://www.ssmp.mdocs.skidmore.edu/files/original/66efc2bc0bfa3b59a7f7e5c033ff9e40.mp3 ca8001dcb15f3637e5bb7c023977a5b9 https://www.ssmp.mdocs.skidmore.edu/files/original/940e8ab63875fafa1683cf774b46c282.pdf a9980144472afb6cbf6752e94871a4d5 https://www.ssmp.mdocs.skidmore.edu/files/original/e7399152e2d39cb730ab4106b424d39a.pdf d97760f0845d824965cb1cc1a91c9880 Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Skidmore College Retirees Oral History A resource containing historical information obtained in interviews with persons having firsthand knowledge. Interviewer The person(s) performing the interview Eileen McAdam, Sound and Story Project of the Hudson Valley Interviewee The person(s) being interviewed Ralph Ciancio Location The location of the interview Skidmore College, Saratoga Springs, NY, 12866 Duration Length of time involved (seconds, minutes, hours, days, class periods, etc.) 59:31.03 Record Creation Date Day/Month/Year of record creation/edit 16/6/2015 Original Format The type of object, such as painting, sculpture, paper, photo, and additional data Audio recording Record Contributor Individual who prepared the item and/or edited it. Susan Bender Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Interview with Ralph Ciancio Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource June 16, 2015 Is Part Of A related resource in which the described resource is physically or logically included. Skidmore Saratoga Memory Project Description An account of the resource Ralph Ciancio was a member of Skidmore’s English faculty 1965-2000 and served as department chair, in addition to his service on numerous important all-college committees. In this interview he talks about challenges and changes in the English department, difficulties faced during Palamountain’s presidency, and the gradual process of developing the Liberal Studies Program - including its influence on enhancing interdisciplinary teaching across the College. Language A language of the resource English (en) Subject The topic of the resource Retiree Oral History Project Contributor An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource Eileen McAdam Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource Skidmore College Type The nature or genre of the resource Oral History 4-1-4 Academic Calendar Academic Rigor coeducation David Porter Distribution Requirements Edwin Moseley English Department Eric Weller Faculty Evaluations FIC Financial Instability Liberal Studies Palamountain Salmagundi Student Activism Tripartite Government https://www.ssmp.mdocs.skidmore.edu/files/original/e7c6a75fd47cfde203258e4cedf7c8fb.JPG 425143e2ef00e97c7427e6216da3fac9 https://www.ssmp.mdocs.skidmore.edu/files/original/3a4623dfab469031d10d6f0e5c23b51a.mp3 d3f853b19c682e20eb5273c2e3749864 https://www.ssmp.mdocs.skidmore.edu/files/original/78be8a8745decee7a1f5bef19c4ac053.pdf 313a6c683bf983c4b8cbffaef5d87784 https://www.ssmp.mdocs.skidmore.edu/files/original/399b06c2c8fe323f452044a7f5f6ac18.pdf b5c83da46c1ba0949c6aec27b22d3917 Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Skidmore College Retirees Oral History A resource containing historical information obtained in interviews with persons having firsthand knowledge. Interviewer The person(s) performing the interview Eileen McAdam, Sound and Story Project of the Hudson Valley Interviewee The person(s) being interviewed Vasantha Narasimhan Location The location of the interview Skidmore College, Saratoga Springs, NY, 12866 Original Format The type of object, such as painting, sculpture, paper, photo, and additional data Audio recording Record Contributor Individual who prepared the item and/or edited it. Susan Bender Duration Length of time involved (seconds, minutes, hours, days, class periods, etc.) 1:01:05 Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Interview with Vasantha Narasimhan Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource June 16, 2015 Is Part Of A related resource in which the described resource is physically or logically included. Skidmore Saratoga Memory Project Description An account of the resource Vasantha Narasimhan joined the Skidmore faculty in 1980 to offer courses in organic and biochemical chemistry.  She introduced the importance of hands-on undergraduate research and began Skidmore students’ participation in the regional American Chemical Society undergraduate research presentations.  She chaired the Pre-Medical Committee from 1980 - 2006.  In this interview she discusses how, during the presidency of David Porter, there was encouragement of science and the interdisciplinary nature of the sciences.  The tenure of President Phil Glotzbach brought increased support for start-up funds to help bring talented new research faculty to Skidmore and add more advanced courses in the sciences like the polymer chemistry course.  She chaired the Chemistry/Physics Department from 2002-until her retirement in 2006.  Language A language of the resource English (en) Subject The topic of the resource Retiree Oral History Project Type The nature or genre of the resource Oral History Growth in Science Interdisciplinary Collaboration Liberal Studies Palamountain Undergraduate Science Research https://www.ssmp.mdocs.skidmore.edu/files/original/fccf41f16a6befe79fcd3ab2b88bf483.JPG bbe01fec2a65a0593c50e05f5c99c2ae https://www.ssmp.mdocs.skidmore.edu/files/original/304593b3ca7acb2efa2ee6bb4d356301.mp3 680bd135e20afd4c8fd4825e796f6eb0 https://www.ssmp.mdocs.skidmore.edu/files/original/cb031f4b1eaa23f5505826d7ae113e7b.pdf d91136d2e287e1e633a01d47fde8a20f https://www.ssmp.mdocs.skidmore.edu/files/original/d9b38b6c1cce96743a22a75d982e0fb3.pdf 52ed266fe7a998934132feccfd39c849 Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Skidmore College Retirees Oral History A resource containing historical information obtained in interviews with persons having firsthand knowledge. Interviewer The person(s) performing the interview Eileen McAdam, Sound and Story Project of the Hudson Valley Interviewee The person(s) being interviewed Tom Davis Location The location of the interview Skidmore College, Saratoga Springs, NY, 12866 Original Format The type of object, such as painting, sculpture, paper, photo, and additional data Audio recording Record Contributor Individual who prepared the item and/or edited it. Susan Bender Duration Length of time involved (seconds, minutes, hours, days, class periods, etc.) 0:57:24 Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Interview with Tom Davis Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource May 13, 2015 Is Part Of A related resource in which the described resource is physically or logically included. Skidmore Saratoga Memory Project Language A language of the resource English (en) Subject The topic of the resource Retiree Oral History Project Type The nature or genre of the resource Oral History Description An account of the resource Tom Davis, was Sidmore’s Chaplain from 1966-1996. In this interview he discusses his role in responding to student needs created by broad sociopolitical changes in the U.S., including religion, abortion rights, and alcohol education. In addition, he reflects on the College’s move to the North Broadway campus and Issues created by its transition to a co-ed student body. Abortion Rights Campus Culture Campus Move coeducation David Porter Gay Rights Palamountain Student Activism Student Newspaper Town-Gown Relations Upward Bound https://www.ssmp.mdocs.skidmore.edu/files/original/cb5f7ef49ee0f852b375af1df6ba158a.JPG a5379b34b9f8d7b2e81dbc6f67477bc6 https://www.ssmp.mdocs.skidmore.edu/files/original/fee930917bff555e7ca6745f6c9befc1.mp3 2ceb509aa169164404d1123f75f9d8d0 https://www.ssmp.mdocs.skidmore.edu/files/original/4bd23a25821f43f95855bc1e6d80af85.pdf 403273b926af440dc079c44b3fc6abb5 https://www.ssmp.mdocs.skidmore.edu/files/original/4b5bf42b44d47a48596c5a0142c7bc1f.pdf e13ff16f2dd4a9cdd15f6d1f45a8a50a Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Skidmore College Retirees Oral History A resource containing historical information obtained in interviews with persons having firsthand knowledge. Interviewer The person(s) performing the interview Eileen McAdam, Sound and Story Project of the Hudson Valley Interviewee The person(s) being interviewed Lynne Gelber Location The location of the interview Skidmore College, Saratoga Springs, NY, 12866 Original Format The type of object, such as painting, sculpture, paper, photo, and additional data Audio recording Record Contributor Individual who prepared the item and/or edited it. Susan Bender Duration Length of time involved (seconds, minutes, hours, days, class periods, etc.) 1:00:59 Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Interview with Lynne Gelber Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource May 13, 2015 Is Part Of A related resource in which the described resource is physically or logically included. Skidmore Saratoga Memory Project Language A language of the resource English (en) Subject The topic of the resource Retiree Oral History Project Type The nature or genre of the resource Oral History Description An account of the resource Lynne Gelber, was at the college from 1966-2002 as a faculty and later chair of the Foreign Languages and Literatures Department (now World Languages and Literatures). In this interview she discusses establishing the first Skidmore-run study abroad programs in France and Barcelona (later Spain). She also reflects broadly on Skidmore’s move to the “new” campus on North Broadway and its transition from a women’s college to co-education. 4-1-4 Academic Calendar Anne Palamountain Campus Move coeducation David Porter Faculty Club Foreign Languages and Literature Palamountain Town-Gown Relations UWW https://www.ssmp.mdocs.skidmore.edu/files/original/3d3ba6e25ec213c5ce6833f2390b733a.jpg 8c9233c56669e0448cc550de09540e1f https://www.ssmp.mdocs.skidmore.edu/files/original/5161bebc3f9c539450413b65fbda16a1.mp3 30dc242f84c2badb743acef5f7f537f3 https://www.ssmp.mdocs.skidmore.edu/files/original/f72db98d3e5482e19204f0277f3fbda2.pdf ee06e82c7e9b59f0c87866cde1cccfb9 https://www.ssmp.mdocs.skidmore.edu/files/original/3c24f653402b198e9e37f0ecbbef51a0.pdf 2970eb46a2beabcc74dfd00cf0a73704 Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Skidmore College Retirees Oral History A resource containing historical information obtained in interviews with persons having firsthand knowledge. Interviewer The person(s) performing the interview Eileen McAdam, Sound and Story Project of the Hudson Valley Interviewee The person(s) being interviewed Bob Foulke Location The location of the interview Skidmore College, Saratoga Springs, NY, 12866 Original Format The type of object, such as painting, sculpture, paper, photo, and additional data Audio recording Record Contributor Individual who prepared the item and/or edited it. Susan Bender Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Interview with Robert Foulke Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource April 25, 2015 Is Part Of A related resource in which the described resource is physically or logically included. Skidmore Saratoga Memory Project Language A language of the resource English (en) Subject The topic of the resource Retiree Oral History Project Type The nature or genre of the resource Oral History Description An account of the resource Robert Foulke was a member of Skidmore’s English department from 1970-1992 and served as department chair for ten of those years. In this interview, he discusses department leadership, changes in the English curriculum, developing a winter term class in Maritime Literature, starting the Writing Across the College program, and his post-retirement travel writing. He also reflects on the importance of a liberal arts education in contemporary society. Academic Rigor Board of Trustees coeducation Curriculum David Porter Faculty Workload First Year Experience Interdisciplinary Collaboration Intergenerational Faculty Relations J-Semester Liberal Arts Education Palamountain student body Tenure https://www.ssmp.mdocs.skidmore.edu/files/original/4aa1606f769de13066cd270aaa229517.jpg ed6e14a0b3ef95d0523cbc0de02a70d6 https://www.ssmp.mdocs.skidmore.edu/files/original/0d216118c817b3b76c1ffb2b18e2eed0.m4a 6932b7a55735743226652e65c2ee3325 https://www.ssmp.mdocs.skidmore.edu/files/original/f4404d93075421d6a13999df37183bea.pdf 387afcda2f0b0c35624f067937ff141f https://www.ssmp.mdocs.skidmore.edu/files/original/d413b3241c02879c7db5913eb0097dd0.pdf 9d7c18904e4e7ed22fad4b336a896a07 Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Skidmore College Retirees Oral History A resource containing historical information obtained in interviews with persons having firsthand knowledge. Interviewer The person(s) performing the interview Emily Meagher Interviewee The person(s) being interviewed John Anzalone Location The location of the interview Skidmore College, Saratoga Springs, NY 12866 Duration Length of time involved (seconds, minutes, hours, days, class periods, etc.) 1:05:49 Original Format The type of object, such as painting, sculpture, paper, photo, and additional data Audio Recording Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Interview with John Anzalone Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource February 24, 2016 Language A language of the resource English (en) Subject The topic of the resource Retiree Oral History Project Contributor An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource Emily Meagher Description An account of the resource Since September  1985, John Anzalone has been a professor of French at Skidmore College. An interdisciplinary scholar, Anzalone has taught in language, film, and the art of translation. He was centrally involved with Skidmore’s study abroad programs as well as the implementation of its Media Studies program in 2014. In this interview, he speaks about these endeavors as well as the broader experience of being a faculty member at Skidmore for over thirty years. Is Part Of A related resource in which the described resource is physically or logically included. Skidmore Saratoga Memory Project Abstract A summary of the resource. Interview with John Anzalone by Emily Meagher, Skidmore College Retiree Oral History Project, Saratoga Springs, New York, February 24, 2016. art history Curriculum Foreign Languages and Literature Interdisciplinary Collaboration International Students J-Semester Liberal Studies MALS Media Services Michael Arnush study abroad https://www.ssmp.mdocs.skidmore.edu/files/original/b273943583213f37158518ec57f6cfdd.png e18eb161254e0cb9aa2de8c7bb49be41 https://www.ssmp.mdocs.skidmore.edu/files/original/d1eb4562877c5181fbad3468f96879d6.mp4 b03f9cdb61db75c820f0d741be27d068 https://www.ssmp.mdocs.skidmore.edu/files/original/d5a5459c9feed2bbc5d7ae6600fdfe53.mp4 e823ee8256b49aaf1b42fd8042e97cd8 https://www.ssmp.mdocs.skidmore.edu/files/original/09ec7a18ae589802c1603539f8fbe94a.pdf 43acd760db00e8d25e6b61c221aa774b https://www.ssmp.mdocs.skidmore.edu/files/original/91eed9008539f6a5109b6eb219a5b022.pdf e9ae28398870c40e5ffa1b0112347379 Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Skidmore College Retirees Moving Image A series of visual representations imparting an impression of motion when shown in succession. Examples include animations, movies, television programs, videos, zoetropes, or visual output from a simulation. Original Format The type of object, such as painting, sculpture, paper, photo, and additional data Audio recording Duration Length of time involved (seconds, minutes, hours, days, class periods, etc.) 1:25 Producer Name (or names) of the person who produced the video Vickie Riley Director Name (or names) of the person who produced the video Vickie Riley Record Contributor Individual who prepared the item and/or edited it. Susan Bender Record Creation Date Day/Month/Year of record creation/edit November 30, 2018 Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource In Memoriam: Anne Palamountain Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource April 24, 2015 Description An account of the resource Anne Palamountain, wife of Skidmore’s fourth President, Joseph Palamountain, was a vital presence at the College during his 22-year presidency (1965-1986)and beyond. In this interview,she reflects on some her first impressions of Saratoga Springs, the turbulent 60’s, her priorities as Skidmore’s “First Lady”, and the challenges and rewards of her career. Language A language of the resource English (eng) Subject The topic of the resource Retiree Oral History Project Contributor An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource Vickie Riley Is Part Of A related resource in which the described resource is physically or logically included. Skidmore Saratoga Memory Project Type The nature or genre of the resource Oral History https://www.ssmp.mdocs.skidmore.edu/files/original/5cadd2984e0eb91af95a552996c40c88.png bd883b3d99b1d50d1bcdf0b9d7466eca Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Bob Boyers Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource February 22, 2017 Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Sam Brown Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource Creative commons license https://www.ssmp.mdocs.skidmore.edu/files/original/bc23d1a052a592890809e86b61eaf995.mp3 110431edbd29c02482fe9dbce96202aa https://www.ssmp.mdocs.skidmore.edu/files/original/2d01c86c961fac8903ac3fbf2992758b.pdf 61a5cc6d8d2cb383e7c91f89d0a7e1fa https://www.ssmp.mdocs.skidmore.edu/files/original/7ebd1a201623e4031d62092adba2e39e.pdf 711c25f00bad3fc83ba943922513b598 PDF Text Text Robert Boyers Interview Transcript Sam Brown: Hi, I’m Sam Brown for Skidmore Oral History. It’s February 22 nd and I’m in the office of Robert Boyers. So I’d first like to ask you, Bob, if you could tell me where you were born, and if you could just introduce yourself a little bit, that would be great. Robert Boyers: Sure. I’m Bob Boyers. I was born in Brooklyn, New York in 1942, and I’ve been teaching at Skidmore College since the summer, actually, of 1969. SB: Generally, can I start by asking how you came to Skidmore? RB: Well, I came to Skidmore in a rather unusual way. I had started a quarterly magazine called Salmagundi out of my apartment in New York City in the middle 1960s when I was a graduate student at New York University, and we managed to bring out—my friends and I had managed to bring out several issues by the Fall of 1968 when I was contacted by the Provost of Skidmore College—a man named Edwin Mosely who had thought about starting a magazine at Skidmore College, and had gone to the Gotham book mart in New York City and had seen some copies of Salmagundi, noted that they were published out of a post office box in New York City, and thought that it would probably be a good idea to be in touch with me about bringing the magazine to the college. So that’s, really, how I came to Skidmore. I came with a magazine. SB: Can you tell me what your motivation was for starting the magazine, specifically? RB: Well, you know, I had several motives. You know, I was a reader of magazines, obviously, like other young intellectuals and so on. And I had begun writing for some of those magazines very early on when I was a graduate student, before I began Salmagundi. I thought it was something I might like to do. The idea had never actually crossed my mind—I mean, I was only twenty-two when the idea finally did cross my mind—and it was placed there by a middle aged professor named Henry Pachter who was the dean of The New School for Social Research in Manhattan. I won’t tell the whole story—I’ve actually written it up in other places. He was a man I got to know in 1964 and he basically put the idea in my head, and encouraged me to do it, and put me in touch with all sorts of writers and intellectuals that I admired. And with that, I was able to figure out how to launch my own magazine. So, that was sort of the origin of the idea, and of course, you know, one’s motives and ambitions are various under those circumstances. Obviously, I was interested in finding an outlet for certain things that I and my friends wanted to write which, at the time at least, was not very easy for us to place in other magazines including very long and demanding essays that we were writing and wanted to continue to write. So there was that sort of thing, but then, also, we were interested in finding a way to bring together politics in the arts in a way that really wasn’t often done in other magazines right at that moment. I mean, there were magazines like the most famous of them: Partisan Review, which managed to publish material on politics and material on the arts, and literature, and film, and so on. But we wanted to do something that was a little different. We wanted to do politics and literature at the same time—to publish articles that engaged with both politics and literature in the same framework and we managed to do that right from the beginning. The only other ambition I’ll mention—I mean there were others—but, really, I was, myself, very taken with the very lengthy essays that were published in the middle of the nineteenth century in the English quarterlies like �the Edinburgh Review and the Westminster Review—the kinds of articles I loved and studied by writers like John Stuart Mill, and Thomas Carlyle, and John Ruskin—those kinds of writers. And really, there was no other magazine in the United States in that moment which reached a large general, educated readership that would accommodate materials of that length. We began to do that right from the start. The second issue of Salmagundi has a very lengthy article on the politics of Jean-Paul Sartre. And we’ve done that throughout the history of the magazine. So that was one of the things that we had in mind to do which we actually did. SB: Can you talk a little bit about how Skidmore facilitated Salmagundi and how it fit itself into the campus right when you got to Skidmore? RB: Well of course, the bottom line really was that Skidmore provided a budget and offices and a couple of student assistants. We had two student assistants. We had very modest offices. Our offices are, now, much more extensive than they were at the time, and we did have, really, a tiny budget—but it was a budget nevertheless. There was no salary for anybody who worked at the magazine, accept for the student assistants, but we had money for mailing and we had a print budget to pay a printer. This was extraordinary. I had managed to support the magazine out of my own pocket for four years which was very difficult to do, and it was wonderful to have this kind of support. In terms of fitting in at Skidmore; that always been not so very easy to tell you the truth. Most academics, then and now, are really not terribly interested in most things outside the framework of their own academic specialty, and Salmagundi is, by definition, a magazine that encompasses all sorts of different things. So, we always had a small cadre of people at Skidmore professors, and students, and so on who were enthusiastic about the magazine, but most people at the college were not terribly enthusiastic or interested in one way or the other. And that was okay—that was fine. I mean, for one thing, what it meant was that we didn’t have any interference in the running of the magazine. There weren’t enough people out there to be terribly interested in it one way or another, as I say. So there was no impulse to become angry about anything that the magazine doing or failing to do. So that was very useful. But, from the start, we wanted to insert the magazine into the life of the college which is what Edwin Mosley—the Provost of the college—had wanted right from the start. So, from the moment I got here, we began sponsoring the kinds of events that otherwise would never have unfolded at this college. Mainly, we began to sponsor and run conferences—many of them two or three day affairs in which major thinkers, writers, scholars, intellectuals would be brought together and asked to sit around a table for three days or so to debate an important subject. The first of those that we sponsored was actually in 1970, and over the years we’ve done more than thirty of those conferences at the college, and that’s one of the ways in which we hoped to develop the intellectual life of the institution. As I say, most of the faculty here were not terribly interested in or committed to those events, and, in fact, didn’t show up at those events. But it’s been a great thing for the faculty and the students who were interested. And, you know, at any given time there were certainly at least a couple dozen faculty members who were invested in what we were doing and many of those faculty, in fact, participated as speakers in some of those conferences. I will say a very considerable proportion of those faculty members were always in the English department rather than other departments, and that’s always been a source of surprise and disappointment to me after all of the many years I’ve been here. But it’s just a fact of life I’ve learned to accept. �SB: I was wondering if you could turn now to when you first came to Saratoga Springs and your personal experience of coming to Skidmore as a younger man. RB: Well, I mean, the college was somewhat smaller in those days for one thing and when I arrived here we were moving between the old campus in town and the current new campus which wasn't all built up when I arrived here in the late 60's and so on. The place you know of course, in terms of the faculty, certainly wasn't quite as strong then as it's become. We have a much larger proportion of the current faculty right now who are doing significant scholarly work. Many fewer faculty in the late 60's and 70's who were here when I arrived, were doing really significant creative and scholarly work, so that was an important difference. Over the years I've watched all sorts of development in the student body. The students in the late 60's and early 70's were terrific they were very good, then there was a long period of time, a considerable stretch of time, when Skidmore was having a very hard time as many previously male colleges and universities began to accept women and began to compete with Skidmore for women students. So I would say for a period of at least a decade and a bit more, there was a considerable decline in the quality of students we were getting. I mean we always had a number of very good students, but it wasn't until the early 1990's that we began to have the kinds of students that we have become accustomed to over the last 25 years or so where most of our students are actually quite good and many of our students are superb. And again, we went through a period where things were very different. SB: Can you talk a little bit about how gender changed the dynamics of the classroom? RB: Well you know, it's funny because when I came in Skidmore was a women's institution but only for a year or so and in fact in the yearbook for the graduating class of May 1970, because I was a young radical, very radical faculty member at the time, the students asked me to write for their yearbook an article promoting co-education, which I did. And of course I argued that it would be good for everyone including the women at the institution and so on if we took in men. But there was a lot of opposition to that—some of it from current students—but a lot of it from alums. They really felt that the character of the institution would change drastically and in a very unfortunate way. Many of the women I spoke to at the time argued on the basis of experience that they had heard from other people that as soon as male students came into Skidmore, the male students would sort of take over the institution. More or less at once it was said that the Skidmore News, the newspaper would be taken over by males, the literary magazine would be taken over by males, the college government association positions would be taken over by males and so on. It never really happened that way, the fears were exaggerated. I felt they would be exaggerated and although I've been wrong about many things over the course of my years at the college that was one area in which I happen to have been right. The men did not take over the institution. We had strong and brilliant women here in the student body over all of the years and we never had any of that kind of problem in that transition. Of course for awhile, Skidmore wanted to attract male students and had a very hard time doing so and a considerable proportion of the male students we did attract were not nearly to the level of the women students we had, but again, after awhile that began to change and you didn't feel that that was any longer the case. So again, my long years here have been a time when we have watched all sorts of changes taking place. But in terms of the gender problem, I really haven't felt that that has been a significant thing at least in my own experience of the classroom and the institution as a whole. �SB: Can you talk a little bit about how the English Department has changed over the years and how it has grown. I understand you play a big role in hiring faculty members. RB: Yes, for many years I was on the Hiring Committee and the Personnel Committee here and until quite recently in fact our Personal Committee in the department was also the Hiring Committee. We didn't have, for most of the years I've been at the college, separate committees assembled to hire a person for a particular position. Again, the people who were on the Personnel Committee, who were elected to that committee, handled not only assessment, which is to say reappointments, tenure, promotions and all of the hiring. So I was involved in hiring, I had a hand in it, I wasn't the person in charge of it, but I had a hand in it and in the hiring just about everybody who is in the department now and that was a wonderful opportunity to be involved in that. The department has changed in a great many ways, and it's hard to say exactly how. I mean you could point to particular areas where the changes have been dramatic. For example, when I came in there was a poet named Lawrence Josephs who taught a poetry workshop each year. He had an academic background and he was a good but not well-known poet, he did not have a book of poems. He was a man, when I came in, who was in his fifties and he had been here for quite some time. We didn't have a creative writing faculty at all, we didn't have a fiction writer on staff. There was no such thing as creative non-fiction. And again, the only person who taught the poetry workshop was this one man Lawrence Josephs and so I and a number of other people began to fight for the idea that to be credible and to offer creative writing in a serious way, we had to recruit and hire creative writers who were significant authors and had well received books to their credit and so on, and who would basically be hired for that purpose. They wouldn't just be professors with PhD's in an academic subject who felt they could teach a course in fiction and so on, which by the way was never taught when I originally came in at Skidmore. So that was one very significant change and as I say I was one of the people who fought very hard for that. Other areas were very different, we often had considerable battles within the department about whether or not we wanted to hire people specifically to teach freshman composition. Many people felt that it was a good idea for everyone to teach freshman composition, not to hire a separate cadre of people who only did that. But basically over the years I think we sort of have all adapted to the situation as its evolved. And the college as a whole, again I think the faculty certainly has become stronger and in recent years, the student body has become stronger. So I would say in general Skidmore is at a pretty good place right now. I mean I could get into all sorts of parochial matters that are still struggling about but probably not of great interest to people who are not academics themselves. For example, the relationship between theory and what we call primary literature itself. In my own estimation in the profession of literature these days we have lots of people who are entering English Departments who are primarily interested in theory and have very little interest in Literature itself. I think that is very unfortunate. People in my generation generally went in to college English teaching because they were passionate about poetry and fiction and such things. We were interested in ideas, some of us like myself were intellectuals who write about all sorts of issues and topics and so on. But our passion is really about poetry and fiction and the primary texts and the arts and so on. I think my sense has been that many people in the profession, and that includes some people at the college as well, are not that interested in literature for its own sake. They are interested in it for the uses they can make of it in connection with their own theoretical investments, which I think is fine as long as they don't communicate that feeling in �the classroom. In so far as they do, my sense is that the students are not getting what they aught to get when they enroll in classes in Literature. But again, that's just one view and there are many other views that are held by very smart people who see things rather in a different way. SB: I was wondering if you could tell me a little bit about the New York Summer Writers Institute and how that has cemented itself into Skidmore. RB: Yeah that's another one of those things that certainly to me came as an enormous surprise. You know I'm not by temperament or disposition an administrator. There was a time years ago when people would come to me and say you should be Chair of the Department or Dean of the College or something and I'd say no, no I have no interest in doing something like that and I'm not really good at that sort of thing. But 31 years ago Skidmore was approached by the novelist William Kennedy who had just begun the New York State Writers Institute in Albany at the State University. He had a dream of starting a summer program and thought that such a program would be very attractive if it was started at a small liberal arts school like Skidmore and in a town like Saratoga Springs. And so because of Salmagundi and my connections with dozens and dozens of writers and so on, people who were approached thought I would be the obvious person to direct such and institute and it seemed like a nice idea and I thought to do it for a short while. I never really dreamed that I would feel like staying with it for a long time. Again, because it involved a certain type of administrative function that really was not ever part of my ambition, but I found that I liked it and that I was able to build the program into a national program over the course of the first 5 or 6 years. I was given rather a free hand to do that and so the program grew and I found that it was very important to me in a whole variety of ways, some of which were personal some of which were professional. I could mention the personal that is sort of interesting, in the sense that my wife, Peg Boyers, who was the Executive Director of Salmagundi and an occasional writer of critical prose, sort of got the feeling after the first 8 or 10 years of the writers institute that she wanted to try to write poetry. She began to enroll in summer courses first with the poet Robert Pinsky but then shortly thereafter with the poet Frank Bidart and suddenly discovered that she was, lo and behold, a first rate poet and has now gone on to publish three well received books of poems and so that has rather changed her life. Of course I will always be grateful for the fact that the New York State Summer Writers Institute came to me and that I was able to make something of it because it gave my wife this whole extraordinary unexpected career, so there was that. But there was another aspect of it that was through the Writers Institute I became close to dozens of first rate writers who began to contribute their writing to Salmagundi Magazine, which is a magazine that of course by that time had a large national reputation as small quarterly but which for the most part could not have acquired the first rate writing of many of those writers had we not developed personal relationships with them. The simple reason is that we don't pay money. They can give that writing to national magazines, so that's been an extraordinary benefit that I never imagined would come to pass when I decided to take on the Summer Writers Institute. Of course it has been great to have the program here at the college. Our public events 5 nights a week draw good audiences, every night of the week in the auditorium and we get lots of publicity for the college all over the country which is very important to the college and very important to me as somebody who has been at the college for almost a half century. That has been wonderful. The truth is again most faculty at the college don't have anything to do with the institute, don't come to the readings, don't derive any benefit personally or professionally from it which is fine. The seats are filled �every night in the auditorium from people far and wide who come to the events and so on and of course we draw students to the workshops from all over the country, a small number of Skidmore students enroll every year but we have students every year from major universities and small colleges all over the country. SB: I guess going back a little bit, to when you first came to Skidmore; I know there was a lot of student protests happening at the time and I was wondering what the Skidmore student body was like at the time and if you could compare it to the student body now a little bit. RB: Well you know I think in the life of any institution the sort of student politics rises and falls depending on the particular student cohort. In a school like Skidmore, a relatively small number of students can change the atmosphere on the campus in extraordinary ways. When I say small number, I really mean a small number, a dozen, fifteen, twenty students out of 2,000 or more students could really mobilize energies on a campus like this in ways that are quite extraordinary. In the late 1960's when I arrived it was an era all across the country of student radicalism and student protest, but the truth is the overwhelming majority of students at Skidmore at the time were not activists, whatever the sort of publicity that's sometimes put out by people who are themselves activists and so on and remember fondly the "good old days" when..., I mean most students then and now are invested in their academic work and their clubs and their teams and so on and are not deeply invested in politics certainly not in radical politics. There was, however, in the moment of the late 60's and early 70's, a considerable minority of Skidmore students who were very involved in politics both on and off the campus. I was myself very involved in antiWar activities and Civil Rights activities on the campus. I was among a small number, it was a very small number, of faculty members who were basically mobilizing student activism back at that moment. But even then, there were considerable differences of opinion about what mobilizing student activists should entail. If you like I can give you an example. At the time of the Kent State killings in the Spring of 1970, which was the end of my own first year at Skidmore College, there were student protests and lots of Skidmore students became involved, many more that I could of imagined would be possible. I mean hundreds of students were involved in on-campus marches and protests. We began to organize, that is 3 other faculty members and I began to organize teach-ins which would address the war in Vietnam, the question of student activism itself, Civil Rights issues as they were then emerging and so on. And basically it was the tail end of the semester and it called a halt to classes. Many faculty members were very angry about this, understandably I think it is fair to say, and I think this history is available in back issues of the Skidmore New and Saratogian and that sort of thing because obviously it really was newsworthy at least in this immediate local. On one of those teach-in occasions, as we were moving into the second day of our sort of work stoppage and student strike, we were moving toward the final exam period and one of the faculty, a full-time member of the English department in Skidmore, a man about my age, in his mid twenties, a very brilliant young man, got up and urged that we continue the strike right through the final exam period that we simply force the cancelation of the exams. Many students were very upset about this and spoke out at that meeting. And of course there were other faculty members who were very upset about it and again I would say legitimately so and that seemed to me a very important turning point. I as one of the leaders of this organization argued that this was not a good thing to do to put students in jeopardy, students were about to graduate, they needed the course credits and so on. My colleague and I had a ferocious public argument on the subject with lots of other �people participating and basically his view was that these kinds of things are much more terrifying in your imagination than they actually turn out to be in reality. My view was that no actually they can be quite terrifying. People who have spent enormous sums of money and suddenly find that they cannot graduate because they don't have the academic credits to do so have real reason to be terrified and their parents have legitimate reason to be very upset and so on and this is taking the whole thing too far. I don't pretend to be right about this sort of thing, but I am pointing it out to suggest that these types of debates were going on at colleges and universities all over the country and it took place here at Skidmore with hundreds and hundreds of students very much involved. But you know over the years after that point there have been intermittent student mobilizations and protests on behalf of one thing or another and again most Skidmore students haven't been deeply involved in those mobilizations and its always very nice to see an occasional sort of eruption of concern where there is a march or a student protest and so on and it's nice to see that Skidmore students are in fact paying attention to what is going on out there in the world. Of course many of those things unfortunately follow what might be called the ideological fashion and lots of people jump on to a particular bandwagon only because it is the thing that is being done all over the country at any given moment and of course that sort of momentary fashion passes the interest in the issues disappears. I think we have seen that over and over and over again and it's not really surprising, but it's the way of things and it is no different in that sense at Skidmore than it is anywhere else. SB: That was great. We are almost done, but I was wondering if there was anything specifically that you would like to mention about Skidmore in general or about any specific anecdotes or encounters with the Presidents like David Porter or anything like that. RB: Well I have had in general, very warm relationships with the various administrations that I have lived through. My sense is that the present administration, President Glotzbach and Beau Breslin and so on are exceptionally good, smart and dedicated. We have our differences to put it mildly, I mean that's what you would want, I mean I think that is what they would want, that people are thinking about real issues have their differences. I've been very concerned frankly in the last few years in the way I have been intimately over the last 25 years or so, about the, what might be called the reign of political correctness on this campus and other campuses. That is an area in which the present administration and I have some rather considerable differences of opinion. Of course time will tell whether these differences are significant as they sometimes seem to me to be. These kinds of problems having to do with political correctness and so on can be very worrying when you think about the way they play out in the classroom, when you think about the way they constrain open discussion and conversation of subjects in the classroom. It can be very worrying if you think about the way they shape the recruitment of new faculty and I'm frankly worried about those things. I've seen things recently over the years, especially recently, which seem to me to suggest that these issues are more important right now than they have been in the past and my sense is that administration typically runs scared when these kinds of things erupt. They worry that the faculty will find them at fault, will censure them and then they don't adopt the kinds of leadership that they are capable of. I haven't seen that just yet occurring with the present Skidmore Administration but there are worrying signs at least for me and some of my colleagues who are similarly worried, and I hope that our fears are, as they sometimes are, exaggerated or misguided, but we will see. �SB: Okay, last question. If you could talk about some of the things you are proud of and what Skidmore has meant to you. RB: Well you know of course I love to teach and I'm old enough to stop, to retire. I'm hoping to keep going, which says a lot about what matters most to me and what I'm pleased about as I look back over my years at the college. Every year for a very long time now at the alumni reunion in late May early June I give a mini class on some subject or other and every year I have a very large crowd turning out and of course many of them are people from a very long time ago who studied with me many many years ago and are coming back to their thirtieth reunion or their fortieth reunion that sort of thing. We get to see one another and remember the past and that sort of thing and that is important to me when I know that these students from the past remember these classes together as formative to them in some way and that of course is in some ways the most important thing. A considerable cohort of students who become very close friends, whom I see on a regular basis, come and stay with us for the weekend and that is sort of great. When we had the last Salmagundi conference this past fall the 50th Anniversary conference, we had 7 former students who graduated in the past who came back for the 3 days, two of them flew in from San Francisco, that was great to me. If you ask me what are you proud of what are you gratified by...That. That is very important to me more than anything else in many ways. SB: Great! Thanks a lot Bob RB: You are welcome. By all means. � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Skidmore College Retirees Oral History A resource containing historical information obtained in interviews with persons having firsthand knowledge. Interviewer The person(s) performing the interview Sam Brown '16 Interviewee The person(s) being interviewed Robert Boyers Location The location of the interview Scribner Library, Skidmore College Original Format The type of object, such as painting, sculpture, paper, photo, and additional data Audio recording Record Contributor Individual who prepared the item and/or edited it. Susan Bender Record Creation Date Day/Month/Year of record creation/edit November 19, 2018 Duration Length of time involved (seconds, minutes, hours, days, class periods, etc.) 00:47:57 Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Interview with Robert Boyers Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource February 22, 2016 Is Part Of A related resource in which the described resource is physically or logically included. Skidmore Saratoga Memory Project Language A language of the resource English (en) Subject The topic of the resource Retiree Oral History Project Type The nature or genre of the resource Oral History Description An account of the resource Robert Boyers, came to Skidmore in 1969 as a professor of English and editor-in-chief of "Salmagundi Magazine," which has been housed at the College ever since. In this interview, Professor Boyers talks about the journal’s influence on campus and beyond, as well as his work as director of the New York State Summer Writers Institute. He also describes his engagement with student activism in the early 1970's, as well as his continuing commitment to maintaining lively intellectual debate at the College. https://www.ssmp.mdocs.skidmore.edu/files/original/2ab4c359d1ca90e8d2e4720c040fb386.jpg cf0be52b1e3a65bd549f7b980d5157df https://www.ssmp.mdocs.skidmore.edu/files/original/23a043a7a56c0cd112bb666e57dd40a7.m4a 6c08a1d3b7e9ff6e01e21bb8a7511fa9 https://www.ssmp.mdocs.skidmore.edu/files/original/cd20cf47b101fbe701fbbd003f53b012.pdf e0b3f2d6b8ad6fd966e39d4741b9c600 https://www.ssmp.mdocs.skidmore.edu/files/original/d2f206d62a9f79dcc9296fff14dc6653.pdf 7499c22945e5ab10e3325f007fe73e29 Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Skidmore College Retirees Oral History A resource containing historical information obtained in interviews with persons having firsthand knowledge. Interviewer The person(s) performing the interview Maria Mayboeck Interviewee The person(s) being interviewed Chris McGill Joseph Location The location of the interview Scribner Library, Skidmore College Original Format The type of object, such as painting, sculpture, paper, photo, and additional data Audio recording Record Contributor Individual who prepared the item and/or edited it. Susan Bender Record Creation Date Day/Month/Year of record creation/edit November 19, 2018 Duration Length of time involved (seconds, minutes, hours, days, class periods, etc.) 1:28:47 Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Interview with Chris McGill Joseph Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource February 26, 2016 Is Part Of A related resource in which the described resource is physically or logically included. Skidmore Saratoga Memory Project Language A language of the resource English (en) Subject The topic of the resource Retiree Oral History Project Type The nature or genre of the resource Oral History Description An account of the resource Chris McGill-Joseph joined the Skidmore workforce in 1987.  She has been a Skidmore wife, UWW student, Administrative Assistant, Skidmore parent, and Special Projects Manager, and she has long had a radio show on Sunday mornings on WSPN. In this interview she talks about the many transitions she witnessed - the move to the new campus, the adoption of technology, the arrival of men as part of the student body, and the opening of many new buildings.  She also touches on the mentoring she received throughout her career and reminisces about her role as manager of the Presidential Search process and administrator for the First Year Experience and the Middle States Association accreditation.   9/11/2001 Campus Move dean of faculty History Department Michael Arnush Pat Oles Peer Tutor Program Phil Glotzbach Phyllis Roth Tad Kuroda Technological Changes WSPN Radio https://www.ssmp.mdocs.skidmore.edu/files/original/28c8f03200f07bebaa6b515412e95f1c.png 41571b7b59919dc01252c33228c4efb1 https://www.ssmp.mdocs.skidmore.edu/files/original/994451d3685fb16283fcb9841f979da1.m4a 713ee2d2a215d99a2eb5cc1ce2b46c3e https://www.ssmp.mdocs.skidmore.edu/files/original/2b623f3c21cfe626fbfeed1fa6d510d1.pdf 46201f3f4630b5238e37321f9e816d56 PDF Text Text Interviewee: Charles (Chuck) Joseph Years at Skidmore: 1985 – 2010 Interviewer: Rebecca Zosia Stern Location of Interview: Lucy Scribner Library, Skidmore College, Saratoga Springs, NY, 12866 Date of Interview: 2/19/2016 00:00:00 Header 00:36:00 Born in Pennsylvania 00:02:00 First experiences in music around church 00:04:00 Began college experience at West Virginia University 00:05:14 Began interest in Stravinsky in undergrad and went to University of Illinois where interest blossomed. 00:7:00 Benefits of trading ideas on a college campus 00:7:45 Attracted to Skidmore because of Liberal studies program 00:09:16 Changes in Liberal Studies curriculum that required thinking in cross disciplinary terms 00:10:50 Skidmore atmosphere was conducive to change, a lot of women faculty 00:11:40 Infusion with new faculty helped change curriculum 00:14:7 Describes city and Skidmore relationship 00:16:10 Introduced an ethnomusicology course with Professor Gordon Thompson 00:17:24 Conception of artists in residency program 00:20:30 Started to teach course with Isabella Brown on Stravinsky and Ballanchine 00:24:40 Beginning to plan a new music center that would become Zankel 00:34:50 Trying to capture music as it evolves to study academically 00:36:00 Discussing Stravinsky research with primary sources 00:44:00 Discussing later academic interests in Broadway musicals 0048:35 Daughter went to Skidmore as a dancer and studied American Studies 00:53:00 Skidmore fosters an environment to challenge conventional wisdoms 00:57:40 Interest in American Studies, and how culture changes � https://www.ssmp.mdocs.skidmore.edu/files/original/465c16c0fcaf7c37890a59338d3f22ed.pdf f5689bf7e983406d47bd87dbc930ed3d Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Skidmore College Retirees Oral History A resource containing historical information obtained in interviews with persons having firsthand knowledge. Interviewer The person(s) performing the interview Rebecca Zosia Stern '16 Interviewee The person(s) being interviewed Charles Joseph Location The location of the interview Scribner Library, Skidmore College Original Format The type of object, such as painting, sculpture, paper, photo, and additional data Audio recording Duration Length of time involved (seconds, minutes, hours, days, class periods, etc.) 00:59:45 Record Contributor Individual who prepared the item and/or edited it. Susan Bender Record Creation Date Day/Month/Year of record creation/edit November 19, 2018 Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Interview with Charles Joseph Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource February 19, 2016 Is Part Of A related resource in which the described resource is physically or logically included. Skidmore Saratoga Memory Project Language A language of the resource English (en) Subject The topic of the resource Retiree Oral History Project Type The nature or genre of the resource Oral History Description An account of the resource Charles M. Joseph came to Skidmore in 1985 as a Professor of Music. During his years at the College, he served as Department Chair as well as Dean of the Faculty/Vice President of Academic Affairs. In this interview Joseph describes his work on expanding the music curriculum, the relationship between his Stravinsky scholarship and interdisciplinary teaching, and his vision for what was to become the Zankel Music Center. Academic Affairs Artists in Residence Board of Trustees Curriculum David Porter dean of faculty Diversity Filene to Zankel Hall (Transition) Interdisciplinary Collaboration Liberal Arts Education Liberal Studies Music Department Zankel Music Center https://www.ssmp.mdocs.skidmore.edu/files/original/87f8de9ebb94716d34433076650dde92.jpg ffd1c4ba1cbd9ca4114593ddf382f6af https://www.ssmp.mdocs.skidmore.edu/files/original/f0b1c0efb3d388c4de9c636ed2e54c9e.m4a f78a438f02a247cc4fb6584bee1317ba https://www.ssmp.mdocs.skidmore.edu/files/original/4a9565e692d4a8b317c3cde0a522caea.pdf 10e429d45578497dba7e20e1c4697239 https://www.ssmp.mdocs.skidmore.edu/files/original/ebdf33e59eeaffde26e3d22bf22801eb.pdf a531790415a4517a743fab60f3fa9d4d Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Skidmore College Retirees Oral History A resource containing historical information obtained in interviews with persons having firsthand knowledge. Interviewer The person(s) performing the interview Olivia Fidler '19 Location The location of the interview Scribner Library, Skidmore College Record Contributor Individual who prepared the item and/or edited it. Susan Bender Record Creation Date Day/Month/Year of record creation/edit November 19, 2018 Interviewee The person(s) being interviewed Joanna Zangrando Original Format The type of object, such as painting, sculpture, paper, photo, and additional data Audio Recording Duration Length of time involved (seconds, minutes, hours, days, class periods, etc.) 01:34:47 Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Interview with Joanna Zangrando Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource February 29, 2016 Is Part Of A related resource in which the described resource is physically or logically included. Skidmore Saratoga Memory Project Language A language of the resource English (en) Subject The topic of the resource Retiree Oral History Project Type The nature or genre of the resource Oral History Description An account of the resource During her years at the College (1976-2007), Joanna Zangrando was a central figure in Skidmore’s American Studies Department and a leading voice for incorporating interdisciplinarity and the study of diverse perspectives into the College curriculum. In this interview she reflects on her experiences helping to create and sustain Skidmore's signature Women’s Studies and Liberal Studies programs. Faculty Gender Equity Feminism Liberal Studies Mary Lynn Reconfiguration student body study abroad Women's Studies https://www.ssmp.mdocs.skidmore.edu/files/original/2c81d6150c4abc2d54ba6725393d5488.jpg 341414fc182104c294b98fc2c06cd788 https://www.ssmp.mdocs.skidmore.edu/files/original/324e744cc9f459d1a19f5869a0f284e0.mp3 b40da13a5e271664e633b9c4c5585e76 https://www.ssmp.mdocs.skidmore.edu/files/original/fe5abf15b192ff1dabce32b1c3576057.pdf 6e47c40bbc3b5d4124475732cc412690 https://www.ssmp.mdocs.skidmore.edu/files/original/54db189cc8ded0ca44ebe52607593fe5.pdf 04ec4900f627aeba70125dde9bc5dd57 Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Skidmore College Retirees Oral History A resource containing historical information obtained in interviews with persons having firsthand knowledge. Interviewer The person(s) performing the interview Jeremy Tenenbaum (Class of 2018) Interviewee The person(s) being interviewed Susan Zappen Location The location of the interview Scribner Library, Skidmore college Record Contributor Individual who prepared the item and/or edited it. Susan Bender Duration Length of time involved (seconds, minutes, hours, days, class periods, etc.) 55:25 Record Creation Date Day/Month/Year of record creation/edit April 23, 2021 Original Format The type of object, such as painting, sculpture, paper, photo, and additional data Audio recording Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Interview with Susan Zappen Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource February 26, 2016 Is Part Of A related resource in which the described resource is physically or logically included. Skidmore Saratoga Memory Project Language A language of the resource English (en) Subject The topic of the resource Retiree Oral History Project Type The nature or genre of the resource Oral History Description An account of the resource Susan Zappen came to Skidmore in 1995 as a head of Scribner Library technical services.  She was named Associate College Librarian for Collections in 2001. Susan was active in the greater library community; she was president of ENY/ACRL, and named “librarian of the year in 2006” by her associates. Susan, a technical director, dealt with how information was accessed and organized. Of course, the technological revolution changed the way this occurred. Susan not only accepted this change, but also leaned into it. Kathryn Frederick, Susan’s successor, describes Susan as the ultimate professional. In this interview Susan describes her work as a librarian, the library’s physical renovation and technological revolution, the communities in which she worked, and her favorite retirement activities.   Collections Diversity Intergenerational Faculty Relations retiree Scribner Library Skidmore History Tang Museum Technical Services https://www.ssmp.mdocs.skidmore.edu/files/original/da56e949f889517d4697787f6e4605f2.jpg b902573a8f67163804d0536c7a8ffb6f https://www.ssmp.mdocs.skidmore.edu/files/original/6c4f648525e3a50121486853ff505ee1.mp3 d48a7e530579e7e2f4a2a873d173eb39 https://www.ssmp.mdocs.skidmore.edu/files/original/98996c034871adb0fa707abd363b6a91.pdf b9f9aa804e731dec9390d22996127377 https://www.ssmp.mdocs.skidmore.edu/files/original/d87cc8b64e262cad9fe86eea1157a189.pdf d7e0ddb9888aabb0ce7ac144ea3e783e Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Skidmore College Retirees Oral History A resource containing historical information obtained in interviews with persons having firsthand knowledge. Interviewer The person(s) performing the interview Renato Dornelas (Class of 2018) Interviewee The person(s) being interviewed Leo Geoffrion Location The location of the interview Scribner Library, Skidmore College Original Format The type of object, such as painting, sculpture, paper, photo, and additional data Audio Recording Record Contributor Individual who prepared the item and/or edited it. Susan Bender Record Creation Date Day/Month/Year of record creation/edit November 5, 2018 Duration Length of time involved (seconds, minutes, hours, days, class periods, etc.) 1:07:45 Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Interview with Leo Geoffrion Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource February 26, 2016 Language A language of the resource English (en) Is Part Of A related resource in which the described resource is physically or logically included. Skidmore Saratoga Memory Project Subject The topic of the resource Retiree Oral History Project Type The nature or genre of the resource Oral History Description An account of the resource Leo Geoffrion joined Skidmore’s Information Technology staff in 1982 at a time when computer usage at the college was limited and its support staff quite small. Over the next 22 years Geoffrion oversaw the development of academic computing and functioned as the College’s webmaster.  In this interview, he describes the evolution of the College’s information technology infrastructure, as well as his work guiding and collaborating with faculty in the introduction of personal computing, the use of email, and computing across the curriculum. After his retirement in 2002, Geoffrion used his web skills to support the work of local community service organizations.   biology Code Blue Eric Weller Friends of Saratoga Springs Library J. Erik Jonsson Library Collaboration Media Services Technology in Education World Wide Web https://www.ssmp.mdocs.skidmore.edu/files/original/81af98f20c832a196ad8912471d813d5.jpg 0c82e7583bc83e757ae046c32bfaf460 https://www.ssmp.mdocs.skidmore.edu/files/original/d7911dc1b87852bd1d14a918cff18bfa.m4a 3db0fb9fa5047bb77a295135ab3d203b https://www.ssmp.mdocs.skidmore.edu/files/original/79156beb34bfb43c0cdf60a959d8f593.pdf 435696b74fefc6ad9747711cfda9caf4 https://www.ssmp.mdocs.skidmore.edu/files/original/54621cb0975f28658933b876e9354a38.pdf f5401926e90aac700c4d4a8b8557e5ff Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Skidmore College Retirees Oral History A resource containing historical information obtained in interviews with persons having firsthand knowledge. Interviewer The person(s) performing the interview Liv Fidler '19 Interviewee The person(s) being interviewed Susan Kress Location The location of the interview Scribner Library, Skidmore College Original Format The type of object, such as painting, sculpture, paper, photo, and additional data Audio recording Record Contributor Individual who prepared the item and/or edited it. Susan Bender Duration Length of time involved (seconds, minutes, hours, days, class periods, etc.) 00:52:24 Record Creation Date Day/Month/Year of record creation/edit November 5, 2018 Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Interview with Susan Kress Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource May 6, 2016 Language A language of the resource English (en) Is Part Of A related resource in which the described resource is physically or logically included. Skidmore Saratoga Memory Project Subject The topic of the resource Retiree Oral History Project Type The nature or genre of the resource Oral History Description An account of the resource Susan Kress joined Skidmore’s English faculty in 1975 and retired in 2013.  During her years at Skidmore she served as chair of the English Department, chair of 3 major college committees, Vice President for Academic Affairs, and Acting President during the sabbatical of President Phil Glotzbach.  She saw the institution of endowed chairs and was herself awarded the Class of 1948 Chair for Excellence in Teaching. In this interview she discusses important curricular changes instituted to increase understanding of diversity and attract more males to the student body. She also reflects on the balance between work and family life and her retirement poetry-writing initiative.  Academic Affairs College Governance Endowed Chairs Literature Women's Movement https://www.ssmp.mdocs.skidmore.edu/files/original/3081bdedc3e73020aa74452180f8db9f.jpg 8869f64df1d9fc9e987387dff877a623 https://www.ssmp.mdocs.skidmore.edu/files/original/be858e860befcec07fd69dda47ec889d.mp3 bc75d3d47960924b58771e55820e5a56 https://www.ssmp.mdocs.skidmore.edu/files/original/3bf3ab72698aa14d1b4e5b7e47ca9a2f.wav 2a005eb0f720cb9afe4cccf4f2f80015 https://www.ssmp.mdocs.skidmore.edu/files/original/2abd52655158f56eef842464f5084abd.pdf 79da71e07be34a13f33e8aeee90c5812 PDF Text Text Interviewee: Barry Goldensohn Years at Skidmore: 1981-2003 Interviewer: Lena Drinkard Location of Interview: West 55th Street, NY, NY Date of Interview: 6/16/2015 00:00:00.00 Header 00:00:33:00 Born in Flatbush Brooklyn, in an immigrant community. Attended a diverse and eclectic James Madison High School with many famous graduates. 00:01:21:00 Barry’s Sister is the famous choreographer Deborah Hay. 00:04:44.24 Went to college at Oberlin University. Met his wife Lorrie Goldensohn and many close friends. 00:7:52.00 Rob and Peggy Boyers found out that Barry could be hired at Skidmore College because Hampshire does not have tenure. 00:8:31.20 Barry takes us through a day at Skidmore as a Professor. Taught two literature classes and one workshop a week and saw students in between and after classes. Discusses senior thesis informal meetings for a potluck dinner. 00:11:17.00 “A perfect professor of poetry.” 00:15:51.15 Barry discusses the students he stays in touch with. 00:19:03.08 Discusses Skidmore’s approach to education. 00:24:57.13 Barry talks about the writing critiques and workshops he led for students. 00:27:22.15 The writing process. 00:27:26:20 “If there’s one thing I know about my friend Barry Goldensohn, it’s that he dislikes sweet food, sweet music, sweet literature” - Peg Boyers. 00:29:23.22 Rob Boyers and the liveliness of Salmagundi and other faculty members is what kept Barry at Skidmore. “Saratoga’s a one horse town and you’re the horse.” 00:32:22.17 Barry on what makes a successful marriage. 00:39:50.28 Barry ended up teaching three to four classes a semester with students who know him and one another very well. 00:45:44 “I only retired from teaching not from writing.” The way he taught took a lot of time, so he needed more time for his life. � https://www.ssmp.mdocs.skidmore.edu/files/original/65e7c7c64e3013ecb9f169b96e98fcb1.pdf 430983a94293ac4a42e5bcafda2e9139 PDF Text Text Interview with Barry Goldensohn by Lena Drinkard, Skidmore College Retiree Oral History Project, Saratoga Springs, New York, April 1, 2017. Lena Drinkard: This is Lena Drinkard, interviewing for Skidmore Retiree Memory Project. I am with Barry Goldensohn in New York City and it is April 1st, 2017. Barry, I’d like to start off my giving you a chance to introduce yourself and talk about where and when you were born. Barry Goldensohn: I was born in Brooklyn, in an area that used to be called something like Flatbush, and now is probably called something else. Went to grade school and high school in an overheated, immigrant-family community—extended community. Pretty varied, my closest friends in high school were a mixture of Italian, German, Greek and Jewish. The—My high school was just a neighborhood high school but its graduates are Ruth Bader Ginsburg, my sister who’s a very famous choreographer Deborah Hay, and Chuck Schumer, Norm Coleman (used to be governor of Michigan or Minnesota, something like that), five nobel prize winners—Ruth Bader Ginsburg did I mention her? And… full of second and first generation immigrant families where there was a lot of pressure to succeed on the part of the kids. My family came from, my mother’s family came from Odessa, and my grandfather was an officer in the (...) army. They left Odessa after the great purge, the great pregome, that drove all the jews out of Odessa in 1905, after the potential episode. And, it was a family that followed the pattern of Odesza families. There was one gifted child in the family, that was my mother, so the family all sacrificed and sacrificed so she could have her ballet lessons. She studied with a student of Magnitsky who would drive up to the mental hospital that Magnitsky was at at the Hudson and bring him down to teach classes. Which was spectacularly for my mother because he really took a shrine to her, regarded her as very special, sent her off to work at an LA company in New York. Then, she got rheumatic fever, which damaged her heart so she taught ballet for the rest of her life. But my sister had no choice. Choice of a career. Nor did my daughter. My mother started on my daughter right away, working on her flexibility. As an infant, Mind you. [Laughs] But my sister stayed with it my daughter didn’t. I got brought on and put into ballet classes when I was a kid because it was cheaper than getting a babysitter. It took for my sister but it didn’t take for me. I left at thirteen. Being dragged to the studio, I had no ability whatsoever. But again, this was James Madison high school. And then in my junior year I took a national test where the Ford foundation early admission scholarship and I wound up at Oberlin. I wanted to go to Columbia but they had no dorm room’s for students for the first couple of years and it would have been three hours a day commuting from Brooklyn. And Yale had pulled out of it at that point. And I was forbidden to to go University of Chicago by a father of one of my close friends who persuaded my parents that the school had been ruined by John Maynard Hutchins. Remember him? He turned it into a very progressive, wonderful school, but I wound up at Oberlin in the process of elimination. Met my wife and got married there and met my closest, my oldest friends. �LD: Did you start studying poetry at Oberlin? BG: In High School. And had a very good, wonderful teacher. Very inspiring and sophisticated. LD: So how did you end up at Skidmore? BG: I was the Dean of Humanities and Arts at Hampshire College before I was at Skidmore and decided that I was writing too little and was persuaded by a psychiatrist friend, that if I wanted more time at writing I should quit my dean’s job which was too engrossing. So I applied to Skidmore and got a job almost by accident as it turned out. The committee chose me but then it went up to the dean and the president and they said oh we can’t accept him, he’s a dean and he’s probably got tenure and we can’t hire people with tenure. Bob Boyers was giving some lectures at Northwestern University and was sitting on a poetry segment and of all things, the teacher was teaching a bunch of my poems. So Bob walked into the faculty lounge with that teacher, and said to him as he entered the room, oh we tried to hire him but we couldn’t because he’s got tenure at Hampshire. And a voice in the back of the room said, “they don’t have tenure at Hampshire.” So Bob called up Peggy, asked her to confirm that, and if that was in fact the case, tell the dean and tell the committee and I wound up getting invited for an interview [Laughs] That’s enough background. LD: Can you take me through a day at Skidmore as a Professor? BG: Well, a day, interesting. Just teaching literally two literature classes and one workshop a week So, and then seeing students in between and after classes. And I wound up often teaching three or four classes a semester because I had a bunch of students who wanted to do their senior thesis in writing poetry, poetry writing. So they met as an informal group but as a class. And we’d meet in the meaning so there wouldn’t be schedule conflicts with their other classes. Often over a potluck dinner. Then it would go on sometimes into the wee hours at either my house or one of their apartments. So it was kind of a senior seminar, right? Every semester I taught a course I loved which was The Introduction to Poetry. I taught it sort of half as a history of English poetry class and half as a course of methods and different types of methods, different historical periods. Starting with Chaucer and winding up with contemporary poets, spending a lot of time with seventeenth century and nineteenth century. I mixed up along the way. And then I taught seventeenth century poetry. My first lecture in that class was Shakespeare’s greatest plays. Al of the work of John Milton was written in the seventeenth century. Some of the greatest poets in language and we’re not going to look at them at all [Laughs] You’ll have to get them in other courses and I focused on the lyrical poems of the seventeenth century. And then writing workshops, and other intro fiction classes. �LD: When I spoke to Professor Goodwin she described you as the “perfect professor of poetry.” BG: What could she have meant by that? LD: I’d like to know what you think! BG: Well, I was actively involved in making it, and reading it, and teaching it as well. So I brought together a pretty full background in the literature and of course the poets concerned with making poems and how poems are made. Looking at the students, how poems are made, how these particular poems are made. LD: Can you talk about your relationship with the students? BG: As my wife puts it describing her students at Vassar, “Oh you fall in love with a few students every year” and I think that’s pretty true. And I like students and in general, I liked teaching them. I liked expanding their minds, and expanding their knowledge. And I was trying to teach them to love what I love, and maybe that’s what Susan was talking about. Also, teaching writing courses at Skidmore, generally I worked with students for 3-4 years and they got to be my friends. You know, ordinary lit teachers don’t have that experience, working semester after semester with the same students. You know you’ll take one course with Professor Boyers maybe the intro to fiction course and another fiction course but that’s about it. Or a victorian lit course, you’d take a three courses in the course of four years. Anyway, my students worked with me semester after semester after semester. Because you could repeat workshops and so, it was the especially nice part of the kind of teaching I’ve done over the years, that you got to know the students very well. LD: Can you think of one student in particular that you had that had an impact on you during your time at Skidmore? BG: That had an impact on me yeah. Well, Mark Woodward, who stayed around working at Salmagundi. Mark did a lot of work with both Bob and me, and has stayed writing and writing. But in this neighborhood there are a couple of students who, anyone you really know and care about has an impact on you. And I went to a reading earlier, or last weekend, by one of my Skidmore students who lives in Austin now but, showed me a draft of her book, she said, it doesn’t have the dedications in the book so I’ll have to send you a regular copy!. Jardeen Lebair, is a wonderful writer, only student I remember who won both our jury poetry and fiction prize in the same year. Remarkably talented student. But there are a lot of students I stay in touch with. �One of my former students, Laura Marshall lives a few blocks up on the west side. Bruce Baker, who’s a very very gifted student, star of the hockey team and he’s now coaching… he’s deeply involved in the city since he’s graduated with minority education, education of the deprived. So he coaches for different hockey teams ad well as teaching. He started off on the ground floor for Teach of America. He was the recruiter for Teach of America and then he said, “Why am I recruiting people to do something that I should do myself?” So he wound up teaching in the city schools, but one because he was male and because he was white, and because he is movie-star handsome, he became a very popular teacher. So popular, that he decided to have a semi-pro hockey career while he was teaching, so they’d keep him on a semester a year while the other semester he’d be playing hockey. He explained to me how, he lives on this block, so we see him, and of course in his hockey career he’s broken every bone—small—bone in his body. He’s also a coach for Columbia's informal hockey team, it’s not a varsity sport. But I don’t know there’s been a lot of students over the course of the years I’ve come to love and stayed very close too and it’s a significant part of our social life, my relationship with former former students, not only from here but from Hampshire and Goddard. Now, Goddard in the mid-sixties when I got there was a magnet school for the daring and the adventurous student. That resident undergraduate program no longer exists. But my students there were spectacularly good. A lot of them are pulitzer prize winners and guggenheim winners and you know major award winners. One of you I’m sure you know of, the playwright David Mamet, and I’ve had two students while we’ve been here in New York. Naomi Wallace who was a Hampshire student and Mammoth. LD: How would you describe Skidmore at the time that you taught, if you describe Goddard as the school for the, can you fill in the blank for Skidmore? BG: Skidmore had a much more traditional approach to education, like the schools I went to, like Oberlin than Hampshire or Goddard. My Hampshire students—I don’t want to slight them either, two of my senior thesis students went on to win Macarthur Genius awards. Naomi Wallace was one of them and Peter Cole who has been teaching one semester at Yale and the other semester living in Jerusalem and running a press for Israeli and Palestinian poets, crossing a lot of boundaries. But Goddard was more a traditional education in a way for someone who has devoted his life to advanced, progressive schools. Like the progressive high school we started early in the sixties, in the Bay Area with a bunch of quaker friends. That was at the very beginning of a whole rash of progressive high schools that were starting to emerge and people would come, we’d often have more visitors than students. LD: What year was this? �BG: That was ‘62-’65 and I graduated with the first graduating class I wanted to go back to college teaching. But my first graduating class of students went to Reed, Stanford, Santa-Cruz. They were on the board of the student-faculty administration group that was defining Santa-Cruz which is interesting. And other schools within the california system. Interesting group of students. That school, after the people that started it passed it on to other faculty members, it got sort of swept up as a southern most adjunct of the haight-ashbury counter-cultures and it was destroyed basically by that it became a fairly destructive place and only lasted a few years. But it was good for the students who went there. One of the student went to Oxford with a grant and got first in PPE, Politics, Philosophy and Economics, that’s degree you get if you want to be prime-minister. Almost all of the proceeding prime-ministers and most of the subsequent prime-ministers had that degree first. LD: It seems like you really knew and understood each student you had— BG: Oh, I would never say that [laughs] LD: Do you think the types of students changed at Skidmore from when you first got there to when you retired? BG: I’m not sure. I taught for about twenty-two years. There seemed to be always, a leavening of very committed and very serious students. I taught fairly esoteric courses. Seventeenth century poetry, poetry writing, and the Intro to Poetry course, that was the longest draw class of the largest cross-section of students. But by and large, the students who went on to work with me, were a largely self-selected group, so I find it hard to generalize about the general run of students. And I heard one of my students saying to someone else, “Oh I would never dare offer Shitty work to Professor Goldensohn.” With a self-selected crew that knew I expected a lot from them, they worked hard. So, I don’t know if that’s the whole student body it’s hard to generalize but they were always enough of those to keep my classes full. LD: Is it challenging to grade someone else's creative writing? BG: Oh, I hardly think of grades. The really challenging part is discussing them. And how you talk it over in the group, in the workshop and individually. What to say, often the harsh things to say, that will help them see the problems that they are running into. [Laughs] Another overheard conversation. I was talking to one of my students in my office and three of my students were right outside my office, having a raucous so I couldn’t help overhearing, conversation about “You know what he said to me?” “ You know what he said to me?” You know, like throw this away or that’s terrible! Or start over again! But if you’re going to teach writing seriously, you have to be candid about what they’re doing. And it’s hard, you try to be rigorous but teaching �poetry writing, which is the main thing at Skidmore has these contradictory elements. You want rigorous attention to what you’re doing, but you don’t want to lose as in any art, the sense of play in getting there. Because a lot of the most creative work comes with playing with it. Play with it play with i! I told my students. You have to catch your mind at its most expansive and least predictable moments. Often this is helped by just lying down. You know, your mind often releases itself more creatively, at the moment before you fall asleep or at the moment you’re waking up. Or when you’re just lying down. I remember one of my students saying “Oh he thinks we do our best work on our backs!” [Laughs] But it’s being open to the mind at play and not working in predictable grooves. And then showing it to people that will tell you the truth about what you’re experiencing. LD: How do you experience criticisms? BG: Well, Peggy Boyers. Just last week, I showed her a draft of a poem. And she said, “Barry, it’s too sweet!” [Laughs] And I said Peggy, you’re the person I remember saying,” If there's one thing I know about my friend Barry Goldensohn, It’s that he dislikes sweet food, sweet music, sweet literature. I think she’s right. And as a matter of fact, I had written the word “sweet” a number of times and swept them out. She was right, I was giving into the sentimental side of myself. It had to do with being eighty and losing a lot of your friends. You know? And that comes with being eighty. It’s in some ways an apologetic… and how do you keep going when people are dying? People you love are dying? So I took some sweetness out. It didn’t belong in that poem. LD: So it sounds like your identity as a writer… well everyone’s identity as a writer changes throughout their lives, in what specific experiences they are going through, but when you were at Skidmore as a professor, how did you divide your time between teaching and writing? And because you were surrounded by Peggy Boyers, and Rob Boyers and all these faculty members that were passionate about poetry did that inspire you? BG: It’s what kept me at Skidmore. It was Bob and the liveliness of the Salmagundi world he created. I used to tease him by saying, Saratoga’s a one horse town and you’re the horse. [Laughs] But Salmagundi brought conferences together every year, it brought fascinating people every year, so I got to know and be friends with Susan Sontag (who I had actually known earlier from my New York City Days) and George Steiner, and all sorts of fascinating people, intelligent people. I got an offer for both Lorrie and I to teach at University of Florida, just move down there from Iowa, (oh I left out that I taught at the Iowa Writers Workshop for a couple of years) and it enabled Lorrie to get a free PHD because she was a faculty wife. LD: And at the time you were at Skidmore she was at Vassar. �BG: Well we lived in Saratoga, and I would drop her off Tuesday morning on this train and pick her up Thursday night. And she would teach all day Tuesday, all day Wednesday, all day Thursday. As the president of Hampshire said to me, when she found out, “Oh my god that sounds like the kind of relationship where your marriage is going to last forever.” Because there’s just enough space between you. And it happens, we have our sixty-first anniversary coming up, LD: What’s the secret to a long—? BG: Hanging in there. LD: Can you elaborate? BG: Becoming one another’s best friend. My wife says, “learning to understand the things that are difficult about the person you’re with,” which is profounder than “hanging in there.” LD: And she writes poems as well… BG: Yes, she’s my first reader always. LD: What were some of the things you guys did in Saratoga at the time? Because as you said, it’s a one horse… BG: Hanging out with Bob and Peg and the other writers. One of my former students from Goddard, Catherine Davis, I recruited her for teaching poetry at Skidmore and we hung out a lot. And, she called me up and told me I was offered a job at University of Washington for half the work and twice the pay, what should I do? And I said, if I ever heard of a no brainer in my life.. LD: Was there anything about Skidmore that you disliked during your time there? Or what was challenging? BG: Well, it’s hard to say. I’m not a good hater. Let me tell you one of the things I liked a lot. The English Department was very congenial, there was not a divided part department. As a Dean at Hampshire, none of my senior faculty were on speaking terms with one another. That happens in schools and departments. I was the Dean of Humanities and Arts. I mean that’s ridiculous!. Lorrie’s Vassar department was which she called a “dysfunctional family.” We saw one of her colleagues recently and I said, “Oh how is so and so?” and she says, “Urg.. She’s still teaching…” [Laughs] “I mean this is a woman in her late seventies I’m speaking to, still carrying �over the animosity from her teaching years, and it deeply divided… that’s never been the case in my years at Skidmore. The only experience I had like that was when I was at Iowa. The Writing Workshop was loosely related to the English Department. And the English Department had a wonderful guy.. was what the rest of the school called “happy valley” because he was just great at human relationships. He then moved to take over the English Department at Suny Albany, I think his name was John Gerber, and when i took over the Hampshire job, I brought him down to Albany and asked him how did you do it? How did you create such a peaceful environment and unified community? And he said, it wasn’t me, it was the years. It was in the sixties and seventies when everything was expanding and I never had to get rid of anyone for budgetary reasons and all I could do was hire people, and set things up. It was the time, but that underlies his genuine openness to people that made that experience at Iowa so wonderful. What he had to do at Albay was very difficult which was cut down the undergraduate programs because Albany had no right offering a doctorate. LD: What do you think made the English department at Skidmore such a unit at that time? BG: I don’t know, I asked Bob Boyers at the time if it was always like that and he said during the Vietnam war, political divides really split up the department but then they got back together or at least by the time I got there it seemed like a congenial group of people. LD: And then did you watch, sort of, new faculty members come in throughout the years and it shifter? BG: Yeah. One of them, Susannah MIntz, who is chair is getting married so I offered her (.....) LD: And those sort of soirees you mentioned, where you would sit with students and have a seminar at houses? Did that happen the entire time because— BG: Yes, pretty much. After a year, the pattern became that I would have a bunch of students. Say six- ten independent students wanting to work on poetry as their senior projects and I realized I would be dead meeting with them every week as a service session and that they had a lot to learn from one another, so they would sign up for an independent study but we met as a group. The faculty thought I was crazy for teaching three, four classes. But that was fun. It was students who knew me well, and one another well, which means they could speak very cANDIDLY TO one another. I remember students saying once in class about a poem, “that’s the stupidest poem I’ve ever read in my life!” In a thick New York accent and the student who wrote it said, “Oh you know… I wrote it on my way to class and I really shouldn’t have offered it. [Laughs] And You know, students could hear one another say things like that, and they didn’t have to be mandy-pandy with one another. You try to create in your class a series with a respect �one another, as people who are trying to learn to do something very difficult, to write a poem. They had to be able to speak to one another and say I think you should change this. And then those exchanges would be very illuminating. LD: I’ve wondered if we’ve sort of lost something over the years because the relationship you describe with your students, *Lorrie walks in * it feels like there are more boundaries implemented at Skidmore between the Professor’s and the students and each other. It feels like there are more unspoken rules about you know, a maybe more professional relationship established today? BG: Well, I thought my relationship with my students was very professional ​about​ writing poetry. Uh, a greater, are you talking about a greater area of things you can’t talk about? LD: Mhm, yeah. BG: You know, I’ve thought about that a lot. [Lorrie talks to Barry] BG: No one taking a course in seventeenth century who has been sexually traumatized should take a course in Shakespeare’s tragedies or comedies for that matter, or seventeenth century poetry which is often playful and its respect for women was less accompanied with attitudes about male and female roles. Very unusual. One of my favorite eighteenth century poets, was about one of the great boundary breaking woman who was irreverent and a giant figure in her age, her name was Aphra Bayne. I would blush now to recite her most famous poem. You know it’s really hard to say. The pre-selection process that I was talking about I think would have… and also the atmosphere, the free give and take served as a kind of barrier for people whose vulnerabilities would now allow them to do that. Because they were open. It was an open secret, so to speak. Very much self-selected. Just as it is an open secret that terrible things happen in Hamlet and Othello and Macbeth. You can’t taming of the shrew for the instance, is a brilliant comic fantasia on sex roles or gender roles. And the women keep their power. The shrew says you “marry me you marry my tongue.” LD: Okay, well we’re reaching the end of the interview. I’m wondering if there's anything we didn’t get to that you’d like to talk about or share. Maybe a story or some piece of information that you’d like to end with. BG: No, I’d just like to say I really liked teaching at Skidmore. But I put a lot of work into dealing with student papers and was eager to retire at sixty-five to have more time of my own for my own writing. I’ve written three books since then. Lorrie’s written three ever since she’s �retired. We’re… as much as I like teaching, I only retired from teaching ​not ​from writing. Because the way I taught took a lot of time, and I wanted more time for myself. LD: That’s a great place to end .Thank you so much for taking the time to talk to me today. I really appreciate it! BG: I enjoyed it! � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Skidmore College Retirees Oral History A resource containing historical information obtained in interviews with persons having firsthand knowledge. Interviewer The person(s) performing the interview Lena Drinkard Interviewee The person(s) being interviewed Barry Goldensohn Location The location of the interview New York City Record Contributor Individual who prepared the item and/or edited it. Lena Drinkard Record Creation Date Day/Month/Year of record creation/edit 4/26/17 Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Interview With Barry Goldensohn Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource April 1, 2017 Is Part Of A related resource in which the described resource is physically or logically included. Skidmore Retiree Memory Project Language A language of the resource eng Bibliographic Citation A bibliographic reference for the resource. Recommended practice is to include sufficient bibliographic detail to identify the resource as unambiguously as possible. "Interview with Barry Goldensohn," Skidmore Saratoga Memory Project, accessed April 26, 2017, http://ssmp.skidmore.edu/admin/items/show/620 Description An account of the resource Barry Goldensohn came to Skidmore in 1981 as professor for poetry in the English department. In this interview, he discusses everything from the diverse Brooklyn community in which he was raised, to his experiences teaching and writing alongside his wife, Lorrie Goldensohn. He also describes his close relationship with his students—many of which went on to find immense success as writers. Despite his love for teaching, Barry left Skidmore so that he could devote all of his time to his true passion—writing. Academic Rigor Campus Culture Curriculum English Department Faculty and Administrative Relations Faculty and Student Relations Salmagundi https://www.ssmp.mdocs.skidmore.edu/files/original/d928fd68586b0ecef14421ab921c9cb9.jpg d8e547a74527a32487160313c72776d2 https://www.ssmp.mdocs.skidmore.edu/files/original/014354824acba652bc94fe3b6c36f939.mp3 daae92dd6dac24b9fb947651281ec98a https://www.ssmp.mdocs.skidmore.edu/files/original/3ea5d8ce2e62cb2c85ca13bc6e9aa1d2.pdf 996d9dd58a2cf6c219693fc421664e8d https://www.ssmp.mdocs.skidmore.edu/files/original/b779d7b5cc662d2605a58e6ed8e0a6dd.pdf c2f1780e7b6ff38e96f80c4016c574a1 Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Skidmore College Retirees Oral History A resource containing historical information obtained in interviews with persons having firsthand knowledge. Interviewer The person(s) performing the interview Emily Meagher (Class of 2016) Interviewee The person(s) being interviewed Bill Fox Location The location of the interview Skidmore College Original Format The type of object, such as painting, sculpture, paper, photo, and additional data Audio Recording Duration Length of time involved (seconds, minutes, hours, days, class periods, etc.) 1:11:49 Record Contributor Individual who prepared the item and/or edited it. Susan Bender Record Creation Date Day/Month/Year of record creation/edit 02/10/21 Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Interview with Bill Fox Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource May 12, 2016 Is Part Of A related resource in which the described resource is physically or logically included. Skidmore Saratoga Memory Project Language A language of the resource English (en) Subject The topic of the resource Retiree Oral History Project Type The nature or genre of the resource Oral History Abstract A summary of the resource. Interview with Bill Fox by Emily Meagher, Skidmore College Retiree Oral History Project, Saratoga Springs, New York, May 12, 2016. Date Submitted Date of submission of the resource. Examples of resources to which a Date Submitted may be relevant are a thesis (submitted to a university department) or an article (submitted to a journal). November 23, 2020 Description An account of the resource Bill Fox was a member of Skidmore’s sociology faculty from 1976 to 2011. During his 35 years of service to the College, he was a valued teacher in his discipline and much appreciated mentor to many junior colleagues. He chaired the Sociology, Anthropology and Social Work Department for multiple terms and served on numerous all-college committees. In this interview he reflects on educational quality at Skidmore; early IT support of quantitative teaching; student-faculty interactions; chairing a joint department; and changes in community life, the physical campus, the student body, academic administration, and the all-college curriculum during his tenure. He ends by musing on the personal impact of a professional life spent at Skidmore. 4-1-4 Academic Calendar David Porter Diversity Eric Weller Fran Hoffman Interdisciplinary Collaboration J. Erik Jonsson Liberal Arts Education Library Renovation Phyllis Roth Skidmore Social Life https://www.ssmp.mdocs.skidmore.edu/files/original/07655b20fcd8e0cdacb3d4ad6a1ad2d9.JPG e061271ff7375443e901dd14b6cb31f5 https://www.ssmp.mdocs.skidmore.edu/files/original/ef026eb3231c034cb45cc1e9dbe4d608.mp3 ef0736880c35915fc757c8a9e3cc8cd3 https://www.ssmp.mdocs.skidmore.edu/files/original/e26fbe2964fb4be5bfeea4a9ebc17b82.pdf 6b03b55565690103c7a475dac1336c38 https://www.ssmp.mdocs.skidmore.edu/files/original/0557869fec770b39545b9417a7312ef5.pdf 2de12e81e5d8009e6c795e0aef8ec58b Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Skidmore College Retirees Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Interview with Isabelle Williams Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource April 3, 2017 Is Part Of A related resource in which the described resource is physically or logically included. Skidmore Saratoga Memory Project Description An account of the resource Isabelle Williams arrived at Skidmore in 1972 and contributed to every corner of the campus over the next twenty-one years. Educator, pianist, administrator. Dr. Williams consistently demonstrated her deep dedication to the life of the mind and the beauty of artistic expression. In this interview, she describes the transformation of the Music Department’s curriculum, the Ladd family’s support of music programming, and her contributions to the initiation of Skidmore’s “new” Liberal Studies curriculum in 1982. Along the way, she provides the listener with a lively sense of campus culture during the years of her tenure. Language A language of the resource English (en) Subject The topic of the resource Retiree Oral History Project Type The nature or genre of the resource Oral History Abstract A summary of the resource. Interview with Isabelle Williams by Susan Kress, Skidmore College Retiree Oral History Project, Saratoga Springs, New York, April 3, 2017. Date Created Date of creation of the resource. November 23, 2020 Campus Culture Filene Foundation International Students Liberal Studies Music Department Palamountain UWW https://www.ssmp.mdocs.skidmore.edu/files/original/4dce70b6d97dff7b5ff8fad59a69f0e8.jpg f5db0150df1738d7a6fd39881c6601f6 https://www.ssmp.mdocs.skidmore.edu/files/original/d750011810159bbca86bef97faed1820.mp3 945f7a959ea00f160e50778476244d5e https://www.ssmp.mdocs.skidmore.edu/files/original/62e9d0eb7d2e95f4232997a92f857029.pdf e6d26e99a8c113ee0e70c691c1885304 https://www.ssmp.mdocs.skidmore.edu/files/original/825f3e8f368418c84cc5a9f5c2f13892.pdf fda8701158f0b8726dc948502417985f Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Skidmore College Retirees Oral History A resource containing historical information obtained in interviews with persons having firsthand knowledge. Interviewer The person(s) performing the interview Andrea Wise Interviewee The person(s) being interviewed Louise B. Wise Location The location of the interview Newtonville, NY Original Format The type of object, such as painting, sculpture, paper, photo, and additional data Audio recording Duration Length of time involved (seconds, minutes, hours, days, class periods, etc.) 1:07:45 Record Contributor Individual who prepared the item and/or edited it. Susan Bender Record Creation Date Day/Month/Year of record creation/edit 04/22/21 Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Interview with Louise B. Wise Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource April 19, 2017 Is Part Of A related resource in which the described resource is physically or logically included. Skidmore Saratoga Memory Project Language A language of the resource English (en) Subject The topic of the resource Retiree Oral History Project Type The nature or genre of the resource Oral History Description An account of the resource Louise Beinetti Wise, a 1940 Skidmore graduate, served as president of the then-College Government Association while a student and was active in the Alumni Association after earning a degree in theater. She joined the Admissions staff in 1970, serving six years as director and overseeing an era of growth in applications that continues to this day. After retiring in 1983, Louise maintained her involvement with Skidmore, serving on presidential search committee that brought David Porter to Skidmore in 1987. Named one of Skidmore’s 50 outstanding alumni in 1972, Louise also received an honorary doctoral degree at the College’s 1984 Commencement and an Outstanding Service Award at the 1985 Reunion. In 1983, the Louise Beinetti Wise ’40 Scholarship was created in honor of her talent, dedication and accomplishments. You can hear her describe the arc of her career in this interview.   admissions Campus Move coeducation Honorary Doctorate Joseph Palamountain Nursing Program Outstanding Alumnae Award Outstanding Service Award https://www.ssmp.mdocs.skidmore.edu/files/original/2fc65db6f09995b7e401962caf455231.jpg 942f2249f1ac32a67ccc48ed5a4b47e6 https://www.ssmp.mdocs.skidmore.edu/files/original/c6d8db16dc111fefa7a74af6a57edcda.mp3 91505c425b7d86a6be44e135b5c7c42c https://www.ssmp.mdocs.skidmore.edu/files/original/dc4db9c6cc4891c471750e87eb93b49a.pdf bed38bf251b7bbac51de2a7611fbf101 https://www.ssmp.mdocs.skidmore.edu/files/original/883ad33313493dbf665ea5a125091e32.pdf a47de97bc4d88f257fcab875ce68f660 Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Skidmore College Retirees Oral History A resource containing historical information obtained in interviews with persons having firsthand knowledge. Interviewer The person(s) performing the interview Andrea Wise Interviewee The person(s) being interviewed Robert (Bob) Mahoney Location The location of the interview East Dennis, MA Original Format The type of object, such as painting, sculpture, paper, photo, and additional data Audio Recording Duration Length of time involved (seconds, minutes, hours, days, class periods, etc.) 01:08:46 Record Contributor Individual who prepared the item and/or edited it. Susan Bender Record Creation Date Day/Month/Year of record creation/edit August 17, 2021 Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Interview with Robert (Bob) Mahoney Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource May 6, 2019 Is Part Of A related resource in which the described resource is physically or logically included. Skidmore Saratoga Memory Project Description An account of the resource Robert P. Mahoney was a professor of biology at Skidmore from 1964 to 1994, with interests centering on microbiology, electron microscopy, and bioethics. He also was instrumental starting Skidmore’s tradition of support for the Red Cross, launching the campus blood donation drives in 1968. In this interview, he talks about how he helped Skidmore secure its first electron microscope and how the Biology Department grew over the years, responding to curricular changes and student interests. The department named its microscopy lab in his honor when he retired, and in 2019 he was recognized as a Red Cross Blood Hero of the Cape, Islands, and Southeast Massachusetts for personally donating 264 pints of blood thus far. Language A language of the resource English (en) Subject The topic of the resource Retiree Oral History Project Type The nature or genre of the resource Oral History Bioethics Campus Move Curriculum Faculty Gender Equity J-Semester Josephine Case Liberal Studies Palamountain Student Research https://www.ssmp.mdocs.skidmore.edu/files/original/8a490139188c429472c9bba294a7014d.jpg 786316ef1a9cf19bf83ffc97f9c4cda3 https://www.ssmp.mdocs.skidmore.edu/files/original/8c7bc545d98c897b337600b4a526be16.mp3 42376f4afe241f0b71f16cfe4e5715c7 https://www.ssmp.mdocs.skidmore.edu/files/original/cf49a5b921a0323510c5f73baf6ac47f.pdf 9291c6e701d0865e6b92d295962ccb53 PDF Text Text Interviewee: Dave Marcell Years at Skidmore: 1964-1992; 2001-2008 Interviewer: Lynne Gelber Location of Interview: Lucy Scribner Library, Skidmore College Date of Interview: January 15, 2019 00:00:00 - Introduction by Gelber 00:00:30 - Where Marcell grew up, history of his education. 00:00:45 - Story of how Marcell heard about the job at Skidmore College 00:02:55 - The American Studies program at Skidmore during the ‘60s 00:04:20 - The death of Val Wilson and Marcell accepting the job offer at Skidmore 00:06:00 - Further description of the American Studies Department and Marcell’s responsibilities as the head of the department 00:07:24 - The classes Marcell taught during the beginning of his career 00:09:00 - Growth of the program and becoming a department 00:10:08 - Friction between the American Studies department and other departments 00:10:55 - Course registration of Fall ‘64 00:13:00 - Marcell’s biggest challenges during his career 00:15:20 - The hiring of new professors in the American Studies Department 00:16:00 - How Marcell became the Provost and why the job was open in the first place 00:20:00 - Comparison of Skidmore to other colleges at which Marcell worked 00:21:30 - Challenges of being the Provost at Skidmore College- becoming a co-ed college 00:24:40 - The orange juice riots 00:26:00 - Development of new landscaping and buildings on campus 00:28:20 - Aggregate cost of all capital investment at Skidmore 00:28:47 - How Skidmore came to build the new campus 00:30:28 - Funding new buildings on campus 00:33:15 - Expanding the applicant pool beyond just women 00:35:00 - Mishap writing letters to parents of prospective students 00:37:30 - Describing the collegial culture of Skidmore 00:39:55 - The tightness of the budget during the ‘60s and ‘70s 00:42:40 - Number of females on the faculty 00:44:30 - Rejection of a union for the faculty 00:45:50 - Marcell describes the nursing program 00:47:30 - Downfall of the nursing program 00:52:00 - Beginning the Phi Betta Kappa Chapter at Skidmore 00:54:20 - Discussing how special Skidmore was as an employer in Marcell’s experience 00:57:00 - Having to fire someone for the first time 00:58:00 - Discussing positive relationships with colleagues 00:59:03 - Closing remarks � https://www.ssmp.mdocs.skidmore.edu/files/original/e208c12ea8a061083426217f919e4a10.pdf 693c01817a67d8f5be220afe5db7c36d PDF Text Text Interview with Dave Marcell by Lynne Gelber, Skidmore College Retiree Oral History Project, Saratoga Springs, New York, January 15, 2019. LYNNE GELBER: This is Lynne Gelber and I'm here with Dave Marcell. It's January15th, 2019. So Dave, let's start by telling us where you grew up grew up. DAVE MARCELL: I grew up in central Florida in the 40s and 50s, my parents retired after World War II. I went to public school in Deland, Florida, and then attended the university that was in the townStetson University. One of my professors at Stetson was an American studies PhD from Yale. He was my mentor and ideal, and thanks to his influence I went on the Yale. Did a doctorate in American Studies from '58 to '64. The last year I was at Yale, I was teaching in the history department and finishing my dissertation and I got a phone call from the secretary in the American Studies department. She said, "Would you please come over here. There's a man here who wants to interview you." I said, "What's that for?" She said, “For a job!" I said, "Well, I've got a job." She said "Well, I don’t know what to do with them. Would you please come over here? He's very nice." And I said, "Well, I've got pick my dissertation up from the bindery and drop it off. I'll be over there in an hour." And I went over, and it was Edwin Mosley. LG: And Edwin's position at the time was? DM: Edwin Mosley's position was Dean of the Faculty at Skidmore College. We had a nice chat. LG: Do you know how he had heard of you? DM: He was, he just happened to swing by. He was visiting doctoral programs in American Studies, and I don't know where he had been before. His degree was from Syracuse, which had a doctoral program. But, anyway, we had a nice chat. I remember saying that I had a job I was going to continue on as an instructor for the following year, but he described Skidmore and the position and I liked him and I said, "Sure I'll come up." And so, I came up with their American Studies department. �LG: Now, was there an American Studies department? DM: No, there was an American Studies program and it had been up and running for three or four years and the person who was coordinating, directing it, was leaving. He had gotten tenure, but he was leaving and he'd accepted a position at Long Island University. So, I came up and they had a long schedule of two days of meetings and it started off with 1/2 an hour with the president of the college, with Val Wilson, and I think this was a Thursday afternoon. I spent 1/2 an hour, 45 minutes with him- lovely, lovely man- and it was just a wonderful conversation and I thought, "My gosh, if the leadership of the college is reflected by this man, he would be a wonderful person to know." And then the Dean turned me over to a faculty member named Irwin Levine. He put Irwin on my case he did. He didn't want the fellow who was leaving to introduce me to the students because there'd been some complexity about his departure and his relationship with the other students. So anyway, Irwin took me by the hand, the arm and squired me around and we were instantly friends. And the rest sort of his history. LG: Except that Val WIlson... DM: I went back to New Haven, picked up the New York Times on Sunday, and there was Val Wilson's obituary. He had died either that afternoon or the next afternoon. He was out playing tennis with a student. He had a heart condition, and he knew that he had this condition, but it was still a very sudden and terrible thing. So Edwin Mosley called up and said, well, our decision will be delayed but anyway, the visit was just terrific. I loved Saratoga and, anyway, they made me an offer and I accepted it. The date of this, I remember because I came up here on the 15th of April and... the year? Oh, God. 1964. Yeah, I remember driving up the Northway thinking, "Gosh, I wonder if I'll be coming this way again." And so, anyway, they made the offer and I accepted it and it was, it was an unusual organizational structure because the American Studies program-and I think was the only interdisciplinary program that had a major- there was an Asian studies program, but I don't even think it had a minor at that time. Anyway, what the director of American Studies did was offer core thematic courses in American culture and then the student major would flesh out this core of courses with courses with courses �in the discrete departments in the American subject areas. And as it happened in those days, the American assistants in history, government, or philosophy were all just really super people so the aggregate of the program, depending on how the students organized their courses, was really terrific. LG: So your title was what? DM: Director of the American studies program. I was... LG: And your responsibility was... DM: I coordinated all the courses, I supervised all the majors, and the majors were only juniors and seniors, but there were about 20. I would guess something like that. I taught- in those days the full load was six courses. I got one course relief from doing all of that other stuff and then I had to fabricate from whole cloth, five new courses, and coordinate with the students supervise the senior theses, which was part of the requirement in those days... LG: So what courses did you teach? When you started? DM: I had a two-semester sequence called the history of American civilization, which was a freshman and sophomore lecture coursetwo lectures in one discussion group a week. And then I had seminars in different subject areas. I had one called American Documents that took traditional all major readings in the subject area. And then I had an interest in American intellectual history. I had, I wrote a dissertation on the idea of progress and its place in the pragmatic tradition, James Dewey and Beard, so I taught a course in American Intellectual history. Gosh, I can even remember- a senior seminar in how to use interdisciplinary sources to flesh out and put into context certain events and episodes in American history and so forth. LG: How many students were in there at the time? DM: In the seminars there would be anywhere from 10 to 15. In the large freshman course, there were 50 or 60 and it was it was a full load. I don't remember a lot of it because it went by so fast. We had a new �baby. LG: So you had 50-60 people in one section? DM: Yeah. Large lecture, two lectures a week, and I broke it down into three or four discussion sections. And then the program grew, and in about, by about '67 we really needed another faculty member and were authorized to do that. I hired a guy from the University of Pennsylvania. Brilliant, wonderful colleague, Stuart Bluman. Did you ever remember Stu Bluman? He spent most of his career at MIT and then at Cornell and he was with us for a couple of years. And at that point we became a department and what, what status that gave us, I do not know, but it created a lot of friction with other departments. LG: Like history? DM: History, Philosophy. Back in those days the departments were really quite siloed and there was great emphasis on each department as a major. There were, other than the Asian Studies program and American Studies, there weren't any interdisciplinary majors. It wasn't until the late 60s the students could create an elective major and then later until the Liberal studies curriculum came into being, and the college made a macro commitment to interdisciplinary team as part of its identity was almost a complete reversal of what I experienced as a as a young faculty member here. LG: Do you think the conflict was competition for majors? DM: Oh yes, oh my goodness. My first formal experience at Skidmore was registration of for the fall semester of '64 and symbolically, the registration was down in the Canfield Casino and each department had a table and people could go around and pick courses out. And there was a senior History major who wanted to take the course in American Documents, but that was a 200-level and she needed a 300-level and I said well I think what I can do is give you some extra assignments, and you can sign up for an independent study. You'll take the 200-level course, do this extra work... and she's all, "That sounds wonderful." So I signed off. Five minutes later, like a V2 rocket, the chair of the history department was in front of me, Louise Dalby, "What are you doing, blah blah blah." I told her what �happened. She said you didn't ask my permission. I said, "Oh, well, it's better to ask permission than excuses, and so forth. Do I have it?" She said, "Of course." Anyway, we became good friends and over the years after that. But I remember someone describing to me the departmentalization as a small well-defined fiefdom of whose boundaries were patrolled by the chair of the department. And that that may echo with some of your recollections, too. LG: What were your biggest challenges, over the years, do you think? DM: Juggling it all, because the field of American studies had a kind of metabolism that was just very rapid, because of its multidisciplinarity. It has all kinds of disciplines and subdisciplines that feed into it. Trying to stay on top of what was happening with the field, as well as make sure that whatever courses you were putting together would be useful and recognizable by people in the field was a challenge. I was lucky I- the second year that I was at Skidmore, '65 or or '66, I went to the state meeting of the American Studies Association and became the editor of a bibliography that came out every year on studies in the theory and teaching of American studies. So I did that for about 10 years and that gave me a kind of professional reason to keep surveying the field and seeing what new programs were offered. What new methodologies and approaches were emerging and so forth. So I kept changing my readings in my courses because when you come out of the graduate program, I was a history- government major as an undergraduate. I had taken one American literature course, but so I had to educate myself in a lot of the areas. So I just kept changing my readings and then try to keep up with myself and stay a paragraph or two ahead of the students. I was also trying to write, and get the book done ... LG: And your program kept growing. DM: And then growing the program kept growing. LG: So then you did some hiring? DM: We hired Prof. Bluman, Stu Bluman, and at what time? I guess about '69 or '70. We hired Mary Lynn, who had spent a year teaching in the history department and gave another dimension to American �Studies. I was trying very hard not to duplicate work that was being done by the Americanists in the other areas, and but by that time, we probably had a total, oh, I don't remember, 30 majors at junior and senior level. And it just kept growing as an enterprise and I stayed as chairman of the department until '77 and then became Provost and academic VP. LG: Now, why did that happen? DM: It happened because I was elected to the search committee for the Provost and we had interviewed three or four candidates and I got a call from the President asking if I would have lunch with him. That was Joe Palamountain, and he asked if I would be willing to resign from the search committee and become a candidate for the Provost job. And I said, "Well if it's okay with the other members of the search committee and if it's okay with the CAPTS committee, yes." And so he did all those bases... LG: In retrospect, do you know why that reconfiguration was taking place? DM: What had happened, and it happened about three or four years after I first arrived at Skidmore, Edwin Mosley, who was Dean of the Faculty, his position was changed into Provost and Dean of the faculty and Norma McCurry, who had been the Dean of the College and who had been in effect, the chief academic officer was moved to report to Edwin. Norma was a brilliant, wonderful woman her- She was a linguist, but she had been in effect, the chief student affairs officer. Edwin, who was a very, very academic affairs. He was he was a very distinguished scholar as well as a just a legendary teacher and so the that division of labor, I think for both of them worked out well. And so what happened was the other person became Dean of the Faculty, do I remember who it was? I'm not even sure. They divided it up at some point. Who became the Dean? Eric Weller became the Dean of Studies and that supplemented some of the academic advising work that Norma had been responsible for. But, by the time Edwin was being replaced, Edwin became ill, and I remember there had to be an acting Dean and whether there was an acting Provost or not, I don't remember. The positions were separated for the purposes of that search, and they ran the search for the Provost first. And then when I was appointed, my responsibility was to run the search for the Dean of the Faculty. That became Eric. We ran a national search on... �boy, these are old synapses, I haven't tested these in a long time (laughs). But Ed, as you can imagine, anybody who moves into an upper level administrative position, after having spent 14 years as a faculty member... Memories are long, issues are complicated, and every idiotic thing I said as a young first or second year faculty member trailed behind me. But, looking back at Skidmore from having moved to other institutions and having worked at- after I return took I took early retirement here when I was 55LG: And what year was that? DM: '91, and I worked at Rollins College for two years. I worked at Bennington College for two years and seeing those institutions and comparing them with Skidmore, Skidmore had a much more professional and collegial culture than those other institutions. As a matter fact, when I went over and worked at Bennington, Bennington was in the middle of a capital campaign and in the middle of that capital campaign, the trustees seized control of the college from the faculty, fired 1/3 of the faculty, and went through the convulsions that... well, they were, they were on the weekly supplement to the New York Times. You may remember some of those things, they ripple out, and Bennington had a culture where every faculty member felt they had a veto over anything at the college and they had a brilliant and interesting and wonderful faculty. But as an organizational structure, their culture was just absolutely toxic. LG: But let's get back to Skidmore. Once you became Provost, what were the highlights, and what were the challenges? DM: Well, the challenges were basically to support the administrative structures that were already in place in terms of both the academic, this cultural student affairs area. All of the deans and directors on the academic side reported up to the Provost and then there were two other VP for business and development. So, one, I had to learn enough about the discrete areas of student affairs, computers. The computers, IT reported to the Provost, and so forth to make sure that we have the right people running those operations I inherited. For example, admissions, about which I knew absolutely nothing. But we happily had a just brilliant, wonderful director of admissions, �Benny Wise, and I asked her what she needed and what I needed to know in order to be her supervisor. She took me under her wing. And we were off and running. One of the first things that she said is we have done some things and haven't planned ahead for doing them. I said, "Well, what are you thinking of?" "Well, we went coed." Well I knew we had done that, but I knew it from the point of view of a faculty member. I said, "What are the kinds of planning steps we might've taken and shouldn't-should have?" She said, "Well, all we did was in effect, say the words, we would no longer discriminate against male applicants, and we sat back and waited. And sure enough they began to dribble in." But, and mercifully, because she was such a creative person, she had a whole series of recommendations on how to make the college more attractive to male applicants. But all of these were things that couldn't be siloed, they had to be decisions made in consultation with the faculty, with plant, with development, with alumni affairs, and so forth. LG: Can you give me an example? DM: Well, how does one prepare a 90% single-sex institution to morph into a 60/40%? What are the things that competitive, coeducational institutions offered that we don't? Well, physical education and athletics was one of them, but was only one of them. They had to change all of the dietetic expectations. Do you remember the orange juice riots? LG: I remember, when the trustees were here. Can you describe the orange juice riots? DM: Well, the boys, as they went through the lines over in the dining hall wanted seconds and thirds, and that was a new experience for the staff over there for planning, etc. etc. etc. And they wanted seconds on orange juice (laughs) and this is one of the things about Skidmore and I don't think I appreciated at the time, but Skidmore was in the in the business of inventing itself as an institution on so many fronts. We were building a new campus. That was one decision that we made which was made in the nick of time. We went coeducational and that's another one made in the nick of time and all of these- both of those decisions involved huge leaps of faith. I remember when I first got here that Eric was taken out to see the new campus by Levine and we drove out into the woods and there was a backhoe digging a hole which became the basement of the library. �And I began to realize as I worked at the college after five or 10 years that every time we built a building, the next year, the interior space of that building would have to be changed because it wasn't just right. And so we were, we were lucky enough to be flexible enough to imagine that as we grew programmatically, we had to change the landscape, we had to change the environment and that in turn changed one of the widgets that was planning the next stage, and so forth. And we were doing this on a shoestring. The endowment for Skidmore when it made the decision to build a new campus was under $1 million and we'd never raised capital money. There was one project I heard about later that we raise the money for father's hall that was on the old campus and that was raised through parental solicitation, but the early campus planning that we undertook projected that the new campus would take 25 years and $25 million. Here we are, how many years later the new campus is still- and the latest building is going up- cost more than the... LG: The Integrated Sciences Building. DM: The integrated sciences building cost more than the whole campus. When Joe retired, I remember him, Joe Palamountain. Joe was president from '65 to '87. I remember when he bid farewell and retired from the campus. He reported that during his tenure, we had constructed 37 buildings. What, how many are we done now? it must be 90 or 100. LG: And some of them have been taken down and replaced (laughs). DM: Yeah! I asked somebody in the administration the other day whether we had an aggregate cost of all of the capital investment in Skidmore, in what the campus is now, and nobody quite has it. So, anyway, I guess I keep shifting my focus because I didn't prepare for this, but looking back, it was an act of faith. How Skidmore came to build the new campus was a series of developments that nobody could imagine. The campus, the Hilton estate, had been in probate ever since the 30s. Lucy Skidmore Scribner had tried to get it for the college but it didn't get out of whatever the complexities were behind that until 1960, and we had a parent who was on the Board of Trustees at RPI, J. Eric Johnson, who was the CEO of Texas Instruments, and his daughter had been a student at Skidmore and she'd gotten ill. I don't know the details, but �the college had just taken wonderful care of her, they'd bent over backwards to make sure she didn't lose time, and he was so impressed by that, that when the Hilton estate came on the market, he offered to buy it and donate to the college if the college would build from scratch a whole new campus. And he did that, as Joe Palamountain used to tell the story: We took a deep breath and decided to go for broke and we almost did. (laughs) And he bought this piece of property, 650 acres, $130,000 donated to the college and we went on a- and this is all before I arrived. We had, I think was a Ford foundation grant, to plan the first iteration of new campus planning and that was what was in process when I joined the faculty in '64. We hired architects from San Antonio, Ford and Carson. They had built a number of campuses, one of which was Trinity University in San Antonio. We have some buildings that look very much like that campus. But the planning was systematic, and so forth. Most institutions, most mature colleges, if they venture in a new capital project, the Board won't authorize it unless you've got half in hand and half in site. The only building that I think we may have been able to do that with was the Zankel Music Hall because Arthur Zankel left us a bequest. And everything else, all we had were plans and hopes and dreams and a certain amount of momentum. And we had a, the New York State dormitory bond issue would- they bonded out some of the first buildings that were built. This library that we’re sitting in now was the firstLG: First building? DM: First building to open, and it opened in either '65 or '66. Do you know what it cost? 1.4 million. And so, but what happened is, we just kept venturing and I wasn't aware of this at all. I didn't think about these things when I was a faculty member. I was trying to get my exams graded and so forth, and so but every year as we constructed more, built more, grew more, our capacity to raise money grew and our ability to attract more students grew. And one of the reasons why Benny Wise was so concerned that we hadn't been planful in going coed was that we'd missed opportunities, because in the decade of the 70s a lot of single- sex institutions went coed. Well, our original plan was that we would build a campus for 2,000 women that was what we envisioned in '62, three, four, not realizing the market for women was going to get extremely tough and tight in the 70s. �LG: Because they could then go to other institutions. DM: They had more choices. Yeah, I remember vividly my first meeting with Louise Wise. I said, you know, "What are your biggest problems and how can I help?" I said, "I don't know anything about your area, but if you know what you need, you tell me and we're going to go get it for you." She said, "We need to expand the applicant pool." I said, "Tell me about that. What was our applicant pool this year?" She said, "Oh, 1,830." I said, "How many did we accept?" "Just under 1,830." And I said, "What were we trying to shoot for as a goal?" We were trying to shoot for, I think, was 400 students in the freshman class and I said, "So you're telling me that we are not a selective institution now, but we aspire to become one?" "Yes." "So, okay, how do we do this?" She had a whole series of ideas. One was using new computer capabilities to communicate with the families of applicants in a very targeted and personal way. And I said, "Well, how can I help?" She said, "I have a project for you. I want you to write a letter as the Chief Academic Officer of the College to the parents of each student and tell them why, from an academic point of view, you think Skidmore would be a good place for their son or daughter." I got to work, and we cobbled up a letter. She was also a very good editor, happily, and letters went out. I get a letter back almost in returned mail. This was this was in March of of my first whole year and it was from a father who said, "Dear Provost Marcell, happy to get your letter. I found.... he said but how are you going to find a roommate for my son Nancy?" And I said, "Oh, golly." So I sat down, "Mr. Owens, we're just venturing as a new way of communicating with parents, we're personalizing our communications, and unfortunately the computer kicked out the wrong gender for your letter and I apologize, but don't worry we'll take good care of Nancy should she decide to come here." And I signed this and thought, I can't send this out. I said, "P.S. I still can't understand why you named your son Nancy." (Laughs) Anyway, come September, there's a knock on my door and here's this very nice guy standing there with a very sheepish young woman, and it was Nancy. But that was the kind of the thing that Louise knew what we should be doing, and she had all kinds of other ideas. And the same thing with computers and so forth. I could barely type a letter on the computer, but I talked with the people in what is now IT, what did we need, and was able to go out and find Ken Hapeman. You may remember Ken, I said the same thing to him: "You tell me what you need and I'll try to get it for you." And help me understand why you �needed it and so forth and so on. So it was, it was easy to do because the institution had such a good collegial culture. LG: Could you describe that culture a little bit? DM: Well, I first experienced it as a faculty member on committees. Academic Freedom and Rights, Tenure, Faculty Council. Those kinds of things. But there was also one committee, that I don't even remember what it was called, but it monitored the budget. And there were two faculty members sitting on it, and so forth, and I just began to realize that while I thought, I probably had been here five or six or seven years before I went on that committee. I thought I knew the college pretty well, and until we walked through the budget, I realized I didn't anything about why these budgets were there, why they were organized the way they work, what the history was of each line item in the budget. And it took three or four years to get that, but there was never any- that I experienced- never any attempt to limit the information flow between administration and faculty, and there were always rumors that Ted Butler really had a pot of gold. LG: Do you want to say, for the record, who Ted ButlerDM: Ted Butler was the budget officer and chief accountant, but what I realize, and in those days that the total operating budget of the college was maybe $20 million. Do you know what our contingency fund was for the college? $250,000 for everything. And every budget was so tight that if any operating area of the college could come in with a surplus, it could be then used for those areas that couldn't control her budgets and so forth. Every budgetary year was an act of faith and throwing of the dice. There was one year, about, and I didn't know this until after I retired and read the history of Skidmore. We had four buildings going up at same time and we didn't have the money for any of them, other than what we were able to borrow through bonding and whatever the capital campaign was going to be able to do that year. We got, and you may remember this because it happened- when did you come? LG: '66. �DM: '66. It happened in 1970. Our auditors provided an audit report to the Board of Trustees that they could not assure our publics that Skidmore would be a going concern given the value of the assets, the indebtedness, the cash on hand, etc. etc. And that's a crisis for an institution. And it was reported to the Board and the Board said we will plunge on ahead, we will redouble our fundraising activities etc. etc. We'll either launch a new capital campaign or something and anyways, looking back from this vantage point, Skidmore seems very different. One of the ways we were funding the new campus- when I first got here in '64, the student population was somewhere between 1,350 and 1,400 students and that was '64. In '65, we grew to 1,500 students, we added 10 faculty members that year and we were going out and hiring young faculty at competitive prices and, I don't know, somebody must've been worried about how we were, because we hired at competitive prices, how we were going to stay competitive for those new 10 faculty as they aged in place because Skidmore's upper level salaries were not competitive, and so forth. So here we were trying to make it up as we went. LG: Do you think it was because there were a lot of females on the faculty? DM: That was part of it because I know there had been times that I heard about back in the depression where married couples had to split one salary and women were notoriously underpaid, etc. Probably when I came here, 3/5 of the faculty were female, something like that. It was like you, somewhere I heard this image at a development conference, and it really struck me to the quick. It's like imagining some guy running down the street with a bag of bicycle parts and is trying to put the bicycle together, get on it and pedal and accelerate all at same time. And thinking back, this is what Skidmore was going through. I can remember in '70 or '72. All of a sudden we were not to get the salary increase for the next year and what a blow this was to people. We all thought, "Oh my God!" Well, we managed to scratch up, I think a 2% increase belatedly after the damage was done from telling everybody no raises this year. LG: Yeah, faculty wasn't happy about that, were they? DM: Faculty was ever happy about anything. And I'll tell you one of the reasons why they're not happy. And this is sort of self-analysis, too. Faculty are really smart and every faculty we've got is the expert in �their field. LG: Do you think that's why the faculty ultimately rejected a union? Remember that? DM: Did we ever really seriously consider a union? LG: We had representatives. DM: Several groups were talking about it I know. I don't know, but it's very hard to go from a situation where, say you're in a department of 10 people and you're the expert on so-and-so, but you've also got opinions about everything, and I remember trying to grasp all of the things that in '77 I suddenly found myself administratively responsible for, and I didn't know anything about. So I'm thinkin, "Okay, well...." Anyway. LG: Those are challenges! Okay so what do you think was the greatest moment for you? Of course, of your career here. DM: Gosh. I'll start at the other end. The most difficult series of experiences was the closing of the nursing department. And that that was difficult personally because the first year that I was here I had in my freshman class a senior nurse who was just brilliant. She was just, and then over the next couple of years, the old nursing pattern was you spend your first year in Saratoga then go to New York for two years of nursing, you take advantage of all those clinical sites and all of the sophistication of the hospitals, and this and that, and then you'd come back to Saratoga for your senior year. And the women who came back to Saratoga from their senior year, they were worldly, they were cosmopolitan. They hadyou talk about growth- and anyways so I always just loved the nurses. And then one of the things that happened in the late 70s, as I kept working with Louise Wise for admissions, she said, "We're going to have a hard time enrolling our class in the nursing program." She alerted me to that about the second or third year. I said, "What's happening? Why, why? We have had at Skidmore since the 20s a baccalaureate nursing program that really is a flagship program." I would venture to say that of all the programs we had at Skidmore, it had the most power and prestige of any of our programs. Better than art, better than, I don't know, what our strong programs were. �LG: Can you describe the downfall? DM: Well, what was happening across the country and, finally by the time our program graduated the last nursing student in '85. Statistically, women who wanted a career in medicine, more women wanted MDs than BSs in nursing. And nursing programs all around the country, distinguished programs were just folding. Well, it's a complicated thing. As we began to realize that this was a problem for Skidmore, we had a building on 38th St., a campus that housed 80 some odd students, classrooms, labs- wonderful building, beautiful piece of location, right around the corner from the big-what was a big hospital down there? Anyway. I remember the year that we finally made the decision that we would close the program, Louise had said we need to enroll 40 new nursing students. We have an applicant pool of X. And if we get 15, we'll be lucky. And we needed to fill those beds in the nursing building down there. I don't know what the building cost. Anyway, it was happening all over the country and we had done studies. The chair of the board directed me to make a study about the field of nursing and what he wanted was a ringing endorsement of the nursing program. I spent three months doing as much research as I could. I came back with a program with a report that said, unless we can find some way of either distinguishing ourselves as different or, whatever, our program is not going to be competitive and that's that. And next we started off with what was, historically, I think probably the strongest program in the college. It was just market forces and, oh God, and we had a very strong nursing faculty. Half of them were graduates of Skidmore and they were fiercely loyal to the program, to the college, and this and that. And one of the things that, as I was trying make this report, we had started a UWW nursing program, and we had 1/2 a dozen students in it. But we had to make use of the Skidmore faculty in order to deliver that program to the UWW students. Well, I said, "Well, is there any nursing program we can affiliate with?" So I went down and talked with the people at Russell Sage. Russell Sage has a very respectable nursing program. And I raise this with the faculty down there and they just curled their lips and would have nothing to do with it because the clinical sites that were available in this area did not compare with the clinical sites in New York. And they were right! On the other hand, what does it take to produce a baccalaureate nursing graduate? Did you have to have all... Anyway, it was doubly complicated as I was to learn because the National League �for Nursing, which was the organization that controlled the standards for the profession, said you could not transfer a course in nursing from one academic program to another. In other words, if you were halfway through your nursing schedule at Sage you couldn't pick up your nursing credits and transfer to Skidmore. The NLN wouldn't....so anyway... LG: I'd like to end this on a high note, though... DM: (laughs) You can edit out some stuff, I hope. LG: One of the most positive moments for you. DM: I think the most positive moment, it's very selfish. We applied for a Phi Beta Kappa Chapter at Skidmore. I think this was like 1970, something like that, and I had gone to a university that didn't have a Phi Beta Kappa Chapter and it had a chapter installed three or four years after I graduated. And one of the nice things about having a new chapter installed is the new institution can pick I think it's five alumni to induct into their Phi Beta Kappa Chapter and Stetson did that for me. So when we were looking at Phi Beta Kappa at Skidmore, one of the criteria is how many of your faculty have Phi Beta Kappa keys. And I was able to raise my hand. And that's small and impersonal. I think some of the big stuff- I was very much in favor of the 4-1-4 curricular change but I didn't play much of a role. I was very much in favor of the liberal studies curriculum because, here we were, as an institution making a commitment to interdisciplinary approaches to...the world is interdisciplinary as we experience it, and so forth. When I first came here, and I had to make sure if I was dealing with Jefferson, I wasn't poaching on the history department's turf or something. And Harry Prosch never forgave me for having the temerity to write about James and Dewey without being a philosopher. Anyway. LG: Dave, thank you so much. This has been fascinating. Bringing back memories... Is there anything that you want to say that we haven't... DM: Well, Skidmore... I think we all knew.... and at different stages in ourI spent off and on 35 years....I retired, I took early retirement when I �was 55, went off and did other stuff and then I came back. And I worked halftime for eight years as a fundraiser. And what I realized is how special, how lucky we are. Yeah, God. When Irwin was squiring me around the first day on campus, we walked across, were out behind Father's Hall and Henry Gallant comes out. How are you, and we chatted, and it was fun, and this is my department chair this and Henry said, "When at Harvard, I did this and that, we chatted." Henry went off and Irwin said that's my department chair, I said "Yes, you both mentioned that," and he said, “he can't go to football games." And he said, "He thinks those guys down there in the huddle are talking about him." (laughs). You'll have to edit some of this stuff out. (laughs) LG: Dave, thank you so much for doing this. DM: Well, there's so much more to talk about, but on the other hand, and I didn't realize this until you-I thought Skidmore was the norm, because it's all coming out of graduate school, I went straight from college to graduate schools to Skidmore and I didn't know anything about... I took the job as Provost at Rawlinson, got there in August and the President told me my first assignment was to fire the athletic director. And I said, "Well, why haven't you done that?" "Well, we were saving that for you." "And have you already reached the decision that should happen?" "Yes." I said, "Okay." He was a very, very nice guy and there was a whole history of conflict with coaches and this and that. Anyway, so, I took him out to lunch less and I said, "What would you like to do with the rest of your life? You're a tenured faculty member and we need a new athletic director, so I have been told." And he couldn't have been nicer. He said, "Well, I'd like to do this and this and this." And I said, "Well, let's do that. " Anyway, our weekly staff meetings are in the president's staff and I'm taking notes furiously. The names don't mean anything. The issues... So I'm taking notes. And about the third or fourth staff meeting Pres. refers to something, and I go back and look at my notes and it was directly opposite to what had been said at the previous day. I looked up and the guy was the vice president for development was looking at me, and he just went..... And I just went, "Oh, shit." But I was lucky with this one when I became Provost, the guy who was the EP for business affairs here was a close friend of Joe Palamountain and he was brilliant guy. He'd been a mathematics major at Syracuse, Jim McCabe, and he was a vice president for research and marketing at Merck before he came here, and he just took me under his wing. We would have lunch once a week and he explained everything and Jim �was a delightful guy in staff meetings. He never argued, and yes was, "Well maybe we ought to try that!" No was "Well, I'm not so sure that's a good idea." I was a faculty member, I was all, "God damn it, we gotta do this, and that." I thought, "I want to grow to be just like that." And it just wasn't in my nature. LG: So a place of good colleagues. DM: Mmm. LG: Thank you. � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Skidmore College Retirees Oral History A resource containing historical information obtained in interviews with persons having firsthand knowledge. Interviewer The person(s) performing the interview Lynne Gelber Interviewee The person(s) being interviewed Dave Marcell Location The location of the interview Lucy Scribner Library, Skidmore College Original Format The type of object, such as painting, sculpture, paper, photo, and additional data Audio Recording Duration Length of time involved (seconds, minutes, hours, days, class periods, etc.) 00:59:04 Record Contributor Individual who prepared the item and/or edited it. Susan Bender Record Creation Date Day/Month/Year of record creation/edit February 3, 2022 Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Interview with Dave Marcell Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource January 15, 2019 Is Part Of A related resource in which the described resource is physically or logically included. Skidmore Saratoga Memory Project Description An account of the resource David Marcell, came to Skidmore as Director of the American Studies program in 1964 and became the College’s Provost in 1977. In this interview he describes early initiatives in interdisciplinary teaching and learning at the College, including a young faculty member’s experience of navigating a curriculum tightly defined by disciplinary boundaries.  Marcell paints a lively picture of the College’s culture and administrative structure throughout the 70’s and 80’s, including the “orange juice riots” and supportive collegial relations. Marcell also reflects on challenges the College faced as it constructed a new campus, navigated the changes created by coeducation, and closed its highly regarded nursing program.  After 10 years away, Marcell returned to Skidmore to work for several years in Advancement.  Language A language of the resource English (en) Subject The topic of the resource Retiree Oral History Project Type The nature or genre of the resource Oral History admissions American Studies Budget Crisis coeducation Eric Weller J Erik Jonsson Louise Wise Nursing Program Palamountain Val Wilson https://www.ssmp.mdocs.skidmore.edu/files/original/c15a90464ad63a5cf0503579a4b12419.jpg c6964c546f859e4f2c3a4150cb515129 https://www.ssmp.mdocs.skidmore.edu/files/original/a39cbba293b8171dc8c88e71396c1be6.mp3 dda9a0a0365c8eb8b963ea4965667b7b https://www.ssmp.mdocs.skidmore.edu/files/original/50e2604c0ef3642e3b730cb62d2cd95e.pdf d9cad02beafcf3552f560e487f047868 PDF Text Text Interviewee: Kathy Carter Years at Skidmore: 1986-2010 Interviewer: Lynne Gelber Location of Interview: Saratoga Springs, NY Date of Interview: December 3, 2018 00:00:00 Introductions 00:01:12 When Carter first heard about the job at Skidmore 00:01:50. Growing up in Glens Falls, New York 00:02:30 Learning how to work in human resources and working with benefits 00:03:21 Adjusting to the shift from the business world to Skidmore 00:04:55 Introducing Carter’s biggest challenges 00:05:30 When did cost sharing start? 00:06:45 Deciding the healthcare plan for union personnel 00:07:51 How would you decide which healthcare plans to offer? 00:08:20 The Mohawk Hudson consortium and healthcare plans 00:09:00 Stop loss insurance at Skidmore 00:10:00 The three health insurance plans at Skidmore when Carter arrived 00:10:30 Dealing with challenges and conflicts with union employees 00:11:20 The joys of interacting with other employees 00:12:20 Attending faculty meetings 00:14:22 Attending various faculty parties to socialize with other employees 00:15:30 Serving under several different presidents at Skidmore 00:16:50 President David Porter and his personality 00:17:35 Keeping in touch with Helen Porter 00:18:15 Not having many interactions with President Glotzbach 00:19:20 Meeting various faculty during meetings to discuss benefits 00:20:30 Explaining benefits to people who were about to retire 00:21:48 What have you been doing since you retired? 00:23:40 Retiree group excursions 00:23:58 During her time at Skidmore, coaching people on if they were ready to retire or not 00:25:10 Planning her own retirement 00:28:15 The addition of new technology on campus and its impact on her work 00:30:31 The differences between the amount of contacts and resources working in the business world versus at Skidmore 00:32:00 “I loved my time at Skidmore” 00:32:40 Her changing job title and description over time 00:33:00 Steve Herron’s impact on her career and the college as a whole 00:34:50 Closing remarks � https://www.ssmp.mdocs.skidmore.edu/files/original/3903cb6c00d6a91797c4e7e8e10afd35.pdf a785059d2544ed9586f1c39f0bf64cd3 PDF Text Text Interview with Kathy Carter by Lynne Gelber, Skidmore College Retiree Oral History Project, Saratoga Springs, New York, December 3, 2018 LYNNE GELBER: We ready? Okay. This is, what, the third of December already? 2018, and we are here with Kathy Carter, this is Lynne Gelber interviewing Kathy with the help of Brianna Logan, class of 2000? BRIANNA LOGAN: '20. LG: '20. Goodness. So, Kathy, thanks for coming in again. Why don't we start by having you tell us when you came to Skidmore? KATHY CARTER: Good morning, I'm happy to be here. I came to Skidmore April 1986. At that time Joe Palamountain was President. Ed McCluskey was Director of Human Resources where I worked. Karl Broekhuizen was the head of the division I worked in. Dave Marcell was Provost and Eric Weller was Dean of Faculty. It was a great team. LG: Yeah. How did you hear about the job at Skidmore? KC: It was interesting. I came out of... I came out of a business environment, a plant environment, actually, and our... LG: Where was that? KC: That was up in Glens Falls, New York. It was Ciba Geigy Inc. It was Hercules, a Swiss company, before Ciba Geigy bought it. Our health insurance rep from Blue Cross Blue Shield told me about the opening at Skidmore and thought it would be a good fit. So I decided to apply for it. LG: Did you grow up in Glens Falls? KC: I was born in Troy, New York and spent my first four years in Troy and then �at four, my father had a transfer. He worked for, at that time it was called Niagara Mohawk, which turned into National Grid, and got a transfer up further north. So we then moved to Glens Falls and I literally grew up in Glens Falls. LG: Good. KC: My memories are in Glens Falls. LG: And that's what's important. KC: Yes. LG: How did you learn the skills necessary for the kind of work with human resources? KC: I grew up in the environment, workwise, when I was working for Ciba Geigy. I was transferred into the human resource department and had a couple of very, very good directors who really taught me the ropes of being in human resources and working with all the benefits. And I had my introduction to labor relations there, also. So it was, was a learn- on-thejob concept for me. Very interesting. LG: And did those concepts translate well when you took the job here? KC: Yes, absolutely. There were things that struck me funny at the time, not anymore, of course, when I came here, and it was all the political women's issues. I think I referred to other women in my department as girls once ("the girls") and found out quickly that wasn't acceptable anymore. It was in the land of business, but not here. So it was things like that I really had to learn differently, and easy enough done if I paid attention. Few slips along the way, I'm sure, but you picked it up pretty quick. As far as the skills, you know, HR skills are HR skills no matter where you work. You have to walk the line where you're doing the best for the employees and doing the best for the �employer. So those skills I brought with me, and they just grew over time here since I was here so darnn long. LG: What were your biggest challenges? KC: Probably my biggest challenges... My biggest challenges were always trying to- some of my biggest challenges- were always trying to keep a good handle on the healthcare costs. Clearly, because that affected the college and then over time, as the healthcare costs grew, it began to affect the employees, because we in-putted cost sharing, as 99 other employers did. 99% of employers. So it was always trying to find a good balance for the employees and the employer. In that, that was probably one of my biggest challenges here. LG: When did cost sharing start? KC: You know, I can't remember exactly. I could guess, but it would be strictly a guess. It had to be.... I'm guessing the late 90s. I'm guessing the late 90s. LG: And how did you come up with the percentage? KC: The college, my department really, hired some consultants that worked in the area and helped us with how to construct that. And it was salary based, you know, the lower salary paid the least amount. Those with the highest salary paid a higher percentage. It was thought to be fair across the board. LG: So this would pertain to both the union and non-union personnel? KC: It wasn't the union because the union...The union, anything you do with the union, because it's a contract, has to be negotiated, so they weren't in the picture on that at the time nor was the college choosing their healthcare for them. The union had their own healthcare and we paid the premium for them- it changed over the years, I understand, after I left, but at that time, we could negotiate. We could attempt to negotiate the cost, but you didn't want �to leave them without healthcare so that was a negotiating issue. But as far as the support staff and the admin and the faculty, they were all under the original cost sharing because they shared in all the healthcare plans we offered. LG: How would you decide what plans to offer? KC: When I first came to the college, the plans were set. There were three plans, and as years went by we did make some changes. We went out to bid with different insurances. At one point we joined a consortium and we were the only ones that ended up buying into that plan, which...it was a pretty decent plan. LG: Which consortium, which plan? KC: It was through the... I won't get the names right because I've been retired so long now. But it was a Mohawk something consortium, yes, Mohawk Hudson Consortium. And it was like our own personal.... LG: So, those were colleges, similar kinds of colleges in the region? KC: Absolutely, but we were the only ones that bought into the plan, so it became our own personal plan, you know, which was I didn't think was a bad thing. LG: That wasn't a self-insured plan? KC: That was a self-insured plan. That was probably our first self-insured plan. I liked them because you had some control over them and you always bought stop/loss insurance in case somebody's bills went over a certain amount, stop/loss insurance kicked in. Of course, then, you know, if you had too many of that, you might've gone out to bid again the next year on the stop/loss insurance. So there were always things that you were trying to balance. �LG: So when Skidmore had its own plan, there were three... KC: When I first came here, they were Blue Cross Blue Shield, which was what we thought was that of the 8020 plan, and MVP and CD PHP. Those are the three plans. LG: And those were the plans that you self-insured? KC: None of those were self-insured at the time, the first self-insured was when we changed the Blue Cross Blue Shield plan to the consortium plan, yes, and since then we stayed self-insured on the main health insurance. LG: Interesting. KC: Health insurance is always interesting and highly regulated, so.... LG: What other challenges did you have? KC: There were union challenges. Union employees would like things different at times, but you have to follow the contract. It was only in negotiating a new contract every three years that either side had an opportunity to negotiate changes in the contract. So that was always a challenge with wants and needs, and contracts and making people feel, not happy in their work, but satisfied in their work because of issues that may or may not arise. LG: What were the most fun things? KC: Working with employees. When I first came here, it wasn't as busy as it got in later years. So I could have some, what I called free time, in my day and I would just walk the campus and stop in different offices whether they were administrators' offices or faculty departments' offices, and just chat with them. Or at one point I offered to come to faculty meetings for departmental faculty meetings and talk about benefits and to answer questions. So the �interaction with the employees, whether they were the faculty or the admin or the support staff was always fun for me. I like people so I was in the right job at the right time, I guess. LG: In those interactions what was surprising to you? KC: I don't think there were any surprises for me. I know I made some very good friends when I worked at Skidmore and I think I shared with you previously that I had a lot of friends on the faculty side of the house, also. And when I went to a faculty meeting, and it wasn't every faculty meeting, but, you know, my friends would pull me over to sit with them and I later found that, as a general rule of thumb, anyone from the administration always sat in the upper right-hand side of the auditorium. LG: Was this in Filene? Or where was this? KC: So, I think it was in Gannett. It was in Gannett because that was larger then and that's usually what held everybody. So that alone was surprising to me, but you know history's history and tradition is tradition. But my friends still pulled me over. It was fun, you know, it was fun. Skidmore is a great place to work. LG: Did you get teased about it among your colleagues? KC: No, I don't think they'd ever said anything to me but I'm sure I'm sure they did some thinking about it. But I I would imagine my people in my area that I reported to were probably happy that I made friends in the faculty as well as I did every other area. It's just good, I don't want to say business, but it's just good practice. LG: There are certain parties that people socialize at during the year- is that where you would also make contacts with faculty or staff? KC: Sure yeah, and especially in the early days I would go to any party- just by �myself. You know whether it was the social...I remember going to a party for Phyllis Roth. I can't remember why, but it was in Falstaff’s. And I went over by myself, but I knew enough people that I was comfortable, but I got to meet more, you know. Or I'd go to after faculty (meeting) get-togethers, and you know I always enjoyed chatting with different people there. It was, I guess, I was very social during those years. It was fun. LG: (laughing) Are you implying that you're not social now? KC: Well I don't go to as many parties anymore, but my life is pretty full. I guess I am social but in different ways. LG: So you served under several different presidents, didn't you? KC: I did. When I came it was President Palamountain, and I can't remember the year he retired, but it was in that first year-of the date he retired, I should say- but it was in that first year of mine because David Porter came in '87, July 1987, I believe. So I was here a little over a year -when David Porter started so I didn't have a lot of time with Joe Palamountain. But, what I remember of him, I remember him as a very shy man, at least with me he was, and you know I could stop and chat with anybody. And then when David Porter came he was so different for me, you know, but I had a longer exposure to him. I guess he was my favorite, David Porter, if we're picking favorites. LG: He was? KC: Well, he was so outgoing and, you know, he knew everybody's names! And he would write these little thank you notes to people just out of the blue. And I can remember when I got one from him, I just got such a kick out of it. And the puns he would tell publicly in his meetings, you know, some people would just shake their heads- yes, groan- and some people would just laugh out loud. But, he was a good, kind person and he seemed to have the leadership the college needed at the time. At least from my viewpoint. He �was well-liked and his wife was very nice, and I still have lunch with her to this day. And you know that David died a few years ago as we all remember, you know, but Helen is still local and she's a good egg. So I keep getting together with her. There are other retirees, you know, retirees are always fun for me. They were the fun group and there was a lot I socialized with. And there's a few that are still around that I knew well and that I still see. LG: So who was president when you retired? KC: When I retired Phil Glotzbach was president. LG: And you had similar kinds of interactions with Phil? KC: I didn't have many interactions with Phil. I think he knew who I was, of course, but there wasn't as many opportunities, I guess, to interact with him. After David left, we had our first female president, and she wasn’t here that long and then I think Phil came after. And I didn't have a lot of interaction with Jamie Studley, our female president. But I certainly knew her, also. You know, when anybody new on that level came, I would go over to their home and sit and go over the benefits with them and their spouse, if they had one, or partner, and explain it. So I certainly had an opportunity to meet everybody at first. You know, it was the same with any new employees that came that were benefit-eligible. I got to know so many people on campus because I was the one who had to explain the benefits to them so that really gave me an easy way to meet people. LG: So would you meet with a group or meet individually? KC: Sometimes I met individually, but I would have a group meeting and I might have five or six in it, I might have two, I might have three. If it was one, you know, it's just done in my office but I can't remember how often I did the group meetings- maybe it was monthly or every couple weeks, depending on the hiring, of course. You know, but that was a nice way for me to meet �people and they got to know me and I think it's always easier when you can put a face to a name so if you do need help in an area you know who to reach out to. LG: So you would be explaining benefits to people as they were coming in? KC: Yes. LG: What about people who were about to retire? KC: Oh, I'm the one that helped all of them and that wasLG: Did you start that program? KC: You know, I don't know. I just did what I was used to doing when somebody was going to exit. They needed to understand what benefits they were going to leave with and how they would work and what paperwork needed to fill out for to get money, so they can make a nice living, or connect them with one of the reps from the retirement companies to go over their retirement plan, even before they were going to retire to make sure they were on the right path so they could have a good retirement. LG: When you first came were TIAA-CREF and Vanguard already the providers? KC: Yes, yes. I think Vanguard was relatively new then, but a lot of our employees- it was probably half-and-half, you know, half went to TIAA and half went to Vanguard. So they had a presence on campus for sure. Both good companies. LG: So, Kathy, what have you been doing since you retired? KC: Um, I guess just living life. I've been gone 8 years now. This month- it's 8 years at the end of the month. I have a daughter and her family locally, so my two grandchildren are local, so my grandson is 13. So he doesn't need a �sitter anymore, but my granddaughter- I'm the back-up when my daughter needs help, which I'm happy to do or there's lots of sleepovers with that sweet little seven-year-old. I have a handful of good friends that I'll go to lunch with or dinner with or go to the movies with. I can catch up on books, or, I own my own home, so I have quite a large yard to take care of. I have a huge flower garden. I've done some traveling but not extensively. You know, I've been to Canada. I visited Texas. I've been to Maine. I've been to Chicago. You know... LG: Do you travel alone or do you travel with a group? KC: No, I've traveled alone usually and sometimes, sometimes, once in a while it was with a group. But mostly alone and it's to people I know. So I don't think my travel has been extensive, but it's been enough for me. LG: Do you ever go with retiree groups on their excursions? KC: No, I haven't. I haven't felt the need to, or the time, to tell you the truth. I can remember always coaching people that come to me and say, you know, I don't know if I should retire. And I'd always say, you know, you know when you're ready to retire, and it happened with me, too. I knew when I was ready to retire. And, you know, I had a full life right from the beginning, and the employees that retired would come back and say to me, "I don't know where I found time to work before." Well, I've begun to say that phrase. I don't have time to keep adding new things in it because my calendar is pretty booked, so.... LG: Would people be worried about having enough to live on? KC: I think people should always be worried about that you can, you know, very easily take care of planning by taking advantage of things Skidmore HR office offers. They bring in a retirement specialist not affiliated with either company, who's excellent. They bring in TIAA-CREF, they bring in Vanguard, so people should always be aware of that. �LG: What involvement did you have with that, bringing people in? KC: I brought in, I made arrangements, sort of arrangements, you know, because these people were already available to you. And other colleges had recommended Dave Carbone, so I made arrangements to get him in here and I think he's been a pretty big hit, because he still comes here. LG: Do you want to explain what he does? KC: Well, I went to him as an employee because I wanted to see. And he really goes over your plan. What are your plans, what are you thinking, have you filled out a budget, so do you know how much money you think you will need? How do you have your money situated in funds? How much you should withdraw, what percentage you should withdraw a year to make sure it lasted as long as you could. So, you know, he really goes over so, so many things with employees. So they really should take advantage. And of course, the TIAA-CREF and the Vanguard people are looking at their plan and asking you what your goals are. And you always have to look at your history of your family and this might sound morbid, but you know how long your mother and father survived. How long did your siblings survive to get an idea and is just an idea of how long you are going to survive. So do you need retirement funds for 15 years or 30 years? So you know, those are all legitimate things to start thinking about. I can remember I went to somebody else after I had gone to Dave and I actually made these charts on an Excel spreadsheet where I had all my income coming in in my budget going out and you know the man I saw, it was local and of course he knew me, and he just laughed and shook his head. And said, "Not many people bring this, these charts but they look pretty good." So I think I was exposed to it for so many years, I just went ahead and played with numbers for myself. But these people will help you do that so... LG: So what kinds of things were most fun, and what kinds of things did you bring to the table at Skidmore that hadn't been here before? �KC: You know I don't know what I brought that wasn't here before because Skidmore had a pretty good system set up. I don't know if I brought more people skills or not to be honest with you. I like to think I did, but I don't know because, you know, you don't know what you don't know, you know? I think- I'm pretty sure I had to bring a level of assistance to employees they might not have gotten before because I was so hands-on. LG: The other day you were talking about technology. KC: Well, that's true. Technology was interesting because in the early years I talked about where I would go roaming, really, sometimes for an hour on campus to pop in and talk to people and it was a good way to connect. But as the years went on, and technology got better, and these new programs were brought in. It was wonderful because you got all these reports coming out the back end which helped you in your job no matter what kind of job you had, but it also took more time to input all the information and the data that was needed so you can get the reports out. So I found over the years, and other people also did as we spoke of it, bound to the office more because there was, there were more hands-on things you had to do technology wise. I know one of the big differences working for business and then coming to the college was in business you could assign people to do a lot, whether it was to write a letter, type a letter for you (which was called typing back then) or put some information into the computers for you. But when you, when I came here, really you were at, you know, even in business, I had a whole law department I could call on down near the city for any legal questions I had. So you know your contacts are all there because they worked with you. But when I came here, you know, you really did your own letters, and you did your own calls and you had to investigate all the legal ramifications yourself. As time went on, and different HR directors came in, you know, there were those contacts set up, but it wasn't for years, probably until the last HR director came in that I really have a goodLG: And who was that? �KC: Barbara Beck- that I really had a good contact. And she was the first one that brought in the law firm, and they did a lot for the college in other areas, but for me it was a good contact for labor relations issues. If I couldn't interpret the contract myself or the law. And they had some good benefit people connected to them either in Albany or Syracuse. So, you know, it was a lot of years where you had to scramble and find your own resources on this. So, you know, the college evolved over time and got better, as you would expect. LG: So, are there other things you want to say about your time at Skidmore? KC: You know, I personally loved working at Skidmore. I loved my job. I loved helping people. I loved helping Skidmore. It was fun and... LG: Did your job title change over the years? KC: I always did the same work and my title changed over the years to reflect the union part, which, you know, I guess... LG: So when you came, your title was? KC: I was the Assistant Director for Benefits and then as the union side of it grew, when Steve Haran was here as the business manager, he really was the key contact for the union. And I think I talked about him when I was in before. He did a lot for the college, and I don't think everybody could see that and I understand it. But he was fun to learn from because he had a lot of knowledge on how to negotiate things. Whether it was with the contractor on getting supplies for a new building or negotiating with the union and I think I mentioned before that he'd turn the budget into pennies and maybe it would end up as: "We have 15 pennies and we can spend it on these items. It's going to be up to both of us to agree on how to spend it." And I could never ever figure out how he got it down [to] pennies. I gave up trying, but I �learned a lot from him and then when he retired, the HR director really took over the role of lead negotiator and it was probably the first, it was it was probably the first director that could assume those duties. And, you know, my role over the 25 years I was here just kept growing on the union side. So eventually I probably had the longest title at the college. LG: Which was? KC: It was Assistant Director for Benefits, Administration, and Labor Relations. And that really reflected you know the two sides of the house I did. After I left I think they hired somebody to do labor relations. And they, you know, they split it out. But I must be, I juggled well at the time. LG: Anything else you want to add? KC: Not that I can think of other than again I'll say Skidmore is a great place to work. The employees, the faculty, they were fun people, intense people at times, sometimes mad people, but always the best. It was a great place to work. LG: Well, thank you Kathy, it's been a pleasure. KC: Thank you, Lynne. Thank you, Brianna. � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Skidmore College Retirees Oral History A resource containing historical information obtained in interviews with persons having firsthand knowledge. Interviewer The person(s) performing the interview Lynne Gelber Interviewee The person(s) being interviewed Kathy Carter Location The location of the interview Saratoga Springs, NY 12866 Original Format The type of object, such as painting, sculpture, paper, photo, and additional data Audio recording Duration Length of time involved (seconds, minutes, hours, days, class periods, etc.) 35:13 Record Contributor Individual who prepared the item and/or edited it. Susan Bender Record Creation Date Day/Month/Year of record creation/edit February 14, 2022 Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Interview with Kathy Carter Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource December 3, 2018 Is Part Of A related resource in which the described resource is physically or logically included. Skidmore Saratoga Memory Project Description An account of the resource Kathy Carter joined Skidmore’s Human Resources team in 1986 where her primary responsibilities included administering the college’s benefits programs and managing its labor relations. In this interview she describes transitioning from a corporate to academic work setting, overseeing complicated health insurance programs, negotiating union contracts, and -most especially- her enjoyment in interacting with employees across the college. Language A language of the resource English (en) Subject The topic of the resource Retiree Oral History Project Type The nature or genre of the resource Oral History CREF David Carboni David Porter Helen Porter Human Resources Labor Relations/Benefits Retirement Planning TIAA Vanguard https://www.ssmp.mdocs.skidmore.edu/files/original/034917791b0cc79ea4d81fc4785beead.jpg 1984d206379b318c2357509c28edcc10 https://www.ssmp.mdocs.skidmore.edu/files/original/e91f90d5c7b1ce8036440bd286bd8b4a.mp3 cd65fd9b2fdd67078e6cc970a4ab0fc6 https://www.ssmp.mdocs.skidmore.edu/files/original/f88f1a8bf1f29c9298484ad7f9b96adc.pdf 64e6c1ee6cb066ac73f1e44618c7bd55 PDF Text Text Interviewee: Karl Broekhuizen Years at Skidmore: 1981 - 2005 Interviewer: Lynn Gelber Location of Interview: Saratoga Springs, NY Date of Interview: April 18, 2019 00:00:00 HEADER 00:00:27 Born and raised in Holley, New York; 52 people in high school graduating class. 00:00:54 Undergraduate - University of New Hampshire; MBA - University of Massachusetts. 00:01:17 As undergrad, worked in UNH controllers office in a junior accountant position. 00:01:37 Interest in working with new automated information and data processing plus management of not-for-profits, particularly colleges and universities. 00:02:50 Upon completing MBA, hired for a new position at U Mass supporting the graduate school in budget development and administration. 00:03:51 “The graduate school at U Mass at that time … mirrored … what a small college and university would be.” 00:04:26 Between 1967-1977, worked as Business Manager for U Mass Graduate School, U Mass Associate Budget Director, and Assistant Dean of Education (chief business person). 00:05:53 Next 5 years as Treasurer at Colby College, then to Skidmore. 00:06:42 On campus interview with, “… a group of thousands.” 00:09:03 One appeal of Skidmore: “…relative to the competition, Skidmore was a very young institution … opportunity for someone with a different perspective…” 00:09:58 Upon arriving September 1981, ”… annual audit had not been yet completed.” 00:12:11 Initial tasks included “…get to know the place and do some staffing.” 00:13:25 Also upon arriving, plans for a sports center were two-thirds done. 00:14:28 In 1981 the college was used to being under-resourced. 00:15:10 “Skidmore became what it was, and what it is today … because they were all invested in … the vision of this institution…” 00:16:15 “One of the things that we were able to do early on is … try to move our construction program up a notch or two in terms of quality, design, location.” 00:17:10 challenge of “…limestone ledge not very far below the surface. And most, if not all, of the early buildings are three feet higher in the air because it was less expensive to go up than to blast and go down.” 00:17:40 Range of building projects included a residence hall, Harder Hall, Starbuck Center and Barrett conversion into offices, Tisch learning center, the Tang, the Northwoods apartments, the Zankel, and additions to the library and the Case Center. 00:19:19 Changes were “a function of … recognizing a change in how curriculum was developed and delivered.” Also, “tremendous growth in terms of the number of employees.” 00:21:07 Worked with Joe Palamountain, David Porter, Jamienne Studley, Phil Glotzbach. 00:21:34 “Joe, in my opinion, saved this college … saw what needed to be done in terms of bringing this campus in this location to a meaningful presence, and I think he surrounded himself with … a great team, and was able to move forward.” 00:24:36 “[Joe] described … his leadership style as sort of a team approach or what he called a matrix management style … the president’s staff … met weekly around a table and discussed whatever the important issue was in each of our divisions, and decisions were made collectively.” �00:25:45 “…he would recommend to the board the hiring or appointment of the chief academic officer or the chief business officer or whatever, but the appointment was by the board. Deans were not. They reported to board appointed officers, and that worked well, I think, for the times.” 00:26:39 “…one instance … I needed fifty thousand dollars more than the preliminary budget figures … We all talked about it in the room and Dave Long, VP for external affairs, said, ‘I can help you with that. I’ll give you fifty thousand dollars out of my budget.’ No great hassle, no … infighting, we were part of a team.” 00:28:05 David Porter’s priorities were faculty and academic programming. “We would still have president’s staff meetings. He, pretty much, continued with the matrix style of operation…” 00:28:58 Phyllis was interim president during construction on the Tang. “I remember very clearly Phyllis being on the top of an excavator with one of the construction team’s people, coming around a grove of trees, in a hard hat…” 00:29:35 "Jamie was very different … it was much more one-on-one … more decisions got made in her office than in the conference room … different styles, and different times, as well.” 00:32:29 Phil “…was interested in knowing, housing-wise … of some of the things that we were doing in terms of bond issues, for instance, and things of that nature.” 00:33:19 Through his years at Skidmore, Broekhuizen appreciated the eclectic nature of Business Affairs. “I mean, we had dining services and post office and bookstores and computing centers and so forth and so on.” 00:33:44 “In terms of construction, the design process of the Tang was the most interesting to me.” 00:34:56 “… a teaching museum. It would be integrated into the curriculum of the college …” 00:36:38 Search committee narrowed field to three architects for Tad Kuroda and Broekhuizen to visit. “Traveling with Tad … was just an absolute joy. Both in terms of focus on the questions we were asking of the architect …, but also spending free time together. We went to a baseball game out in Los Angeles, for instance … I was the only white guy there. And Tad just tweaked me … ‘What’s it feel like to be a member of a minority group now?’ [laughs]. And it was all said in fun you know, in jest and so forth, but it was just a positive experience.” 00:38:41 Then each architect came to Skidmore to give presentations. “…we had a site picked out …Predock said no … if you want this to be integral to the campus you need to have it on a path where students go, they’ll be forced to go by it or better yet through it. And so he selected this site, made his point, and talked about it growing up out of the ground and it would have this limestone-like exterior and you could go through it or you could go over it, and it was just very very exciting. I mean, he had clearly done his homework.” 00:40:45 “When the search committee came to make its final recommendation, I think it was Predock hands down. I mean I cannot remember a dissenting voice there. And working with him and his colleague, the vendor contractor, was just a joy.” 00:42:12 Another high point was hiring Barbara Beck as the Human Resources officer. She created “… a comprehensive Human Resource function that helped department chairs and faculty with leadership issues and problem solving.” 00:43:21 Restructuring after Dave Marcell left led to the Computing Center reporting to Broekhuizen. Some had suggested it “…be split between academic computing and administrative computing … I kept saying, ‘No, we want one person to be responsible for both areas so there’d be better coordination and articulation of their vision and their role… I just did not want essentially the same general function, computing, … vying for the same resources…’ ” 00:47:00 Skidmore community well served by Business Affairs senior directors. �00:48:03 “…Bob Jarvis, who did a wonderful job, … when he retired … ultimately, I decided to outsource the leadership to …Sodexo… I understand they are doing a fantastic job.” 00:49:55 “I have said … ‘Skidmore College could afford to do anything it chose to do. It could not do everything it wished to do.’ ” 00:50:25 “One of the greatest privileges of my life, to work at Skidmore.” 00:50:31 END � https://www.ssmp.mdocs.skidmore.edu/files/original/15b306280817ba9b8319bdb96bb85a93.pdf f713a768cc6d9e0020b1a2d821dd321e PDF Text Text Interview with Karl Broekhuizen by Lynne Gelber, Skidmore College Retiree Oral History Project, Saratoga Springs, New York, April 18, 2019 LYNNE GELBER: Today is April 18th, 2019 and I’m here with Karl Broekhuizen and Sue Bender and this is Lynne Gelber. And we are happy to see you, Karl, after some time. Why don’t we start by having you tell us where you were born and raised and then maybe how you got to Skidmore eventually? KARL BROEKHUIZEN: I was born and raised in Holley, New York, which is about 25 miles west of Rochester, a small town of about eighteen hundred, primarily agricultural. I went to a small, a relatively small school system; there were 52 of us in my graduating class. When I left Holley to go to college, I went to the University of New Hampshire in Durham, New Hampshire. After that I went to the University of Massachusetts to get my MBA degree. I decided between undergraduate and graduate school that I thought I wanted to be more involved in the administrative side, financial side, of higher education. I had worked for the controller’s office at UNH and got a taste of that. LG: Excuse me, that was as a graduate student? KB: No, an undergraduate. LG: As an undergraduate? KB: Yes. A junior accountant type job. But I noticed, and this was in the early ‘60s, that at the time automated information and data processing was becoming, was coming on the scene. Most of the folks, the senior folks at UNH with whom I worked, were either retired military folks or faculty members who’d left the faculty to come into administration. And they felt, my observation was, they did not, were not fully embracing some of the nascent information processing age, and I felt there might be room for somebody in that arena. Also, somebody who had a somewhat different view of how not-for-profits, in particular — in general, and colleges and universities, in particular, ought to be managed and operated. At the conclusion of securing my master’s degree at U. Mass., the treasurer, who was the Chief Financial Officer at U. Mass. at the time, created three positions to report jointly to him and the dean of a particular college. To help serve, support the Dean in the academic college, administratively, �particularly financially, budget development and administration, but as I say, reporting jointly to the dean and to the treasurer. I was the first one hired in this role, as it turned out my classmate and roommate, apartment-mate, was the second one hired. My posting was to the graduate school, his was to the school of business. The graduate school at U. Mass. at that time had about 52 hundred students, had its own admissions operation, registrar’s operation, the University academic computing center reported there. The associate dean for research was in that office, so it was a very eclectic kind of arrangement and mirrored, in many regards, what a small college and university would be. LG: How long did you stay there? KB: I was there from 1967 to 1977, and throughout that I was the Business Manager in graduate school, then became Associate Budget Director for the University, and subsequent to that there were financial problems and the chancellor requested that I become the chief business person at the School of Education. And I was an Assistant Dean of Education at the time. I had an opportunity for a career change; I took the opportunity. U. Mass. had grown very much when I was there. When I first went there it was twelve thousand, five hundred students, when I left in 1977 it was twenty-five thousand students. With no disrespect to anybody, but the faculty had unionized, it was very different and it was very much political — part of the state, Massachusetts higher education system, it was very difficult to get things accomplished, both in terms of bureaucratic processes and scale. I applied for and was appointed Treasurer at Colby College in Waterville, Maine, which had about sixteen hundred students at that time. And had more control over its own destiny, not that there aren’t campus politics but about two layers was removed. And I was there for five years and then had the opportunity to come to Skidmore in September of 1981. LG: How did you hear about the Skidmore position? KB: I think I probably read about it in the Chronicle of Higher Education. LG: And you had an on campus interview with whom? KB: Well in the Skidmore tradition it was a staff of, it was a group of thousands. I mean it was a day and a half or two days on campus. Joe Palamountain was the president at the time, so I met with him, I met individually with Dave �Marcell, who was the provost, Eric Weller, who was the dean, Dave Long, who was the VP for … development, I think, at the time. Business Affairs staff, Steve Harran and Ted Butler. Claire Olds was the personnel director at the time. Some students, many faculty. Mark Gelber was on the faculty, was a member of the, a faculty member of the search committee. Mary Lynn was on that group at the time. I can’t remember most of the others. Had a very good, a pleasant session with my predecessor’s predecessor, Jim McCabe, who was a former Vice President. But anyway, it was quite an experience. LG: [laughs] So, and that was what year, again? KB: That was in June or early July of 1981, when the college was using, … I don’t know whether, I guess she was a friend, Nancy Martin Archer, Archer Martin was her name, and she was the search consultant. LG: So when you started work in 1981, what challenges did you face? KB: Well, I was not here, I guess I would say thankfully, in one regard, in the bad old, real bad old days, but I was here when days weren’t so good, either, particularly financially. Let me step back for just a second and say one of the things that appealed to me about the Skidmore opportunity was that it was, relative to … I won’t call them Skidmore’s peers, at the time, but relative to the competition, Skidmore was a very young institution and did not have 200 years of hidebound procedures, legacies, histories to have to deal with, and I felt, and Joe Palamountain reinforced the notion, that there was an opportunity for someone with a different perspective and some energy to come in and accomplish things, without having to be a slave to, again, as I say, 200 years of “the way we always did it.” KB: So coming to Skidmore in September, the fiscal year was June 30th, I was surprised, among other things, that their annual audit had not been yet completed. And so, Joe’s team and the board didn’t have much of an idea about how the college stood. And this was, you know, we were less than ten years into co-education, enrollments were a challenge, Louise Wise, the Director of Admissions at the time, was scrambling to fill beds. That year, in particular, the college had what it characterized as an “over-enrollment,” against what they had planned, or they had imagined, I think might be a better word than planned, would be the enrollment, and were renting spaces downtown, in School 7, the Van Dam building, and the community motel, for students. And how do we deal with that thing, that arrangement? We �were running busses, anyway, to Moore Hall, this was two, at least two, more stops. How do they get services, how do you arrange for them to get meals and so forth. So that was a challenge. The board had made the decision, either the previous February or May board meeting, to build a new sports center, which was seen at the time to be an addition to the Lodge. So, that was my first construction project on this campus. And very interesting, very … very different from the style of architecture elsewhere on campus, I would point out. The big job was to get to know the place and do some staffing. The area for which I was responsible at the time was called Business Affairs; it was not adequately staffed. The, then personnel function, now Human Resources, was essentially two people: Claire Olds, former Dean of Students, former Dean of Women and then Dean of Students, and Marianne Castelot and it was very clear that that area, given what was happening in society and on campuses, that area needed to be beefed up and needed to have somebody at its head who was more experienced, professionally experienced, in employment law, among other things, and good practices. LG: So had the architects and plans already been done for that sports center? KB: They were two-thirds done, I mean it was … one of the things I found, coming to Skidmore, and understandably so, was that the college never had, up to that point, sufficient resources to build buildings, design and build buildings that had sort of a common theme, and so forth. So what we needed, the college needed at the time for its dance program, athletics, et cetera, was space. And they couldn’t afford to, yet, to pay for the kind, the amount of space, they needed, with … wrapped in a finer quality skin, if you will, than we had. It was something that, you know, one of the realities of life. When I came to Skidmore, when we finally got the audit for the year ending June 30, 1981, the market value of the endowment was 7.3 million dollars, and the comprehensive fee was ninety-four hundred dollars. So the place, the college, was used to being under-resourced. And, I would say, I said back then, I would say at least up until the point in time that I retired, Skidmore became what it was, and what it is today, in terms of what I would categorize as the middle of the top tier of institutions, independent of the largest colleges, on the backs of the faculty and staff, trustees and students. Everybody uniformly put their shoulder to the wheel and pushed because they were all invested in what this … what the vision of this institution was. They gave fringe benefits rather than salaries, because it was less expensive �to do so. And people were very grateful for that. So, the … whatever story there was behind the now Williamson Kettering Williamson Sports Center, was a function of, “we need the space for our programs; it can’t be a pretty space.” One of the things that we were able to do early on is … and I would, I had, I made the case but I had a lot of support from the academic leadership of the college and ultimately the president and trustees, was to try to move our construction program up a notch or two in terms of quality, design, location. Much of what I know of the early development of this campus comes from, you know, other people … people like Joe and Jim McCabe, Dave Marcell, Erwin Levine, Mark Gelber, and so forth. I didn’t experience it all myself but I observed the results. One of the early things that the college had to deal with was when they acquired this property there was a lot of a limestone ledge not very far below the surface. And most, if not all, of the early buildings are three feet higher in the air because it was less expensive to go up than to blast and go down. [chuckles]. LG: Were there any other buildings that you were involved in? KB: Oh, there was a whole range. Ahh … what did we do, we did a residence hall, we did Harder Hall, temporary space [laughs]. Ahh … we renovated a large space, took Starbuck Center, which was a student social space, at one time, converted it into offices and so forth. Did the same with Barrett, that was in process when I first arrived, but Barrett was another student lounge, student center, at the time. We did Tisch, a learning center. Umm, certainly we did the Tang. I was involved in the planning process, design process, for the Northwoods apartments, the same with the Zankel. I was … I retired before they were, the Northwoods were just about completed when I retired, the Zankel was, we were still seeking funding as I recall. We did the library, additions on this library, during that tenure. We did the big addition to Case Center. LG: A lot of change! KB: Well yes, and the change was a function of, I think, the growing reputation and acceptance, acknowledgement of the student population, potential student population, of what Skidmore was and could be. It was a change, recognizing a change, in how curriculum was developed and delivered. The other thing I would comment on is that there was tremendous growth in �terms of the number of employees. When I came there were maybe 250, possibly 300 employees — faculty and staff. When I retired there was over 600, and now I understand its up over 800. But that’s a function of legal requirements; Title 9, in terms of women’s athletics, greater use of delivering … a need for counseling services, computing services, athletic teams, balancing mens and women’s teams, in terms of offerings, new additions to the curriculum, there’s a lot of new majors and so forth, greater health services, more staff for that. LG: In the course of your years, who were the presidents of the college? You started with Joe … KB: Joe Palamountain hired me, and then retired after six years. The college then hired David Porter, for almost 12 years, Jamienne Studley for four, Phil was here two years, when I retired. LG: You’ve really seen everybody after Val Wilson. Umm …? KB: I mean I, yeah, and I’d like to comment about that. I think Skidmore, this college, is today, is what it is today, in a large part because of Joe Palamountain’s presidency. Joe, in my opinion, saved this college. Val died prematurely, and Joe, who had little institutional experience, he had been provost at Wesleyan, came and saw what needed to be done in terms of bringing this campus in this location to a meaningful presence, and I think he surrounded himself with a good, a great team, and was able to move forward. I think when he chose to retire and the board hired David Porter, at the risk of seeming immodest, I think David was able to do what he did best, which was faculty interaction and support, because he inherited a very good support team. Dave Marcell and EricWeller, Dave Long, … I was part of the team, whether history will decide whether I was a major contributor or not [chuckle]. But that meant that David could rely on those folks to take care of daily operations, doing the stuff that needed to be done, so that he could visit faculty in their offices and focus on his vision for academic and programmatic growth of the college. LG: You were here at the point when Phyllis Roth took a year, two different times, KB: She, Phyllis, was acting president when David took sabbatical, and that was �for like six months, and then in the interim period after David’s retirement, in December, she completed that fiscal, that academic year and the first portion, I think it was, of the following. LG: From your point of view was that seamless? KB: Yes, yes. LG: You might comment on, aside from their different interests and talents that the various presidents brought, in what ways did their interactions with your area change … or grow? KB: Well, Joe was fairly hands off. He described, when we had our first or second interview, he described his leadership style as sort of a team approach or what he called a matrix management style. Which meant that the president’s staff, which at the time I think it was six of us, met weekly around a table and discussed whatever the important issue was in each of our divisions, and decisions were made collectively, and if … Joe was the referee to the extent that one was necessary, which it rarely was, and by the end of the conversation if, in fact, we couldn’t reach a conclusion, which we often did in one sitting, we all knew what the marching orders were, I mean, Joe would say, “yes, let’s do that,” or “let’s take some more time,” or whatever. And he said, at the time, and there is, in trustee minutes or board books or somewhere, that the president and the vice president, presidents, were what was called board appointed officers. That is, he would recommend to the board the hiring or appointment of the chief academic officer or the chief business officer or whatever, but the appointment was by the board. Deans were not. They reported to board appointed officers, and that worked well, I think, for the times. Oh, I was very, very impressed by one instance that I can recall very clearly, that I had, and this was during budget development time. I had an issue, and I can’t even remember what it was, it might have been in the computing center, where I needed fifty thousand dollars more than the preliminary budget figures required. We all talked about it in the room and Dave Long, VP for external affairs, said, “I can help you with that. I’ll give you fifty thousand dollars out of my budget.” No great hassle, no … what I would characterize as infighting, we were part of a team. And we would all meet, I think it was bi-weekly, one-on-one with Joe, just to talk specifically about things in our areas. Rarely, unless they were personnel, there was rarely any �decision made — it was more information exchange and obtaining perspectives, one to the other. But really the decision making was collective. I think, erroneously, many people thought that that made Joe sort of aloof from the operations. He wasn’t, it was just his style. When David came, again I think he set his priorities as the faculty and academic programming. We would still have president’s staff meetings. He, pretty much, continued with the matrix style of operation and the recognition of a differential between board-appointed officers and other senior members of the community. There were, to the best of my recollection, no major personnel changes during the period between David’s retirement and Jamie’s coming on board that Phyllis had to deal with, in that regard. Essentially it was, the time when, it was time to go to construction on the Tang. And I remember very clearly Phyllis being on the top of an excavator with one of the construction team’s people, coming around a grove of trees, in a hard hat and leading … But that was what I remember as the most visible nonacademic activity that Phyllis got involved in, I mean new activity. Jamie was very different, in my opinion she … I don’t know quite how to phrase it, she didn’t pay as much attention to the notion of separation of board appointed officers and their roles and responsibilities and others. The size of the president’s staff increased, Don McCormack was added to the group … and … LG: And Don was, at that time? KB: Don was Dean of Special Programs — had been, for a great long time. But, not but, his reporting relationship was to Dave Marcell, as Provost, or whoever the chief academic officer was, as Dave had left at that time to go to Rollins. But anyway … things, from my perspective, got much more centralized in the office of the president. She was very hands on, involved in lots of decision making. … LG: So the president’s staff had less of a voice? KB: As a collective, yes, it was much more one-on-one. It was like a wagon wheel, with Jaime as the hub, the rest of us were spokes, more decisions got made in her office than in the conference room. I had been at the college for whatever it was, eighteen or twenty years at the time, had my relationships with various trustees, that gave me a level of independence that a newer, less �tenured, not in terms of tenure, but in terms of time, other officers might have. So like the Vice president for Development or even the faculty, at the time. So, I mean it was just different styles, and different times, as well. LG: And what about Phil? KB: Well we worked together for two years and he was getting his feet under him, again. He was interested in knowing, housing-wise, I guess, of some of the things that we were doing, in terms of bond issues, for instance, and things of that nature. That was the level of his engagement in the Business Affairs area. LG: So Karl, in all of that, tremendous amount of change, what was the most exciting for you, the most pleasant, let’s say? KB: Well I think in terms of Business Affairs, at the time it was a very eclectic kind of division. I mean we had dining services and post office and bookstores and computing centers and so forth and so on. But certainly, in terms of construction, the design process of the Tang was the most interesting to me. Again, many members of a community that views itself as being very inclusive and so forth aren’t aware, I guess, of what’s included in the bylaws of a non-profit organization. The bylaws of Skidmore, at the time, and I’m sure they haven’t changed much, said that the Business Affairs, the vice president for Business Affairs, under the president, is the one responsible for the design and construction of the buildings and the facilities. So, I, when David and the faculty, particularly the art faculty, decided that we should have a museum, and the trustees were not enthralled with that notion, at the time primarily because their vision of a museum was a place where you showed artwork, paintings and sculptures and so forth, and Skidmore couldn’t afford that, given all the other challenges and desires that it had, and David, working with, must have been Bennie Wise, Phyllis at the time, and other faculty, determined that this would be a teaching museum. It would be integrated into the curriculum of the college, and take advantage of the college’s reputation in the arts, “art” arts, but make sure that students were there, involved in that facility, as part of their experience, their Skidmore experience, not just to go and view masterpieces and so forth. And so the board authorized us to do a teaching museum, I convened a group, with recommendations from Phyllis as to faculty members and who �would be there. We got alumni involved in it, trustees involved, and staff, and we had a search committee for an architect. And Tad Kuroda was intimately involved in that and working with Tad was just an absolute joy. We ended up with Antoine Predock. His name was surfaced by Jim Kettlewell, who was on the search committee. We winnowed ourselves down to three architects, the finalists, and Tad and I visited them in their studios. Antoine Predock, Frank Gehry in California, Predock in New Mexico and Robert Venturi in Philadelphia. And traveling with Tad, and these were typically two day visits or whatever, was just an absolute joy. Both in terms of focus on the questions we were asking of the architect and so forth, but also spending free time together. We went to a baseball game out in Los Angeles, for instance, and that worked out very good. Tad was a baseball fan, a big fan. And we watched the Dodgers play, I can’t remember whom, but we were up in the cheap seats because we got tickets last. And the Dodgers had an Asian, Japanese, I think, pitcher who was lightening, he was just very very good, and we ended up in these upper bleachers and … I can’t tell you how many, but I bet you there were at least 25, maybe more, folks there all Japanese or Japanese American. I was the only white guy there. And Tad just tweaked me … “What’s it feel like to be a member of a minority group now?” [laughs]. And it was all said in fun you know, in jest and so forth, but it was just a positive experience. We then had each of these three architects come to Skidmore, make presentations in the Surry, and I kept playing my role, and part — one of my roles was, “We’ve only got six million dollars to fund, to spend. How can you bring your vision in for six million dollars?” Gehry said, “Oh, it might be a little more than that,” but he wouldn’t give us a number. Predock came, and he came at least one, maybe two, days early, met with us and he spoke with faculty. One of the faculty members who we asked to take him on a tour of the surrounding area and of the campus was Ken Johnson, head of the Geology Department at the time. And Gehry was very much into designs that were organic to the site, and we had a site picked out and a facade that would blend very much, with colonial kind of construction and it was up closer to the campus. Predock said no, you don’t … if you want this to be integral to the campus you need to have it on a path where students go, they’ll be forced to go by it or better yet through it. And so he selected this site, made his point, and talked about it growing up out of the ground and it would have this limestone-like exterior and you could go through it or you could go over it, and it was just very very exciting. I mean, he had clearly done his homework. Gehry and Venturi were older guys, whose reputations �were more well established. Predock had a reputation but it wasn’t on the same scale. They came in, did their dog and pony show and left. And I believe, if my recollection is correct, when the search committee came to make its final recommendation, I think it was Predock hands down. I mean I cannot remember a dissenting voice there. And working with him and his colleague, the vendor contractor, was just a joy. One of … Predock would do these clay models and so forth and I remember looking at one that he brought up, … and talked about these sloping roofs, “and we’ll plant grass.” And I said, “no, we’re not going to do that. [laughs] I understand what you’re trying to do, but I’m not going to ask the physical plant crew to be mowing roofs. And this in wintertime and so forth and so on.” But just, and from my, now more just in perspective I think that both the structure, the museum structure, and the teaching aspects of it and the way it helps to both inform and deliver the curriculum and students academic experience has just been a remarkable success. It was a joy to have had a role in that. LG: Anything else that you want to add? KB: Well I would say … hiring Barbara Beck as the Human Resources officer who took, what was really, with no disrespect to her predecessors, sort of a paper processing operation into a comprehensive Human Resource function that helped department chairs and faculty with leadership issues and problem solving. Did a great job in terms of contract negotiations with, seven, at the time, unions. LG: Were you involved in her hiring? KB: I hired her. LG: Ok. KB: With some faculty dissent who thought that the person from corporate, GE, couldn’t be successful in an academic environment. Not true. LG: Ok. Anything else that we haven’t touched on that you have been thinking about? KB: Well, I think that … I can’t quite remember the circumstance, I that that, I guess when Dave left, Dave Marcell, yes, the range of the number of divisions that reported, yes, we were going to do away, they did away with �the Provost title, and it became Vice President for Academic Affairs and Dean of the Faculty; Dave’s and Eric’s function was combined. There were then questions about whether, since that sort of had a less diffuse focus in terms of divisional areas of responsibility, more focused on the faculty and academic program, what would happen to the various divisions. And Dave’s was … David Porter said Dean of Faculty would continue to report to the Academic Vice President, though I think it was Associate Dean at the time, and the Director of Admissions would report directly to David, Dean of Special Programs… LG: David Porter? KB: David Porter. Dean of Special Programs would report to David Porter, umm…, oh, Dean of Student Affairs would report to David Porter. Computing Center would report to me. And one of the things that I argued vociferously for, in opposition to positions that Michael Arnush and others took, was, … who was suggesting that the Computing Center be split between academic computing and administrative computing, with academic computing reporting to the Chief Academic Officer of the College. I kept saying, “No, we want one person to be responsible for both areas so there’d be better coordination and articulation of their vision and their role with directors of academic computing and administrative computing.” Ken Hapeman was there at the time, Leo Geoffrion, and Stan McGaughey, and I said, “I just did not want essentially the same general function, computing, vying for resources, vying for the same resources. I want one person to make the case, to be … if they were going to report to me, and ultimately to the president.” And so we did that and I think that worked out very well and it’s still the case today with Bill Duffy, and formerly Justin …, I can’t remember Justin’s last name, being an attendee at the Dean’s staff meetings. So that portion of the loop was better represented, I guess. I think that, it’s not just me, it’s the team that was in place with the support of Joe and David in particular, that the professionalism at the College, in terms of … well the areas in Business Affairs, and not exclusively, but elsewhere, have just come leaps and bounds. And I would say, I have said and I would repeat, again at least for the time that I was privileged to be at the college, that most members of the Skidmore community have … had no idea how well they were served by the senior directors in Business Affairs. The Ken Hapemans, Barbara Becks, Phil Cifarelli, Chris Kaczmarek, umm, we ran into some turmoil for a bit in facility services but got that squared away… �LG: Who was running that? KB: Well when I came it was Bob Jarvis, who did a wonderful job. Colonel Jarvis! [laughs] So when he retired, which many have said that was the worst thing he’d ever done, we had some trouble just getting the right focus and coordination. And ultimately, I decided to outsource the leadership, to Marriott, which became Sodexo, and so forth, but I understand they are doing a fantastic job. We insisted that the employees, the … unionized employees, would remain Skidmore employees, but the leadership would be on Sodexo’s payroll. But they were every bit as much a Skidmore employee. If they had to make a choice between what was right for Sodexo and what was right for Skidmore, Skidmore had to be it. And they were not to wear their Sodexo uniforms on campus. LG: So what was Sodexo’s responsibility, again? KB: Well Sodexo’s role was the leadership of facility services. The professional staff, the foreman and assistant … director and assistant director, but the line folks were our …were Skidmore employees. But I would say, you know, all … and I would take great credit for, well I would take some credit for this in terms of, at the time, the Business Affairs staff, their professional growth and leadership and management style all in service of the academic and student affairs programs at Skidmore College. I think it’s grown; I think the college is well served by it, not without challenges. I would say, I have said to, particularly to David Porter when he showed up, when he arrived, and I said the same to Jamie and I’ve said the same to Phil, shortly after he arrived, “Skidmore College could afford to do anything it chose to do. It could not do everything it wished to do.” LG: And with that, thank you. That was a wonderful ending. KB: A great privilege. One of the greatest privileges of my life, to work at Skidmore. LG: Excellent. Thank you so much. KB: Well you’re very welcome. � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Skidmore College Retirees Oral History A resource containing historical information obtained in interviews with persons having firsthand knowledge. Interviewer The person(s) performing the interview Lynne Gelber Interviewee The person(s) being interviewed Karl Broekhuizen Location The location of the interview Saratoga Springs, NY, 12866 Original Format The type of object, such as painting, sculpture, paper, photo, and additional data Audio recording Duration Length of time involved (seconds, minutes, hours, days, class periods, etc.) 50:33 Record Contributor Individual who prepared the item and/or edited it. Susan Bender Record Creation Date Day/Month/Year of record creation/edit March 29, 2022 Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Interview with Karl Broekhuizen Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource April 18, 2019 Is Part Of A related resource in which the described resource is physically or logically included. Skidmore Saratoga Memory Project Description An account of the resource Karl Broekhuizen came to Skidmore in 1981 as Vice President of Business Affairs and remained in that position until 2005. In this interview he describes his path to Skidmore, including his education and experiences as a financial officer at other higher education institutions. He considers the unique opportunities involved in managing a relatively young institution like Skidmore and reflects on his work with four College presidents. Some of the financial challenges faced by the College across the years, its ambitious building program (especially the Tang), and building reputation throughout his tenure are topics that figure prominently in this interview. Language A language of the resource English (en) Subject The topic of the resource Retiree Oral History Project Type The nature or genre of the resource Oral History College Reputation David Porter Glotzbach Sports Center Human Resources Palamountain President's Staff Studley Tad Kuroda Tang Museum Zankel Music Center https://www.ssmp.mdocs.skidmore.edu/files/original/4a696fa9e7d8091291cc5b0f17a55ece.jpg 0b1a271aa15ea6e7640b7210f8e52221 https://www.ssmp.mdocs.skidmore.edu/files/original/083c43768d6b0471e14b8b6cfe7cab8a.mp3 5178aa558a7baa964e9b5a5259be9ecc https://www.ssmp.mdocs.skidmore.edu/files/original/235e628838ef9c872ea98d4f21e9a76c.pdf 0fbc3df74bf344cf48cada071e507b30 PDF Text Text Interviewee: Terry Diggory Years at Skidmore: 1977 - 2010 Interviewer: Lynne Gelber Location of Interview: Saratoga Springs, NY Date of Interview: September 10, 2019 00:00:00 Header 00:00:35 Born outside Philadelphia, after 5th grade moved to Long Island through high school. College at Yale and graduate work at Oxford University. 00:01:10 Oxford schedule faster than US graduate programs, therefore started first tenure track teaching job (Skidmore fall 1977), at relatively early age, 26. 00:02:12 Had visited Saratoga Springs as a teenager and “liked the people that I met in interviewing” at the Modern Language Association in NYC. 00:02:32 “a big MLA … the face-off between M. H. Abrams and Hillis Miller … famous event.” 00:02:52 Taught modern poetry [specialty] and “Western Literature: The Classical Period.” 00:03:25 Interest in classical literature from broader interest in literature and in languages. Major at Yale: History, Arts and Letters program. Took Greek, Latin, and other classics courses. 00:04:36 Favorite courses to teach? Different over time. E.g. modern poetry and contemporary poetry. “…joke … everybody I was teaching in contemporary poetry was now dead.” 00:05:15 “Enjoyed the Classical World course … got me involved in…the Classical Studies Ecclesia … a group of people in various departments who were interested in classical studies.” 00:05:53 Included Tom Lewis (English department), Helga Doblin (was teaching classical languages at that time) Penny Jolly (Art History), Darnell Rucker (philosophy) 00:07:00 Highly involved in “the further development of interdisciplinary courses in the Liberal Studies program.” Taught in both Liberal Studies 1 & Liberal Studies 3. 00:07:46 Liberal Studies 3 was the humanities-based division "but all … Liberal Studies divisions looked out from their base to embrace some sort of interdisciplinary work.” 00:08:04 Taught Liberal Studies 3 course on the New York School painters and poets — “interdisciplinary in terms of the arts.” Also team-taught course on Darwinism in Liberal Studies 4, the science-based division. 00:08:42 Chaired Committee on Educational Policies and Planning, (CEPP), “…at the time when the faculty instituted the Liberal Studies program … I’d long had an interdisciplinary interest, and … Skidmore had a culture that was very open to interdisciplinary work.” 00:09:30 Resistance to Liberal Studies? Some simply resistance to change, some departments felt stretched, staff-time wise. “So, it was an interesting political shift in that sense.” 00:10:35 “And many departments really did strongly invest in Liberal Studies … placing themselves in the broader context of service to the college and to all students…” 00:11:15 Also twice English department chair, frequently on department Personnel committee, plus some ad hoc committees including a Presidential Search Committee. 00:13:30 The Presidential Search Committee that hired President Glotzbach. 00:14:08 1970s many big, risky changes for Skidmore “I came at a time when I think a lot of people at the Institution felt that that was at a low point. It very quickly picked up after that, but, because I was new, I didn’t really sense that as a low point because for me it was all new and exciting.” �00:15:29 Low points? Tensions surrounding controversial personnel decisions. “I valued the collegiality, the friendship, that I had with people who were on different sides of those issues.” 00:17:00 Also on the Dean of Faculty search committee that appointed Phyllis Roth. 00:17:14 Tang Museum planning group. “…commitment to making… the mission of the museum … interdisciplinary … That was a spirit that I was very much on board with.” 00:18:20 Toured other college museums and interviewed people about programs there. 00:18:58 Interviewed architects, brought Antoine Predock to Lyrical Ballad bookstore. 00:21:47 Also special: Liberal Studies program and the learning for both students and faculty. 00:23:40 Liberal Studies 1 “a team-taught course drawing on faculty from all different departments. … The faculty teaching in the course would share lectures.” 00:24:49 “Students would meet twice a week for the large lecture and then twice a week in seminar to discuss the reading and connect that to the presentation in the lecture.” 00:25:11 Occasionally featured a guest lecturer with a particular expertise. 00:25:30 David Porter was a regular guest, delivering a piano performance and lecture on creativity and human expression; playing music and being playful. 00:26:43 Retired in 2010, age 59, because college offered early retirement as a cost saving measure during recovery from the great recession. 00:28:19 Involved in and convener for Skidmore’s Retiree Initiative Planning Group. 00:29:14 A coordinator with the Saratoga Immigration Coalition (immigration support). 00:30:12 Service component - recruiting volunteers for English Language Learning programs or drivers to appointments. 00:31:20 Also legislative advocacy work at state and national level. Eg. “Drivers licenses for undocumented immigrants … speaking to the transportation need.” 00:32:41 “Phyllis was really devoted to the institution, … it seemed like she never slept! …She was up in the wee hours of the morning working on her email.” 00:33:15 “That devotion to the college and the sense that our best interests as a faculty were being closely looked after, I think was really important.” 00:33:29 “And she had a sense of vision. She was certainly engaged in the nascent ideas for … the Tang museum.” 00:33:58 “She was thinking about the full arc of faculty careers and so was very interested in developing retirement programs.” 00:34:20 “Phyllis … interdisciplinary mindset … so I think she was very interested in supporting all the divisions of the college.” 00:34:58 The Ren (Renaissance) Group, “an informal group of faculty who gathered to talk across the lines of the humanities and the sciences.” 00:35:35 “I think Phyllis, having been involved in those conversations, was in a very good position as Dean to not only listen to but also to speak for, let’s say, the sciences, as well as the humanities, in developing programs at the college.” 00:36:02 Faculty dining space… “many iterations of that.” 00:37:01 Faculty social culture change “…small village … everybody knew each other.” 00:37:46 Also, “fewer courses were offered during the lunch hour … gave a time when faculty were available to come together.” 00:38:39 "Later… scrambling to eat a bag lunch in my office … made all the more important efforts such as Phyllis’ to develop a dedicated place that was all about faculty coming together.” 00:39:15 Different now. “Of course small villages have their disadvantages as well as their advantages … but … something lost in … bigger institution where people don’t know each other.” �00:39:45 “That even changed in terms of operations like purchasing … with the growth of the college has come a more formal institutionalization.” 00:40:38 Growth in student body, faculty, administration, and “the mode of administration.” 00:41:21 Some nostalgia for the laid back, interpersonal approach 00:42:29 Moseley Lecturer (1992-3). Presented research on Grace Hartigan’s collaborative work with New York School poets, done in conjunction with an exhibit in Schick Art Gallery. 00:45:15 “The flexibility, the willingness on the part of many offices to pitch in to that project … how lucky I was to be part of an institution where that kind of collaboration was possible.” 00:45:56 “The core of the show was a particular series of paintings that Grace Hartigan had done where she had actually written text by the poet Frank O’Hara into the paintings, but … only one of those paintings was in a public collection.” 00:46:53 Skidmore art professor Harry Gaugh suggested contacting Hartigan directly for locations. “…in some cases the person on her list no longer had the painting and I had to do some further detective work.” 00:49:54 “It was interesting … seeing this one set of work by this one artist … in a very different setting … the context in which we first saw them is always part of my memory.” 00:50:31 END � https://www.ssmp.mdocs.skidmore.edu/files/original/bc7ac2d0f9fba423300a6d08360b0f74.pdf 39bd3e5eb57ee4670f03ac8339575ff4 PDF Text Text Interview with Terry Diggory by Lynne Gelber, Skidmore College Retiree Oral History Project, Saratoga Springs, New York, September 10, 2019. LYNNE GELBER: Good morning, Terry. This is Lynne Gelber. It is September … TERRY DIGGORY: Tenth. LG: Tenth, 2019, and I am with Terry Diggory and this is the Oral History Project for Retirees. So, would you like to tell us when, or where you grew up and what brought you to Skidmore? TD: Oh, that’s going way back! [Laughs] LG: Well, that puts it in context. TD: I was born outside Philadelphia, spent time there until, through the fifth grade, and then my parents divorced and I moved with my mother and sister to Long Island. Went through high school on Long Island, and went off to college, and after graduate … LG: Where? TD: I went to college at Yale and then did graduate work at Oxford University. And that put me on a fast track because they have a different graduate system so I spent less time in graduate school than would have been typical if I had spent time in America. Which meant that I ended up at Skidmore, my first tenure track teaching job, at a relatively early age. I was 26 when I started teaching at Skidmore. It was the … LG: And you started when? TD: In 1977, fall of ’77. LG: Ok. Did you have other posts before Skidmore? TD: Um, I taught for two years at Yale while I was completing the graduate work, the dissertation, at Oxford, mostly because I couldn’t afford to stay in England much … much longer. �LG: So what brought you to Skidmore? TD: Well, it was a job offer, it was the best job offer in prospect. I already knew … we had visited Saratoga Springs when I was a teenager so I knew something about the area. I liked the people that I met in interviewing and it looked like a good place to start. LG: You interviewed at the MLA? TD: Yes. Yup. LG: In? TD: New York City. It was a big MLA because it was the face-off between M. H. Abrams and Hillis Miller. LG: Oh yes! TD: Famous event. LG: Ok, so, when you came to Skidmore, what were you teaching? TD: Well I was brought here to teach modern poetry, that was my specialty, but … LG: Is that what your dissertation was on? TD: Yes. But, because of the nature of, well Skidmore as a college and our department, of course I taught in a variety of areas. I also had an interest in classical literature so I taught what was then our “Western Literature, the Classical Period” course. LG: Where did your interest in classical literature come from? TD: Well, a broader interest in literature and also an interest in languages. So when I was in college … I hadn’t studied Greek and Latin previously but when I was in college I took both Greek and Latin. In fact I, I was not an English major in college; I was a major in what Yale called the History, Arts and Letters program. And I ended up taking, I took some English courses but �most of my courses were not in English, in fact, and they included courses in the classics. LG: Hmm, interesting. So, who was the department chair at the time, when you came? TD: Well, Bud Foulke was the chair but actually the year that I was hired Bud was on leave and Ralph Ciancio was acting chair at that time. So Bud came back to the chairmanship in the first year that I was actually teaching. LG: What were your favorite courses to teach? TD: That’s tough. Do you mean in terms of my entire career? Because there were different … different courses developed over time. I certainly liked modern poetry and contemporary poetry, although we had a joke about the fact that the longer we waited the more outdated the contemporary poets and contemporary poetry became until finally I realized that everybody I was teaching in contemporary poetry was now dead. And so those two courses. I very much enjoyed the Classical World course that I taught as well. And in fact that got me involved in one of the first interdisciplinary programs that I was connected with at Skidmore and that is the Classical Studies Ecclesia, we called ourselves, at first; it was just a group of people, there was no Classics department at that time, it was just a group of people in various departments who were interested in classical studies. LG: Who made up that, the Classical Ecclesia? TD: Well, Tom Lewis in my department, was a big supporter of that. Helga Doblin was central because she was actually the person who was teaching classical languages at that time. Even though, again, in her case, that wasn’t really what she was brought for but that was a strong interest of hers. And there were people in Art History … oh, I’m trying to think who … let’s see, oh, Penny Jolly, when she came, early on, I believe she was involved in that. People in, of course, philosophy. So … LG: Darnell? TD: Yeah, Darnell. LG: Darnell Rucker �TD: Right. LG: Good. So what other courses besides those did you really enjoy teaching? TD: Well, as the college evolved, one of the big developments that I really embraced was the further development of interdisciplinary courses in the Liberal Studies program. And, that became a big investment of my time and I really enjoyed teaching in both Liberal Studies 1, the introductory course that for a while all first year students were required to take, and then also in the Liberal Studies 3 division. And, again, kind of like … LG: Was Liberal Studies 3 division-wide? TD: It was sort of the humanities-based division but all of them, all those Liberal Studies divisions looked out from their base to embrace some sort of interdisciplinary work. So the course that I taught in that division was on the New York School painters and poets. So in that case it was interdisciplinary in terms of the arts, but I also taught in Liberal Studies 4, which was the science-based division, and I taught, team-taught, actually, a course in Darwinism as part of that. LG: Ok, the Liberal Studies program - when did that start? TD: Um, early ‘80s. And I was the chair of the, of CEPP, the curriculum planning committee, at the time when the faculty instituted the Liberal Studies program. So in that sense, even before the courses were created, I already had an investment in it. But, as I said, about my undergraduate work, I’d long had an interdisciplinary interest. And I had a sense, too, that already, because of my work in Classical Studies and so on, that Skidmore had a culture that was very open to interdisciplinary work. LG: Did you have any resistance to that? TD: Oh sure, yeah, yeah. LG: Which consisted of what? TD: Well, of course, in some cases there’s simply resistance to change. You �know, “this is different. We don’t like it. We like what we’re doing now and we want to keep it that way.” So there was that kind of resistance. There was resistance on the part of departments who felt, in terms of their staffing restrictions, that they were already stretched to offer the courses that they needed to staff their major requirements, let’s say. Um, and they didn’t feel that they could, what they saw as, quote, “giving up staff time” to teaching a course which they regarded as being outside of the department. So, it was an interesting political shift in that sense, in that, I think, to the extent, and many departments really did strongly invest in Liberal Studies, but they were, by doing that, they were placing themselves in the broader context of service to the college and to all students rather than saying “We’re here for our particular discipline.” And I think that affected what was already here in the spirit of interdisciplinary work, but I think that it had a broader effect as the Liberal Studies program took root. LG: In addition to the Committee on Educational Policies and Planning, CEPP, were you on other committees that were significant to you? TD: Yes, especially in my department. CEPP was the major committee that I had several stints on at the college level, with the exception of some ad hoc committees like Presidential Search Committee and things like that, which are obviously important but not a standing committee. But given the fact that the English department is a large department, we have a pretty complex committee structure internally. So, for instance, I, in addition to being department chair at two different occasions, LG: When was the first time? TD: When I was department chair? LG: Yeah, do you know the date? TD: Um, I’m very bad on dates. [laughs] LG: Ok. TD: We could look that up. But, of course the department chair involved me in personnel work, but we also have our own Personnel Committee within the department and when I wasn’t chairing the department, and the chair exofficio sits on the Personnel committee, I was frequently serving on the �department Personnel committee. And that’s one reason why … some people are surprised when I tell them that I never served on CAPT, the College Appointments Promotion and Tenure committee, which is certainly, and rightly so, considered a major if not the major committee for the college. But the reason is simply that, in my case, that I didn’t serve on CAPT was that I was doing so much personnel work at the level of my department that I felt that, you know that’s where, that part of my energy was being channelled and I didn’t have the extra resources, personally, to commit myself to CAPT. LG: You mentioned presidential search. Which president search ended up with you on it? TD: Um, I was on the search committee that brought the current president, President Glotzbach, here. LG: Ok. And your role was just as a member of the? TD: Yeah, yeah, yup. LG: What was the lowest point for you, as a faculty person or as a member of the Skidmore community? TD: Umm, … that’s hard to say because I don’t really think of a lot of low points. Interestingly, even before I started at Skidmore, when we … we moved to Saratoga the summer before I started and we had a house right near the race track but also right next door to the Dean of Students, who was Claire Olds at the time. And I was just getting to know more about the college and I remember talking with Claire, kind of over the garden fence, and this was in August and she said, “Well, things are looking pretty good. It looks like we are going to make our class for this year.” And this was still, at the time, during the 1970s when Skidmore had gone through a lot of changes, risky things like building the new campus, going co-ed, and it was struggling to attract students. So, I came at a time when I think a lot of people at the institution felt that that was at a low point. It very quickly picked up after that, but, because I was new, I didn’t really sense that as a low point because for me it was all new and exciting. TD: I think the low points probably, … again, involved some personnel decisions, �some hiring decisions that were controversial. Some tenure promotion decisions that were controversial. I don’t regret my role in those decisions, but they were always personally difficult because of the tensions that were a part of that, and, you know I valued the collegiality, the friendship, that I had with people who were on different sides of those issues and, you know, you always wonder, “So, am I gonna lose some friends because of these issues?” And I have to say that on the whole I’m very grateful that despite those controversies, that I felt that I was able to maintain friendships with people who were on the other side of the controversy. But it was tough-going through those times. LG: That’s remarkable … umm, what can I say,… ambassadorial work. Were there other committees outside of the department that you served on or other functions that you had while you were here? TD: Well, I was also on the Dean of Faculty search committee that resulted in the appointment of Phyllis Roth. I was on the planning group for the Tang Museum, and that was a really exciting time. I mean to me … LG: Tell us a little bit about that. TD: Well to me, in the time that I served at Skidmore, having the Tang Museum develop here was certainly a real high point. Again, it also speaks, of course, to the interdisciplinary interests of the college, because, right from the beginning of the concept of the Tang there was a real commitment to making this not simply an adjunct of the art department — it was certainly going to feature the arts — but the mission of the museum was very early on determined to be interdisciplinary. So, again, that was a spirit that I was very much on board with. LG: Did you meet with the architects? TD: Yes, we met with the architects. We also did, the first step, actually, other than, you know, just planning meetings, was doing some touring to other college museums to see how they were set up physically, to interview people about programs there. So I remember we visited Colby College, Williams College, Dartmouth, umm, and those were very interesting experiences. And then we did, also, interview the architects. In fact, I think I may have been one of the first Skidmore people to meet the eventually appointed architect, Antoine Predock, when he first came to campus. He came, this was before �he had been selected, but he wanted to get to know more about Skidmore and he came during the summer and, interestingly, one of the first things that he wanted to do was to go … he said, “Is there a good local bookstore?” So we went down to Lyrical Ballad bookstore, in downtown Saratoga Springs, and he just bought a lot of books about area history, Saratoga history and the history of upstate New York and so on. And it turns out that what he was doing with these, he went back to his studio and he used the materials from these books to develop a kind of conceptual sense of the spirit of the community. And, so again, it wasn’t in terms of practical design, but it was almost a visual collage that would symbolize to him something that he would then translate into the design of the museum. And he was very committed, I think, both in terms of his own theory of architecture, but also because he was an architect who had been primarily associated with the west and the southwest, and he was conscious that this would be a commission for him in the northeast, and he … LG: Was he aware of the climate and the snow? TD: Yes. Yes … yes he was. And he wanted to really show us that he understood who we were as an institution and what this region was all about. And I think that was the factor, really, that got him the commission to design the museum. Because, unlike some of the other architects, who basically came in and said, “I’m a famous architect. You’ll have one of my buildings and you’ll be lucky to have it,” what Predock said was, you know, “This is not about me. This is about Skidmore. I want to make sure that the building that we build is really going to be integrated with the overall mission of the college.” And that was, that was very persuasive. And I think that’s what we got. LG: I’m glad you talked about that. Other special moments that you can recall? TD: Well, again the special moments, not so much the committees but the special moments would be going back to the Liberal Studies program and what, especially Liberal Studies 1 meant for those who were involved in it. And again I think for the college as a whole, in terms of faculty development. I mean, obviously the goal was to introduce students to liberal arts education, but in the course of doing that, I think the faculty learned from each other a great deal. And again, there was resistance. You know, some faculty felt, “this is a real stretch for me.” But of course, one of the things that we learned from each other was a broader range of pedagogical strategies. And �the Liberal Studies 1 faculty would meet on a weekly basis and talk about what the topic was for that week, what approach we might take to dealing with the material in our seminars, and then of course there would be the large group lectures and we would be exposed to our colleagues lecturing, which, again, was not something that would normally have been available to us. So that was a real highlight, to me, for the college. LG: Do you want to mention how the Liberal Studies 1 was structured? TD: Sure. LG: For those who aren’t familiar with it? TD: Sure. It was a team-taught course drawing on faculty from all different departments and because every student, every first-year student, was required to take it, we had to have a lot of sections. And there were sections, about 15 students per section, and a faculty member was assigned to the section but then the faculty teaching in the course would share lectures. So, actually because we didn’t have a lecture space at that time, big enough to fit the entire class, we divided up, at one point we actually did three lectures — we did the same lecture three different times. Then we got it down to two times and we, the last space I think we used was the theater, and students would meet twice a week … LG: Palamountain? TD: Palamountain Hall, right. Students would meet twice a week for the large lecture and then twice a week in seminar to discuss the reading and connect that to the presentation in the lecture. LG: And who gave the lectures? TD: It was mostly the faculty who were also teaching seminars, but occasionally, if we felt that a particular expertise was needed that wasn’t already represented by the faculty teaching the seminars, we would ask for a guest lecturer to come in, from another department. LG: Who were some of the guests? Do you remember? TD: Umm, well … �LG: Was David Porter one of them? TD: Yes, David Porter loved to give a presentation … there was a section … LG: He played piano, right? TD: That’s right, there was a section about, it was about creativity, basically, and human expression, and he loved giving a presentation that he thought of as about play, and by that he meant both, you know, playing a musical instrument, but also being playful. And, so, yeah, he would often do the prepared piano — a la John Cage — and show what could be done with that. And he was, of course, a wonderful lecturer as well as a performer, and that was a very special guest appearance that we relied on. He did that a number of years. LG: Ok. Umm, tell us what you’ve been doing since you retired, and when, exactly, did you retire? TD: I retired in 2010, which was early retirement, by most standards, but that was during the period of the, or at least the recovery from the great recession, and Skidmore had offered early retirement packages because they were trying to offload some of the more … senior members off the payroll, as a cost saving measure. And I had not been thinking, frankly, of retiring at that time. Although, you know, I was beginning to look at when retirement might come, say three or five years in the future. LG: How old were you? TD: Well, I was actually 58 when I made the decision and then 59 by the time I retired. So anyhow I decided to take the early retirement package. LG: And that was what, that package? TD: It was a salary plus enhancement, that is, you got a portion of salary on top of your regular salary so you … LG: As opposed to phased retirement. TD: Yes, that’s right. It wasn’t … I went cold turkey. Right, I simply quit teaching �at that point. although I did not stop, cut ties with the college. And one of the things that I had already begun to become involved in was an evolving retiree group, which hadn’t existed at the college. But my colleague Phyllis Roth had been very interested in this as Dean, and when she retired, just a little bit before me, a fund developed in her honor which was designed to fund retiree activities of some sort. And out of that grew what we now call the Retiree Initiative Planning Group. And I’ve continued with that and serve as the convener for that group. So that’s been one of the things that I’ve been doing since retirement. LG: What are some of the other things? TD: Well the main preoccupation right now, since the last presidential election in 2016, … immigration has come into the foreground of national debate, and I became involved, initially through the church that my wife and I attend in Saratoga Springs, in immigration support work in the community. And a number of faith communities and one civic organization, Saratoga Unites, came together to form what we call the Saratoga Immigration Coalition, and I’m one of the coordinators for that. And we do a whole range of support activities, advocacy activities, for … LG: What kind of support activities? TD: We work with local service providers like the Saratoga County EOC, the Economic Opportunity Council, in recruiting, let’s say, volunteers for English Language Learning programs that they offer. We also collaborate with them in a transportation program, because a number of immigrants in our area, especially if they are undocumented, cannot drive, and yet they have children in the school system, they need to get to school appointments, they need to get to grocery stores, they need to get to medical appointments. So we have a cadre of volunteer drivers so that somebody can request, through the staff member for the Saratoga EOC, a ride at a certain time coming up next week, and we will get a volunteer driver to take them to that appointment. So that’s one, that’s the service component. But we’ve also been involved in advocacy work, both at the state and, to some extent, also at the national level in terms of legislation. We were … our coalition was a regional partner in the local, recent effort to get drivers licenses for which undocumented immigrants in New York State would be qualified. So again, that was speaking to the transportation need. �Susan Bender: Terry, I’m going to … this is Susan Bender, I’m going to insert my voice for a minute. I’m just the tech person, but, reflecting back on your interview and what you’ve been talking about, you mentioned that you served on the search committee that ultimately ended with Phyllis Roth’s appointment as Dean. I wonder if you could reflect back on Phyllis’ Deanship and talk a little bit about her contributions to the college in the years that she was here. TD: Well Phyllis was really devoted to the institution, so … she was notorious for, it seemed like she never slept! You would look at the, when she would send out emails you would look at the time stamp on it, and you could see that she was up in the wee hours of the morning working on her email. So, I think just that devotion to the college and the sense that, our best interests as a faculty were being closely looked after, I think was really important. And she had a sense of vision, she was certainly engaged in the nascent ideas for the museum, for the Tang museum. I’ve already mentioned the fact that she was thinking about the full arc of faculty careers and so was very interested in developing retirement programs. And I think she, although of course there’s always suspicion when somebody comes out of the faculty into an administrative position like that, is she going to play favorites? Is she going to…, you know, favor, in the case of Phyllis, the humanities over other divisions of the college? And Phyllis, and I know this personally because of other informal projects that I was involved with Phyllis in, that she, again, embodied that interdisciplinary mindset that I’ve already spoken about, so I think she was very interested in supporting all the divisions of the college. TD: The informal project that Phyllis and I participated in together was another interesting manifestation of the interdisciplinary work, or the interdisciplinary spirit of the college. We called it the Ren group, which didn’t stand for the bird but stood for Renaissance, and the idea that, you know, the renaissance person was somebody like Leonardo da Vinci, who was an artist, a scientist, all disciplines wrapped up in one, and it was just an informal group of faculty who got together especially to talk across the lines of the humanities and the sciences. And I think Phyllis, having been involved in those conversations, was in a very good position as Dean to not only listen to but also to speak for, let’s say, the sciences, as well as the humanities, in developing programs at the college. LG: As a support for that initiative of getting faculty to talk to one another, were you involved in her decision to create a faculty dining space? �TD: Well yes, and of course there are many iterations of that, but I wasn’t involved directly in the planning but I was certainly aware of her interest in developing that. And, you know that’s come and gone, alas. I mean the, each iteration of that plan has come and gone. LG: It was started first in Falstaff’s. TD: That’s right, yeah. LG: Because the students were no longer using it. TD: Yeah. Well actually, early on I think there was a version of it in the Surrey, and then it really took off in Falstaff’s and then for a while it was over in Case Center. TD: Yeah, yeah. That’s been something, that’s also an interesting topic to talk about, and that is faculty social culture. I mean in the time that I’ve been at the college that’s changed quite a bit. We were, when I first came here Skidmore was a small village, and everybody knew each other. The Dean of the Faculty at that time, Eric Weller, was very conscious, also, as Phyllis was later, of promoting the social life. He would always have a big faculty party at his house. I also remember, kind of nostalgically, that, I think, actually, fewer courses were offered, and so the registrar was able to actually kind of schedule a lunch hour into the schedule of courses. So that, maybe … I’m not sure if no courses, but fewer courses were offered during the lunch hour and there was a time, that gave a time when faculty were available to come together. Right. And we would come together in the Spa and you would just show up at a table, and so that wasn’t formally a faculty/staff club or anything like that, but it was just a time when faculty could just sit down and, you know, chat with each other over lunch. And I remember, later on, both because of the pressures that had accumulated on my shoulders but I think also just part of the changing culture of the college that I ended up, for the most part, scrambling to eat a bag lunch in my office, you know, in between meetings or in between classes or something like that. And so I think that made all the more important efforts such as Phyllis’ to develop a dedicated place that was all about faculty coming together, yeah. And, you know, we are a different institution now, we’re not the small village. And of course small villages have their disadvantages as well as their advantages, you know. There’s always that sense that somebody’s �looking over your shoulder and, you know gossip abounds. But, and now there’s not that kind of hothouse atmosphere, but I think there is something lost in the sense of a bigger institution where people don’t know each other. But that even changed in terms of operations like purchasing. I mean I remember early on at Skidmore if you needed supplies for the department office, basically the department chair or the secretary would go out to a local store, you know, buy a bunch of pencils and then walk into the business office and present the receipt and get reimbursed, and that was the purchasing procedure. And of course now you have multiple forms that you have to fill out and you have to go through authorized suppliers and so on, so with the growth of the college has come a more formal institutionalization. LG: When you say growth of the college are you referring to the student body or the administration or the faculty? TD: Well overall. Yeah, the student body has grown, faculty has grown, but also certainly the administration and the mode of administration has changed as well. So, it’s gotten more, you know, obviously some would say more professional, you know, we follow best practices for tracking finances and business measures and so on, which, I’m sure, is certainly to the good in terms of the financial security of the college. But, again I’m still kind of nostalgic for the laid-back, kind of slap-dash approach of doing things. LG: The interpersonal relationships? TD: Yeah, absolutely! Yeah. Because you, … yeah, and that was a personal relationship. I mean, when you walked into the business office, you knew the person that was processing your reimbursement. Or you knew who to call … you know, something … a problem was coming up you’d say, “Oh, well, so and so,” you wouldn’t even think of it in terms of the office, I mean now that’s what you say, “Well, I have to call Facilities about this,” but in those days it was all personal, “Oh, I have to call so and so, she’ll know how to fix this,” [laughs]. SB: Rose Verro. TD: Yeah, right [laughs]. Yeah, absolutely. LG: Are there other things that you want to include in this interview? �TD: Um, no, I think we’ve covered a lot. Umm … LG: Anything that sticks out in your mind? TD: Well, a moment that, you know, personally sticks out in my mind that I’m very grateful for, and again illustrates the collaborative nature of the college, is the opportunity that was presented to me — I was named the Moseley Lecturer one year, and I had been working, the research that I had been doing was, again growing out of my Liberal Studies course on the New York School poets and painters, and I had been researching a particular artist named Grace Hartigan, who worked with poets like Frank O’Hara, John Ashbery, people now known as the New York School poets, and I had gotten interested in the possibility of doing a show of her work, and so when the invitation to deliver the Moseley Lecture came I asked if I could use that as the occasion for not only giving the lecture but also doing a show at the Schick Art Gallery. And of course that required the agreement and full collaboration of the art gallery. At that time David Miller was the director of the gallery and he really embraced the idea. So again here’s this, there was no sense of guarding turf, but …you know, this English professor wanted to put on a show in the art gallery, that was fine with him, and we worked it out and he invested a lot of his own effort. LG: When was this? TD: Again I’m bad at dates. Early nineties? [laughs]. And so that required the full collaboration of the art department, but also, because the dates when the show could be done and also the dates we brought Grace Hartigan to visit the college, at that time in connection with the show, but I think the Moseley Lecture had been typically delivered in the fall, but we could only do it in the spring, and so I think my doing that threw off the Moseley calendar, because then it got shifted to the spring, but again the college administration said, “Ok, so we can do this.” So the flexibility, the willingness on the part of many offices to pitch in to that project, it was certainly a highlight for me. And to me it also illustrated how lucky I was to be part of an institution where that kind of collaboration was possible. LG: So the art department was responsible for bringing her work, for guarding them? �TD: Well the art gallery, yes, oh yeah. They brought, it had become a fascinating project for me because the core of the show was a particular series of paintings that Grace Hartigan had done where she had actually written text by the poet Frank O’Hara into the paintings, but the challenge was that only one of those paintings was in a public collection. So, my wife and I went on a cross country tour tracking down where these paintings were and then we had to negotiate with each of the private collectors to bring them to this show. So, you know that, the background there, that was quite an experience in and of itself, going around. LG: Tell me about that a little bit more. Whom did you meet? TD: Well, again, first of all, to start with the idea of collaborating at Skidmore, the first person, when I began my interest in this series of paintings, the first person I actually talked to about it was Harry Gaugh, who was a member of the Skidmore art department and had worked in that period. He had written a book on Frantz Kline, written a book on de Kooning. And I explained to him this problem, so I’m trying … “Harry do you have any ideas how I could begin finding these paintings?” And he said, “Well, why don’t you just write to Grace Hartigan?” [laughs] The artist! [laughs]. You know because he had, again through his own research, had been involved in that world, I think he had met Grace Hartigan. And he said, you know, start with the source. And that was already something that I had learned from my PhD dissertation, which was about WB Yeats and American Poets and my supervisor at that time said, “Write to American Poets and just ask them,” you know, what their relationship to the poetry of WB Yeats was, and how, what they think the influence might have been. So the idea of just going straight to the source was already in my background. So I wrote to Grace Hartigan. Luckily she was very open to the possibility of my working on this project so she was able to give me a list, to the extent that she was aware of where the paintings were, of who had them. It was somewhat out of date, so I … I could work from that list, but in some cases the person on her list no longer had the painting, and I had to do some further detective work. And so we would then get in touch with the individuals and say, “Can we come and photograph the painting?” And so it was interesting, again, seeing this one set of work by this one artist, how these works had ended up in a very different setting. So one work was in a home in the lower Hudson Valley belonging to an art historian. It was an old Victorian house and the painting was up on this dark stairway and she … you know, it wasn’t an especially lavish home, she was an academic and didn’t have a big income, but really �treasured the painting. And then another place we went was a home in Grosse Pointe Michigan. Somebody who was a high-time art collector, and so that was, again, a very different setting, with track lighting for all of the paintings and a big setup for displaying the collection. So we saw the work in very different settings, and of course for me, now, when I see those paintings, their original … the context in which we first saw them is always part of my memory. LG: Good! Well, I think we’re just about out of time. I really appreciate … I thought there were some very interesting ideas that you gave us and I want to thank you again … TD: Thank you. LG: … for spending an hour with us. TD: Thank you! � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Skidmore College Retirees Oral History A resource containing historical information obtained in interviews with persons having firsthand knowledge. Interviewer The person(s) performing the interview Lynne Gelber Interviewee The person(s) being interviewed Terry Diggory Location The location of the interview Saratoga Springs, NY, 12866 Original Format The type of object, such as painting, sculpture, paper, photo, and additional data Audio recording Duration Length of time involved (seconds, minutes, hours, days, class periods, etc.) 50:30 Record Contributor Individual who prepared the item and/or edited it. Susan Bender Record Creation Date Day/Month/Year of record creation/edit March 29, 2022 Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Interview with Terry Diggory Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource September 10, 2019 Is Part Of A related resource in which the described resource is physically or logically included. Skidmore Saratoga Memory Project Description An account of the resource After earning his D. Phil. at Oxford, Terry Diggory was born outside began teaching at Skidmore in the Fall of 1977, offering courses in poetry and the Classical World. He participated programs at the College, broadly including the Classical Studies Ecclesia and the Liberal Studies program. One of the poets in his Liberal Studies course on the New York School, Grace Hartigan, was the subject of his Mosely Lecture in which he connected her poetry and painting. As the College embarked on its program of interdisciplinary teaching leaning, Terry chaired the Committee on Educational Policies and Planning (CEPP) as well as the Curriculum Committee. He also served as English Department chair. Other committees included the search that brought Phil Glotzbach to the College, the search that ultimately led to the appointment of Phyllis Roth as Dean of the College, and the group that planned the Tang Teaching Museum. Since retirement in 2010, Terry has been the convener of the Skidmore Retiree Initiative Planning Group and has also been a leader in the Saratoga Immigration Coalition. Language A language of the resource English (en) Subject The topic of the resource Retiree Oral History Project Type The nature or genre of the resource Oral History Antoine Predock CEPP English Department Eric Weller Liberal Studies Phillip Glotzbach Phyllis Roth Tang Museum https://www.ssmp.mdocs.skidmore.edu/files/original/8d0b9143230256c97c3fbed06a4f374d.jpg ed01d954424e8d184307e264db8d3ce3 https://www.ssmp.mdocs.skidmore.edu/files/original/c02ab030e3e9195f9e23127654e2546b.m4a 0bf25d81fb7629f9a9820e3562df5a9b https://www.ssmp.mdocs.skidmore.edu/files/original/657f7b7b3ddb54cc266c51baa3734da1.pdf 3dc664538e36423b499fe2e46c9356c6 PDF Text Text Interviewee: Larry Ries Years at Skidmore: 1979 - 2004 Interviewer: Lynn Gelber Location of Interview: Saratoga Springs, NY Date of Interview: September 24, 2019 00:00:00 Header 00:00:30 Grew up poor, one of 9 children, in Kentucky; attended a Catholic high school in Wisconsin and graduated top of the class — “gave me a new lease on life.” 00:02:01 After HS, worked 2 years as migrant farm laborer, then attended a small Catholic college in Conesus, NY for 2 years until ran out of money, then moved home and finished English degree at Thomas Moore College in northern KY. 00:03:24 Next was awarded a teaching fellowship at Southern Illinois University; earned Masters in English. Then taught for 2 years in Italy at an international high school. 00:03:59 Returned to US and earned Doctorate in English at Southern Illinois University. 00:04:15 Family moved to Albany, where Ries taught English for 7 years at SUNY Albany, and then was an administrator for 2; wife worked reviewing doctoral programs for the NYS Ed dept. 00:05:25 During time at Albany wrote Wolf Masks, a book on contemporary British poetry. Despite publishing, didn’t get tenure, so after working administration, took advising position in 1979 in Skidmore’s prison program. Joe Bruchac was running it at that time. 00:06:00 Program at Great Meadows Correctional Facility was part of the University Without Walls (UWW), an external degree program originally funded by the Ford Foundation. 00:07:20 Originally the program offered both inmates and guards opportunity for 4-year degree. 00:08:12 Also was an on-campus element for paroled men who had done well in the program. 00:08:48 Combination of inmates & guards in same classes led to problems, so dropped guards. 00:09:18 Ries was also a lecturer on campus in the English department. 00:09:30 Ries led prison program from 1980 to 1985, then became Assistant Director of UWW. 00:10:23 Next became Director of the Skidmore Masters Program, another external degree program, though it did include an on-campus element. Ideal was 15 students; sometimes had 25. 00:13:07 Promoted to Skidmore grads and in Adirondack region (b/c few opportunities there). 00:15:03 Many factors led to end of program, including “a changing of the culture,” less focus on external programs, more on campus. Also, remote learning became more common; less need. 00:16:56 Loved teaching Liberals Studies 1 because of the wide range of reading and the opportunity to be educated and then to learn how to transfer that to students. 00:17:45 Working in the prison could sometimes be traumatic, being locked in with tough men. 00:19:30 Still, the men loved many teachers - eg. Betty Balevic, Helga Doblin — “they revered [Helga Doblin] because they never had good discipline before, they only had bad discipline so when someone did that for their betterment, they recognized that and they appreciated that.” 00:22:26 Once while Ries was teaching Death of a Salesman, “we were acting it out and …[one student] says, “But Pop don’t you understand, I’m a failure! I’m a failure!” and all the guys �started crying because it was their life all of a sudden you know, this sense of being a failure … it was such a moving moment.” 00:23:19 A difficult moment: when Skidmore financial support of prison teaching faculty wasn’t as strong as it could have been, considering Skidmore got PELL, TAP and HEOP money for it. 00:26:04 Recruited faculty by personal invitation and word of mouth from other faculty. 00:26:49 Even science courses were taught, although not with labs. 00:27:33 Received grant to bring computers into the prison; 1st program in NY to do that. 00:28:14 Some problems with faculty incl. inappropriate dress; not submitting grades on time. 00:31:40 Special experiences in the Masters program included working with elderly students, including Frank Crone, who did a thesis in religious studies and later funded a scholarship. 00:34:30 Students worked with a faculty advisor aligned with their area of study. 00:34:50 Sometimes hard for adult students who had other obligations, eg. a troubled child. 00:36:44 During initial on-campus seminar, students met with faculty advisor to design their program, which sometimes involved independent study credits, other times students would take classes at schools near them and apply transfer credits toward their Skidmore master’s degree. 00:38:06 Also added some evening classes for local students in the master’s program. 00:38:30 Different experiences than daytime classes, eg. taught “Growing Up In America” to seven women and one man; the man had been seeking his birth mother and found her during the course, and they “mothered” him and “it just worked beautifully as part of the course.” 00:39:31 The night courses allowed the students to “come and have actual discussions rather than work totally on their own and … that’s a better form of education usually than doing something completely independently.” 00:40:08 Enjoyed career at Skidmore, felt fortunate to have different positions and head a number of committees, “which gave me work with the wider community.” 00:40:35 One challenging one was the Benefits Committee, with which Ries had worked for a year to present recommendations that were challenged in one meeting; fortunately, President David Porter backed Ries up and it worked out. 00:43:15 One last memory from the prison program, interviewing one potential student, Robert Chambers, who “was just horrible, just terrible, and we rejected him and he sued the college, on the grounds of discrimination,” Fortunately, Chambers got transferred so suit declared moot. 00:45:23 END � https://www.ssmp.mdocs.skidmore.edu/files/original/fee65f9b6fb5bf9c3d8f1b3988a1ebb9.pdf 286d3ac9ad4b8869290b650a97e7ff47 PDF Text Text Interview with Larry Reis by Lynne Gelber, Skidmore College Retiree Oral History Project, Saratoga Springs, New York, September 24, 2019. LYNNE GELBER: Good Morning, this is Lynne Gelber interviewing Larry Reis, with technical assistance of Sue Bender. It is September 24th, 2019. So Good Morning Larry, nice to see you. LARRY REIS: Good Morning Lynne, good morning Sue. SUE BENDER: Good Morning Larry LG: Let’s start off by telling us a little bit where you grew up LR: Oh wow (chuckles) I grew up in Kentucky, one of nine children to a German Catholic family, South of the Ohio river not too far from Cincinnati, and we were very poor and when I was 12 years old I got sent to a Catholic seminary up in Wisconsin where I went for four years of high school, which kind of changed my life. LG: How did it change your life? LR: I got an education I was always in trouble as a child and I kinda found out for the first time that I was smart (chuckles) never knew that before, the nuns weren’t very good in the school where I was LG: In Kentucky? LR: In Kentucky, and so I graduated first in my class up there, so it just gave me a new lease on life LG: Was that a different culture? Going to Wisconsin? LR: (laughs) Totally, they made fun of me all the time LG: Because of your accent? LR: Because of my accent, the teachers made me stand up in class and pronounce words that they laughed at when I pronounced them, so it was a weird experience, but it was a good one overall �LG: So where did you continue your education? Did you do that right away? LR: Uh no, I became a migrant worker for two years because after high school, I couldn’t go back home. My father was an abusive alcoholic father who shouldn’t have had any kids, but he had nine and so it wasn’t a good environment. We had a two-bedroom house for eleven people um so I just started working whatever work I could get. So I picked potatoes, picked grapes, you know for $2 before I started going to college. LG: So how did you decide to go to college? LR: (laughs) I didn’t want to pick apples and grapes for the rest of my life um so I um started out in Western, NY. I was out picking the depth of potatoes, and grapes in south of Rochester. There was a little community college down there at the time, a Catholic college called St. Michael’s. I don’t think it’s there any more in Canesus, NY and I went two years there, ran out of money, went home and finished up at Thomas Moore College in Northern Kentucky, a very good, little private college in Northern Kentucky. LG: And from there, where did you go? LR: I went to Southern Illinois University, I got an assistantship - had no money still LG: What did you major in, in college? LR: English, um went to SIU, Southern Illinois University and had a teaching fellowship so I taught two courses and um, got my Masters in two years and then went to Italy to teach for two years, went to Rome and taught in Rome at an International High School for two years and then came back to Southern Illinois. In the meantime, I’d gotten married and had a child in Italy and then came back and got my Doctorate degree at Southern Illinois University in English LG: And what brought you to Skidmore? �LR: Well, I started as an Assistant Professor at SUNY Albany and I was there for 9 years LG: Did you get that job through the MLA? LR: Uh yes, actually it was because of the MLA. I was late that year and they couldn’t go to MLA because Albany got snowed in and that year, (that was the year they got a 30-inch snowfall and the airports were closed) and so they didn’t do their interviews at MLA that year, so they did them later, and I was in the market so they invited me to Albany. So I came up, they offered me a job in the English department and I taught there.- It was a terribly political place at the time. It was just horrible and my wife was reviewing doctoral programs at that time for State Ed and they took away the doctoral program in English at SUNY Albany (laughs) and that put me in a terribly awkward position so they didn’t give me tenure the year my book came out. Then they took me in administration though for two years. LG: What was your book on? LR: Contemporary British Poetry, Wolf Masks was the name of it. So, they did take me in administration for two years, but it just left a bad taste. So I wanted to get out of there and since my wife was working still in Albany at State Ed, we wanted to stay in the area because she had her career fully started and uh so Skidmore had a job opening for an advisor in the prison program and in ‘79 I came up and interviewed and was offered that job. LG: With whom did you interview? LR: Who? LG: Yes LR: Don McCormack, Bob VanMeter, and Joe Bruchac. LG: Okay, and Who was the? That was under the Office of Special Programs, right? �LR: Yes, uh huh when Mark Gelber was Dean LG: Okay and what was Don McCormack’s position at that point? LR: He was head of UWW LG: So, this was part of the University without Walls? LR: University without Walls and Joe Bruchac was running the prison program at that time, so I was hired to work under Joe Bruchac. SB: Larry, could you explain the prison program for folks that might not know about it? LR: Okay, as part of the University Without Walls, which was an external degree program originally funded by the Ford Foundation. Before I got here they had started a program at Great Meadows correctional facility which is in Comstock, New York and it was set up to offer inmates and guards at that time a four-year degree. And when it began they had guards and inmates in the same classrooms and Skidmore faculty would go up there five nights a week to teach a three hour class. One night they would teach one class for three hours and I don’t know how it was before I got here but once I got involved, we had five faculty members going up there five nights a week. It was a big group of faculty offering classes up there and it’s 45 miles away so it was a good trek for anybody to go up there to teach. And in addition to that program, which graduated quite a few students, there was an on-campus element of the program where men who had good records inside the prison and who had done well in the program up there would be paroled to Skidmore campus and they would live on Skidmore campus and complete their education here, and there were quite a few. When I first arrived, there were five men on campus at that time. LG: Was there a problem with the guards being in the same classroom as the �inmates? LR: Yes, so it was a big problem. It turned out that many of the inmates were brighter than some of the guards (laughs) and that caused quite a conflict and that program fell apart quite quickly so by the time I got here, it was only open to inmates LG: Alright, did you have other positions at Skidmore? LR: I was a lecturer in the English department as well LG: Okay, how long were you with the University without Walls? LR: The second year, they made me head of the prison program and I think I did that for five years and then… LG: And what years were those? Do you remember? LR: Well, I came in ’79 so I think in ’80 - ’81 I became head until ’85 I believe then in ’85, I became the Assistant Director of University Without Walls under Bob VanMeter. Don McCormack moved up to be Dean of Special Programs. Bob VanMeter moved up and they made me the Assistant Director, so I got out of jail finally (laughs) after 7 years and so um, then I stayed in that position until whenever we started the masters’ program and I’m not sure what year that was when we started the master’s program because I became the first Director of the masters’ program. LG: Explain a little bit that masters’ program please. LR: Okay, the masters’ program was built on the model of the University Without Walls, which was an external degree program for adult students. And for many years, there had been talk of doing a masters’ program at Skidmore and finally, it was put together by a faculty committee, of which Phyllis Roth was a member, plus a whole host of other people LG: Was Phyllis Dean of the Faculty at that point? �LR: Yes, uh-huh and they put it together, went through all the faculty channels, etc. through State Ed and it became a program. The difference from UWW is that we did have an on-campus element of it. When students began their program, they had to come to Skidmore for a week and take a week-long graduate seminar and I always thought of that as kind of a bar-raising element to see if students could actually do the kind of work that we were going to ask them to do. And they had a research paper to do as an element of that seminar and it was a good way to find out if they had the basic skills that you need to do graduate research. And we washed out maybe 30% of the students at that seminar. In other words, if they couldn’t do that kind of work, there was no way they were going to do it independently afterwards. LG: On average, how many students then would be in a seminar? LR: In the early years, we were almost (laughs) we were almost too successful. We had 20, 25 a couple of times. We wanted to have 15. We thought 15 was the ideal size but there was always pressure for enrollment around here and so if we got 25 (laughs), we would keep 25 and try to make it, but we did really well I know in the early years. I know after a while, they had more trouble filling those seminars. LG: Why was that do you think? LR: I don’t know, I don’t know um, I know we did a lot of advertising. I used to send letters out to alumni of Skidmore. I would send out letters because I thought some of them would like to get a masters’ degree from Skidmore and we did, we got quite a bit. Our first graduate of the masters’ program was someone who had graduated as an undergraduate from Skidmore. And we also advertised…. LG: Do you remember who that was? LR: Katie..oh, I can’t remember her last name, I think it was Katie (laughs) and she �worked with Jeff Segrave and sports psychology was what she was doing, her program. And we advertised extensively throughout the Adirondacks also because people up there didn’t have access to graduate programs, and we were successful in bringing people who had degrees but didn’t have any graduate degrees LG: And these were primarily liberal arts? LR: Yes, they had to be interdisciplinary liberal arts programs…I always thought the program was quite successful I thought especially it served women, the women who got dumped by their husbands after graduate school (laughs) after they worked to put their husbands through graduate school you know, and then the husbands would split. They got their careers started and then these women were left, they had gone to college, but they had nothing else. We had quite a few of them coming back to get their degrees so they could launch their own careers and I thought that was a great use of the program. LG: So, was it low enrollment that made the program disappear? LR: I think it was a whole lot of things including changing of the culture here at the college LG: Can you explain that a little bit? LR: I get this more second hand because I wasn’t here any longer LG: What year did you retire? LR: I retired, well, in 2000, I went on a phased retirement and I retired fully in 2004 and they had four or five directors after me of the masters’ program, but people told me that the college became more inward as time went on instead of out, just the way that UWW collapsed and the masters hung on for a few more years but then that… and the faculty seemed more inward centered I would say, rather than the external programs weren’t as important and maybe, there was a lot of competition in these areas too. When we �started UWW, we were one of the few programs that offered that kind of education and the same with the masters’ program when we started that. We were an exception and I think that as time went on more and more people especially with online learning could do it in a whole host of ways. You could go to SUNY Albany and do most of your work as an external student, so people didn’t need this kind of learning as much anymore either. So I think there are a lot of factors engaged in that plus money (laughs) which is a whole ‘nother issue. LG: what do you think were some of the outstanding moments for you in your career at Skidmore? LR: I enjoyed teaching in Liberal Studies, the original liberal studies program. I taught every semester in LS 1 and I just thought that was a terrific program. I felt that it educated me as well and it helped me learn in a way to transfer that to students and I just loved that. I thought that was terrific, I loved the wide range of reading. If I was a student (chuckles), I would have taken a course like that if they had had it when I was around, so that was it. Working in the prison program is traumatic, you go up there everyday like I did for five, years - six years and hear those bars clank behind you and you’re in there with men, many of them. Comstock is like… LG: A maximum security? LR: It’s a maxi max you know, it’s one of the worst prisons in New York state where Silent Sam was kept, people like that um, and it’s filled with hardened criminals and these are not nice men I mean they (chuckles), they are tough and there are times when you feel your life threatened. One time they had to sedate a man because I told him he had to take a Sociology course and he said I’m not gonna take one of those nigger courses. His father was killed in the New Jersey riots in the black riots and his father was killed there. He �was a big, huge stevedore, he worked on the docks. His arms were that big! And Danny, he told (me), —he was (laughs) an Irish guy with a high-pitched voice —and I said, “Danny, if you wanna get a degree, you gotta do your social sciences requirement.” And he’s like, “Mr. Reis, I’m not gonna do that,” and I said, “Well you don’t have to get a degree, that’s your choice but if you want the degree..” and he just went off, he went crazy, and then they came down and put a needle in him right away, because I don’t think anybody could have handled him if he really got going, and there were things like that, and you know, it was always tricky having women going into that environment. It was always….most of the time, it worked well. I mean Betty Balevic was such a trooper, she was such a… she went up there from Schenectady every semester LG: She was in the Business Department? LR: Yes LG: And what did she teach? LR: She taught Business Management and Betty would go up there every semester and she had to drive from Schenectady up there, which was a long way and the students loved her. Helga Doblin would go up there and the students loved her, they needed good discipline LG: What did Helga teach? LR: She taught Latin and Greek up there and one time (chuckles) I was up there, we have a little office and I see Helga marching down the corridor *boom,boom,boom*, the only way that Helga could do it and I rush out and I said, “Helga what’s wrong?” and she says, “I gave a man a bathroom pass,” it was like high school, they had a pass you know, and only one could leave at a time because with three-hour courses so everybody had to get out the door. And she says, “He’s been gone ten minutes!” and I said, “Oh, you �want me to go and check on him?” “No, I do that!” (chuckles) and she walks, I would never walk into a bathroom in a maximum-security prison. Helga marches in and then a minute later, she has this guy by the ear and she’s brining him back, “You come back to class!” and she brings him back. This guy was a triple murderer (chuckles) and they revered her because they never had good discipline before, they only had bad discipline so when someone did that for their betterment, they recognized that and they appreciated that so she was special that way so.... But the prison, working in the prison was a special time for me here. I think it took its toll over six years, it was very exhausting work and it was night-time work in addition to day-time work, plus I taught a course up there once every other semester. LG: In? LR: In Literature LG: In Poetry? LR: No, well I did teach poetry courses, but I tried to do the general literature you know, poetry, drama, and fiction LG: Was it an Introduction to American Lit or something like that? LR: It was kind of a hybrid course like an Introduction to Lit, but I remember teaching “Death of a Salesman” one time, and we were acting it out and the guys were playing the different roles and one (chuckles) one of the guys was playing Biff, the oldest son of Willy Loman and he says, “But Pop don’t you understand, I’m a failure! I’m a failure!” and all the guys started crying because it was their life all of a sudden you know, this sense of being a failure I mean, it was such a moving moment. I was tearing up but I didn’t want to (laughs) show them that. I was being moved but also the boy there. So it was really great moments like that. LG: What were the most difficult moments? �LR: (long pause) I think the sense that at times, as a prison program we were cut loose on our own and didn’t get the kind of support that we wanted LG: From the Faculty or from the Administration? LR: Both, both and Rick Rosenfeld was my assistant in the program for a while and when we taught up there we would get paid a stipend. We didn’t get paid much, I mean to begin with, I don’t think we ever got paid equivalent to what the faculty got paid so you know, we weren’t paid really well, so when we taught we would get paid $1500 or something like that back in those days and then Don decided that he didn’t think that we should get paid anymore that we should just do it as part of our regular work. So Rick and I decided to go on strike (laughs) and we said, “Well, okay then we’re just not gonna teach anymore in that case!” Why would we do that? You know you work all day doing administrative work, and then you gotta prepare a class and then you gotta go up and teach three hours and you gotta travel an hour to get there and an hour to get home, and you’re just dead! Why would you do that? So they backed off of that, but that kinda thing, I mean, that was kinda..and UWW was turning $100,000 back to the college every year in surplus money LG: And the money was coming from? LR: The prison program LG: State money? Or Federal money? LR: Well, they got Pell and TAP right, every student got a Pell and a TAP grant plus a HEOP grant so there were three sources of funding coming in for every student and you know, we paid our faculty, but there was a huge surplus every year, and we turned that all back to the college, so when they didn’t want to pay us (chuckles), that was like a slap in the face like that’s what I felt maybe when you say difficult, those kinds of things it’s like for �me it would have been a no brainer to say this staff is important in what they’re doing and we got all this money, let’s support them as well as we can, and that didn’t happen all the time. LG: How did you recruit faculty? LR: Personally, I went around and sat in people’s offices all the time and said listen, I got this program (chuckles) I’m trying to run and it’s exciting and I got a lot of faculty that do it, and I think you’d really enjoy doing it. Phyllis (Roth) did it for a semester. LG: Teaching? LR: I forget what she taught. Her field whatever, you know, area of literature she taught you know, but it was mainly personal salesmanship and I think word of mouth from other faculty. Faculty who did it, had good experiences, who talked to other people. LG: Were there any general science courses? LR: Yes, Dick Lindeman taught every semester, taught Geology all the time, who else did we have? LG: Figured field trips would be a problem LR: (laughs) Yeah, a big problem, but Ken Johnson taught up there also. We had a number of people who taught science courses up there. There was no lab, although, when he taught Geology, he would take a lot of samples up and everything but there is technically no lab. They wouldn’t let us do that, and we got a grant finally to bring computers into the prison. We were the first program in New York State to do that. There’s a grant from a foundation in New York City that Special Programs still gets $20,000 a year from them, and I think it goes towards the Jazz Institute and things like that now, but they supported us for many years with money that allowed us to put computers in the prison. That was a real step forward. �LG: Alright, are there any other moments or interactions with faculty that come to mind? Or Administration? LR: Um, I remember I had difficulties at time with faculty. I had a female faculty who refused to wear a bra in the prison (chuckles) and I said, I can’t let you go in anymore. I said that’s cruel and unusual to the men in there and she finally changed but it was so obvious you know, and one of our faculty members with the guys that came out of prison, she would seek them out for sexual activity… stuff is always difficult (chuckles) you know. You’re dealing with adults first of all, who really can do whatever they want, and yet you know it’s not in the best interest of the people that kind of thing. Our last payment to the faculty was always dependent on them handing in their grades, their final grades, and we had some guy in Economics who didn’t stay here and he simply refused to hand in his grades. This was when I was assistant director. Ken Klotz was then directing the prison program at that time, and I don’t know why he was doing this, but he wanted to be paid and Ken said, “Well, let’s pay him and maybe he’ll…” I said, “No, if he’s not gonna do it with good will now, he’s certainly not gonna do it with good will after he gets his money.” And I had a talk with the guy and I said, “This is their money that’s paid for their education and they deserve their grades. If you’re angry at the administrators or something, you can’t hold their grades (chuckles), cause they’ve earned that and they deserve that and they’ve paid for that with their TAP and Pell money.” And Mehmet got real angry with me one time too. Mehmet and I are close friends. LG: Mehmet Odekon in Economics? LR: Yeah in Economics, and Mehmet wanted me to take off that rule about holding the grades until you pay. He said because we’re professionals! And I said, “I know you’re professional but Mehmet, we still have problems with �getting grades out of people. This is the only hold I have to get the grades.” And he stormed out of my office and Mehmet didn’t talk to me for a year after that. We’re very close friends now (chuckles) but he thought I was just being stupid and a hard ass or something and he was a faculty and I was an administrator and he wasn’t gonna take that from an administrator, but that kind of interaction happened a lot. LG: I wanna go back to the Masters program and ask what were the most fruitful experiences in that program? LR: There were so many. We had an older gentleman, he died last year in fact, it was in his nineties, but Frank Crone was his name and he was a donor to the college. He sat on fifteen boards and he wanted to do a program in Religious Studies. He was an old, Jewish gentleman, who wanted to…he had a firm belief that if people could (chuckles) only understand that Christianity and Judaism are really the same thing, that they grew out of the same seed, and he actually wrote a book about this later on, about the book of James, which was one of the apocryphal gospels and he worked with Sheldon Solomon, whom he finally had a blow up with, and Joel Smith was his faculty advisor LG: In Philosophy? LR: Right, in Philosophy and Religion LG: And Sheldon in Psychology? LR: Yes, and Sheldon in Psychology and this guy did a wonderful program and then he funded a scholarship program for the Masters program afterwards and we named it after him. The Crone Scholarship so that was really nice to happen LG: And he got his degree? LR: And he got his degree, and he didn’t need it for anything. This was just pure, he needed guidance in how to approach the subject he wanted to do �LG: And what subject did he want to do? Do you remember? LR: It was just called Religious Studies, I think. You know, it was the overall Master of Liberal Arts in Religious Studies LG: And there was a final paper that they had to write, a thesis? LR: Yes, that’s what he did his paper on, Christianity and Judaism being the same thing. He worked with Phil West also a lot at that time.. He was in English, passed away my goodness, ten or fifteen years ago now, Phil. LG: Okay, any other interesting theses that came out of that? LR: Let me think back, that’s a long way to think back (laughs) There were so many good students and they worked really closely with the faculty which was really good. Every student had their faculty advisor from a department in which they worked. It was just exemplary the way it worked when it worked well. Like all external programs, I think there are times when it doesn’t work at all for a student. The student can’t get through his or her own motivation. I had a student who called me one time and said she had an adopted child from Russia and the child was psychotic, that it been in one of those orphanages. She said sorry, I just can’t find time to do any studies, I’ve got to take care of this child and I said, you really need to take time for yourself, don’t worry about your studies, you got more important things to do. There was this old, Jewish woman who came into the program, she was from Florida. And Rose must have been between 65 and 70 when she came to the program. She was the sweetest woman in the world. She volunteered for everything down there. If any committee or any social work unit needed help, Rose was there. She couldn’t do academic work and she came, and she did our seminar and I looked at her paper and it was just terrible. It broke my heart, but I made the phone call and I talked to her for about an hour and I told her how much I admired her that she didn’t need a degree to do all the �good work that she was doing, that she ought to continue doing everything she’s doing, and just forget about(chuckles) getting a masters degree, and it went well, much better than I thought it was going . I thought I was gonna wind up with this woman crying on the phone, but she finally thought that was the best advice. LG: Larry, it occurs to me, we haven’t said how that program works. There’s the initial seminar and then what? LR: Okay, and at that time they meet with a faculty adviser to set up kind of an ideal program so, if you want to do religious studies, you might take a course in the Bible etc. and then it was up to the student to find the resources for those courses now, one of the major resources is simply, go to a university near where you live and take a course and then have it transferred into Skidmore LG: And that would mean just presenting the transcript? LR: A transcript, official transcript. The second thing would be to do an independent study with a Skidmore faculty member. In other words, if there is material you wouldn’t find in a normal course, the faculty member would help you put that material together into a special course, an independent study, I’m sure the same way undergraduates do at times here LG: And the faculty would be reimbursed for that? LR: Yes, as well as for mentoring the student as the advisor. And the third thing we did, we started after a while, was to start evening classes on campus for local students cause we always have a cadre of maybe 30 students in the program who were roughly from the Albany, Saratoga area and so one night a week we would have a course in which students could come on campus and study. I remember teaching that course one time. I taught a course called Growing Up in America, and I had seven women and one man, and �the man was a man who taught in the music department at the time. He was a classical guitarist and during the course of that course, he was looking for his birth mother and he found her during the course and we were reading all this Growing up in America with “Huckleberry Finn” and all that literature we were reading at that time and the seven women just mothered him like (laughs) he was a lost child and he would come in and tell us where he was in this search and it just worked beautifully as part of the course. LG: And the purpose of that evening course was to build a sense of belonging? LR: Well, it had to fit into their individual programs first of all but it came from a place where they could come and have actual discussions rather than work totally on their own and as all of us know, that’s a better form of education usually than doing something completely independently LG: Is there anything else about your experience at Skidmore that you would like to share? LR: I had a very good career at Skidmore, I enjoyed myself immensely. I always felt like there was a lot of work to do and I was fortunate to be able to have over my career, four or five different positions and I also headed a number of committees while I was here also, which gave me work with the wider community LG: What committees? LR: Benefits committee, what else would I be on? Benefits stuck out because that’s the year we totally redid benefits for retirement at one point and working in the Karl Broekhuisen era and Steve Harren era was quite a challenge (chuckles) when you’re working with money, but we did and that was good LG: And who was president at the time? �LR: David Porter was president because I remember an incident when we had worked a year and we brought out these recommendations LG: On benefits? LR: On benefits and it went to Financial Policy and Planning committee and Karl changed it in one meeting after our year’s work and two faculty members came to tell me this and I was so angry, I kicked him out of my office. I called David Porter and I said, “You asked me to chair this committee and I said I did, and we did this” David intervened, and it got changed back. I was so angry at that time with what Carl did. LG: Do you want to share what the changes were? LR: I forget what they were LG: It was important at the time? LR: It important at the time. It was like the number of years of service you needed, the strange combination of years of service and age before you could retire and get benefits, medical benefits and you’re like tiptoeing through crocodiles working through all this. Pat Lee won’t talk to me either at that time, because we were giving benefits to families and she argued with me that it should only be the faculty members themselves and no one else and I said but our sense of community is different than that but it was that kind of thing so to work a year and try to come out with something then have it changed in a two hour meeting was like Oh” LG: So the impetus was mostly financial? LR: Of course, yeah LG: Anything else you wanna share with us? LR: No, one good thing as an interesting story is that, do you remember the preppy murderer in NYC, strangled a girl having sex in Central Park? His name was Robert Chambers, he applied to our program up at Comstock and I was �assistant director at that time, I wasn’t in charge of the program, but Don McCormack, he was dean at the time, he said, “I want you to go up and interview this guy because it’s gonna be a kind of a touchy interview,” so I went up and interviewed him and it was just, he was just horrible, just terrible, and we rejected him and he sued the college, on the grounds of discrimination, because we would let all these Blacks and Hispanics in the program, and he was like good White boy and he wasn’t gonna sit and take this. So for many weeks, I had to meet with the college lawyers about this cause I was being sued personally as well as the college being sued, and it was just about to go before the judge and he got in trouble and got transferred out and the judge declared his suit moot cause he wasn’t there anyway so we just dodged a bullet on that one (laughs), but that was a big case at the time, little anecdote but kind of interesting LG: Good, well I wanna thank you very much for taking your time to share all these reminiscences with us LR: Thank you, it was interesting LG: The walk down memory lane? LR: Well, you know, the memory isn’t always real accurate all the time so it’s kind of fun to go back and think about things like that LG: Okay, thanks LR: Thank you LG: It’s been a pleasure � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Skidmore College Retirees Oral History A resource containing historical information obtained in interviews with persons having firsthand knowledge. Interviewer The person(s) performing the interview Lynne Gelber Interviewee The person(s) being interviewed Larry Ries Location The location of the interview Saratoga Springs, NY 12866 Original Format The type of object, such as painting, sculpture, paper, photo, and additional data Audio recording Duration Length of time involved (seconds, minutes, hours, days, class periods, etc.) 45:24 Record Contributor Individual who prepared the item and/or edited it. Susan Bender Record Creation Date Day/Month/Year of record creation/edit March 29, 2022 Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Interview with Larry Ries Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource September 24, 2019 Is Part Of A related resource in which the described resource is physically or logically included. Skidmore Saratoga Memory Project Description An account of the resource Larry Ries came to Skidmore in 1979 after teaching and working in the administration for 9 years at SUNY-Albany. His initial job was as an advisor in the University Without Walls prison program at Great Meadows Correctional Facility. He later became Assistant Director of UWW and then the first Director of the Skidmore’s Masters’ program, which was based on the UWW experience but required an interdisciplinary approach to study. He also taught as a lecturer in the English Department and Liberal Studies I, required of all first year-students at Skidmore. In this interview he describes his circuitous route to obtaining his PhD and provides vivid accounts of his experiences in many roles at Skidmore. Language A language of the resource English (en) Subject The topic of the resource Retiree Oral History Project Type The nature or genre of the resource Oral History Cornstock Correctional Facility David Porter Interdisciplinary Collaboration MALS Phyllis Roth UWW https://www.ssmp.mdocs.skidmore.edu/files/original/f9bce7006c931b2eaed235784e38d6e5.jpg 18883315413995f40af946c047c4a9cb https://www.ssmp.mdocs.skidmore.edu/files/original/8b26d55b932f59a5ef2abbca8a10c621.m4a 5f1678d9abc1289ccfbb2f9fc74d1024 https://www.ssmp.mdocs.skidmore.edu/files/original/98de521eb464ccd78387d86597f88d65.pdf 4ae6bb3425ed95228a9f361a028a0f9e PDF Text Text Interviewee: John Cunningham Years at Skidmore: 1967-2017 Interviewer: Lynne Gelber Location of Interview: Saratoga Springs, NY Date of Interview: April 4, 2022 00:00:00 Header 00:00:39 Grew up in Greenwich, CT; uncle, who was painter, lived with family, normalizing notion of career as artist. 00:01:21 As child, always interested in creative projects, science, & math. 00:01:38 Earned Bachelor’s degree in Physical Chemistry from Kenyon College (OH). 00:02:12 In senior year at Kenyon, took first painting class - discovered the excitement of art:“every mark was unique.” Subsequently decided to apply to Yale to study art. 00:03:24 Kenyon painting teacher Joe Slate supported decision & helped get Yale interview. 00:04:45 Yale interviewers thought it “cool that a scientist …wanted to be an artist.” 00:05:45 Cunningham had no sculpture experience before Yale, though his uncle had studied w/ Jackson Pollock. 00:06:20 “I really loved college! …I didn’t …get all As. I got As in those kind of things that interested me, mostly the strange things that everybody else flunked [laughs].” 00:06:55 Two degrees from Yale: BA in 1963 & MA 1965. 00:07:10 Chemistry background led to job in Yale Geology department neutron activation lab. 00:09:12 After Yale, worked for kinetic sculptor George Rickey; physics knowledge helpful. 00:10:42 A couple of years later began to seek teaching positions & hired at Skidmore (1967). 00:12:18 “At that point, Yale graduates …[were known for creating] teaching experiences that produced … extraordinary results … individuals with just staggering skills.” 00:14:16 In early years at Skidmore, there was a lot of socializing between faculty & parents and faculty & students. When Cunningham interviewed w/ Alice Mosher, she mentioned some faculty who had married students. That wasn’t shocking then. 00:15:55 Also, there was a strong collaborative working atmosphere among the art students. 00:18:20 When Skidmore all women, much student travel; after men began to attend, less travel. 00:19:45 In first few co-ed years, the women voted the men into the offices/leadership positions. 00:20:47 Before became fully co-ed, male RPI & Colgate students attended Skidmore courses. 00:21:02 One Colgate medical student, Ben Cohen, also interested in art. Cunningham insists, “I did not flunk him! [laughs] … He was a really great guy.” 00:22:55 “I was absolutely staggered by the accomplishments and skill of the women at Skidmore… stunned at how high the board scores were… impressed by the accomplishments … and still am, actually.” 00:24:45 The Great Race: originated with donation of huge amount of styrofoam; realized it would be great for making boats, opened up community contest to make boats out of anything and then race them across a pond out in Greenfield. 00:29:12 The old campus had problems with security. New campus building is beautiful, but we lost the faculty studio space, which had been a focal point of student-faculty activity. 00:31:04 During planning for new building, Cunningham spoke to architect and suggested a way to expand his office without expanding costs, so ended up with huge office! �00:32:56 While at Skidmore, “I started my own business, I had patents, I kept going on my scientific pursuits, I published in Nature magazine, … and I was very involved with my teaching … I just generally loved my teaching. My students were great, absolutely great.” “My goal was to present students with really exciting and interesting materials and circumstances where they could really just fulfill themselves, and my goal was to help them do that.” 00:34:41 In 1967, Skidmore art dept. didn’t even have a drill press. By 2017, had 3-D printers. 00:35:33 Upon starting, ordered many tools and taught students to use them. The existing faculty didn’t think it appropriate for women to use tools like bandsaws and compressors. 00:36:52 While sculpting one day, discovered method for craning force; published & patented. 00:40:19 Started company that built Seicon isolator, a device to absorb vibrations. 00:41:10 Started the business because he had presented info about the isolator to Caltrans, who offered to support a bridge project if he could raise $ for it. 00:41:47 No bridge, but raised over $3 million, learned a lot, enjoyed science and art combo. 00:43:12 After the business, time writing about conceptual art. Not yet published, but might. 00:44:41 In retirement, enjoying beach driving and fishing. Also doing 3-D printing sculpture. 00:45:38 To do 3-D art, one must know how to draw well. … “I’m having a lot of fun with it.” 00:47:05 Unlike riding a bike, the software is challenging to get back to after being away. Overall, the CAD (Computer Aided Design) software is “more difficult than you’d think." 00:49:00 “I regard myself as an incredibly lucky man.” I don’t …recall actually having a boss … I came from that generation where faculty would shout and argue with the president at faculty meetings.” Remembers one meeting where “Somebody took a swing at somebody else!” 00:51:30 On introducing students to using computers in the creative process, started incrementally. 00:52:56 Once when there was difficulty getting budget approval for supplies, met with Dean. “He was just so amazed at what I was showing to him … we got some neat stuff, really wonderful stuff.” 00:55:42 “It was just an extraordinary privilege. I had a lot to do! You know what I mean? I had a lot to do!” [laughs] 00:56:08 END � https://www.ssmp.mdocs.skidmore.edu/files/original/90a540b6ae834d682d09265a71f9886a.pdf 41169655b458e6632df97302f7647052 PDF Text Text Interview with John Cunningham by Lynne Gelber, Skidmore College Retiree Oral History Project, Saratoga Springs, New York, April 4, 2022. JOHN CUNNINGHAM: This is harder than I thought it was going to be. [laughs] LYNNE GELBER: This is Lynne Gelber. It’s April 4th, 2022. I’m here with John Cunningham, retired from the Art Department, and our wonderful helper Susan Bender. And John, welcome. It’s really nice to see you after so many years. I just want to ask you to tell us where you grew up and how you came to be at Skidmore. So why don’t we start there. JC: Ok. I grew up in Greenwich, Connecticut. My uncle was a painter and he lived with us for years. So, when I was small, growing up, the smell of oil painting, like, just filled the house, and one of the things about it was, I guess when you grow up that way, you know, the idea of being an artist is just truly a real thing. There’s nothing odd or strange about people being artists — it’s just a thing that people do. I also wonder about the oil fumes. I always kind of feel, looking back on it, who knows? I could have been really intelligent [laughs] if it weren’t for those fumes! And I guess I was always interested in what I thought to be creative stuff. I did lots of projects when I was younger, and I was very, very good at science, and particularly mathematics, and so when I went off to college, at Kenyon College in Ohio, I was a … physical chemistry was my speciality. And I was … [laughs] actually, looking back on it, I tell my students about this and they feel it’s a little bit sick… I was remarkably good at it. I was remarkably good at the math. I could walk up to a blackboard in those days, and write out — actually I needed two blackboards — and write out the proof of the �Heisenberg uncertainty principle. And … I didn’t think of it at the time, I look back and I don’t even think my professors could do that. My senior year in college [laughs] I took a painting course. And that’s when I discovered that being creative really had nothing, necessarily, to do with science. One of the things about science I always thought was interesting, that for a thing to be real, for a thing to actually be considered to have happened, it has to happen more than once! [laughs]. If a thing happens just once — well I guess the Big Bang happened once, so I guess we have to accept that — but if things just happen once, scientists just assume it just really didn’t happen because it must be duplicable and be observed by others. And, and then I discovered art. Did that, you know. You reach out to that canvas and you blot your brush to that surface, every mark was special, every mark was unique, and I discovered that being creative had nothing to do with putting on a lab coat and mechanically reproducing experiments that hundreds of other people had done before. So, I took that one painting course and … LG: Was it the professor or people in the class who inspired you, or … the material? JC: It was me. Oh, and I had a great teacher, very imaginative, Joe Slate, very imaginative and… LG: What was his name? JC: Joe Slate. Joseph Slate. He was a Yale graduate, and one day in the spring of my senior year, Joe said to me, he said, … no, actually, I started it, because I said, “Hey Joe,” I said, “You know, I’m thinking of changing from chemistry and maybe focusing on art.” Joe goes, “Really?!” He says, “You know, I was going to ask you about that,” he said, “but I didn’t want to �change your opinion. I didn’t want to be forward,” he said. He said to me, would you like to go to Yale?” [laughs]. So I said, “Yeah, sure I’d like to go to Yale!” Because at that point it began to dawn on me that being creative was something far more exciting than just donning a lab coat and mechanically reproducing events that were well known and experienced before, but rather there were aspects of being creative that were tremendously exciting, really, really unique, and I was sure art was one of them. LG: So, you went to Yale for an MFA? JC: Yeah, and, with … but I went to Yale. Well first, Joe Slate set me up with an interview at Yale, see — because I had taken no art courses to speak of! [laughs] This one painting course! And I was applying for entrance at Yale Graduate School! But Yale in those days offered a BA and a BFA, and so I went up for my interview and the people there thought it was so cool — this was the old days, you could never get away with things like this nowadays — they thought it was so cool that a scientist person wanted to be an artist. I went up there, met a bunch of people, walked around, talked, and they said, “Okay, you’re in.” [laughs] And for the next 3 years I thought I was a special student, you know, but I wasn’t! I was just a student but I was a student who had absolutely no art experience whatsoever and I was in graduate school, see. LG: But you had had experience with oil painting? JC: Well, I’d done a little bit of, yeah, a semester of oil painting LG: But with sculpture? JC: No, I had no experience at all. Although my uncle, my uncle did study with Jackson Pollock at the … at the Munson Arts Institute in New York. He was a student with him. He said that the most intelligent thing he heard Jackson �Pollack ever say was “Gin is a great cathartic.” Now, I knew what gin was, I’m not sure, even today, I know what a cathartic is, [laughs] but it sounded really funny at the time. So, anyway, I loved … actually, looking back, I have to say, even when I was at Kenyon studying science, I loved college! I really loved college. You know. Although I have to say I wasn’t, I didn’t certainly get all As. I got A’s in those kind of things that interested me, the strange things that everybody else flunked. [laughs]. LG: John, what kinds of … well let me ask you, when did you get your degree from Yale? JC: Well, I have two degrees from Yale. Let me see, one was, I think, in ’63, to my surprise, they gave me a BA, and then in ’65 I got my MA from Yale. Actually, when I was at Yale I got a job — most of my fellow students at Yale got jobs in the Geology department doing, you know, drafting work in the Geology department. And so I went to the Geology department and said, “Hey, all my friends are working here. Have you got a job for me?” But I knew nothing about drafting! And they said to me, “What can you do?” And I said, “Well I know something about chemistry.” Turned out I knew a lot more about chemistry than anybody in the Geology department [laughs] who were accustomed to studying rocks! So, they put me in charge of a neutron activation lab, because that was my speciality when I was in college, and I was really very good at it. And, as a consequence of that — neutron activation is when you bombard a molecule with neutrons, and you create an unstable isotope and that emits radioactivity that’s proportional to the amount of that material in a substance. And we were working on processes where if you took a tablespoon of alcohol and mixed it in Lake Superior, we could measure it. [laughs] But, during the process I got very radioactive, and after my third … third, no second year, or so, my son was just born, the chair �of the Geology department called me into his office and he said, “John, I have to tell you something. You’ve just recorded more radioactivity than anybody else has ever recorded at Yale university!” [laughs] So, that was …I used to think it was funny, I brought my friends to the lab and I would wave my hands in front of the Geiger counter and I always thought it was funny. But you know in those days, who knew! We didn’t know. I always … I wondered a little bit about what the effect was on my health, but here I am at an advanced age and I seem to be doing alright, so! [laughs] LG: Ok, so when you left Yale, what year was that? JC: I think that was in ’65. But I went to, after I left Yale, I got a job working for a sculptor, a kinetic sculptor by the name of George Rickey. LG: And how did you meet George? JC: George sent a letter out to all of the graduate schools saying that he was looking for an assistant. He was looking for somebody who could weld, who could solder, who could do metal work and all these other things, and I could do those things so I responded. And, George and I, we had the most amazing relationship because George was an incredibly educated man, classically educated, and what we would do, he was a kinetic sculptor — kind of think of Calder, in a way, things that balance, you know, center of gravity, period functions, things like that — and we would sit around George’s table, right, in the morning drinking coffee, and on a napkin George would talk physics to me, back and forth, and he would draw these things out on a napkin and then I would go out into the studio and I would make them. And I was very good at the science part of it. One of the problems with George, he had other artists who were assistants and these were people who could make things but they never understood the science of �it, and so I was the first person he ever worked with who understood, you know, things like center of gravity, movements, you know, and so forth. LG: So how come … you only stayed with him … one year? JC: I worked with him for about three years, and at one point, I guess I walked in and I realized it was time for the little bird to fly the nest, you know? And I could easily see that I was getting too comfortable. And so what I did … [laughs] talk about, you know, well luck, talk about luck, and maybe that’s the secret to life, is luck, and being ready to act when that coin flips your way, you know. So, I sat down and got a map, and I was living in a house where, fortunately, we were paying very little rent, and I drew a circle on that map of commuting distance, right, and LG: And where was that house? JC: The house was in Chatham, NY. And … big circle of commuting distance, and within that circle were three colleges with significant art departments. And one was SUNY, one was Williams and one was Skidmore. And, so I just fired them off letters, saying, “Are you looking for a sculptor?” [laughs] And all three of them were!! Can you imagine that? And… LG: Well there was also a significant Yale presence here at Skidmore… JC: Oh yeah, but that wasn’t necessarily a welcoming thing in those days. LG: Oh? JC: Oh yeah. Oh boy, there were politics involved in that decision. Everybody was amazed at Skidmore that they hired me because those other three Yale guys [laughs] were very controversial. And yet, here again, they hired a fourth one, you know! Although I have to say I was a little bit of an outlier. Although come to think about it, I’m thinking … at that point, Yale graduates, with Josef Albers sort of background and direction, flooded the country with ideas about design and creativity that were aesthetically �magnetic, and these people put together very, very teachable experiences that produced just extraordinary results, just extraordinary results! There was a horrific flaw in the entire process, though, … and early on I kind of, I knew exactly what it was, because these people believed, truly believed in their heart of hearts, that they had defined creativity! They truly believed this. And, of course, if you just think about it for a second, the moment you define what being creative is, it ceases to be creative. I can’t understand why more people didn’t see that, you know? Although, as far as a teaching vehicle goes, they were able to produce individuals with just staggering skills. People who could manipulate color and form. We produced students who could draw with skills that you just don’t see nowadays. Our students could sit down with an H pencil and sketch you while you sat and talked to them, you know, they were that skilled. And … LG: So now are you talking about Skidmore students? JC: Skidmore students … well I’m talking about the Yale courses that were developed all across the country. And, of course, I was a part of that, so in that kind of context, I’m probably, as far as a teacher goes, more attractive, you know. LG: So, what courses did you teach when you started here? JC: Well, I taught … LG: And you started here in, again, 19… JC: ’67. 1967. It was an all-women’s school… it was an all-women’s school… Oh, can I tell you …? Okay, so, my very first interview with the chair of the department, Alice Mosher, who was this wonderful, wonderful, brilliant, brilliant woman. So, she sits down and she’s talking about the department and she’s, “Well…” and she describes the department and the faculty, and she’s “Oh, four or five of the faculty,” I can’t remember how many, �“married Skidmore students.” I said, “Oh really,” I said, you know, “That’s interesting.” [laughs] You know, didn’t think anything of it! “That’s good, I guess,” you know? Years later, I can remember talking to my student assistant and I said, “Yeah, when I came here it was really interesting, in my first interview the chair of the department said there were a number of faculty that married Skidmore students,” and the guy went, my assistant went, “What!?” He was horrified! He was shocked! And I, when he was shocked, I was shocked! I thought, “What did I say?” You know, “What did I say?” [laughs]. To make a long story short, there was a period when we started, Lynne, you must remember this, the faculty and the students were really, really close. Really close. The faculty were also close to their parents, the parents would come visit on the weekend, we’d have them over, we’d have Bloody Mary’s on a Saturday afternoon, you know, the drinking age was 18. We had “beer crits” [laughs] every Friday afternoon at 4 o’clock in my studio. And … it was an exciting time. Oh, another thing about it that I thought was interesting, as opposed to my view of artists today, is that we all shared. It was a sistership, it was a brotherhood, it was like, we were all engaged in this wonderful, exciting venture together, you know? Nowadays it’s every man or woman for yourself, you know? There’s not that sense of sharing and communication that existed then. LG: I think that may have been your department. JC: And, oh yes. Yeah, in particular. LG: Not all departments were like that. JC: I think that’s probably true. �LG: There was considerable sharing across departments, by individuals, though. JC: Yeah. No, I think you’re probably right on that. But it was also because, that Yale background, we had this project, we were all engaged in this dream, pursuing this dream, it was truly magical, looking back at it. There was a soul to our involvement with the class, and with teaching, that I think sort of evaporated over the years, you know? I feel privileged to have been able to be a part of it. LG: When you interviewed, did you interview with anybody besides Alice Mosher? JC: Oh yes. Edwin Moseley, who was Dean of the College, and uh, this was funny, so Edwin says to me, in our first interview, he says, “John, have you ever been to Skidmore before?” And I said, “Yeah, yes I have.” Well, I had because my brother’s girlfriend called me up at Kenyon once, I think I was a junior, called me up, this was my brother’s girlfriend, and she said to me, “Would you like to come to Skidmore’s dance weekend with me?” JC: I said, “I’m in the middle of Ohio, I have no way of getting there. Although I have a friend with a car. Can you get two or three of my friends dates and we’ll all drive up together?” And she said, “Sure.” So, we threw a case of beer in the back of a car and drove up to Skidmore. And, LG: Now this was a time when you could drink at 18 in New York but not in Ohio, is that correct? JC: Well, that didn’t slow us down in Ohio. I look back on it now, Kenyon was an all-male school, okay, so all we had to do was drink, you know? Skidmore was an all-women’s school and all they had to do was drink, I think, looking back on it. Davis, Tom Davis, was the chaplain. He told me once, he did a survey at Skidmore, probably a little before I got here, and he said, �“You know, we did a survey and discovered that at any given time, 50% of the girls were at other schools” because it was not that much fun to be, you know, all by yourself alone here at Skidmore, “and the other 50% wanted to leave but couldn’t!” [laughs] And while I was at Skidmore that changed, I have to say. We got co-educational; all of a sudden it was really, really rewarding, it was fun to be at Skidmore. LG: What difference did it make in your department to have men in the undergraduate classes? JC: Well, I have to tell you the first men were really kind of … chancy [laughs]. You ask yourself, Skidmore goes co-educational, what kind of guy would make that choice, right? So, our first candidates weren’t that strong, looking back on it. And I’ll never forget one of my good friends saying to me, “Boy,” she said to me, “You know, you really know when you’re hard up when those poor guys start to look good to you.” [laughs] And the first few years, you’ll remember this, the Skidmore girls voted men into all of the offices — do you remember that? That was also, I thought, really very revealing. But anyway, over the years things sort of evened out. It was a rough time for the college, but I think for those of us struggling through, it was a tremendously exciting time of flux, experimentation, and it was very, very alive. I’m not the only one looking back and feeling privileged being able to participate in that experience. LG: When … before we became a fully co-educational institution, there was four one-four, and, do you remember that men from Colgate would come over? JC: Four-one-four, I think, happened after we were, I’m pretty sure it did, we were co-educational, I think, by then. No? No. Because I was active … yeah, four-one-four. �LG: Because guys from Colgate would come over… JC: Yeah, and I had classes where guys from Troy came over, too. Troy — RPI. Yeah, I had a huge bunch of guys from RPI who would come. LG: Because one of the people who came from Colgate was a medical … well, he was studying to become a doctor, and his name was Ben Cohen. JC: Oh, I remember Ben Cohen! Oh my God, Ben Cohen was this … Ben, oh, it’s annoying, because Ben Cohen, Ben Cohen told the whole world that Cunningham flunked him! [laughs] in three dimensional. And I, here’s my chance to publicly set … I did not flunk Ben Cohen. [laughs] I gave Ben Cohen a permanent incomplete! [laughs] But, ah, no, I remember Ben Cohen very, very well. LG: And I remember Ben Cohen (*see note) because his father said he could not …um, he would not underwrite his college education if he left Colgate and decided not to be a doctor. He wanted to be an artist. JC: Yeah, yeah. LG: And I just am remembering that he then went into UWW instead. JC: Yeah. And I remember Ben Cohen at parties. We used to have student faculty parties, and I can remember on occasion stepping over Ben Cohen [laughs] at parties. But, I did not flunk him! He, actually, that was published in the magazine! I was shocked to see that published! [laughs]. But, no Ben was a great guy, though. He was really a great guy. LG: What were some of the other highlight moments of becoming co-educational? JC: Uhh… I will say this, that when I came to Skidmore as a young man, I grew up in a family with… I have two brothers, I went to Kenyon — it was all male, you know, and so when I arrived at Skidmore I was, as far as women go, I was I think rather shy, and I was absolutely staggered by the accomplishments and skill of the women at Skidmore. I remember going �through their college board scores as an advisor, and I was stunned at how high the board scores were — just absolutely stunned. And, that took me a long time … I got over that shyness, you may have noticed that [laughs]. But I was very, very shy. So, I started from a point of view where I really was impressed by the accomplishments of women at Skidmore, and still am, actually. And I think the guys came to Skidmore and ,all of a sudden, the college environment became whole and healthy, and men brought a very different sort of an attitude toward it, and we all grew, sort of, accordingly, but I have to say, looking back on it, some of my best friends today are women that I met, kind of back then as a consequence of shared activities, you know, and stuff… and men, too. LG: John, what are some of the other highlights from your experience at Skidmore? JC: Well of course we did the Great Race. Do you remember the Great Race? LG: Oh yeah! Why don’t you explain it? JC: Well in those days, see, if you really wanted to get a big crowd of people, all you had to do, since the drinking age was 18, was to get a keg of beer and a huge crowd would show up, see? So, if you had a project [laughs] that you wanted to do, getting it off the ground was really easy! So, about the time we started this I had arranged with — what is it, Monsanto? One of the big chemistry companies — to donate to Skidmore a boxcar full of Styrofoam. And, you have to see a boxcar to really understand how much Styrofoam that is! It’s a huge amount of Styrofoam! And I hadn’t considered how much it was. So anyway, the boxcar arrived at a siding and we had the Skidmore grounds people to take it … the only place we could put it on the old campus was in the steam room, the steam house, where they packed it in there in this great big industrial space and you went in there and you could just barely get �through and all the rest was Styrofoam! So, for years we made Styrofoam stuff. So, there we were in class one day and we’re thinking, “Hey, we’ve got all of this Styrofoam. It’s the perfect stuff to make boats. Let’s have a race!” [laughs] So it started in my class. So, we put posters up and I went and I talked to this guy Braim, who’s a local lawyer who owns — actually there’s a street named after him, and it’s Braim’s Pond; it’s up here in Greenfield, I think. And he gave us permission. In fact, he actually went and hired himself a master of ceremonies, which I thought was really kind of funny, but he really supported us. So, I put signs up and my assistant put signs up, and … I can remember my assistant, at that time, Mary KeatingLeahey, is her name now. So, we got a couple of kegs of beer, we put the kegs of beer on the side of the road where this pond was, and we sat there wondering, “is anybody going to show up?” [laughs] Feeling a little bit silly, but then, again, we had a couple of kegs of beer, at least we could drink beer [laughs] and then all of a sudden, at one point down the end of the road, we saw this car driving around the, it was an old dirt road, driving around this corner with this strange contraption strapped to the roof, and we knew we were good. And all these people showed up! And the pond, a week before, had been frozen, so the water was really, really cold. And so, for a series of years we held the Great Race! And we … what the hell was the prize? I’m trying to remember what the prize was. There was a whole series of rules, and the last rule, I think, was the best — the last rule was that you could cheat! [laughs] We made it very clear. LG: So, the idea was to make something with Styrofoam? JC: With anything. With anything! And the idea, we had a course laid out, see. And one time, since you could cheat, some guys from RPI came in wet suits and, in the middle of the night, and they laid a rope from one end of the lake �to the other, see, [laughs] and they had this contraption that they then tied the rope to and then when we said “start” the people on the other were like pulling on the rope! LG: Now did that ever continue on the new campus? JC: We did it for a couple of years and then I, you know, I … I thought that it was inappropriate for me to continue to be the prime mover of it and I just sort of tried to encourage the student body, just to take it over and sort of step out of it and it did happen, gosh, it still may be on the calendar, The Great Race, and they put this little notice up, I don’t think anybody shows up! But for years they would do this…[laughs]. LG: Let’s talk about the move to the new campus and how that affected you, how you adjusted to new space. JC: Oh well, the old campus was just a horrible, horrible thing, and the art department was the last to move. And we had terrible problems down there with security, so moving up here was a, just a wonderful opportunity. And, of course, the new building was beautiful. But, there were lots of things that we gave up. On the old campus, because you had all these old buildings, all the faculty had their own little studios. Now, the studio wouldn’t necessarily be a room any bigger than this, but it was your place to work. It was on campus. And, it was very funny, the plans always, always included faculty studios, as part of the future, and it’s sort of remarkable how, over the years, that was just forgotten. But I have to say, one of the things I greatly missed was the fact that my, our studios, the faculty studios, became just a focal point of student-faculty activity, on the old campus, and that we ended up losing. Our colleagues, outside of the department, always kind of … they would look at our building and see the teaching studios we have and somehow assume that those were our spaces, you know, but, really, they �weren’t — we couldn’t create our own work in the spaces reserved for students, and with supplies reserved for students, either. So, in the end I created my own studio, and many of the other faculty did, which meant that activities that used to — professional activities that used to involve Skidmore and my students ceased to exist because I was, you know, elsewhere. So that’s a price we paid. LG: Did you have any role to play in the planning of …? JC: Oh yes, oh yes. [laughs] So, my office was designed between ceramics, and there was another wing that was sculpture. And there was this little space, in between part, was my office, and I remember talking to the architect, “Hey look, do you realize that you could take that front wall of my office and move it forward another 20 feet [laughs] and all we have to do is just pay for a little bit more ceiling [laughs].” I said, “Furthermore, we can cut the expense by not putting any ceiling in, just leave the pipes open,” and so forth. So, I ended up with, I think, the biggest office on campus. In fact, Palamountain came to visit once and he’s looking around this brand-new building and somebody says, “Yeah, and this is John’s office” and Palamountain sticks his head in and then he goes, “How in the hell did Cunningham get this big space?” [laughs] I just happened to be there talking to the architect. [laughs]. But no, it was a beautiful space; I loved my office. And, in fact, when I retired I … for 50 years, I had a place on campus, you know, for 50 years, and it was always there. And that’s … LG: And you retired in what year? JC: I retired in, when did I retire … 2017? Yeah. Is that 50 years? Yeah. Something like that, yeah. So, I miss that office. I really do. Any place in Saratoga, I always had my office. And go hang out, go read, you know. But, �in fact, I haven’t been back to my office. It would make me feel sad. I’m hoping John Galt is in there….laughs] LG: So, were there other highlights that, you know, special moments for you, in the course of those 50 years? JC: Well, I think that, as I was saying before we started the formal part of the interview, I think …for me, I was really involved in doing things. I started my own business, I had patents, I kept going on my scientific pursuits, I published in Nature magazine, … and I was very involved with my teaching, I mean I just generally loved my teaching. My students were great, absolutely great. Wonderful, wonderful people. And, as I got older, I became very selfish, as I may have said, and if I could be on a committee and I thought I could make a difference I’d be on a committee. Otherwise, the hell with it. I think much of the stuff the faculty has to do involves jumping through hoops and I had already jumped through 50 years of hoops, so I just pursued my own heart and what I saw to be my students’ best interests. One of the things with my discipline, by the way, is that, as opposed to my friend who taught Physics, where much of the time he had to regretfully inform them that they just got a C minus, and hence their career as a doctor [laughs] was in question, you know, and suffered terrible phone calls from angry and hostile parents, my goal was to present students with really exciting and interesting materials and circumstances where they could really just fulfill themselves, and my goal was to help them do that. And at the very end I got heavily involved in three-dimensional printing, you know — computer processes. And, in fact, if I would be …one of the things that disappointed me a little bit about retiring is that in the three or four years just before I retired I was really able to bring sophisticated technologies like 3-D �printing to the Skidmore sculpture area, and just as we were getting off the ground I sort of left. [laughs] But I guess it’s ongoing now. In that same respect, when I came to teach at Skidmore the sculpture area had … like, a drill press [laughs]. No, wait a minute, it didn’t have a drill press! When I came, I ordered a drill press! I think they had a hand drill, you know! And that was the only tool they had. LG: So, you had to teach the students how to use the tools? JC: Yeah, oh, and that was … oh I remember the existing faculty were very upset because they didn’t think women should be … it was appropriate for women to use tools like that. Especially when I was ordering things like bandsaws and compressors. So, anyways, usually what I did was, I kind of outfitted Skidmore the way my own studio was outfitted … with like, well, in the end plasma cutters, welding equipment, woodworking stuff. My kind of work sort of spread over a variety of interests. Here is the interesting thing, though, my studio is bigger than my house at home and it has all of the kinds of stuff that Skidmore has, and now that I do 3-D printing, I don’t need any of it. [laughs] I don’t need any of it! I sit down in front of my computer, you know, and I create these drawings — which, by the way, is much harder than it sounds — hit a button, and a couple of weeks later a big box arrives on the front porch. And … I’m thinking that’s the future. That’s the future. That’s sort of the next step that I would have loved to have been able to see. LG: You mentioned that you had patents? JC: Yes. LG: Do you want to talk about that a little bit? JC: Uh, one day I was … I said that science sort of followed me around … I was making a piece of sculpture, right, and so I was reaching down my hands and had these little screen parts and I’m pushing them around, and, all of a �sudden, I saw a way of creating force that I knew nobody had ever seen before. I also knew for [sure-ity] certainty how the pyramids were built, how Easter Island was built, how Stonehenge was put together, and … but it seemed to be such an abstract, difficult thing … I was invited to be a guest lecturer at a Mensa convention once, and I brought all my models and things and at that point I hadn’t figured out the mathematics of it and I invited all of these intelligent people to look at this and see if they could help me kind of figure it out. You could see how it worked! You could see how you could lift something HUGE with a minimum of force, but mathematically I wasn’t able to see the picture until, [laughs] and every time I always say “whatever you do,” I say to my students, “Don’t throw away your old physics book.” [laughs] So I took my old college physics book, put it down, and discovered that I could figure out the math. And in those days, I don’t know if they still have the program, but NYU, which had a “premiero” physics department, had a relationship with the art department, or with the school, with Skidmore. You could go down to NYU and they would give you library services and stuff and help you do research and I went down there with the physics department at NYU. I sent them all my papers about how you could generate, or magnify, force using this principle, and I sent them all my mathematics, and I went down there. And I’ve since discovered that Larry Spruch, who was chairman of the department, was a world famous … world famous physicist! So, I went down to see him and I went in his office and there were four or five guys, and Larry Spruch was sitting in his office, and so I went down there and they were interviewing me about this process. And Larry, who by the way, had the deepest, strongest, most powerful voice of any human being I’ve ever met, he said, “John,” he says, “We’ve looked at your materials,” he says, “and John, it’s just garbage!” he said, “And,” he �said, “we almost just threw them in the trash!” and he actually threw them in the trash! [laughs] So I stood there … and … actually, looking back at all my projects and things, I always had … knock on wood, because there’s always an end to the story, you know, knock on wood, … I always had an ability to know what I didn’t know. Some people don’t have that ability at all, but, so far, I’ve always had that ability, you know, to know what I didn’t know. So, Larry … I’m going, “Yeah, but Larry, you see, you go like this, you go like this,” I go with my fingers, “and it’s an equilibrium and you … that is forcing that…” And Larry goes, “He’s right! He’s right!” [laughs] He says, “John,” he said, “you’d better publish this. We’ll help you publish it in Nature,” he said, “because if you don’t publish this idea,” he said, “somebody else is going to steal it.” That’s what they told me then. So not only did I publish it, but I also patented the constructions derived by it to build seismically isolated bridges and so forth. And I started a company — we marketed, for years, a device that would … absorb all the vibrations from your washing machine, you’ve got a washing machine it goes [wobble sound] like this. Our device would just totally solve the problem. In fact, Consumer Reports tested it, and they said, “We tested the Seicon isolator,” the washing machine isolator, “and it’s the only one we’ve ever tested that actually works!” [laughs] they said. But then they said, “but it’s very expensive!” [laughs]. Which pissed me off, you know? Caltrans … I went and made a presentation at Caltrans. Caltrans said that if I could find the funds to build a bridge, they would supervise it and they would test it, and I made arrangements to do that, but I had to raise the money to build the bridge. And not being a scientist, I didn’t have access, you know, to it. If I’d tried to write a grant proposal ,I didn’t even have the �vocabulary, you know, to do it. So, I decided to start a company — hopefully, my idea was, that we’d earn enough money to do the necessary research, but we got sort of sidelined … involved in other things. But anyway… Learned a lot being a businessman, though. Raised over three million dollars, actually, as part of the project. It was always funny, it’s like, people … I can remember prospective freshmen coming into my office, and usually, often, the father would be openly contemptuous of art as a future …[laughs]. The conversation would come up, “What do you do? What are you doing?” And at one point my company was invited to Bath Ironworks to see if we could apply the isolation system to the drive systems of Navy warships. So, I would say, “Yeah, this is what I’m doing.” [laughs] Only to get an angry letter from this guy saying that I’m supporting the military [laughs] establishment, see! I think it’s really cool, warships are really cool things! Oops! Anyway, so the science things, I sort of, I guess I never did separate it from my other interests, you know. LG: So, does that company still exist? JC: No, it sort of faded … faded out. It faded out. Well, when I was running it, it was going really well, but then I sort of lost interest in making money, and … I had other things to do. I’m really, super glad I did, too, you know, because I think I did … I ended up doing some really, really interesting things that I never would have done otherwise. LG: Like what? JC: Ah [laughs], well a lot of writing that hasn’t been published, okay. For example, I have written, I think, a staggering article about conceptual art, you know, based upon many of my experiences. And one of the things about getting older that I find really interesting, I have lots of things like this that I �haven’t published and I think they’re really, really important — it’s like my article for Nature, you know. LG: So where are you publishing? JC: I haven’t. It’s just living on my computer. Oh, little bits of it, little bits of it kind of go out into the world. But again, since I’m an artist and a sculptor and I didn’t come from a world that published, and things, and I think as a consequence I suffered from that. And I often think that since I’m retired now, I should be taking these efforts and I should be … because I may be gone [laughs] and it will all be forgotten and nobody will care! There’ll be this ton of stuff, nobody will even go through it, they’ll just put it in the garbage. [laughs] LG: So, what have you been doing since you retired? JC: Well, I just bought a brand-new Jeep Gladiator so I could really do substantial beach driving and fishing. [laughs] Okay. And I’m doing three-dimensional printing. I just ordered a work that’s done in stainless steel. It’s sort of an interesting process, it starts off with a powder, a bed of powder, and this laser fuses the powder, that’s how it makes it. And the interesting thing, since it’s in a powder, the form is supported so you can do delicate things, and I’m really interested to see that you could do stainless! It’s a modest size, it’s only about this big, and I’m really looking forward to seeing that. Although, this is interesting, I have, maybe, alluded to this earlier — I truly believe this — I look at the things I make, and they’re made with computer aided design programs, right, which are horrifically difficult to learn, you know, but to use any of these programs, to do them well, you have to kind of know how to draw, alright? And if you don’t know how to draw, you’re forced to lean on clip-art, and other methods, right? And so the quality of the artwork takes a huge hit. Nobody knows how to draw anymore. The people �teaching drawing don’t know how to draw any more. [laughs] Very, very few artists today can draw a flower pot and make it look like it’s sitting on a table top, for example, you know? And that’s one of the things that we used to do at Skidmore incredibly well, years ago. So, even with threedimensional printing, I have a feeling that the kind of work you’re going to see coming out of it is going to be limited, you know, in a way, because you are going to be limited by the innate skills of the creative minds making it. But, I’m not — it sounds like I’m discouraged, I’m not discouraged, I’m having a lot of fun with it. I should have brought some to show you, actually. LG: Will the artists have to learn code? JC: No, no, and I think that’s a huge mistake. I think people think they’re taking the off-the-shelf processes and using them, but they’re devilishly complicated. One interesting thing about software, I remember it being said that you never forget how to ride a bicycle, and that’s kind of true. You never forget how to ride a bicycle, but software, you forget how to do! [laughs] And one of the people my company was doing business with, one of the engineers remarked — he worked for a very large engineering firm — when their designers, when their people who worked with CAD programs, went on vacation, there was always a couple of weeks of down time for them to get back into the drawing because you forget! There’s something about the nature of using the software that, even if it’s sort of intuitive, it does not, it doesn’t stick with you. It’s very, very hard to do. And it’s funny because they have, Skidmore has started the, what is it, the Makerspace? And I always laugh because the people putting the Makerspace together haven’t really been doing three-dimensional printing or using the technology, and the biggest problem with the Makerspace is going to be how are you going �to get somebody to give you a drawing, a CAD drawing that’s adequate to create significant objects. And, I’ve never had a student come to me with those skills. So, it’s very, very... it’s much more difficult than you might think. Anyway, so that’s what I’m doing now. LG: We have about five more minutes left, so I’m curious to know if there’s anything we should include that we haven’t touched on, or that I haven’t asked about. JC: Well, no. Otherwise I should say, I may have said this already, I regard myself as an incredibly lucky man. That I’ve spent my whole life and I don’t think I ever recall actually having a boss, [laughs] you know? Surrounded … LG: I wonder how people like David Porter or subsequent art department heads would [laughs]… JC: I came from the, you know the generation. I came from that generation. I came from that generation where faculty would shout and argue with the president at faculty meetings. Do you remember that? You know? And, life has changed. Life has really, really changed. So, I always, I just assumed those prerogatives. It was a wonderful, wonderful opportunity. And, uh, I have to say I … LG: Whom did you shout at? JC: What’s that? LG: Who remains in your head that you shouted at? JC: Oh, I remember one of our colleagues. Were you at that faculty meeting? There was this fight and this argument and I was looking at this sea of people, you know, and all of a sudden over the crowd I saw this fist go up in the air! Somebody took a swing at somebody else! I don’t know who was the swinger and who was the swingee! [laughs] �LG: What was the topic? I mean what was the controversy? Do you remember? I don’t. JC: Do you remember that Sue? It was when we were meeting in … LG: Was it Filene? JC: No, that hall over here in, what’s its name, LG: Palamountain? JC: No, no down, where are we here … LG: Starbuck? JC: No, no, Starbuck, yeah. One of the, uh …. no, not Starbuck, in, let’s see… LG: Oh, on the new campus? Originally, we were meeting in Filene and then we were meeting in Palamountain. JC: But in Starbuck isn’t there, there’s a big, big meeting room that was big nough for all of us and we were in that room. LG: I think it was Filene, JC: No, no, it wasn’t Filene, for sure, I remember. Anyway, oh tempers! And it’s funny, I have seen a change. When, I think the faculty used to say they were the college and I don’t believe you can say that now. I’m not sure it was a healthy thing to say that, or believe that, but nonetheless I think they, we thought that in those days. LG: Anything else we should ask, Susan? SUSAN BENDER: Yeah, I’d be interested — when did you start introducing students to using computers in their creative process? JC: I started … oh, I actually gave a talk, one of those alumni talks, recently, and I showed some of the work my students did, and, so I started, oh my gosh, eight or nine years ago? But I started off gently. Now, of course, I send off a file and this beautiful finished thing comes back. But we started off with doing things like, um, we have a plasma cutter and you can program that �plasma cutter to cut two dimensional shapes out, okay? And you can create a virtual three-dimensional object and you can cut slices through it, threedimensionally, and with that plasma cutter you can cut out these cross sections. And, you can then — oh the plasma cutter you could cut out your signature, I mean, it does a beautiful, clean job — and, you can weld them all together. So, I got into, we got into the computer thing kind of incrementally, to the point where I am now, where it’s like, yeah, I do the whole CAD program and I will do a three-dimensional thing, and like, little by little by little. Oh, there was one thing, it was about four years ago, where I would submit a budget for the supplies, and nothing would happen, you know, and I was getting so frustrated because it’s like, time was passing and we were missing out, and so I decided to make an appointment with the Dean, and I would bring the Dean all the stuff… LG: Who was that? JC: I probably shouldn’t say. [laughs] Anyway, so, I went into his office, right? And, you know he knew me and I knew him and we’d seen each other around and I would speak up and stuff, and finally I said “Ok, listen, I’ve got to talk to you about … this is who I am and this is what I’ve done.” I showed him my Nature publication, I told him I was a scientist and … he was horrified! He was just shocked. Because his attitude towards artists was that artists just simply weren’t that intelligent. I just got that sense. He was just so amazed at what I was showing to him, because like out of the blue this guy comes up to him and says “Hey, listen this is what we are doing and this is what I want to do with it.” I was saying to him, you know? And I have to say he picked the ball up. He picked the ball up and we got some neat stuff, really wonderful stuff. And then I had to retire. [laughs]No, I didn’t have to �retire, but I did step down at … I’d like to think at the height of my game. [laughs] SB: Get out while the getting’s good? JC: I think I did, yeah. LG: John this has been a delightful hour to spend with you, thank you for sharing some of your stories. JC: I have to say that the entire experience, I think it was staggeringly significant in that it also had a lot to do with people and personalities, it had to do with the times. I know a lot of people, I remember, who was it, the Dean, ahh, what’s her name, … I remember asking her, why so many people retired embittered? So many of our colleagues, I thought, would retire, kind of … just embittered, angry, you know? And I vowed I just wasn’t going to do that. And she said, “Oh well, the student evaluations,” you know, all these sorts of reasons. I never felt that way. I just … it was just an extraordinary privilege. [inaudible] I had a lot to do! You know what I mean? I had a lot to do! [laughs] SB: Thank you John, this has been delightful. JC: Well, you’re welcome, you’re very welcome. END *NOTE- Ben Cohen started Ben & Jerry’s � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Skidmore College Retirees Oral History A resource containing historical information obtained in interviews with persons having firsthand knowledge. Interviewer The person(s) performing the interview Lynne Gelber Interviewee The person(s) being interviewed John Cunningham Location The location of the interview Saratoga Springs, NY 12866 Original Format The type of object, such as painting, sculpture, paper, photo, and additional data Audio Recording Duration Length of time involved (seconds, minutes, hours, days, class periods, etc.) 56:08 Record Contributor Individual who prepared the item and/or edited it. Susan Bender Record Creation Date Day/Month/Year of record creation/edit October 24, 2022 Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Interview with John Cunningham Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource April 4, 2022 Is Part Of A related resource in which the described resource is physically or logically included. Skidmore Saratoga Memory Project Description An account of the resource John Cunningham grew up in Greenwich, Connecticut. In this interview he discusses how he combined his interest in physical chemistry and math with the art influence that surrounded him since childhood.  After receiving a BA and MFA from Yale, he joined the Skidmore art department in 1967 when Skidmore was still an all-female institution.  He discusses the influence of Josef Albers and the Yale approach to art that was prevalent among the 3 Yale-trained art professors already on the faculty, the effect of the transition to coeducation, the “Great Race” project to build a floatable object and the move to the new campus.  He further explores the introduction of the computer and later 3-D printing to art students.  Before and since his retirement in 2017 John has pursued science projects including an article published in "Nature" and presentations at science gatherings on building the pyramids.  John has received a patent for the Seicon isolator, favorably reviewed by "Consumer Reports."  Language A language of the resource English (en) Subject The topic of the resource Retiree Oral History Project Type The nature or genre of the resource Oral History 3-D Printing 4-1-4 Academic Calendar Art & Science Campus Move coeducation Edwin Moseley Great Race on Braim Pond Josef Alpers Skidmore Social Life Yale Influence on Art https://www.ssmp.mdocs.skidmore.edu/files/original/878e3a4fa806b9605ac6f26942f32606.jpg 128109595eac0e28fe95caae0b107653 https://www.ssmp.mdocs.skidmore.edu/files/original/481f4b8849648292837e96bc57e93349.m4a 69d3219334afbfa528baa2511fdfdb5a https://www.ssmp.mdocs.skidmore.edu/files/original/0015f5078efa840e8d501ff9137ae0b5.pdf f91bf649c477a6c5293ca2442c876b1b PDF Text Text Interviewee: Patricia Rubio Years at Skidmore: 1985 - 2016 Interviewers: Lynne Gelber and Susan Bender Location of Interview: Saratoga Springs, NY Date of Interview: April 14, 2021 00:00:00 Header 00:00:33 Born in Valparaíso, Chile; lived in Viña del Mar; attended small, multilingual, private K-12 school in Valparaíso. 00:01:28 Attended Universidad Católica de Valparaíso - 5 year program for a degree in Spanish 00:02:12 Applied for/received Fulbright Scholarship to attend University of Minnesota 00:03:00 Planned return to Valparaíso to teach, but 1973 military coup changed University situation and prevented return. 00:03:35 March 1974 joined Juan Carlos in Spain and they married there in June 1974 00:03:50 Lived in Barcelona for a year and a half; applied to graduate programs in Canada; attended University of Alberta/lived 5 years in Edmonton. 00:04:41 Came to Skidmore September 1980. Juan Carlos taught and Paty completed dissertation; both applied for green cards; daughter Camila born June 1982. 00:05:35 Because couldn’t return to Chile, had intentionally staggered dissertation completions, so if 1st MLA search unsuccessful, they could stay in Canada while Paty completed dissertation. 00:06:28 In 1984 Paty taught a semester at Middlebury College, VT. Paty & Camila moved to VT, Juan Carlos spent weekends there. 00:07:34 Paty applied to positions at Skidmore and Russel Sage. Offered both; chose Skidmore. 00:08:02 Visa and citizenship processes expensive, time consuming. 00:08:53 Now hiring institutions pay the fees; that has helped Skidmore draw foreign faculty. 00:09:39 Taught 101 - 300 level classes in Spanish American literature and culture. 101 is favorite “because students are a clean linguistic slate and they have a sense that they’re really making progress throughout the semester.” 00:10:33 The few Hispanic undergraduate students at that time “gravitated towards Spanish.” 00:11:30 The Spanish-speaking students had stronger oral skills than grammatical; therefore different needs than the non-Spanish speaking students. 00:12:41 Other roles: 1987-1990 coordinated Self Instructional Languages Program (SILP). 00:14:11 In SILP, students develop oral skills using recordings, a curriculum, and meetings with tutors, most of whom are native speakers. 00:17:00 Also: directed Women’s Studies program, chaired Foreign Languages & Literatures Department for 5 years; Associate Dean of the Faculty for 7 years, was Acting Dean when President Phil Glotzbach went on sabbatical. 00:17:50 Helped move Women’s Studies program from a minor to a major, establishing a curriculum in Women’s Studies. 00:18:31 Goal of Women’s Studies 101: provide overview of the field and current/evolving issues, so covered wide range of topics - theoretical, historical, sociological, political. 00:19:27 In June 1997 brought National Association for Women’s Studies’ annual conference to Skidmore. Collaborated with Special Programs and with Women’s Studies faculty to create program. Great ideas - art exhibits, a film program, a book show, presentations, keynotes, etc. 00:24:44 Challenging, but “I discovered I could do this!” Phyllis Roth empowering influence. �00:25:30 Also, administrator roles were empowering — could improve things for the department. Example - stabilizing adjunct courses by making full-time adjunct positions. 00:27:55 Became Associate Dean when Muriel Poston was Dean. Learned to look at things from broader perspective. 00:30:00 Rubio (from Humanities), Poston (from Sciences) perfect team b/c balanced qualitative & quantitative. Learned how to put problems in context to see various repercussions of small decisions for the departments and college. 00:31:32 As administrator, saw Skidmore as a whole Institution,… possibilities, strengths, weaknesses, places to concentrate, who to talk to, who can help? 00:32:00 “It’s fascinating! … those seven years that I was in the Dean’s office, I liked every single one. … I just loved every minute of it.” 00:32:38 Interest in diversity arose first with students — realizing how the Latino students felt… that one of the reasons they came to study Spanish is because they found people like them. 00:33:53 Latino Cultural Society was first Latino student organization - evolved into RAICES. 00:34:17 Another source of interest in diversity was the program itself - Foreign languages … by definition [a] diverse topic …foreign languages, foreign cultures. 00:34:35 And Muriel Poston herself; the first Black Dean of the Faculty in a mostly white institution & white community. Had to go to Glens Falls simply to get hair done. When Poston interviewed at Skidmore, she asked to meet with faculty of color. There were only 5 or 6. 00:35:17 Once Dean, Poston asked faculty to examine department hiring processes to determine usefulness in attracting faculty of color. 00:35:40 When Beau Breslin became Dean, he appointed [Rubio] Associate Dean for Diversity. Skidmore hired consultants to improve hiring processes. Success in that effort due in part to great support from Deans Muriel Poston and Beau Breslin and President Phil Glotzbach. 00:37:35 A position description/ad exhibits “the seriousness of the institution … in terms of hiring faculty of color.” Hiring processes changed, following consultant’s advice. 00:39:12 Retired 2016 00:41:03 Since retiring, annually travels to Chile for several months to help sister run her restaurant and to visit lifelong friends; in summers volunteers with Saratoga backstretch workers, teaching English as a second language; plays golf; on board of Saratoga Film Forum and Saratoga Chamber Players; passionate about working in yard and garden. 00:43:06 Also reads a lot. “Now I’d rather read than write. Juan Carlos taught me that. …at some point he said, ‘I’m done with research. I don’t want to write any more, I want to read.' And that makes sense to me now. It didn’t then but it makes sense to me now.” 00:44:21 END � https://www.ssmp.mdocs.skidmore.edu/files/original/c65a837e139652e712cc71568c96093f.pdf d1c119146a7bb209bf72eb7cb8c16e85 PDF Text Text Interview with Patricia Rubio by Lynne Gelber, Skidmore College Retiree Oral History Project, Saratoga Springs, New York, April 14, 2021. LYNNE GELBER: This is Lynne Gelber. I am with Susan Bender. It is April 14th, 2021, and we are interviewing Patricia Rubio for the Oral History Project. So … PATRICIA RUBIO: Thank you for having me. LG: It’s our pleasure and thank you for doing this. PR: Well, my pleasure. LG: Patty, why don’t you tell us a little bit about where you were born and brought up and your early schooling. PR: Sure. I was born in Valparaíso, Chile, but lived from ages six to 23 in Viña del Mar. Valparaíso’s twin city. My three sisters and I went to a small private school in Valparaíso. There were about 600 students between kindergarten and 12th grade, and most of the instruction in elementary school was done in German. So, I was introduced to a foreign languages at age 5 in kindergarten. and graduated from this school thirteen years later with additional solid instruction in English which was introduced in seventh grade. I was very fortunate to have had access to that kind of education. Classes were very small, never more than fourteen to fifteen students; there were seven students in my senior class most of whom I had known since kindergarten or first grade. I interrupted my studies in my junior year to come to live with a family and attend high school in Storrs, CT. in 1962. This was also an important experience in my upbringing. After high school I entered college. LG: In Valparaíso? �PR: Yes. The college system in Chile follows the European model, which means that one has decided in one’s two last years of high school the career one will pursue. From very early in high school I knew that I wanted to teach and I liked literature and history so I pursued a degree in Spanish. So Spanish and Latin American literature and culture with a very solid foundation in syntax and linguistics. It’s a five-year program that included one year of Latin and Greek, theoretical linguistics, syntax and normative grammar. The objective of the program was to prepare students to teach the Spanish high school curriculum which included Spanish, Chilean and Spanish American literature plus Spanish grammar and writing. I had also made up my mind while in college, to pursue graduate study, at least a Masters degree. So, in my last year at the university, I applied for a Fulbright Scholarship which I received. LG: And that was at Valparaíso? PR: Yes, at the Universidad Católica de Valparaíso. In those days, this 1969-70, Fulbright assigned prospective students to graduate programs at Universities in the U.S.. In Chile I had begun to pursue an academic career through teaching assistant positions in Spanish American literature. I was approached to teach General Literature, and so a degree in Comparative literature was appropriate. The idea was that I would return from the U.S. with an M.A. to a position that included General Literature as part of my teaching duties. But things happened. The military took over the government in 1973, during my first semester at the University of Minnesota in Minneapolis. The situation at the University in Chile changed and I never returned. Instead of Chile, I left for Spain in March 1974, and married Juan Carlos in June of that year. �LG: In Barcelona? PR: In the Barcelona area. We lived in Barcelona for a year and a half, knowing that it was just a stop in the voyage, and went to Canada to pursue our PhDs in Hispanic literatures and the University of Alberta. We lived in Edmonton for five years which despite the extreme harsh winters we really enjoyed. We staged it so that Juan Carlos would defend his dissertation before I did so that we would have two possible hiring rounds for finding jobs in this part of the world. Jobs were not easy to find. Lynne, you were the chair of Modern Languages and Literatures then and you hired both of us. Thank you for having done so! LG: The rest is history! [laughter] LG: So, when you came here you were not initially teaching but then …? PR: Well, what happened is that Juan Carlos came with an H-1B visa, which allowed him to work and I had a visa that allowed me to live in the country but not to work. We applied for the green card in Juan Carlos’ second year here, had Camila, and waited patiently for the INS to do its work. The process was successful, and we became citizens five or six years later. LG: You came to Skidmore? PR: We both came to Skidmore in September 1980. LG: OK. PR: When we came, I was ABD, Juan Carlos had finished his degree. I had been awarded a thesis scholarship, which would have allowed us to stay for an additional year in Canada. In our first year here I completed the dissertation. I taught at Middlebury College in a one semester replacement in 1984. Camila, who was a toddler, and I moved to Vermont. LG: Camilla was born here. �PR: Yes. Remember LG: I do remember because we decorated the office. PR: [laughter] Yeah. Yes, she was born in June 1982. You gave Juan Carlos a really good schedule according to which he started teaching late on Mondays and ended early on Friday afternoon so that he would be able to drive to Middlebury to spend the weekend with us. It was a tough semester. I had never taught in the US; they had hired me because they needed someone who would be able to teach Spanish American Culture and Civilization. Every class was a new prep. I remember spending every Saturday at the library preparing classes, while Juan Carlos took care of Camila. Sunday was a family day. After we obtained our permanent visa, I applied for several positions in the area, including Skidmore. The faculty had changed the curriculum and passed a foreign language requirement. So the department needed to hire two additional faculty and, as I said before, you hired me. I also had an offer from Russel Sage but of course I chose Skidmore. LG: Thank goodness! PR: Either before or after Middlebury, but during the visa process during which I was allowed to work, you hired me to teach part time: one Spanish language course each in the fall and the spring. If I remember well, it was Intermediate Spanish. LG: As I recall, we were able to use the services of the lawyer for the College, in Glens Falls. PR: That was in order to get the renewal of Juan Carlos’ H-1B. We hired a lawyer from Albany to help us with the application process for the residency visa. In those days, the Institution didn’t have to pay for the process. After the immigration law changed, the hiring institution is responsible for the fees �which are very high. We are fortunate that Skidmore has been able to do that because it explains in part the success the institution has had in hiring foreign faculty in the past five years. A good number of the foreign faculty come with an H1-B visas which is the entry way to permanent residency. LG: I vaguely remember that. PR: Yes. LG: So what courses were you teaching? PR: Where? LG: At Skidmore. PR & LG: [laughter] LG: Thank you. PR: That’s O.K. Well you know that in our department, everyone teaches the whole gamut of courses So I taught beginning Spanish and all the way up to 300 level classes including Spanish American literature and culture. LG: And what were your favorite? PR: My favorite? I always liked to teach 101, because students are a clean linguistic slate, and they have a sense that they’re really making progress throughout the semester. The more fortunate ones, during Christmas break, would travel to a Spanish speaking country where they realized that they could read a menu, could be really helpful to their families in negotiating the cities, reading signs, etc... This was a powerful experience and they would come back really energized and ready for more. LG: How many Hispanic students were there in the undergraduate population at that point? PR: Few. They gravitated towards Spanish courses, thinking that being Latino also meant being Latin American; and some were immigrants themselves. It was very nice to have, particularly at the upper level, students from diverse �backgrounds. They contributed points of view and diverse ideas to class discussion. At the upper level, that is in literature and culture and civ courses, there were always a number of native Spanish speakers, and that was also nice. In these classes we read sophisticated materials and they were able to help their classmates to plough through the texts. Nowadays Latino students are aware of their identity as citizens of this country. Many take Spanish classes because they want to increase their language abilities and learn about their cultural and family backgrounds. LG: As I recall, those students had an oral knowledge. Is that correct? Yes, they did. Their oral skills outperformed their ability to write correctly in Spanish. Often first or second-generation students had the most difficulties because they were fluent but their knowledge of the language was not normative; their grammar was not accurate. Our curriculum back then was mostly intended for non-native speakers and those courses were in many ways not well suited for students who had leaned Spanish at home without formal instruction. LG: And they didn’t have any grammar skills? PR: Most of them did not. The grammar accuracy was all over the place [laughter]. LG & SUE BENDER: [laughter] SB: Spanglish. PR: [laughter] Well, a lot of Spanglish, like, “How are you?” “Nada mucho,” which in Spanish means, “he or she swims a lot.” Very difficult linguistic habits to undo. But this was the Spanish they heard and spoke in their communities, and it worked for them. Many of them were eager to learn normative grammar. �I also very much liked teaching mixed populations of students: US majority students with Latino students. LG: So you had other responsibilities in the course of your career? PR: Yes. it started with the Self-Instructional Languages program. You appointed me as coordinator in 1987 a position that I held until 1990. Sonja Karsen had established the program in the seventies and coordinated it until she retired. LG: Sonja Karsen, who was the … chair of the department? PR: For twenty-two years, right? LG: Until … PR: Until she stepped down and you became chair. LG: Yeah … PR: The Self-Instructional Languages program contributed to the language offerings of the department. It included, LG: Arabic and Hebrew. PR: Yes, Japanese, Chinese, Portuguese and Russian. LG: Russian, how could I forget? PR: We then added Korean and Sanskrit. SILP was and continues to be a very successful program, it allows the College to offer twelve languages, which is impressive. And it is popular program with students. Years after I had stepped down and began to chair the department, the program was enrolling close to 80 students. The SILP languages continue to be a venue for the fulfillment of the language requirement. LG: Say one or two words about what the Self-Instructional Language Program is. PR: Sure. The focus is on developing aural and oral skills. Students meet with a tutor (most tutors are native speakers), twice a week for an hour. Students have to have prepared the material before coming to the tutoring session, �thus the name of the program. At the tutoring session, they discuss and practice material, and agree on the assignment for the following week. Tutors guide and monitor students’ progress. During my time with the program, students had a textbook and tapes as learning materials. They followed the curriculum developed by the Self Instructional Languages Association. Tutoring groups are small, not to exceed 5 students per language section. When the number of registered students exceeded five, as it often happened in Hebrew, for example, students were placed into parallel sections. This allowed for ample time for discussion and practice and ultimately students had more one-on-one time with the tutor than in a regular class that met three times a week with 15 students. LG: And the instructor is a native speaker except for Sanskrit. PR: And Arabic and Hebrew PR: The person who tutors in Arabic, has a doctorate in Arabic linguistics, and the person in Hebrew, although she was not from Israel, was very successful and probably the longest serving tutor in the program. Both were there when I took over the coordination of the program and remained long after I had stepped down. I believe that Regina Hurwitz still tutors Arabic. LG: Well … PR: At the end of the semester students were tested by an outside examiner. The SILP Association helped us to identify potential outside examiners when necessary. The Japanese examiner came from Cornell, the one for Hebrew from the State University at Buffalo, the examiner for Russian from the U of Albany, etc. LG: And what was your role? PR: As coordinator I met with each student interested in the SILP language before �they registered in order to explain how the program functioned and what their responsibilities would be. It was important for them to understand, for example, that the grade they received in the final exam was the grade for the course. That they needed to work diligently during the semester even if they were not being tested periodically for a grade. Any testing given during the semester was only diagnostic. The program was not open to first year students. The thinking was that there are too many claims on their time that could interfere with the independent study of the language. I also coordinated the tutoring schedules and liaised with the Registrar’s Offic. I hired the examiners and set the final exam schedule. Examiners often were not local. I was also the person to go for tutors and students in case of grievances or problems. LG: What other roles did you have in the course of your career? PR: I directed the Women’s Studies program for four years, succeeding Mary Stange who had been the first director of the program. I thoroughly enjoyed this assignment. A number of my courses in the Foreign Languages and Literatures department counted towards the WS minor and the major. During my time as director, the faculty approved the major. During my time as director, we expanded the WS curriculum to include one intermediate level course and the senior seminar. The WS faculty was very supportive of the various initiatives that we pursued and contributed to various tasks when necessary. Although the program had existed for over a decade, it cemented its place among other interdisciplinary programs once the major was approved. The generation of women faculty that preceded me, and most of whom were tenured professors before I joined the College in 1984, had worked hard in building the program. Most of them were very committed to �enriching and delivering the curriculum, advising students, supervising theses, and in mentoring incoming women faculty. . When I stepped down from WS I became chair of the FLL, a position I occupied for five years. I then became Associate Dean of the Faculty a position I held for seven years. LG: What was, do you think, in all those years, your biggest challenge? PR: Every administrative position brought different challenges; that is what made each so interesting; everyone presented opportunities for professional and personal growth. For example, when I became WS director, the program was ready to move from a minor to a major. The proposal for the major was a collective WS faculty undertaking spearheaded by Kate Berheide and myself. Kate, a professor in Sociology, had experience in WS program design. The WS faculty, had a central role in the discussion and approval of the final proposal. The process took over a year from start to finish, that is from when we began to work on the proposal to college faculty approval. We needed to have all our ducks in a row as we knew that we would face some opposition from a number of principally male segments of the faculty. Although the vote was not unanimous the proposal passed by a sizable majority. It would be interesting to revisit the minutes of that Faculty Meeting. As a result of the major’s approval, student interest in WS grew so that it became necessary, for example, to offer two sections of WS 101 every semester. This was huge because we were able to increase the number of students interested in pursuing the major or minor. On average, during my time as director, we majored about 8 students per year, which was not small for an interdisciplinary program. �LG: Did you teach the 101 course? PR: Yes, I did for the four years I headed the program. It loved the course; the curriculum was broad and interesting; student interest was high and 101 engaged them in a journey of discovery regarding their own identity as women. Although the majority of students were women, there were one or two men per year who were curious took it. There were no male majors during my time s director. LG: And generally, what kinds of things did you cover in that course? PR: It included the history of the US women’s and feminist movements; women’s political struggles and involvement in the fight for the vote, the ERA. Their participation in the antislavery and temperance movements. We studied feminist theory; the history of women’s pursuit for the control of our bodies; the political, social and personal consequences of women’s social roles in patriarchal societies and in the patriarchal workplace; the intersections between gender, race, ethnicity and class. We also read literature, notedly Atwood’s A Handmaid’s Tale; some poetry. The objective of the course was for students to understand the discipline; the areas of knowledge that define Women’s Studies. To provide a solid base for the rest of the curriculum. LG: Now, what do you recall from those years that you were directing the Women’s Studies program? PR: I recall many things. I recall the importance for the institution of having a vibrant, energetic community of female faculty. We built community by means of, for example, weekly brown-bag lunches, two WS potluck dinners per year which were open to students and staff as well; faculty meetings to discuss issues pertaining the program: curriculum, staffing needs, program objectives, invited speakers, etc. These were always occasions to welcome and recruit incoming faculty, to learn about each other’s teaching and �research. Students were involved in several of these activities: they were part of the Steering committee, and as I have said6 invited to WS sponsored activities. In terms of challenges, the four-day National Women’s Studies Association meeting, in June 1997 was huge. Phyllis Roth, then Dean of the Faculty and Vice-president of Academic Affairs. was approached by Marjorie Prise, then President of the NWSA, about the possibility of hosting the 1997 annual meeting. Marjorie was then Professor of English at the University of Albany, and I was incoming director of Women’s Studies. Phyllis consulted with Mary and me, and we decided to accept the challenge. And a challenge it was!! Mary went on sabbatical and I attended the NWSA 1995 meeting at the University of Oklahoma, in order to meet with members of the NWSA leadership, and to observe how the conference was structured and ran. There were over 500 participants at the Tulsa meeting, and we needed to plan for similar attendance at Skidmore. It exceeds the scope of this interview to detail what the planning and organization for the conference entailed. Suffice it to say that central to its success was the active involvement of the WS faculty, and the collaboration with Sharon Arpey in Special Programs. The Women’s Studies faculty and I worked on the ‘academic’ program, while Sharon Arpey undertook the ‘non-academic’ aspects of the event (housing, food, infrastructure, etc.). She and I worked closely for two years. The conference included a film program, a sculpture show in South Park, a women-faculty art show in Schick Gallery, a large book exhibit in the gym, dozens and dozens of presentations, several keynote speakers, and a healthy dose of minor controversies. �LG: So you were coordinating, what, with the library and with the Tang? PR: The Tang did not exist back then; we had an exhibit at the library on women in Skidmore’s history organized by Mary Lynn who, with some of her students drew materials from the College archive. LG: OK LG: It sounds like it was most fun. PR: Yes, it was. I also discovered that I could successfully work on a large project. At first, when Phyllis said that it would be my undertaking, I said, “Sure, why not” and when I left her office I thought, “By golly! What did I just get into? LG: Very empowering, isn’t it? PR: Yes, it was, and I thank Phyllis for having given me the opportunity and for having confidence in me. Typical Phyllis: she gave opportunities for people to grow and develop. I remember in my first year chatting with her while we walked across campus; at some point she said, “Well, you know, in the future you’ll be chair of the department,” and I thought, Really? Am I hearing right? So going back to your earlier question, Lynne, of major challenges, every one of the positions presented worthy challenges. Chairing the FLL was also a huge challenge. But by then I had discovered that I could be an effective administrator and I wanted to be chair. I had also learned that I could work with various individuals, even with those with whom I was not particularly simpatico. All of that was very empowering, as you said before, and I needed every bit of that experience as head of the FLL. You were chair of the department for a good chunk of time, you know how complicated it is to head a multi-section department; every section has its needs, the whole is �larger than the sum of its parts. I always thought that one of the main challenges in the department was the imbalance of its structure: two large section, French and Spanish, and four smaller sections, Chinese, Japanese, German and Italian, three of which were unevenly staffed. So when Chuck Joseph who was Dean of the Faculty interviewed me for the position, I told him that one of my objectives as chair would be to stabilize the small sections. So that they would feel better in the department, not overwhelmed by the two large sections. It was hard to keep the department engaged in everything, knowing that colleagues in the small sections, often felt that their voices were not as strong as those in the large sections. So I said to Chuck “There are three sections — Japanese, Chinese, and German — that only have one full time faculty and also adjuncts; it is always a problem in Saratoga find good adjuncts for those positions. I told him that I wanted to upgrade the second position to full-time. It would also free tenure and tenure track faculty to participate in the delivery if the all-College requirement. He agreed, and we created a second full-time position in German, Japanese and Chinese. Italian had been stabilized when Giuseppe became chair; at that point we hired a second person into a tenure track position. PR: So that objective was realized, and I still feel proud of it. The other major undertaking was guiding the the self-study necessary for the 10-year review, so once the review was done, I was ready to go. You know? There were other colleagues wanting to be chair and, who had other ideas for the department, and that’s important. PR: Then Muriel became Dean, and after … LG: Muriel? PR: Poston. Muriel Poston became Dean, and after her first Associate Dean, Mark �Hoffman, stepped down — he had only made a commitment for two years, — there was a call for interested faculty in the ADOF position. I threw my hat in. Ultimately, Muriel offered me the position which was an entirely different ballgame. In all the other administrative positions I dealt with specific, more or less narrowly defined tasks: hiring, the schedule, tending to faculty needs, mentoring incoming or pre-tenure faculty, connecting to the DOF, etc. In the Dean’s Office, one gets to see the institution from a very different venue. It was, like, “Wow, this is really something that I’ve never done.” Muriel had a broad and deep understanding of US higher education. She had also worked at the National Science Foundation, was a member of a number of associations of higher ed, was very interested in educational policy, in diversity issues. I learned enormously from her. During the three years that I worked with her she sent me to conferences, encouraged me to meet other ADOFs from different institutions, to get involved in various groups and tasks. For the first time I understood how narrowly I had understood my position and responsibilities at the institution; how little I knew of the big picture of higher education writ large. This is not just the department, this is not just my course, this is not just my research, but this is the institution, nationally. LG: So … ok, when …oh, alright. So when you are talking about writ large, are you talking about things like finances and, are you talking about …? PR: Mmm, I am mostly talking about the academic area. As the ADOF, one of my responsibilities was academic space: labs, research areas, classrooms, studios, etc., When we hire, particularly in the sciences, can we accommodate that person in terms of their lab needs? Finance, not directly, but most everything that one wishes or needs to do is budgetarily possible or not. One of my tasks was to try to find the money; talk to folks in financial �affairs. The same with faculty positions. I was in charge of all non-tenure track hiring. Every one of those positions needed approval from Financial Affairs. What was incredibly interesting fin working with Muriel is that she her disciplinary training was in the natural sciences and for her data is central. So, I would bring an issue to her, and she would say, what is your data? We would discuss it and at some point it became clear that we were interpreting it differently. She, from a quantitative and I from qualitative perspective. She would frequently say, “but the data, Paty, suggests that…” and I’d said, “yes, but not everything is data, Muriel.” Right? “What do you mean?” “Well, there are ambiguities, you know. Look at the data from this perspective” And because she was very smart, she would say, “Oh, ok, fine. Let’s then rethink it.” The process was fascinating. She had the ability of seeing both the particular and the general at the same time. Discussions would begin at the micro level and often by the time she was done with it, we were able to understand the larger implications. I had never worked with a person like Muriel. PR: I wanted to help Muriel to understand the culture of the institution. She came to us from the National Science Foundation. She was an outsider; the only black woman in the upper administration; she had not worked at a small liberal arts college before; and she needed help on how to … and so how to get people to get to know her; she was shy. And I was not always successful in creating opportunities for her to know the faculty. I mean, you know, I was part of the administration, but I was unable to solve the problem fully. So, in that sense, I failed, if you will. My experience in the Dean’s Office, however, was amazing. For the first time I understood the institutional �possibilities and the limitations. When Muriel left, Beau Breslin stepped into the Dean’s position. My job changed in interesting ways as faculty development and diversity were added to my duties. I had learned much from Muriel about the importance and need for hiring diverse faculty across the institution. It would be too long to detail what we did. Suffice it to say that Beau moved along what Muriel had begun; after four years the profile of the Skidmore faculty was beginning to change. It wasn’t easy. Departments were not always ready to shed their old procedures. “We shouldn’t do it this way”, “We have never done it this way”. But finally, everyone bought into it. It was fascinating. LG: Icing on the cake? PR: Icing on the cake, yeah. (00:32:25 ) SB: Could I ask a question? PR: Sure. SB: Talking about the institution, … LG: This is Susan talking. SB: This is Susan talking, yeah. [laughs] We were talking about your Institution wide perspective in engagement, Patty. I know that diversity was a topic near and dear … maybe Lynne was heading in that direction, but near and dear to your heart, and I wonder if you could talk a little bit about the source of your commitment to diversity and what you believe, over the years, how Skidmore changed in that regard? What some of the successes, challenges were and some of the challenges that still remain? PR: The source of my initial interest was connected to students, really, specifically to the Latino students. When I came to Skidmore, a steady number of them, particularly Latinas took my classes, my lit and culture classes mostly. And as a result, I developed relationships with students, and realized the cultural �confusion of many of them. I taught language courses and Spanish American lit and culture. We did not then have courses on LatinX studies which is what they were really craving for. Mine and other courses in the department could only partially fulfill their need for understanding part of their cultural identity. So, with a little bit of guidance they created the Latino Cultural Society which was the first Latino student organization at Skidmore; it then became RAICES. It helped then to consolidate their position at the institution which was and still is majority white. They brought speakers, organized social and cultural events. They were a diverse bunch with various backgrounds. And then, of course, came Muriel. Muriel Poston, again. You know, the first Black Dean of the Faculty in a mostly very white institution. LG: And white community. PR: And white community. In order to get her hair cut she had to go to Glens Falls … to get her hair done. There aren’t any men or women hair stylists in the Saratoga area who know how to cut or style African American hair. When Muriel visited Skidmore, she asked to meet with faculty of color. Chuck Joseph, then Dean of the Faculty, asked me that morning to put together a group to meet with her in the afternoon. There were five or six of us in the room. One of the first things she did as Dean was to ask chairs and program directors to look at their hiring processes, to interrogate whether it was a friendly hiring process or, whether that hiring process was useful in order to attract faculty of color. We had never been asked to include diversity into our hiring processes. PR: And, … but things really got working when Beau became Dean. SB: Beau? �PR: Breslin. Because Muriel could only take it so far and she was in the office for five years only. Right? As Assistant Dean of the First-Year Experience, Beau was part of Muriel’s staff and part of the discussions we frequently had on diversity. So when he became Dean, he embraced diversity as one of his agendas. And then when he became VPAA and Dean of the Faculty, he appointed me as Associate Dean for Diversity. And we hired Pat Romney Associates, in order to streamline across departments, the hiring process. Uh, there was a lot of screaming and shouting [laughs], “We don’t want to do it this way. We’ve always done it this other way. Why do have to do this?” and Beau was firm. I mean, the success of the diversity agenda is not necessarily mine. I would never have been able to do anything as Associate Dean without the Dean really pushing for it. And Phil also was very much on boar; it became a priority for him. LG: Phil PR: Phil Glotzbach, the President. There were budgetary implications. Pat Romney came to campus twice a year to run a workshop on diverse hiring that began with “this is the way that the ad needs to be written. The diversity statement is not at the end, the diversity statement is in the middle.” I mean, things like that. Because diversity is not an afterthought. Faculty of color, domestic faculty of color are very attuned to how the ads read. The ad says a lot about how serious the institution is in terms of hiring faculty of color. I was in charge of the process, in terms of making sure that every single ad was appropriately written, that it followed the guidelines; there were also protocols regarding the selection of finalists, for the campus visits that every department needed to follow. I was very passionate about this work. It felt so meaningful. I worked very hard with departments and programs and it was a job that I loved and it was successful. I mean, look at the diversity of the �faculty now. It’s huge! And so … but if it hadn’t been, early for Muriel, next for Beau, my interest would have been just my interest, but it would of not have translated in real changes for the Institution. LG: Are there other things that we haven’t covered that we should talk about your career? When did you retire from Skidmore? PR: It’s been five years, so I’ll …[laughs] No, it’s in 2015. But really, I retired in 2016. What happened is, I was due a sabbatical which delayed by retirement date. It was time. Seven years in the DOF, it was time. And I had to choose. You both know this well … as interesting as the work is, it becomes a chore, and the chore for me were the CAPT cases particularly having to read the student teaching evaluations. One year there was a candidate in the dance department where most faculty teach only one and two credit classes. That year I read thousands of student evals. And I knew that the coming cohorts would be larger. We had been hiring over ten new faculty per year: too many evaluations. I just couldn’t do it again. It’s like, “Why did you retire from the English Department, or History, or you name the department?” “I don’t want to read another composition or essay.” Exactly that. So it was time for somebody else to do it. And, … so seven years was a long time. How long were you in the DOF? SB: Four PR: Four, yeah. LG: So, what have you been doing since you retired? PR: Oh, depending on the time of the year. I go to Chile for three or four months or sometimes twice in one year. I help my sister in her restaurant in Santiago. When I am there she can take a vacation; I run her restaurant for �her; it’s a lot of work but also great fun. Most of the time we work side by side which I really enjoy. I’ve lived for 40 years in the United States, and one of the things that I decided when I retired was that I wanted to go back to Chile a lot to visit my sisters, my family. And, I’ve done that. Also I still have a number of good friends I have a dual identity. LG: Friends here or in Chile? PR: In both places but I meant in Chile. Many of them are school friends. The classes were small we made life-long friendships. With four or five, we’ve been friends for what, 67 years? I also read a lot and I do some volunteering, particularly in the summer for the Backstretch at the horse racing track. A large number of the backstretch workers are Latin American. I’ve also taught English there also, in the summer. LG: As a second language? PR: As a second language. Umm, I also play golf. I love the game; I started playing golf with my father when I was 12. LG: Oh? PR: He was a sports person so as he grew older, he gave up tennis for golf. I started playing it again here in the US after not playing it for about 15 years. It brings really good memories from my late childhood and as a young adult in Viña del Mar. When I retired, I first thought that I would complete some research projects that were interrupted by the time I was in the administration. But after a bit I thought: what’s the point? Who will read what I write? �LG: You’ve turned the page. PR: Yeah, I mean, I’d rather read than write. Juan Carlos taught me that. You know, at some point he said, “I’m done with research. I don’t want to write any more, I want to read.” And that makes sense to me now. It didn’t then but it makes sense to me now. LG: Now of course you are on the board of the … PR: Of course, yeah, well, yeah, and I was on the film board when the Film Forum existed, and then you invited me to be on the board of the Saratoga Chamber Players, and that’s been great. And I work in my yard, my garden, which is my passion. [laughs] LG: And how does your garden grow? PR: Oh wow. It does sure grow, when… LG: This time of year. PR: Yeah, this time of year. LG: Anything else we should cover? SB: Nope. LG: Good? PR: Good? Ok. LG: Alright. Thank you sooo, so much. PR: Oh, my pleasure, my pleasure. Thank you for having me. END � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Skidmore College Retirees Oral History A resource containing historical information obtained in interviews with persons having firsthand knowledge. Interviewer The person(s) performing the interview Lynne Gelber Interviewee The person(s) being interviewed Patricia Rubio Location The location of the interview Saratoga Springs, NY 12866 Original Format The type of object, such as painting, sculpture, paper, photo, and additional data Audio recording Duration Length of time involved (seconds, minutes, hours, days, class periods, etc.) 44:21 Record Contributor Individual who prepared the item and/or edited it. Susan Bender Record Creation Date Day/Month/Year of record creation/edit October 24, 2022 Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Interview with Patricia Rubio Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource April 14, 2021 Is Part Of A related resource in which the described resource is physically or logically included. Skidmore Saratoga Memory Project Description An account of the resource Patricia Rubio began her career at Skidmore in 1983 after graduating from Valparaiso University in Chile and, after arrival at Skidmore, her PhD at the University of Alberta in Canada. She filled many roles at Skidmore - coordinator of the self-instructional language program, Director of Women’s Studies, Chair of the Department of Foreign Languages & Literatures, and Associate Dean of the Faculty. Since retirement in 2016 she has helped run her sister’s restaurant in Chile, taught ESL to backstretch workers at the Saratoga track, played a great deal of golf and serves as chair of the board of the Saratoga Chamber Players. In this interview she also discusses the complexity of the self-instructional language program, changes in the Women’s Studies program and its evolution to a full major, the influence of Dean of Faulty Phyllis Roth, her work with Dean Muriel Poston, and issues of diversity. Language A language of the resource English (en) Subject The topic of the resource Retiree Oral History Project Format The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource Oral History Beau Breslin Diversity Emigration to U.S. Latino Students Latino Studies Muriel Poston Phil Glotzbach Phyllis Roth Self-Instructional Languages Spanish American Literature Women's Studies https://www.ssmp.mdocs.skidmore.edu/files/original/562d637b96311cf28c5bb454cc7bf1d2.jpg 2ba9fbee0ebc28177fc0e830914cb842 https://www.ssmp.mdocs.skidmore.edu/files/original/ec5417e100df540a4a9e67d4549dcddb.m4a d1e887704740c2e3889bbe1608cc27a9 https://www.ssmp.mdocs.skidmore.edu/files/original/defbc0c36a98e1dfa801964d3b3c4941.pdf 28ea757456b1732d49063ae89aea3ec0 PDF Text Text Interviewee: Sue Van Hook Years at Skidmore: 1992-2010 Interviewer: Andrea Wise Location of Interview: Cambridge, NY Date of Interview: June 3, 2021 00:00:00 Header 00:00:31 Fall 1992 hired as part-time Teaching Associate. “It was so important to me that I personally drove my application to campus.” 00:01:42 Realized “This is a college in the woods. This is home for me!” 00:02:32 60% fall labs were taught outdoors 00:03:15 Previous career was in land conservancy, 5 years in CA and 5 years in ME 00:03:40 1992, North Woods very quiet; by 1995, mountain bike race, other unsustainable uses 00:05:00 Argued that North Woods is irreplaceable “living laboratory.” 00:06:05 With support from Pres. Glotzbach, Mike West, and Mike Hall, Campus Environment Committee was allotted money for creation of a North Woods stewardship plan. 00:06:25 Prior to Van Hook’s time at Skidmore, the North Woods had been used for teaching (for art, literature, geology, music, physical education, etc.), but while she was there, academic use became more extensive & formalized. 00:07:35 Karen Kellogg hired at Skidmore and Environmental Studies major was born; she brought Northeast Regional Climate Summit to campus 00:08:15 “Because of our North Woods, … academics from all over …willing to come and …were very, very jealous." 00:09:16 Mike Hall attended Campus Environment Committee meetings and listened carefully supporting the creation of the North Woods stewardship plan. 00:09:40 Van Hook wrote stewardship plan in summer. Also showed staff woods as explanation. 00:10:09 North Woods home to water snakes, redwing blackbirds, foxes, owls, prehistoric horsetails, yellow ladies’ slippers, 33 of the 36 species of ferns in NY state, etc. 00:11:00 “…those things started to disappear as more and more people came … the tragedy of the commons story.” 00:12:08 Van Hook told Glotzbach & West, “The environment really needs to be part of every decision the college makes.” 00:13:10 Therefore, Glotzbach & West invited chair of Campus Environment Committee to attend Institutional Policy and Planning Committee meetings. 00:14:25 Once on campus, Van Hook considered getting PhD. However, realized would have to give up many community and parenting activities. Decided “I had the best of both worlds” being involved in community and teaching the fun part of classes. 00:17:07 Skidmore had been hiring TAs on adjunct, one semester at a time basis. Teaching quality suffered as adjuncts were unfamiliar with the labs. With Phyllis Roth’s support, Department chair Dave Domozych formalized one-year contracts, then three-year contracts, and eventually a Senior Teaching Associate position for long-term TAs. 00:19:20 Curricular changes in 18 years — in first 8 years, 4 required lab courses before students could specialize. Then, demand for specialization sooner, so 4 courses combined to 2. �00:20:16 Spent a summer learning Cell & Molecular Biology lab techniques. Challenging at first, but then became fascinated with the microscopic world where “molecular engines … send things around inside the cell.” 00:22:09 One-on-one research opportunities led some undergraduates to publish papers. 00:22:53 Effects of digital age on writing quality, plus combining foundational courses, led to loss of student abilities for cross-disciplinary thinking, making connections on their own. 00:23:39 Climate change has increased student awareness of environment and related interests in gardening, outdoors, etc. 00:25:00 New science wing allowed for grant funded collection of specialized microscopes; also, atrium led to more connection between science faculty because more mingling. 00:26:10 Phyllis Roth - in addition to being supportive of TA professionalization, also extremely personally supportive during Van Hook’s breast cancer. 00:28:10 Roth unique, easy to talk to. ,one of a kind; when being treated for her breast cancer, Roth wore many different wigs, saying “let’s make it fun.” 00:29:30 Van Hook had 3 young children, 30 minute commute, and multiple community activities when starting as TA. Work-life balance? Schedule corresponded well with children’s school, and no pressure to research/publish, but encouragement to do so. 00:31:09 As the children grew older, worked at Skidmore for summers.” Skidmore Life Science Camp for Girls - taught 8 or 9 years, “awesome experiences.” 00:32:24 Camp teaching evolved into summer independent study work with Skidmore students, which then evolved to working with Ecovative & continuing research with Skidmore students. 00:33:55 Technology changes: Did “chalkboard teaching” while grad student, then overhead projectors in first years as Skidmore TA, then whiteboard/smartboard teaching along with two younger peers (“Charlie’s Angels”). 00:35:21 When Blackboard tech arrived, where providing syllabus, giving assignments, grading lab reports was all done through software, “it was really a big part of my decision to transition and leave.” Preferred grading outdoors. Zoom has advantage over Blackboard because can see students. “I really rely on energetic exchange between people — to know how they’re doing, to know how I’m doing, who’s struggling, who has a question…” 00:38:15 Working with HEOP students (Higher Education Opportunity Program) — saw student potential, many challenges for them, much extra help in office hours. 00:39:45 One student, with much mentoring, is now health care professional in El Salvadore. 00:41:01 Was once called at 2 am from very stressed student, worked with HEOP to help him complete semester; “I … learned their life stories,” gained trust. 00:42:00 Students with major life challenges — need to start supporting them earlier; HEOP students arriving on campus earlier. “Some of my best experiences … pre-orientation trips.” 00:44:22 Only one woman faculty when Van Hook was in college in 1970s. Saw her in Albany airport years later; now very close. “She was my role model for being a female scientist.” 00:44:50 At Skidmore in 1992, a few women faculty in department, a few people of color, all of the TAs were women. Now changes - some more diversity. Still, a need for STEM pipeline. 00:45:55 Eg. Soul Fire Farm teaches African American’s how to farm, providing a pipeline. 00:47:45 Science “frontiers” - currently shifting away from the microbiology frontier (previous frontiers were space and oceans). Now it’s soil! 00:48:15 Agricultural practices as far back as Mesopotamia are wrong. Soil mycorrhizal systems of fungi and bacteria shouldn’t be tilled because leads to off gassing of CO2. 00:50:05 Climate change can be reversed with better soil management. �00:53:35 Story of transition to Ecovative: dreaming techniques, “life is mushrooming.” 00:55:00 Mycorestoration and mycoremediation workshops with Paul Stamets. 00:57:12 Thursday Naturalists (octogenarians) - saw face in Chaga mushroom. 00:59:23 Snake death dance/heart shape, message to “do what I love most.” 01:02:55 Phone call with Eben from Ecovative - told about dream exercise, chaga & snake. 01:03:37 Began mentoring Ecovative staff. 01:04:55 Won EPA grant, collaborated with Skidmore students (research). 01:05:50 Fall 2009, because of recession, Skidmore needed to lay off 70 people - offered voluntary incentives, provided Van Hook with “graceful transition” to Ecovative. 01:07:00 “The message for me in my whole healing journey from the breast cancer has been to listen to your heart more.” 01:07:55 Taught Ecovative employees fungi/science, first company grew slowly, then 60 employees during a recession! Mushroom packaging was ahead of its time, now catching on. Now Ecovative exploring alternative meats. 01:10:10 A thread through her careers was to care for people; misses the students tremendously. 01:10:48 One more Skidmore story - transformative experience of student with cerebral palsy. Mattress in car to get to experiment site in North Woods, photographed slides at different magnifications so she could see what other students saw. She now has “PhD in neuroscience so that she could understand her illness.” “Those are the things you teach for… I miss the students.” 01:13:00 End � https://www.ssmp.mdocs.skidmore.edu/files/original/7d5aa65f6eed3a4fe29863d1cbf5e72e.pdf 6f41583bee6f5da22ed932054f8144dd PDF Text Text Interview with Sue Van Hook by Andrea Wise, Skidmore College Retiree Oral History Project, Cambridge, NY, June 3, 2021. ANDREA WISE: Good morning, this is Andrea Wise interviewing Sue Van Hook on the morning of June third, 2021, at her home in Cambridge, New York. And now I’m going to have Sue introduce herself and tell us how she first got involved with Skidmore College. SUE VAN HOOK: Good morning, Andrea. It’s great to see you again, after 11 years, since I left Skidmore College. So, I came to Skidmore as a Teaching Associate for a part-time position teaching Population Biology. And I had a two-year-old at the time, and two other girls in elementary grades, and my husband came in one day and said, “It’s time for you to go back to work.” So, there was an ad in the paper, the Albany Times Union, for this part-time position in Population Biology and I said, “Well this fits pretty well.” And I was applying for another job, with American Farmland Trust, at the same time. And, I went to two — both interviews, and as it turns out it was great that I got this job and not the other one. [laughs] But I remember that it was so important to me that I personally drove my application to campus. AW: Oh wow! SVH: Since I lived nearby. And I drove in to the main entrance there and I was just overwhelmed with the allée of, not even a formal allée, a woods, of trees, for quite a distance, as the first impression that this college was making on anyone who entered it. And then I turned on to the perimeter road to get to the Dana parking lot, and I got more into the woods. And when I turned into the parking lot there were tons of trees in the parking lot and I got to park near the trees and they shaded my car and I thought, “This is a college in the woods! This is home for me!” The woods are my home. I feel more comfortable there than anywhere else, so I felt really really good about that first impression. And then I went in and met Bernie Possidente, and he was wearing red sneakers and it just got better from there! [laughs]. They ended up giving me a very informal interview that day — they were desperate for someone for this position and, um … I think I got a call within a couple of days — “You’re hired.” [laughs]. Very, very fun. So, as it turns out, I was teaching for Monica Raveret Richter in Population Biology, and it wasn’t exactly my field — I was a botanist and mycologist, but it was okay. And the best part of the class, for as long as we could in the fall we went outdoors for the labs. And we did three weeks of labs on bees — testing bee preferences. We made, the students made their own bee feeders, we kept beehives in the lab, they learned how to paint bees, we were almost handling bees, and we did it all in the North Woods, so I was, like, “I get to teach the fun part of the course with the great students in lab, hands-on, for three hours, outdoors!” AW: [laughs] SVH: “Outdoors again, next week too!” And so, I would say a good 60 percent of our labs in the fall semester were outdoors in the North Woods, and it was amazing! It was amazing! And so the reason it’s so important to me is I came from 10 years background of land conservation before that. On both coasts. I was a preserve manager for the Nature Conservancy in northern California �for five years, where I did my graduate work, and then I was a director of stewardship and land conservation for Maine Coast Heritage Trust for the whole coast of Maine. And that was my entrance into this great new campus with woods! So, it got challenged right away. I came in ’92 and it was in 1995 that the first championship mountain bike race was held for New York State in our precious woods. And that changed, sort of, the course of history for the North Woods. They’re still a wonderful place to be, but it’s, um, it’s harder for me to go there every year. AW: I’ll bet. SVH: Yeah, but the beginning part was, I would be out there by myself scouting, preparing, and I would be there for hours and never see another person, and … besides the carriage roads, you know, which had been maintained well for a hundred years or more, the small trails were small! Really small! You really felt like you were in the woods! And so … lucky. AW: Yeah. So, tell us a little bit, please … I wonder if you could tell us a little bit about just how you opted to embrace the North Woods as a teaching lab and formalize it a little bit more for all of Skidmore. I mean, there was a great deal of work that went in to development … I hate to use the word “development,” but to embracing the North Woods and having it become a teaching opportunity for you and others on the Skidmore Campus, of course the students as well. SVH: Yes, so, that is a long story … and it goes through three college presidents. And, what I saw there was a living laboratory, and the argument I made after this threat from the biking championship, was that we could build 10 science buildings and we could take wrecking balls to them and we could still rebuild them — we wouldn’t lose too much, other than money. But what was occurring in the North Woods was, if we were wrecking it with inappropriate uses on slopes and willy nilly trails being created, without any stewardship — we couldn’t replace that ever. So we’re looking at tens of thousands of years of evolutionary history in the fauna and flora, and now the funga … there’s a new word for fungi kingdom, it’s called fun-ga. Love it! We could never replace that, and that was the argument I made, and I thought to a classical scholar such as David Porter, he would hear that argument. Didn’t. To Jamie Studley — she didn’t hear that argument either. And finally, it was actually Mike West and Phil Glotzbach together who heard that argument, and we were able to finally get some level of protection for … in the shape of a stewardship plan that we ended up writing through the Campus Environment Committee, to sort of formalize this as a living laboratory. And in the meantime, well, even when I got there the woods were being used. They were being used by art students, they were being used by literature classes — they were studying Thoreau. They were being used by the geology labs. They were being used by music … and some PE teachers were, you know, Physical Education had their students out there. So, I think there was always a history of students using the woods, but not as extensively or formally as what we did over the course of the 18 years that I was there. AW: So at some point you became involved with the Campus Environment Committee. Your love of the North Woods, your sensitivity to the concerns surrounding overuse of campus resources, led you to a broader appointment or a broader position on the Campus Environment … so tell me a little bit about that. �SVH: I don’t remember how I got invited to that committee, but [laughs] it probably was after the bike race. Umm, Eban Goodstein, from Economics, was chairing the committee at that point, and I just sat in on a couple of meetings and then I went, “Yeah, I need to get involved in this.” And … its fuzzy where the leadership went, but Eban Goodstein, …well I guess one of the monumental things that happened during my tenure there was shortly after Karen Kellogg was hired and ES was born — the Environmental Studies major was born. Eban brought … no, Karen actually brought — Eban had left and gone to Lewis and Clark, and he started the first Climate Science Summit among 40 academic institutions — and this would have been the early 2000s, and Karen went to that on the west coast and then she brought it back to Skidmore and we had our first Northeast Regional Climate Summit on Skidmore Campus. It’s pretty awesome! AW: Yeah. SVH: Yeah. It was very empowering to know that we had the awareness building there. And because of our North Woods, all of these academics from all over New England and the Northeast were willing to come and we went out there with them and showed them our living laboratory and they were very, very jealous. Turns out there were only seven college campuses in the Northeast that had adjacent properties, and ours was one of the larger ones. The biggest one is at Williams College, with 2,500 acres, but it’s not immediately adjacent to campus. AW: When you say adjacent properties you mean wooded properties? SVH: Yeah. Walk out the door from a classroom into the woods. AW: Okay. SVH: At Williams you have to get in a car or take a bus to get there. But ours was one of the next larger ones, and that was an important fact for me. I mean, I said to the admissions people, “Mary Lou, this needs to be featured. You want to attract good students here? We have one of the largest living laboratories. Put it in the admissions information!” And so, so that was an interesting progression. And I guess I just got more and more involved in the committee, as a member of the committee. I remember Mike Hall being on the committee, and Mike was really good at listening. He was really good at listening, and he represented a lot of the financial constraints for the Institution but he was also very supportive. So we got money to do the Stewardship Plan, and over the summer I wrote it and did all of the research, and I took Karl Broekhuizen out there; he’s like, “What is this all about?” And I said, “Why don’t you come on a walk with me, Karl?” and it was the middle of a hot summer day and I walked him on every single trail out there in an hour and a half, and he was quite [laughs] quite exhausted by the end, but it, it drove home the point. Because a lot of the people sitting on campus in offices just see the edge … right? They just see the edge. Step in a couple of feet and you’ve got water snakes three feet long in the Wilson Marsh, and the redwing blackbird territories, and you’ve got the horsetails, which are prehistoric, dinosaur-type plants, growing around the water tower! And you go a few more feet over the hill and you’ve got the yellow ladies slippers, which only grow on limestone soils — very, very rare populations in all of New York State! And eventually you get �deep into the woods and you get 33 species [of ferns] — of 36 total species in New York State, 33 of them are on our campus! AW: That’s awesome. SVH: That’s what they didn’t see. AW: Yeah. SVH: That’s what they didn’t see. They didn’t hear the bird, they didn’t see the owl, they didn’t see the fox family that we showed students — with the pups — they didn’t see that, and all of those things started to disappear as more and more people came to the campus for biking, for dog walking, you know, it’s the tragedy of the commons story. SVH: So eventually my good friend Sue Rosenberg, in your department, became the chair of the Campus Environment Committee, and she was chair when we wrote the Stewardship Plan. And we were able to hire some students. We were able to create a Director of Sustainability in the Facilities Department, who was housed there, who lived there, and at first it was a student, Mary Patterson, and eventually it became a full-fledged position after I left. So, after Sue — I can’t remember the transition with Sue, but it went from Sue to me. And, the Campus Environment Committee included one faculty member that was the liaison to the Institutional Policy and Planning Committee, the highest committee level of the college. And that person never showed up at our meetings, … I mean, just rarely. I don’t even remember; it was a bunch of different faculty members in the time that I was on the committee. And so finally I went to Phil Glotzbach and Mike West and I said, “So, this arrangement isn’t working.” And I said, “You know, the environment really needs to be part of every decision this college makes. Every single decision. Whether it’s about students, whether it’s about student housing, whether it’s about curriculum, whether it’s about physical plant — there’s an environmental component, and especially as climate change is facing… growing more and more in our faces, we have to plan for this. And I said, “You know what, this woods we have is a carbon storage facility. We can get paid for this woods! Have you thought about that?” Mike West, at the time, had just arrived on campus, and he came to our meetings. He came to our meetings — a lot of them! And he heard the issues we were working on, one of which was energy, renewable energy; and Karen was very, very involved in pushing that. He investigated geothermal and look what happened! I mean the whole campus is geothermal now, and we led the academic community in that effort, absolutely led it. So, they heard me and said, “Ok, fine, let’s take the chair of the Campus Environment Committee and have them come sit on IPPC,” and at the time it happened to be me so … you know, me, little TA in the Biology Department, sitting with all the deans and …! [laughs]. It was great! I loved it! And I sat quietly for six months and listened, and then I started using my voice. So that’s sort of the trajectory of my time with Campus Environment Committee. I don’t even know if the Committee still exists, frankly, now that we have a Director of Sustainability, I have a feeling it’s been subsumed under that umbrella? AW: Yeah, but it has assumed a prominence that it would not have without all this foundational work that you led. So, tip of the hat to you, Sue. �AW: I wonder now if this is a good opportunity to, it sounds like it might be, to lead into your work in the sciences. The challenges and the rewards of being a Teaching Assistant in the Biology Department, not only incorporating the North Woods in much of your work, but also other opportunities in the classroom and beyond. SVH: Yeah, thanks for that question — that’s a great one. So, I have to tell you that I got back on campus. I was sharing an office in that — remember that weird hall down from your office, it was just windows and they put up a board. I was in one of those [laughs], the first one — with another woman who was hired part-time, a teaching associate … who didn’t do very well, she was gone in one semester. But, … so I got there and I’m like, “I’m back in academia! Oh, this feels fun!” I started unpacking all of my science books, you know, we’d moved to Cambridge two years earlier and I’d just left them boxed up in the attic, and I brought them out and I put them on my shelves and I’m like, “Ok, maybe it’s time for me to go back to school and get my PhD!” AW: Oh, my goodness! SVH: “Maybe that’s a really good idea. The kids are kind of all in school and taken care of in daycare; I can manage this.” And I thought of it for about six months, and then I watched all of the biology faculty, [laughs] and I saw that if they had children, they had one, and if they had any social life, it was with one another — you know, maybe Friday-night pizza, that was about it. And I was, meanwhile, coming … I was in a part-time position, I was coming home and coaching pee-wee soccer, pee-wee softball, I was coaching with my kids, doing dance classes with them at the Dance Center. AW: Sorry to interrupt, you have three children? SVH: Three daughters, yes, yes, yes. And I thought, “Well, I’d have to give up all of this community involvement that I have in my community here. Head of PTA Environment Committee, you know, lots of things… I was involved with singing in the Chorale. And I thought about it for a long time, because I was always a really good student, at the top of my class, and I was like — the PhD trajectory, I was accepted to a PhD program or two and I chose not to at the time and I went with my husband’s dreams instead of mine, and so I was like, “Yeah, I’m really supposed to go down that path,” and I really made a very conscious decision that I had the best of both worlds. And teaching labs was like definitely the funnest part of the course. I felt that students retained more of those experiences than they did from lectures, and I thought, “Just be happy with this. This is enough. This is fine. This is awesome.” And, the way things grew — and this is where Phyllis Roth comes in — she was Dean of the Faculty at the time when Betsy Franz left, and passed the baton to me. We taught together for one semester and Betsy left. After 25 years she said, “Sue, I feel confident enough that you are going to fill my slot here. This is good.” [laughs]. Almost did. I didn’t make it 25 years. But, at the time they had been hiring a lot of adjunct TAs, you know, one semester at a time, and they were "less than” … they were “less than” in delivery to the students. They were barely able to teach the labs in terms of following directions of what the lab exercise was or experiment was. And so, the Department made a conscious decision to up it, to up the standard. And, you know, a �lot of research institutions, the labs are all taught by graduate students, right. So Skidmore is different in that regard, we didn’t have a graduate program. So we actually hired people. So, I was part-time for fall semester; for spring semester they asked — I went from part-time teaching two labs, I think, a week, to an overload spring semester. [laughs] So they … they saw a good thing when they got one. I was very broadly trained with my natural history education at Humboldt State University in Northern California in botany and mycology. So, I did the overload and then by that fall I’m like, “Okay, that was not fun! [laughs] And you’re paying me $2,000 to do this? No, I don’t think so.” So we really made the TA positions more formalized, and we were on one-year contacts at least. And then when Dave Domozych became the chair and his wife was one of the TAs, along with me, she had her PhD, Dave went to Phyllis and said, “You know, can we give them three-year contracts?” And so that happened through Phyllis’ support. And so there was an evolution, and the other … the next step, was, “Can we give them any promise of a promotion? Anything? Can we give them anything?” Well at the time Loretta Parsons had been there over 25 years and … she, you know, that’s a long time. Can we at least make her a Senior Teaching Associate?” Which they did, and she got a big chunk of change, and then, we had to go through the process but there was at least that opportunity to get one step higher. Ok, so we did it! And then, the three of us that were there used to joke about the new people coming in and say, “You know, we’d make more money if we quit and reapplied.” [laughs]. AW: [laughs] I don’t know [laughs]. SVH: [laughs] Well, they always started way higher than we did. I started at $18,000. AW: Oh wow. SVH: Yeah, for a full-time salary. Yeah, so…But, I don’t care about all of that, and part was that it was the most fun! And I went through several curricular changes. So, we had single courses for two years straight — students had to take Population Biology in the fall, Plant Biology in the spring, Cell and Molec in the next fall and Animal Biology in the following spring. They had to do two years of required courses before they could get in to electives. And after eight years of that — this is the changing in the student, incoming student expectations and standards, right? They want … there was more specialization happening sooner. Right? So, they want … the Cell and Molecular thing, track, was like really hot stuff, right? The genetics and doing the PCRs and identifying the genes and … that was just hot, a hot ticket item. Field biology? Ehh, not so much. [laughs] Right? So there was pressure on the department to shorten that requirement phase from two years to one year, so we crammed those four courses into two courses. So all of a sudden, I had to teach Cell and Molecular Biology, as a field biologist. So I had a very long summer training with Pat Hilleren, [laughs] learning to do PCRs, and I failed about seven times and I said, “You still want me to teach this?” [laughs] AW: And help us … PCRs are? SVH: Polymerase Chain Reactions, right? So you’re extracting DNA and then you’re subjecting it to a bunch of enzymes and chopping it up and replicating it really fast in a heated up little machine — this is how much I remember [laughs] — not very much! And you amplify the DNA �so you have a big enough chunk that you can run it on a gel and spread it out so you can actually see the different genes. AW: Okay. Oh wow! SVH: This was like — I had done plenty of labs, gel technique with auger and Petrie dishes, so handling the auger gels was fine, you know, I knew all of that, but working with the DNA part! But then I had my eyes opened to this whole other world, this microscopic world, and how these molecular engines act like little Pac Man and move, send things around inside the cell, and I eventually became totally fascinated with it. AW: Um, so obviously this is a response to student expectations, student preparation, and just changing methodologies in academe, right? I mean there’s a whole bunch of things at work, forces at work on this, but in terms of student outcomes, the preparation they got at Skidmore did led to some pretty awesome achievements on behalf of our alumni, correct? SVH: Yes, correct. The super-achievers were still there. And Nicole Donofrio published several papers as an undergraduate, doing research with Dave Domozych. There were a few others, we had, there were a few whiz kids that just took it very far, as far as they could, because they had that one-on-one research opportunity, which continued all through the 18 years I was there. That was very special, and we emphasized that to the Admissions Department, too. Very, very rarely can you go to an institution where your kid is going to get one-on-one research experience, if they choose, with a faculty member. Not a TA, a faculty member. We TAs expanded those opportunities, too, over the years, for more independent study. But, the writing quality declined. You know, it was really the digital age taking hold, right? Screen mentality, not having whole conversations, not learning language, not learning how to write it, not learning how to speak it. Everything getting shrunk to bite size. Not being able to synthesize and not being able to use cross-disciplinary thinking. So for me, the shrinking of the courses from four into two, we lost all the depth, and all that depth allows you to do the crossdisciplinary thinking, to make connections on your own — “oh THAT is really connected to THAT?” That all disappears. And so that was hard to swallow because you want to impart all of it. You want to say, “No, you need to know this much!” I would say the environment and the awareness of science literacy increased. Right? So you have more kids that are interested in the outdoors, more kids interested in gardening, more kids interested in environment, more kids interested in climate science …. So there was a student movement for environmental awareness, but I don’t see that the science requirements followed that. Now I think it’s shifted, so you can fill me in on … AW: Well, actually I’ve been gone now for a few years myself, but I believe you’re right, I think it has shifted. And then there is also, actually, the growth of Environmental Studies, which sort of emphasizes what you just mentioned, I mean, growth in science in a different area. But now, more important than ever, we have a brand-new science building at Skidmore. Have you been to that new building? Do you know much about it? SVH: I have not been there. [laughs] I’ve been back on campus a few times to teach for a few �people, lead some walks in the woods. Umm, you know, that said, I witnessed the new wing being built, at the tune of $4 million at the time, which allowed for the super-duper microscopy facility to be built. Again, Skidmore’s on the map because of Dave Domozych and that, and the grants he obtained for that — every kind of microscope we have. And undergrads get trained on them and get to use them, that’s unbelievable — no one gets to do that at undergraduate anywhere else. So I witnessed all that. And that, because of the atrium on that wing, being able to see all the floors brought the geosciences and the physical sciences and the chemical sciences and the biological a little bit closer. A little bit closer, because before we were isolated on floors and we didn’t really go between floors but the atrium we used and we walked down through there and we saw each other that way. AW: Sure, that makes sense. So you talked a little bit about Phyllis Roth, initially, and I’m just interested since she was Dean … and Interim President when you were there? I’m trying to remember. SVH: Yeah. AW: So I think you had some pretty good interaction with her, maybe you could give me a sense of how supportive she might have been of the sciences and of your work? SVH: Yeah, I love to talk about Phyllis. A wonderful character. [laughs] I miss her. So initially Phyllis, as I said, was very involved with Dave Domozych in upping our positions as Teaching Associates and giving us the opportunity for one promotion commensurate with salary increase, too, so that was very much appreciated. And then Phyllis did something really, really, personally wonderful for me. So I was diagnosed with my breast cancer on September 9th, 1998 — nine, nine, nine, eight. And I had told Dave Domozych, chair at the time, that I was going to give him a call the next day when I got my results, and either I was going to come or I wasn’t going to come. And the reason I was going to be able to tell him that was because Phyllis said I could take a year off paid. She gave me full pay for six months, she introduced me to someone in the English department who had just been through this, right away, and I went and had lunch with that person right away, Jo Devine, and we had a wonderful lunch — took away a lot of my fear. And then I was on disability pay for the other six months. It took that whole level of stress, that whole level of stress away. She knew I had to focus on me, and I don’t think I could have gotten through that year with my little children — my children were 7, 11 and 14 — and … not having to worry about finances, and my husband is a self-employed artist, so there wasn’t a whole lot coming in from that stream of revenue, and so this was a really, a huge meaningful, supportive act on her part. And then it was just too ironic that she then had to go through this herself. It was just too much. So, I will always hold Phyllis very dear to my heart, for that and many other reasons. I mean, she was someone I could just talk to, and I didn’t feel that way with a lot of people in the upstairs, on the fourth floor, but I felt very comfortable going to her with any kind of faculty-related concerns or student concerns. And she was just a pip! I mean, she approached her breast cancer by wearing a different kind of wig every day! I mean, I thought, “God, you’re so awesome!” I didn’t … I went bald and turbaned, you know, I couldn’t put a wig on my head! She goes, “Oh come on, let’s make it fun!” AW: I remember that. I do remember Phyllis’s many wigs and I’m not surprised to hear about �this powerful expression of personal and professional support for you and I’m glad for you and I think we all feel the loss of Phyllis, even now…. This sort of leads me into matters of gender and work-life balance, and obviously a health crisis is above the line here, but I’m just wondering, you had three children when you started teaching at Skidmore — you still have three children — your children were young when you started teaching at Skidmore. You had a 30-mile commute to Saratoga. You had engagements in the community and other interests. How did you balance all of this with a pretty demanding job as a lab teacher at Skidmore? SVH: Once I made the decision that being a lab instructor was enough, it eased. And I realized that I’m really only there eight months a year, right? I get pretty much three months off in the summer and I get January kind of off, although we are doing a lot of prep. So it corresponded very well with the kids in their school years. When they were really little, I took my summers off, and then I couldn’t resist the wonderful opportunities that Skidmore afforded me in being able to do research if I wanted to. So there was no pressure to publish and do research, like tenure-track faculty have, but I was certainly encouraged, and that was a gift, too. So I could use the facilities such as the autoclave in the microbiology lab, or the greenhouse, you know, to do experiments. And … and my love was fungi! So, one of the first, well, and we also had a sabbatical replacement for population biology for Monica one year, and his approach was to let students do independent research right from the get-go, right the minute they walked in the door as first year students. And Laurie Freeman and I were co-teaching the labs at that point and so we said, “Yeah, bring it on! We’ll create a 12, 15, 30, whatever many students out of 120 want to do this.” So, out of 120 students we had 10 percent — we had 12 students that wanted to do this. So, I felt glad that I had time off, but, as the years evolved and the kids grew older, I was able to go back there for summers, and one of the draws was the life science camp for girls, the Skidmore Life Science Camp for Girls, sixth grade to eighth grade. AW: Right. SVH: And … for one year we had it for boys, too, it was co-ed, because my daughter went one year with her co-horts who were guys. And the boys at sixth grade to eighth grade — oh my gosh, not worth it! [laughs]. Wayyy too hard to handle. So we decided, we made a decision that this is just going to be a girls science camp, you know, we’re just going to do STEM for girls. And I think I did that for eight or nine years, and … awesome, awesome experiences for the girls! It was pulling garlic mustard, we had them all in hip-waders in Wilson Marsh pulling out purple loosestrife and while we were in there, we saw the snakes and the turtles and the birds nesting and it was just awesome. So, that evolved from that camp in the summer, which was a two-week camp, into then working independent study with students. And then, my connection with Ecovative, the last four years, or three, four, five years I was there, presented a new grant funded opportunity — it was for students to get paid to do research for the EPA and the USDA, and then after I mentored two students, two of our students in their senior years for those capstone research projects, both got hired immediately upon their presentations at the end of the summer over in Murray-Aiken, and worked for Ecovative for a number of years. I started working just independent study with anybody who wanted to, so I got a lot of ES students who were really fascinated with mushroom packaging and what Ecovative was doing for the environment, and worked with just a lot of different extra kids that way, as I was transitioning. �AW: I will talk a little bit about Ecovative in a minute, but I want to ask, also, if you can tell me a little bit — we talked about this before the tape started running — about IT, and changes in technology and how that may have affected you, expectations for you as a teacher, expectations of your students. Did it change the way you taught? Did it help/hurt? Some of the challenges? SVH: So, my first response is, I got out in time [laughs]. That said, my graduate work was done — and I TA-ed for seven years as a graduate student — so I did a lot of chalkboard teaching and I was very comfortable doing that. Then we started to get … we were still using overhead projectors in the labs … AW: I know, I remember [laughs]. SVH: … for eight years with Monica. I don’t think we got beyond overhead projectors in Plant Biology. Overhead projectors! I still have all of those mylars up in my filing cabinets. I just can’t throw them away, thinking someday they’ll be useful again. And then it evolved, and my exposure to it was through Environmental Science, through teaching. I eventually went to teaching half the year in Environmental Science, ES 105 labs, with Kim and Karen, which was — the nickname for the three of us, by the students, was the Charlie’s Angels! [laughs] And so, we got some pretty cool imitations from our students, I must say! But they started using the Smart Boards because they were younger faculty who had come in with it, right? I’m teaching up here with all the old faculty who don’t know how to do this, and they’re coming in with this whole Smart Board technology in front of the classroom and so I had to adapt to it. But by the very end, they introduced the Blackboard …? AW: Whiteboard? SVH: No, the Smart Board was the whiteboard, but the Blackboard was a software program where you interface with the students on the software, like you give them their assignments on there, you give them the syllabus on there, you read their lab reports on this thing, on this computer thing. I’m like, oh no, I do enough time on the computer screen, I do not want to be reading student papers on the computer screen when normally I go up in the field where my husband’s painting for a weekend and I look out over this beautiful landscape of fall leaves and I grade papers up there. That’s where I’m grading papers. I am not sitting at a computer grading papers. So it was really a big part of my decision to transition and leave. Yeah, I just did not want … and then they were just beginning to teach online courses and like, “Sue, do you want to teach this online course this summer?” “N-o, n-o.” AW: But of course, and I understand what you’re saying and I’ve felt it myself and I’ve heard it from others, but this past year of COVID has taught us, more than anything, the ability to pivot and use online resources. It’s the thing that kept many of us going. I mean, did it make you think, “Oh, should I have done more or should I do more, or …?” Any regrets? SVH: No regrets, but I did adapt, right? And Zoom was very different than what we had available 10 years ago. So Zoom you can see each other and you can put up your slideshow, your PowerPoint slideshow, and interact that way and see them, you know, you can at least see people. You know, I’m an energy worker, as well, I do healing touch, so I really rely on �energetic exchange between people — to know how they’re doing, to know how I’m doing, who’s struggling, who has a question, you know I just … the in-person thing will never be replaceable really, but Zoom does a pretty good job of making it available in this pandemic. And I think we will … you know, I really don’t ever want to drive to another meeting! [laughs] I do yoga four mornings a week, which I did this morning from my living room with my yoga instructor on the screen, and I may not ever transition away from that, actually. AW: Yeah, it’s true. SVH: Yeah. AW: So I want to briefly pivot here, myself, and just … you’ve sort of alluded to this a couple of times, you’ve mentioned students, and I’m just interested, over your 18 years at Skidmore, some thoughts about changes in the student body, or any particular student stories stand out in your mind even now? SVH: So one big elephant in the room is BIPOC. We haven’t talked about that. And during my tenure there it was the push across the board for multiculturalism to increase, multiculturalism on campuses. And I was certainly part of that. And HEOP [Opportunity Program] was a big piece of that, and HEOP in the sciences was definitely a challenge. So I always had HEOP students among the 48 or 50 students I taught every semester, and I was on the phone with the HEOP people over in Starbuck a lot, because they kept telling me, “Don’t alter your expectations, don’t alter the way you grade papers, don’t alter a thing. We’re bringing these kids in, we’re giving them extra help.” And, so, okay, so I gave the extra help in my office hours for making up a lab or redoing a lab or … and yet, I got into a real fight one time about this because I said, “They’re still pouring through the cracks. This isn’t working! This isn’t working. We need to do something different here.” And I remember we had one African American student, he was in my Population Biology Lab and Plant Biology Lab for the first two semesters — it was like, we had a department-wide discussion at one of our department meetings saying “We’re going get this guy through. He has enough potential, we are gonna get him through.” And we did. I had one student from El Salvador, who happened to be an exchange student here in this town and who my daughters adopted and gave all their clothes to because she arrived with no clothing. We went through the attic and among the three daughters we outfitted her with all her needs for the year. And she was playing soccer with my middle daughter and then she had the opportunity to stay and she came to Skidmore, and she was in my lab in Biology, in Plant Biology and Population Biology. I spent a lot of extra time with her and I knew her. I knew … she came here not knowing English, you know, as a high school student, eleventh grader, and even when she wasn’t in my courses, she was still in my office hours, you know, because she knew me and she could trust me and I mentored her, and I mentored her, and I mentored her, and I mentored her, and she went from being a C minus student finally up to like a B plus and got through. And she and I have stayed in touch and she is now back in El Salvador, living with her family, married, with kids, and is a health-care professional. AW: Oh wow. That’s awesome. �SVH: It’s a great success story. I had another situation where I was called at two o’clock in the morning from one of my students who had been admitted to Four Winds, and he was begging me not to flunk him, you know, to hold on, it was near finals time and the pressure was just too great and he collapsed. And in talking … I’m like, “Why are you calling me? I’m not the right person you should be calling.” He said, “But I can trust you, I can trust you, and you need to do this for me.” And so I got on the phone with HEOP and we came up with solutions. But I, in my office hours, had learned their life stories, and these are kids who are sending back money to their families, who took care of all their siblings all through high school, with single parents, I mean, their stories were just phenomenal! So, we need to do better, younger, we need to start at … three years old! You know! And it’s hard to force it at this level because you mentally see the need and want it to happen, but it doesn’t happen that way, you have to grow it. And so we started bringing the HEOP students on campus a whole month early, the whole month of August, to prepare them. Some of my best experiences were, Kim and I led pre-orientation trips to … and we did the Environmental Studies one. And so we took kids backpacking through the woods at Merck Forest. And I did that for eight years and we had a lot of HEOP students come on those, a lot of international students come on those, and one of the best times was [laughs] … Abdullah Bah did get through the program as well, and he came from Senegal, and we’re on this field trip and we’re working forestry all day long. We all have hardhats on and we’re clearing brush from the trail crew and we get to the end of the day at the cabin and I say, “Ok, it’s time to go for a swim in the lake.” That was our shower, right? And so everybody comes, and one girl got really hurt that day, she fell from the dock — that was an emergency we dealt with. And another girl that trip forgot her contacts, so that was another psychological emergency — I’m doing healing touch for her, [laughs] giving her my lavender oil to get her through the night, for her anxiety attack. Anyway, so we get back from the lake and then he shows up to me with this little towel and this little bar of soap and he says, “Could you please show me where the showers are?” [laughs]. And I said, “We were just there! Somehow that didn’t get communicated to you. I’m so sorry.” And I said, “But, down here in the creek there’s a little pool and it’s far enough away you could sit down there and do what you need to do.” AW: So you talked a little bit about changes in student diversity. Similarly, for faculty and staff, I mean, I’m not sure if this was a change that you noticed when you were there. You left Skidmore in … 2010 and you’d been there for 18 years so … 92? Yeah, ’92. So, you know, just … gender, cultural, and other diversity issues, as far as faculty and staff go. Anything there that comes to mind that you want to share, particularly in the sciences? SVH: So when I was in college in my Department of Botany, there was one woman faculty member in the ’70s. She taught Zoology and I took it from her. And she and I met in the Albany airport 40 years later, because she was from Albany, NY, and I didn’t know it! [laughs] Now we’re really close. And she went through breast cancer too, and she was my role model for being a female scientist. So, um … when I got to Skidmore there were … one, two … two of the tenure track people were women and … um, maybe five were guys. Chemistry … I don’t think there were any women chemists at the time. There were TAs — most of the TAs were women … I would say all of the TAs were women! All four floors, the TAs were women. Um, right, so we can do with less salary and we want to be Moms, and … so. But that changed, that definitely �changed. I think there was a time there were more women faculty in Biology than men. In terms of diversity, we had one Latinx … and that might have been it. Umm, and I don’t think that’s changed since I’ve left. I don’t think there’s anyone there that I know of. ES might be different, but …yeah, I know ES is different, I know they have two people of color. So, yeah again it’s that pipeline, right? It’s that pipeline, that STEM pipeline. And, um, where did I just see … oh, the whole organic regenerative farming movement is altering this. So there’s a farm nearby here somewhere called Soul Fire Farm that is run by African American people for African American people, to teach them how to farm. Think about that connection to slavery, right? So, they were the ones doing the farming, right? And where did that disconnect happen? Because we shoved them all into ghettos and cities where they couldn’t farm, or they were too poor to own land and they couldn’t farm, or they were still indentured, …. So that shift is fascinating — that deserves a PhD right there. But this farm is focused on bringing them through the pipeline, and that’s what we have to do in the sciences as well. And the science … what I’m seeing now is that the shift is away from molecular and cell science, the microscopic level, and back to big ecosystems-based science. I mean, climate change is forcing us there, right? And the more we’ve learned about fungi, I mean … fungi, my babies, have exploded since Paul Stamets, right? So, I brought Paul Stamets to campus in 2008, and it was Muriel Poston who had heard him speak at a botanical conference and said, “Sue, get this guy here!” [laughs] And, I got huge backlash because he was not an academic. She didn’t care because she saw he was doing science, but my department didn’t even frickin’ come to the talk. Yeah. So that’s a little aside, but anyway. So we’re seeing this push and the fungi … because we’re now going underground, right? So there’s always a frontier in science. So the frontier while I was at Skidmore was into the cells, into the DNA, right? And now the frontier is, we’ve gone to space, we’ve gone to the oceans [laugh], now the frontier’s beneath our feet. It is soil. We know nothing about the soil. And our farming and agricultural practices, way back from the fertile crescent in Mesopotamia, was wrong. To plow the earth destroyed all that mycorrhizal fungal thread network. And all the carbon plants … I just learned this year! I was a botanist — I just learned this year that plants are sending 40 percent of the sugars they make through photosynthesis to the roots! We’re all above ground people, we just see what’s above ground, right? “That’s a tree! Who cares about the roots! We know they’re there, okay!” No, 40 percent of what’s manufactured, the manufacturing plant is, which is making the sugars that the rest of life depends on, is being sent to the roots, and not to the roots but to the fungi and the bacteria in the root system, the mycorrhizal connections. And that is why our carbon dioxide in the universe is out of balance, right? 70 percent of carbon dioxide belongs in the soil. And because of … not because of burning fossil fuels, that’s only 5 percent, but because of our agricultural practices, where we till and we lay bare — you drove over here today, you saw bare fields, driving over here today — we lay bare fields, that means there’s no microbial life in those fields, and if there is any, it’s off gassing CO2 like crazy through respiration. That is where the CO2 is coming from. That’s where the bulk of it is coming from. I’ve spent the last five years reading my head off about this and studying this, because it ties my whole life together. And so … we need to stop the fossil fuel emissions, right, to stop the source, one of the sources, from going up in the atmosphere, but doing that doesn’t do anything with the carbon that’s already there. It’s going to take another 800 years for that carbon to go somewhere. So, putting it back in the soil, within two years, if we put two percent of the carbon, two percent, that’s all, back in the soil, we can bring the parts per million back down to 350 parts per million within 10 years. We can reverse �climate change in 10 years. And guess what? Our new president understands this. And this trend into the soil, this new frontier, is happening fast. Within five years it’s happened. Normally it takes … so I mentioned the first climate change report about excessive carbon dioxide, went to President Johnson’s desk in 1965! I have known about it since then. I have been teaching about it since then. That’s 50 years! And it took us that long, and it’s like kinda too late, right? But it’s not too late, because this whole soil story is catching on like wildfire, and there are bills in state legislatures and there are bills in Congress now and it’s just exciting. And guess what? It’s because of the fungi!!! AW: [laughs] So, as if you weren’t excited enough! [both laugh]. Um, you left Skidmore after 18 years and began yet another career. You’ve had a multi-career lifespan, which I think is very fascinating, and you went to work on fungi with Evo-cative? Evocative? SVH: Ecovative. AW: Ecovative, excuse me. It’s a challenging name. So, I want you to tell me a little bit about that, and maybe, it sounds like that sort of encompasses a lot of — it drew a common thread through a lot of your experiences. SVH: I’ll tell you how the transition happened, but just two days ago, I came full circle with that company. I’m writing a book about it and I’m nearing …progress, nearing ending progress on it, but two days ago I got up really early, 6:30, and I drove up to Merck Forest, and — I mentioned Merck Forest before, up in Rupert, Vermont — a 3,000-acre preserve. And, I’m becoming the new president of the board there in another couple of days. [laughs] AW: Congratulations. SVH: Thank you — my fifth career [laughs]. And I picked up the farm truck and I drove the farm truck down to Troy to Green Island, where Ecovative is, to pick up their waste product, which is spent oyster mushroom substrate that they’ve grown the new “My bacon” meat alternative on. So, I’m holding in my hands this mushroom that I brought out of the woods, by myself, in 2007 … brought it in to culture. That is now getting cloned into “myco-bacon,” “my bacon” and being sold at Honest Weight Food Co-Op in Albany for six months, and is now getting scaled nationally, in the next year, with a hundred million dollars of new investment. And I’m holding this thing, this strain, … and saying, “Yeah, I knew you had potential!” [laughs] AW: That’s great! SVH: So … so the way I got there is just the best story, and it will be in the book, is in the book, and it’s also in the New Yorker magazine article about Ecovative that came out on March … on May 20th, 2013, called Farm and Function, and there’s a big part of that story. And also, this story is also in Fungi Magazine — I can’t remember what year — it was a couple of years after that. So, I’m a lucid dreamer and I’m studying dream … dreaming techniques with an international dream teacher who’s written all the books, Robert Moss, who happens to live in Albany. And I’m at one of his workshops up at Gore Mountain, and the message I get at one of the exercises that we did, which was creating a synchronicity card deck, was “life is �mushrooming.” And I picked my own card out of the deck, and he said, “If you pick your own card, it’s serious business — you’d better do what the card says!” AW: [laughs] SVH: So I had … my question was — this was November 2005. My question was, “what is the next creative phase of my life?” I was already feeling that Skidmore was dwindling. And, “what is the next creative phase of my life?” Now maybe I’ve got one more shot at one more career. That was my question and I picked my own card, “life is mushrooming,” that I’d written. And, so I’m like, “Okay, what does that mean for me?” So, that Monday I called Paul Stamets in Washington State and I said, “Paul, you don’t remember me from 30 years ago but we were in 4H together” and I said, “I want to take your Mychorestoration and Mycoremediation course on how to heal ecosystems using fungi. That’s what your book is about. That’s what I want to do. I have enough background; I can pull this off. It marries my environmentalism with my mycology.” And he said, “Yeahhh … no, no, you’ve got to come take the beginner seminar first.” I said, “Paul, come on, I have a graduate degree in mycology. I know how to culture fungi.” He goes, “Yeahhh, but there’s some little tidbits you need to know. You need to come do the beginner’s seminar.” So I go out there in March of 2006, borrow my sister-in-law’s car in Portland, Oregon, drive up to the Olympic Peninsula, take the course — I’m practically teaching lab, he says, “Sue, can you help out those people there? Sue, can you help out those people there?” Thirty people! And I come home with 12 fungi that he gave us, in test tubes. And so I went back three months later, in June, to take the other course, and came home with even more. So I thought, “Ok, I’m going to now go out in the woods and build my own strain library.” And David had given me a little cinderblock room in the back of the greenhouse [laughs] that I could call home. We were actually doing our slug experiments in there, too, [laughs] so I’ve had it for a while. And I said, “I just need a refrigerator please,” and so I got permission to be in somebody’s refrigerator and I started collecting fungi and building a strain library. And, low and behold, Karen sticks an article in … a year later, in June of 2007, on my door, at the end of the semester: “RPI Grads Grow Mushroom Insulation Board.” And I walked past it for four days, because I was busy with summer school or whatever, and finally on Friday I sat down and read it and went “Oh my God! I have to meet these people!” [laughs] So I found them through the staff directory, they are faculty members, and got hold of them and, in the meantime — my first email with Eben, one of the two guys, was on Wednesday and we’d arranged for a call on Friday, and on Thursday, in between, I went out to the North Woods with the Thursday Naturalists, who’s a group of octogenarians, average age octogenarians, who I’ve been botanizing with for years — and Skidmore woods is one their favorite places to come — and that particular day was in June, we were going to look for the 33 species of ferns, and we found them all. And, not only did we find them all, but I’m having this conversation with Win Bigelow, he says, “Sue, what do you know about chaga?” and I said, “Well I’ve just learned about chaga because Jackie Donnelly picked me up and took me to this thing growing on a tree and we had, and we…” you know, did that. So, I’m talking to Win about the chaga and we get down to wayyy back in the corner of the woods by the Middle School, and we are going into this one glade to find silver spleenwort. And I’m at the end and the person in front of me is 96-year-old Sally Ingalls, with her walking stick and her hand lens, and I’m looking at her and I’m going, “You’re my idol, you’re my idol! I’m going to be you; I’m going to be you!” [laughs]. So I’m the last person in line and we’d just talked about chaga and here’s this yellow birch and there’s a chaga mushroom right there! And �it’s low on the tree — usually they’re up high, and it’s low! And so I had my little Canon Power shot, and I knelt down and I’m looking at this chaga and it’s like, “Hmm, this looks like a portal, there’s like a chunk of it over here and a chunk of it over on the other side and there’s like a little black frame around in the middle — I’m going to just take a picture of this!” So I knelt down, I looked through my camera, and this face appears! I’m going to show you the picture, I have it upstairs. This face — you can put it in the article — this face appears and it’s this Indigenous elder with big bushy eyebrows and a pointy chin and a beard and it passes through the portal in my viewfinder, it just moves right through there, and I snapped and I got the face. And I’m like, “Whooo, I’m getting chills! The fungi are talking to me! They’re giving me some big information here!” On the heels of my dreaming thing and on the heels of going out to Paul, who’s very dreamy, and has done his share of hallucinogenic tripping [laughs]…most of where his ideas come from. And, I’m like, “Okay, I’m really getting a hit here!” And so I just, I just keep it all to myself and I go up to the other people and they found the silvery spleenwort and we look at it, dah dah dah, and I come home. That night I go for a walk at ten o’clock at night because there’s a full moon and I… you know my husband and I had just had an argument about determinate versus indeterminate tomatoes and which ones we’re going to plant and I said, “This is ridiculous, I’m going for a walk.” And I’m going out to the cemetery, where it’s my favorite place to walk, and there’s this snake on the side of the road doing this “death dance.” It’s a snake I’ve never seen before but I instinctively know it’s a milk snake, it was broad white and brown banded. I said, “I think you’re a milk snake but it doesn’t matter, you’re a snake and you’re doing this thing and … straight up in the air and then falling on your head and straight up in the air and falling on your head," I’m like, “this is kind of like … what is going on?” So then I just, I said, “I’m leaving,” so I go to my tree, I’m hugging my tree and leaning on my tree and I’m watching the moon and then “Okay, time to go back.” And I come back and I’m like a little bit afraid to see where this snake is next. This snake … freaks me out. This snake has made itself into the shape of a heart, which snakes don’t do. And I get down on my hands and knees to see where the head and tail were. It had bit its tail with its head, and the middle of the snake was the groove in the top of the heart. I’m like, “You shouldn’t be bending right there like that.” So this is like a special message to Sue from snake medicine spirit … and I thought it was just, “Go home and be loved, be loving to your husband, forget the stupid argument.” No, it wasn’t that. I mean I did that anyway, but it wasn’t that. [laughs] This, you know, so snake medicine is about shedding your old skin, transformation, new life ahead, all of this messaging coming through. And we had seen a giant water snake on that field trip that day. And it wasn’t in Wilson Marsh, it was way up on a rocky outcrop where it shouldn’t have been so that it caught our attention. Anyway, so two snakes in one day, and then, so I'm like, “This message is, ‘be what you love. Do what you love the most.’ This is what the snake is telling me.” So, that’s Thursday night. So Friday morning I’m driving to Skidmore, I’m going to have this first phone call with Eben, this cool guy, this cool young guy, and I’m like, “Oh, I’ve got to go see the snake.” [laughs] And the snake wasn’t there, it was up this friend’s driveway, in a straight line, it had crawled out from underneath a little juniper bush, and I’m like, I got down on my knees and, “Are you alive or are you dead, snake?” It was dead and little ants were feeding on it. I’m like, “I witnessed your death dance, you gave me a message before you died. [laughs] You’re telling me to do what I love. This is pretty cool.” So my first conversation, right out of the blocks, I just said, “Hi. Why are you using a commodity, a food commodity and not a waste product?” [laughs] That’s the first words out of �my mouth, because they were using … they had taken flour and water and pearlite, you know, the white stuff in potting soil for holding water, and oyster mushroom spores they ordered off the Internet to make this board. I said, “You shouldn’t be using food. This feeds people.” They go, “We already switched. We already switched. We are using agricultural crop waste.” I said, “Oh good.” I said, “So what are you looking for…” And they’re looking for … “in your strains? Like what are you looking for?” And they’re, “We want it to be dense, fast growing and really strong.” I’m like, “Do you know anything about fungi?” “No, we’re engineers.” I’m like, “And you’re starting a company to grow fungi, is that correct?” “Yes, it is!” [laughs]. And so, I said, “So how far are you along are you?” He said, “Well we filed the provisional patents and we have some lawyers and we have business plans,” and I said, “Oh that’s good, because I don’t know any of that stuff and nor do I want to. But I do know the part about the fungi and I’d be happy to work with you.” And so by the end of an hour and a half call, …and I told him the whole story about the snake and the chaga, because if he didn’t … if he balked at that then I didn’t want to work with these guys. But he is a lucid dreamer too, so he was like on the edge of his seat on his end of the phone line and I could tell. And like, “Okay, we can do this. We can marry our interests here.” So I worked for them. I grew … so when I went upstairs to Bill Tomlinson, we arranged a transfer of biological materials agreement between the two colleges, because they were in the incubator at RPI still, and I grew their spawn for the first two years. So I grew all their fungi, and I grew them with my strains, and … in our autoclave. [laughed] I processed them in our autoclave and then I delivered them or they’d come up and pick them up. I taught them all of their sterile technique and I taught them all the names, all the biology of the fungi, and I mentored and mentored and mentored and mentored and mentored. For nothing! [laughs] Because I’m a teacher, right? I kick myself — if I had any business sense whatsoever, I would have charged them for all of this information. [laughs] AW: You would have been a partner. [laughs] SVH: I would have been a full-fledged third partner. How dumb was I? Where are my spirit guides now, like, “You’re supposed to be helping me here!” [laughs] So anyway, I gave it all for free, and … whatever, I’ve never been about money in my life, ever, in anything I’ve done. In fact, every … of the four jobs I’ve had has been the trail-blazing position. I’ve been the trail blazer and I’ve left and the next person makes two or three times what I made. So it’s not, it’s not what I’m here for on the planet. AW: Right. SVH: So anyway, this story got better and better. So, I’m still teaching, so this is 2007 to 2010. I’m still growing their stuff, teaching them, engaging our students, and then … 2008 we applied for our first EPA grant. And they tried once on their own and didn’t get it [laughs] and so they called me up and they said, “Ahh, we need your gray hairs.” [laughs] And, so I was the PI on the first EPA grant, and then we got a Skidmore student, Dawn Harfmann, Tom Harfmann’s daughter, from IT, and she and I worked on it for six months and then she came and worked with us, upon graduating. And now I got Gordon MacPhearson to do the USDA grant the following summer. So I was still using Skidmore facilities, Skidmore students, and it was just a wonderful situation. And then, I … we got the grant, so I had to go do the grant, right? So I had to take a leave of absence, unpaid, because we didn’t get sabbaticals as TAs. And so that was all arranged, �and I went in January of 2009 through the summer and did the grant. I got paid a little more than I would have teaching kids at Skidmore, that was fine, so that’s good. And then I get back on campus and the first faculty meeting in the fall of 2009 and Phil gets up and says, “You know we’re in … we’ve had an economic recession for 2007, 8 and 9 and we just have to lay some people off — we have to get rid of 70 people.” I don’t know if you remember that? AW: I do. SVH: Yeah. And he said, “But, we’re going to be able to do it voluntarily with a little bit of a bonus incentive for getting out the door.” It was a great … it was a big bonus, as it turns out. “And, in order to apply for this voluntarily you have to be at least 55 and you have to have worked here for 15 years. So I was turning 55 the next month and I had 15 years, no I had 17 years in. I had 17 years in then. “Ahhhh, spirit, you told me it’s time to shift. Ahh, this is like a pretty graceful way to do it with a little extra cash on the way out the door. Am I supposed to do this?” “Yeah, you’d better apply.” [laughs] There were six of us in the Bio Department who could have applied. I was the only one who did, and it was competitive — more than 70 people applied. So, I got it, and I still smile at the grace … this graceful transition that was no stress. And so the message for me in my whole healing journey from the breast cancer has been to listen to your heart more. I mean, I get to see my heart beat every day, because I’m missing one, and so it … you know, in academia we are so in our heads all the time, it’s like, balance your head and your heart, people. And when you do, things are easy, they’re not hard and challenging, the spirit is on your side. They want this abundance for you, they want this thing that you’re on the earth to do, for you. Stay out of the way! Stay out of the way! And when you stay out of the way it is fun! It’s like magic! You get snakes doing dances. And you, I mean, you meet chaga men in the woods, and … it’s just beautiful! And so that was my fourth transition to this new thing I’d never done called business! AW: [Laughs] SVH: And it turns out that I was, like, teaching all the science there, mentoring all these people. I mean, we grew slowly at first and then it was like, boom! Up to 60 employees. During the recession, we were up to 60 employees, which was pretty … Paul Tonko came and cut our ribbon. [laughs] And so this company is coming into its own now. We were, 10 years before its time in growing mushroom packaging to replace Styrofoam. Completely compostable, 100 percent plants and fungus, no waste product, throw it in your garden, throw it in your mulch, thing. That’s taken a decade to catch on and now it’s really catching on. And it’s now, all that has been licensed to a company in California. They don’t even do it any more here. So now they’ve moved on to alternative meats, and that is going to be mind blowing and successful too. So. AW: Um, Sue, we have been chatting for quite a while and it’s been wonderful, it’s been fun. I’m just, I just want to ask you if there’s any … we’ve only touched on so many things, but if there’s anything that I didn’t mention that you feel is particularly essential to mention now, this is the moment! [laughs] You’ve had a very colorful, very innovative career, and a big chunk of it spent at Skidmore for the enrichment of the college and the student community. I just want to be sure I haven’t forgotten anything that you’ll think about later and say, “Oh gosh, I wish I’d �mentioned this.” SVH: Well I feel really honored that I’ve gotten to share what’s kept me really excited and engaged in this retirement. And I retired from Skidmore in 2016, so I didn’t really retire until then. And I was a healing touch practitioner at the office of Ecovative. I saw 60 employees on my massage table. They realized the benefits of caring for ourselves. And so a big, one of the big things I did there, and I think I did at Skidmore and I think I did everywhere I’ve been … “Oh hello helicopter!” [laughs] [loud helicopter flying overhead] Um, I’m just going to wait … So one of the biggest things I’ve done all throughout my career is care for people. And, I miss the students tremendously, every one of them. You know, I had a big transition, a BIG transition when I went to teach in Environmental Science. Because I came, …you know, you gravitate to people who are most like you, right? So I was a top A student, I mean I was the top grade in my class all throughout my career. And so I gravitated to those kids, the super performers in our labs, and I took care of the other people, but like I really gave a little extra encouragement, I wanted them to really succeed. There was one other student I want to mention, that was transformative for me. She had cerebral palsy, and she was also the daughter of a staff member. I had her for two semesters and … I was told, “Do what you can to accommodate her.” She could barely walk and I had to have a bed in the lab. And in the fall lab we were doing the bee experiments outside, and I said, “I’m going to find a way to get you into the woods to paint bees.” And at the time I had inherited my mom’s old Dodge K-car station wagon, which was kind of on its last legs, so I put a mattress in the back of the station wagon, and we got her down the elevator and got her into the back of the car and I drove her out into the woods. And it was a time where the roads were in good-enough shape, it was down where the new student dorms are now, it was down in that section of the woods, and the roads had not eroded, where I could drive her right to where we were doing the experiments. And then for the next semester her lab was in the prep room in the Plant Biology class, and I spent hundreds and hundreds of hours … digital photography in the microscope was new, and I put the camera in the microscope and I scanned every single microscope slide that we looked at the whole semester, at low magnification, middle magnification and high magnification so that she could see absolutely everything that the students saw. And I filmed all of this, so that took me hours of my own time, and then I … while she’s lying in bed I’m talking her through it, so I taught another three-hour lab to her every week individually. She invited me to her PhD graduation party … where she walked, was walking beautifully. PhD in neuroscience so that she could understand her illness! And … it was at the Parting Glass down in Saratoga, and I brought my whole family with me. I said, “Kids, you’ve got to meet this woman. You’ve got to meet this woman.” So those are the things that you teach for. And … yeah, I miss the students. AW: That’s an awesome story, and very moving, Sue. I want to thank you for sharing that, I want to thank you for being a good teacher and a great colleague for many years at Skidmore. I’ll sign off now. END � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Skidmore College Retirees Oral History A resource containing historical information obtained in interviews with persons having firsthand knowledge. Interviewer The person(s) performing the interview Andrea Wise Interviewee The person(s) being interviewed Sue Van Hook Location The location of the interview Cambridge, NY 12816 Original Format The type of object, such as painting, sculpture, paper, photo, and additional data Audio recording Duration Length of time involved (seconds, minutes, hours, days, class periods, etc.) 01:13:01 Record Contributor Individual who prepared the item and/or edited it. Susan Bender Record Creation Date Day/Month/Year of record creation/edit October 25, 2022 Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Interview with Sue Van Hook Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource June 3, 2021 Is Part Of A related resource in which the described resource is physically or logically included. Skidmore Saratoga Memory Project Description An account of the resource A member of the Biology Department faculty from 1992 to 2010, Sue Van Hook was a senior teaching associate specializing in botany and mycology. She was a leader in campus sustainability projects and in the stewardship of Skidmore’s North Woods. In 2007 Sue produced "Treasures in the North Woods: A guide to the natural campus at Skidmore College" in collaboration with students, staff, and faculty spouses. This interview was recorded on the porch of Sue’s home in Cambridge, N.Y., on June 3, 2021. [The interview has been slightly edited for length.] Language A language of the resource English (en) Subject The topic of the resource Retiree Oral History Project Type The nature or genre of the resource Oral History Biology Department Campus Culture Campus Environment Committee Collaborative Research Curriculum David Porter Diversity Growth in Science North Woods Opportunity Program Phil Glotzbach Phyllis Roth Student Faculty Relations https://www.ssmp.mdocs.skidmore.edu/files/original/a275d8c7a87173af01059cdbe36b3fc3.jpg a074bd82cd05aa4316f3a5d3e91b2afb https://www.ssmp.mdocs.skidmore.edu/files/original/2fbc252c5aea73bfa9ed2151f69f7657.m4a 74ebdcb5df6115f9bc3ed3b6e4d2984f https://www.ssmp.mdocs.skidmore.edu/files/original/1159c2c8043b62d63f9aab6a77bd4e11.pdf 234c4fd7be4fa9d5320561ed29b0f5cb PDF Text Text Interviewee: Sandra “Sandy” Welter Years at Skidmore: 1984 - 2017 Interviewer: Lynne Gelber Location of Interview: Saratoga Springs, NY Date of Interview: 4/21/2022 00:00:00 Header 00:00:28 Raised East Haven, CT; 1st in family to attend college. After Elmira College graduation in 1971, married & moved to Ballston Spa so husband could work at Skidmore. 00:02:05 Next, earned Masters in English & a permanent teaching certification (SUNY Albany). 00:02:30 Then, taught Saratoga Springs Jr. High/7-9th grade writing to atypical students; developed a creative curriculum featuring special projects — unusual at that level in 1970s. 00:03:25 Paused teaching to have 2 children; wanted to return to teaching part time, but the public school administration was “… just not there yet in terms of …” the job-sharing concept. 00:04:19 Therefore, became curriculum developer and director of the Beagle School and created programs for the public schools Gifted and Talented program while also caring for young sons. 00:04:49 In early 1980s was recuperating from a stroke when friend Bob Miner invited Welter to observe his class at Correctional Facility in Comstock, NY, part of Skidmore’s University Without Walls program. Welter loved it; Director Bob Van Meter invited Welter to teach. 00:08:57 The Comstock students were “intensely interested … they were connecting what they were reading in ways that … I was not used to with younger students. [I] found it extremely stimulating and I thought, ‘I think I could make a difference here. I think I can help.’ ” 00:09:55 Program expanded to include a second correctional facility, over 40 faculty, classes four nights a week, almost 200 students involved, many graduates. 00:10:30 Welter’s role expanded to include advising on curriculum, helping develop final projects, running a skills lab in math, writing and reading, and then being the Director. 00:11:15 Gov. Pataki (elected 1995) removed all of the funding; Welter still ran program for nearly two years, with volunteer teachers and extra books, but then it closed. 00:12:33 Welter stayed on as a UWW advisor for regular, on campus, students. 00:13:00 New Masters of Arts Liberal Studies (MALS) program created, in 1997 Welter joined. 00:13:40 Skidmore, one of earliest MALS programs, attracted students from all over the world. 00:15:30 In the early 2000s, greater pressure on faculty to publish and serve on committees led to decline in faculty participation in MALS, so MALS closed. 00:18:28 Welter granted administrative sabbatical to go to China; “Taught English composition to junior level university students who were being trained as English teachers in China.” 00:19:08 Skidmore had a formal arrangement with the University of Qufu for many years. Initially established by Murray Levith; Skidmore graduates and faculty went to teach there. 00:19:48 “A wonderful year experience. Incredible. And lifelong friends — I’m still in communication with several of my students there and a couple of the faculty who I taught with.” 00:20:04 Welter taught English composition (103, 105) for last four years working at Skidmore. 00:20:30 Skidmore was “… an institution that always seemed to be able to look outside the box, and I am an educator who was always looking outside the box.” 00:20:56 Because Welter ran programs, biggest challenge was nurturing faculty interest in them. 00:21:43 “Murray left the China program and I took on the directorship until it closed.” �00:22:07 “When we first started, there were … no Western influences in the Chinese university system. … By the time we left, the universities were able to train their own teachers to come back and do the work that we were doing, and very well, actually.” 00:23:10 “I actually had thirty three years of bliss! [laughs] I hardly had any problems at all other than struggling to make sure that we had interesting and new and exciting faculty always working with our students.” 00:23:32 Fondest memories? “Mostly center around the students. … Because I dealt with so many different kinds of students at Skidmore.” 00:23:55 At end of Skidmore career, teaching in the English Department was also a positive experience, “…wonderful to watch them come into their own…” 00:24:15 Had ESL experience so worked with international students & HEOP students. 00:25:12 Taught Summer Institute for many years, teaching extra skills to prepare students for Skidmore. “So I guess the students were, are kind of my central focus.” 00:26:15 Also had wonderful colleagues at UWW, MALS, and in the English Department. 00:28:14 “Skidmore went co-ed right when we arrived. And so the men who were at Skidmore [explained in counseling that] their problem was that they were not getting enough food. So Bob, my husband, had to go to the dining services and explain to the little old ladies who were working in the dining facilities that they needed to give the boys more food!” 00:28:55 “And that seemed to me like such an innocent kind of kind issue to be dealing with in the early days at Skidmore” compared to the complicated issues students face now. 00:29:40 Dining was not buffet; was served family style, but not enough for the men’s appetites. 00:30:10 Also, the beds were too short! Led to sore backs and hurt knees “because they were scrunched into these little beds.” “Growing pains” that Skidmore needed to address. 00:30:55 In 1971, classes had moved up to the new campus, but students still lived on the old campus in town, including Moore Hall, “the big ‘Pink Palace.’ ” 00:31:44 A years-long transition process for the old Skidmore campus. Many buildings, now homes and apartments, still have the Skidmore names. Empire State College also owns some. 00:33:20 First experience of Saratoga Springs was so dreary, Welter hoped her soon-to-behusband would not get the job, but he did, and “…here I am 50 years later, very, very happy.” 00:36:51 Welter arrived in China in August 2001, so was teaching in China on 9/11. “I didn’t come back at all during the whole time I was in China; … A year later [I] found that, coming onto campus, … I was going through what everyone went through the year before.” 00:38:28 Different presidents … Joe Palamountain, David Porter, Jamienne Studley, Phil Glotzbach. “David … he was one of the most remarkable human beings. … He always remembered my name. … He came to every department … and sat in everybody’s office and wanted to talk to you. And he came into my teeny little closet of an office in UWW and wanted to know all about it, with huge enthusiasm, and caring and kindness!” 00:40:00 Over the years, faculty regularly raised questions about curriculum, issues of diversity and inclusion, the role of a liberal arts college in the world, how to stay relevant — “I was glad that Skidmore was asking those questions, … I think it kept Skidmore viable and fresh and … I was always impressed with their sincerity and seriousness about our role, our job, as educators.” 00:41:35 END � https://www.ssmp.mdocs.skidmore.edu/files/original/41a4b4a33275503c3fda918082ab710c.pdf 5afbdc93158b15d8191ceef9f191d82e PDF Text Text Interview with Sandra “Sandy” Welter by Lynne Gelber, Skidmore College Retiree Oral History Project, April 21, 2022, Saratoga Springs, NY. LYNNE GELBER: This is Lynne Gelber for the Oral History Project of the Retirees, and I am with Sandy Welter. It’s April 21st, 2022, and … Sandy, why don’t you tell us a little bit about where you grew up, and … SANDY WELTER: Sure. Thank you so much for inviting me to this exciting project! I grew up in southern Connecticut, outside New Haven, in a small working-class town called East Haven. My Mom and Dad were factory workers, I was the first in my family to go to college. So, it was a big deal when I went off to Elmira. I went as far as I possibly could from my hometown — I was accepted at Conn College and at U Conn and several other closer colleges and universities, but I really was a … had wanderlust, and I wanted to get as far away as I could, because we never really travelled very far. So I went to Elmira, out in the western part of New York State, got a very, very good education. Went junior year abroad, so I studied at the University of Leicester in England. Met wonderful international students there, was planning on returning to England to do graduate work in linguistics. But, when I returned to Elmira in my senior year, I met my future husband, who was teaching at the college. And so, after I graduated in 1971, I immediately got married and he got a job as the first Director of the Counseling Center at Skidmore College, so my … the day after I was married, having no honeymoon, we actually came to Saratoga Springs and moved into our apartment in Ballston Spa. My husband at the time started his job, and I applied to the graduate program at SUNY Albany, and I got in. And that started my future here in Skidmore. LG: And the graduate program was in …? SW: I was in English and Secondary Education. So, I did a masters in English with a focus in Secondary Ed — so I got both a Masters in English as well as a permanent teaching certification. So, the first seven years after my graduate degrees at SUNY Albany, I taught in the Saratoga Springs public �schools. I was in the Junior High School. I taught 7th, 8th and 9th grade, and I taught writing, most particularly. I also taught more — I taught both, two extremes. I taught all of the Junior High School kids who were kicked out of all their other English classes, ended up in my class, and I also taught all the gifted kids who were bored in their classes. So I developed a journalism class, we developed a newspaper in the journalism class. This was all stuff, in the early ’70s, that didn’t happen. It didn’t happen in the Junior High. We did music analysis, we did a newspaper, we did … you know, we did all kinds of things. And so, I had a lovely five years in the public schools, and then I had my children. I tried to go back to the Junior High because I was very happy teaching in the secondary school. I was tenured at that time public school tenured. But I only wanted to work part time because I had two young children at home. And that was early 1978, ’79, and the administration in the public schools were just not there yet in terms of being able to figure out how one could job-share. I was suggesting, there must be another woman — again, very sexist, but it was — well there must be another woman who wants to job share, so I would work part time and this person would work part time and we would cover all of the needs of the institution. “Nope.” So, I said “fine” and I walked away from my teaching position there. I then was a curriculum developer and a director of the Beagle School, which was an independent nursery school and kindergarten. I worked for the Gifted and Talented program in the school district, the whole district, and I developed programs there, all the while taking care of my younger … my growing sons. Um, in early … in the early ’80s, a friend of mine approached me. I had had a serious medical problem. I had actually had a stroke. With two young children. And I was recuperating at home and quite depressed because I was afraid to do anything. And this gentleman came in to visit and he said, “You know, I think that you should come up … there’s this program that I just started teaching in at Skidmore. You might be really interested - you could be, I think you would be great at this,” and it was … LG: Who was that? �SW: That was Bob Miner, and he was suggesting that I come up and observe his class at Comstock. And he wanted to know if I would be interested in teaching in the Skidmore prison program through University Without Walls. And I, at that point, was looking for a new lease on life, really. I was looking for a new focus. It was one day a week, you know I thought, “This is perfect for me.” It was getting me involved. I had been doing some part-time work for the University Without Walls with many of their adult learners — I was doing prep, composition prep for many of their international students. They had Qatari businessmen who were coming to get their UWW degrees, and when they came to Skidmore they were working on their final projects, and so I worked, I did a lot of work with them in terms of editing and writing and communicating and helping them to get a more academic spin on their final projects in writing. So, I was … LG: Who connected you to UWW? SW: Um, I think … hmm, who connected me? Maybe, um, Mark Gelber? Maybe Barry Targan, maybe … I mean, these were all friends I knew through Sam and Bev Mastrianni, and so they were people in the community but they were also very Skidmore connected. And then I met Bob Van Meter and he heard that I had been doing work with writing and remediation with writing, … LG: At the prison? SW: At … well, in the community. I was doing some community work, and he heard that. And then when Bob Miner recommended me, he said, “Oh I’ve heard of this person.” And I went and I met with Bob Van Meter … LG: Who was, at that time? SW: He was, at that time, the Director of UWW. And then met Larry Ries, who �was the Assistant Director, and Ken Klotz who was the … um, Director of the Prison Program at the time. LG: When was this? SW: Early … it was, um … 1988 maybe? Something like that. LG: Ok. SW: As it turns out, I … actually went up with Bob Miner to observe his class at Comstock, at Great Meadow, the maximum-security prison, and I loved it. I came back and said … LG: And the guys must have loved it too. SW: Well, I mean I sat in the back of the room, didn’t say a word, I just watched, and it was … I thought, this … because these … these inmates, these students, were like sponges! They wanted to know everything, they were so intensely interested in everything they were reading and everything they were writing. They were connecting — because they were adults, they were connecting what they were reading in ways that were so unique, that I was not used to with younger students. And I just found it extremely stimulating and I thought, “I think I could make a difference here. I think I can help.” So, I went back and I talked to Bob Van Meter and he said, “You want to do a comp course?” And I said, “Sure, I’ll do, I can do a basic comp course, I can do a second, you know, like the 103 and the 105, equivalent to what we were doing on campus.” And I did that, and, in fact, we expanded during the next ten years into Washington Correctional Facility and so we had two programs, we ran faculty up to the prisons, those prisons, four nights a week. We had over 40 faculty hired every semester to teach up there. We had, you know, more, almost 200 students involved in the program, many graduates each year, and it was a really dynamic part of the Skidmore community. LG: And your role expanded? �SW: It did. So I went from teaching just the comp courses to becoming a full time advisor up there. So I was doing advising on curriculum, I was helping develop final projects, I was running a skills lab and we set up a computer lab up there so I was doing a lot of basic skills in math and in writing and in reading. And eventually I was asked to take on the Directorship. And so, the last four years of the program I was the … LG: This would be…? SW: Around … we closed the prison program because of lack of funding. If you remember, Governor Pataki came on board and the very first thing he did after he was elected was to close down all of the college prison programs in the state of New York. So, he removed all the funding, closed all the programs down, said this was not, you know, “state TAP money and federal Pell money was not going to educate inmates.” And so, he pulled all of the funding, and because of that, we ran our program with volunteers. Our faculty went up there voluntarily. We had extra books that we could use until they all ran out, and I ran the program for almost two years after that, on a voluntary basis. Um, we weren’t giving credit because we couldn’t, but we were up there still involved with the students who were our students, until we couldn’t any more. And that was between the years of about 1988 to 1998. I think we closed the prison program in about 1998 or 1999. So, then I’m … now I'm at Skidmore, having spent 10 years in UWW, not as much, certainly not much time on campus, I spent most of my time up at the prison. Um … and the question was, “What now?” And so I stayed on as a UWW advisor for regular students for a couple of years, and then, the masters program conception was being developed through Larry Ries and the state of New York and a variety of other people. Lots of support, I think … LG: That’s the Master of Arts in Liberal Studies? SW: That’s correct, thank you Lynne, a Masters of Arts in Liberal Studies. It’s an �interdisciplinary degree so the framework of this graduate degree was to, in fact, bring in at least two disciplines in to the, sort of, core curricular components. And that was unusual at the time. There were several MALS programs across the country, we were one of the earliest and we were also part of the national organization, the Consortium of MALS programs, and that’s in two thousand and something … um, no, I don’t have the dates, but we hosted the national convention here in Saratoga, at Skidmore. We housed everybody at the Gideon Putnam, we had our sessions there … we couldn’t have them on campus because there wasn’t enough room … It’s a national, we had a lot of people coming in. We had several hundred people here, so … . And we had keynote speakers and we had themes and, you know, so it was a … Skidmore was very involved in the Master of Arts in Liberal Studies movement. We had graduates who came to us through the UWW program but also from other places, so most of our MALS students were graduates of other institutions from around the world and around the country. And they had a residency, but it was only a one month — a one-week residency — and then another two or three days at the end to have their final projects approved. So, they didn’t have to be on this campus, so we had students all over the country, and the world, actually. Um, so that was a great next step for me at Skidmore. MALS was a great deal of fun, and it grew into a very viable program. Um, the fabric of the college began to change in the early 2000s. And faculty who used to, either because of a need, a desire to, explore pedagogies with other kinds of students other than 18 to 21 year olds, or, because they had particular interests that were not necessarily — did not necessarily fit in to an undergraduate curriculum, they were really very interested in teaching at the UWW and the MALS program. They loved to teach there, they liked the kind of students, they liked the diversity of subject matter, they liked the depth of inquiry that happened at the graduate level. But … and for many, in the early days, it was a very helpful bump in their salaries. I mean, we did pay well and we paid in addition to their Skidmore salary and in the early days of Skidmore, you know, people, faculty, didn’t make a lot of money, so it was a good way of supplementing. By the time the programs were, the UWW, closed and MALS was still involved, faculty had a different agenda. �They really needed to publish, they needed to publish, publish, publish, they needed to be on committees here on campus. Um, more so, I think, than maybe in the past. I don’t know because as an administrator I didn’t, I was on committees but I didn’t have the requirements of that. So, it was more and more difficult to get faculty to help, to be faculty advisors, to supervise independent studies, to oversee final projects or theses, and it got to the point where, I think, Larry Ries, the Director, and some of the later Directors of the Masters’ Program, had to ask, is this really now the mission of the college? And I think eventually the answer was, “No.” It was not. So, the Masters’ Program closed, um … LG: Do you remember the year that it closed? SW: Oh, you know, I … I don’t. I came into the Masters’ Program in 1997 and I retired from it … so, whenever … (uh no, I didn’t because they closed) before I retired. Because then I went on to the English Department and I taught in the English Department full time. So, yeah, and in between there I went to China! [laughs] I nearly forgot to tell you about China! I took a sabbatical, I took an administrative sabbatical, and …while MALS was still running, but when it was struggling, and I was feeling a little frustrated and working very hard and not being able to get much support, and I finally decided, “I think I may need a break.” So, I asked for an administrative sabbatical for a year, I was granted one, and through Murray Levith, I went to the University of Qufu in Shandong Province in China, and I taught English composition to junior level university students who were being trained as English teachers in China. LG: Now did Skidmore have a formal …? SW: Yes, we had a formal arrangement with the University of Qufu, for many years. Initially established by Murray Levith and then we had graduates of Skidmore as well as faculty who went to, over, every year, to teach there. Doretta Miller taught there, Murray Levith taught there, I taught … I think Marty Canavan in the Business Department taught there, and probably �several other people. Lots of graduates of Skidmore College went over and taught as well. So that was a wonderful year experience. Incredible. And lifelong friends — I’m still in communication with several of my students there and a couple of the faculty who I taught with. So. Yeah, so I actually retired … after UWW and MALS and China, I went to the English Department full time, at the very end of my career, and taught composition, English 103, English 105, for the last four years of my Skidmore career. So … and that was great. So I was, I kind of came back to a very traditional academic environment. I’ve had a very storied experience at Skidmore and I thank Skidmore for that, because they were an institution that always seemed to be able to look outside the box, and I am an educator who was always looking outside the box. LG: So, what do you think your greatest challenges were? During all those years? SW: Hmm, well, probably … because I was in the administration, per se, having always done, had to run a program, whether it was UWW or MALS or China, I think it was just … nurturing, my biggest challenge was always nurturing support from the faculty. That was a big job of mine, always. Um, new faculty — I would go to new faculty receptions all the time, introduce them to the MALS program, to the University Without Walls, to the China program, because, again, that was where, possibly, faculty would be interested — I was, by the way, Murray left the China program and I took on the directorship until it closed. The Universities were now, Universities in China were, now having, had enough of their own graduates who could then come back and teach in their institutions. When we first started, there were very few Western, - no Western influences in the Chinese university system, so … we were kind of on the, we and Yale were the two institutions, Skidmore and Yale were the two institutions that were in China at the very early days. Umm, before Tiananmen, you know, during that period. By the time we left, the universities were able to train their own teachers to come back and do the work that we were doing, and very well, actually. So, I guess my biggest challenge was always nurturing faculty interest in these kinds of — I don’t want to ever use the word marginal, but certainly the more peripheral … not necessarily the central mission of a small �undergraduate liberal arts college. I was always doing work in areas that were slightly, um, different in definition of that core mission. So that was my major struggle. I actually had thirty-three years of bliss! [laughs] I hardly had any problems at all other than struggling to make sure that we had interesting and new and exciting faculty always working with our students. LG: So, what are your fondest memories? SW: Ah, fondest memories … mostly center around the students. I mean, I … because I had, because I dealt with so many different kinds of students at Skidmore — I mean, I dealt with the traditional, you know, 18 to 21 yearolds at the very end of my career at Skidmore, when I was teaching in the English Department, and those students were fabulous! I loved them! I always taught freshmen … freshmen or sophomores, and so they were always a little green and they were always a little bewildered and it was always wonderful to watch them come into their own, because they would stop in my office four years later, as seniors, and here were these fabulous grown-up young men and women who made me proud! I worked with a lot of the international students at Skidmore, so … LG: What did you do with them? SW: Again, ESL work. I did a lot of personal, my own personal ESL training, and then brought that to some of my writing courses. So, I did a lot of work with the international students and a lot of work with the HEOP [Opportunity Program] students, who were coming to Skidmore from, um … underprepared, underpreparing High Schools. They were very smart men and women, very, very smart, but their basic skills were not as strong as the kids coming out of, like, Country Day School, you know, or some of the great prep schools that our students come from. So, these young men and women needed a little bit of a leg up, and I taught in the summer, to the …yup, I taught in the HEOP Summer Institute for many years. �LG: That’s the Higher Education Opportunity Program. SW: That’s, thank you, it is the Higher Education Opportunity Program, of which Skidmore had, still has, I’m assuming, a very important program, a very important branch in the both state and federal level of Higher Education Opportunity Program. So, I taught in the Summer Institute for many years, doing a kind of “Boot Camp” with them so that when they came in September they would be prepared, more prepared than they would have been had they just spent the summer at home and then gotten out of their high schools and come to Skidmore. It would have been a bit of a, not only a culture shock but an intellectual shock for them. So, they were able to, we would do, you know, reading skills and study skills and some of the basic cultural experiences of what it was like to experience college in the classroom as well as in the dormitory. So, I did all of that, as well, in the summer. So, I guess the students were, are kind of my central focus. I had wonderful colleagues, both at UWW and MALS, and in the English Department. Again, that was a plus as well. LG: Ok. Are there other things that we didn’t cover? SW: Let’s see, talked about China, my sabbatical, umm, … I don’t know, I mean, it feels like I, … I mean I had such a rich experience at Skidmore, and I … LG: You talked about some of the changes… SW: Yeah, I mean there’s … LG: Can you expand on that? SW: Yeah, sure. When I, I mean … this will be a story that will be interesting to consider what, in terms of change … When I first came to Saratoga, I was not involved. I mean, I was in graduate school, my then husband was the Counseling Director at Skidmore. And, of course, I didn’t … and I met lots of Skidmore faculty through that, we were the young couple, you know, the new young couple at Skidmore, back in the day when those — they were �new young couples who would show up every year and we were it. So, we went to lots of parties and met with lots of faculty, all of whom were extremely warm and very welcoming. I was in graduate school so I didn’t have a lot of connection to Skidmore, but my husband would … of course, being in the Counseling Center, couldn’t talk about his discussions, although, at one time he did share something, which I thought was classic. And, of course it was because he had to share it with the larger Skidmore community, and he said, “Well, Sandy, the boys…” This was when Skidmore went co-ed. Because Skidmore went co-ed right when we arrived. And so the men who were at Skidmore had just started to arrive, and they were in classes, and they would come to the Counseling Center and they would sit down, and, in the Counseling session, their problem was that they were not getting enough food. So, Bob, my husband, had to go to the dining services and explain to the little old ladies who were working in the dining facilities that they needed to give the boys more food. And Bob said, that seems to be the major problem [laughs] that I’m dealing with in the Counseling Center right now is that the men are not getting enough to eat. And that seemed to me like such an innocent, kind of kind issue to be dealing with in the early days at Skidmore. And when I think now about all of the issues that our students face, the complicated issues of, you know, relationships and gender identity and issues of drugs and alcohol and all the stuff that face our students now, it seemed like that was an awfully innocent time when I first got here, to be thinking that these poor men needed to get more food. [laughs] LG: This was at a time when there were not, it was not buffet, in the dining hall. SW: No, they sat and they had to be given food, that was not buffet, absolutely. This was early days when you sat — dressed, you got dressed — and you sat in the dining hall and the food would come and it’d be in family style and there’d be a little bit, and by the time the men got the food, there wasn’t anything left! And they were being, you know, they were starving! [laughs] So … �LG: Were there also complaints about the beds? SW: Oh, the beds were too short! Beds were much too short, and now the … every guy was like, walking around with a sore back and hurt knees because they were scrunched into these little beds. Yeah, there was all these things that Skidmore needed to … there were growing pains, that’s… LG: Did they hang out the sheets? Out the windows, to complain? SW: Oh, I don’t remember that! Oh, I don’t remember that, no, that must be somebody else’s story. All I remember is the story about the food. LG: Yeah, the trustees were on campus. SW: Oh, no kidding! Oh, that’s funny. Yeah. Um, so, you know, I think that’s, just the … and of course, when we first came, when I came to Skidmore, we were still on the old campus. There were still half of … the busses were still going from Moore Hall, the big, the “Pink Palace,” from Moore Hall to Johnson Campus, because there were still classes going on down in the old campus. Which, that, within two or three years … well, not, no, not the residences… . Classes moved, almost always, all up to the new campus, but the residence halls, Moore Hall, still used, still was functioning, for many, many years, until they finally built enough dormitories for all of the students to … LG: So, did that impact what you were doing? SW: Um, no. No, it did not. I mean, I just, it was just an interesting transition and it was one in which, for someone who was also involved, because I was teaching, I knew the community, the Saratoga community, having been a teacher, I was very involved in many of the Saratoga projects. I worked on the Art in the Park project and many of the other kind of community-based projects for kids in town. It was interesting to see what Saratoga was going to do vis-a-vis the Skidmore, old Skidmore campus. And that was an interesting conversation for many years. Actually … well, not anymore, but �was for many years, as to what to do with those buildings, how to best repurpose them, were we going to tear — should they be torn down? Et cetera, et cetera. Verrazzano College, which no longer exists, bought most of the old campus … LG: That was Verrazzano? SW: Yeah, that was Verrazzano, and they set up a college, just where the old Skidmore campus was, but they did not last, and therefore many of the buildings were sold to private individuals. And so, we now see that, if you go on the east side, many of the old Skidmore buildings, even with the Skidmore names on them, are now either private residences or apartments, et cetera. And now Empire State has taken over many of those buildings, those buildings as well. So, there’s been a lot of change. When I, the day that I came to Saratoga, … in 1970, March … no, March of 1971, I was not yet married, I was engaged to be married in July, and my soon-to-be husband was up here for an interview for this job at the Counseling Center, and I came up to see what, if we got this, if he got this job, where we would live and what would be, where I would be. And it was March! And we all know what Saratoga looks like in March. It’s muddy, it’s gray, it’s dirty, there’s old snow everywhere, and in 1971, three quarters of Broadway was barricaded. There was … no stores. They were papered over … there was the Church Street News, the Farmer’s Hardware, Glickman’s Store, General Store, and that’s about it. There was very, very little, in terms of … LG: How about antique stores? SW: No, that was Ballston Spa that had, I mean, we had a lot of just open store fronts, barren open store fronts. Um, and I sat in the Red Barn, I don’t know … you won’t remember the Red Barn. The Red Barn used to be where Fingerpaint is now, which used to be where Borders was. While my soon-tobe husband was in his interview with Claire Olds and, … LG: Who was then Dean of…? �SW: She was Dean of the Students, because he had to meet with her regarding the Counseling Center, and then he met with President Palamountain and he met with Dr. Mastrianni, who was doing partial counseling work at the time. And I sat in the Red Barn and was looking … thought, well I could go up and down Broadway, I could go in the shops, I can see what’s going on … Hmmnn. [laughs] Nope! There was nothing! It was freezing, it was cold, it was dreary, I sat in the Red Barn drinking a cup of very bad coffee thinking, “Please don’t get this job! Please don’t get this job! This place is horrible! Oh, my goodness!” And he came out of that and he got the job and here we are, here I am 50 years later. Very, very happy. Happily, Skidmore was a huge part of that happiness, and I raised my two children here and they had a fabulous education in the public schools and went on … LG: What year did you retire? SW: I don’t remember! I have no idea. In fact, I was going to ask you that because it’s not on my piece of paper! You must have it on a [laughs] I can’t remember what year I retired! Four years ago? Maybe? I don’t remember. LG: I’ll check on that. SW: It’s terrible, I … really, I’m sorry. I’m sure you know what it could have … um, twenty … it was December of, I retired mid-year, so it … LG: Was it 2000…? SW: No, oh no, no, because I was … LG: 17 SW: 2017, that makes sense. Yes, 2017. Because I was in China, teaching at the University, in … on September 11th. And … I had just gotten to China. I had gotten there two weeks earlier. I had gotten on the plane and gone over at the end of August and I taught in China from 2001 to 2002 and then I went back in 2004 and 5 to follow up on some things that I had started over �there. But my teaching year was ’01-’02, and I’d been there, and three weeks later, 9/11 occurred. And, I came back after a year, I didn’t come back at all during the whole time I was in China, I was back a year later and found that, coming onto campus, I was … I was going through what everyone went through the year before. And it was fascinating to watch me. I watched myself, I’m going, “Why am I so emotional? Why am I having all these feelings about this?” Because I wasn’t here. I wasn’t there, I didn’t see anything. And they had the anniversary and I was there and I was … you know, Skidmore did some wonderful things during that period for their faculty and their students, so … Anyway, what else? Anything else? LG: I was about to ask you. SW: Oh, I’m very sorry! I think … anything else? I don’t know. I’m sure that when I’m done with this, I’m going to think of twenty things that I wanted to tell … I wanted to talk to you about. Um … LG: So, you saw a number of different presidents? SW: Yes, I did. I came in under Joe Palamountain, and then, … was it Jamienne…or, … LG: David? SW: No, Jamienne…? Oh, David was first. Ok. And David, oh! Whom I adored, adored, adored. He was one of the most remarkable human beings. And he remembered my name, and there’s no reason why anybody should ever remember my name, I was kind of a small cog in a very big machine and he always remembered my name, always came … he was the president, if you remember, he came to every department. He came around and sat in everybody’s office and wanted to talk to you. And he came into my teeny little closet of an office in UWW and wanted to know all about it, with huge enthusiasm, and caring and kindness, oh! He was a wonderful man. A great loss for us, for every… for the world, actually. And then, Jamienne Studley �had her short tenure, and then President Glotzbach, and now President Conner. So, yes, I’ve seen a lot, through many, many. Um … LG: Lots of changes in the administration … SW: Lots of changes. It’s interesting. You know, again, as someone who was totally invested in Skidmore College but I didn’t have a part, I was invested personally but I didn’t own anything because I was always in these programs that were kind of um, different, aside from the main mission of the College, I couldn't really … I had an interesting perspective and I kept watching every five or ten years or so, the same questions — that the faculty were raising the same questions again and again, about curriculum again, about issues of diversity and inclusion, about the role of a liberal arts college in the world, and how were we going to stay relevant. These are all questions that we went around and around for many, many years in different iterations, and I think they’re still valid, I was glad that Skidmore was asking those questions, because it kept them, I think it kept Skidmore viable and fresh and … I was always impressed with their sincerity and seriousness about our role, our job, as educators. LG: Thank you so much! SW: You’re welcome. This is my pleasure, and thank you for inviting me. And I’ll call you up when I have five more things to tell you! [laughs] � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Skidmore College Retirees Oral History A resource containing historical information obtained in interviews with persons having firsthand knowledge. Interviewer The person(s) performing the interview Lynne Gelber Interviewee The person(s) being interviewed Sandra "Sandy" Welter Location The location of the interview Saratoga Springs, NY Original Format The type of object, such as painting, sculpture, paper, photo, and additional data Audio Recording Record Contributor Individual who prepared the item and/or edited it. Susan Bender Record Creation Date Day/Month/Year of record creation/edit February 3, 2023 Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Interview with Sandy Welter Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource April 21, 2022 Is Part Of A related resource in which the described resource is physically or logically included. Skidmore Saratoga Memory Project Description An account of the resource Sandra Welter began at Skidmore in 1968 as a teacher in the University Without Walls (UWW) program at the Washington County Correctional Facility. She later became a full-time advisor for that program and finally its Director until the program closed in 1998 due to a lack of NY State funding. She then advised in the regular UWW program and, in 1997, in the MALS graduate program. She also taught writing in the Skidmore program at the University of Qufu in China in 2000-2001, as well as in the English Department on campus. She taught ESL to foreign students and worked in the Summer Institute with Higher Education Opportunity students. In addition to her work with these various programs, she discusses in this interview the transition to the new campus and changes in campus life as men matriculated.  Before retiring in 2017, Welter had experienced the college under Presidents Palamaountain, Porter, Studley, and Glotzbach. Language A language of the resource English (en) Subject The topic of the resource Retiree Oral History Project Type The nature or genre of the resource Oral History Bob Van Meter coeducation ESL Ken Klotz Larry Ries MALS Opportunity Program Prison Programs Qufu-Normal-University-Program UWW